What score this game deserved after latest patches?

Of course they do, but assuming MEA deserved (on average) 7/10 at launch, a 10-bomb has considerably less impact than a 0-bomb on an overall score.

Keep telling yourself that so it fits your agenda derpy.

That's called trolling. But it got nothing to do with you demanding the ban of a whole site.

truth is Trolls bother rate with a zero more than DECENT human beings/gamers.
in what planet (pun intended) me3 and inquisition deserve less than 5?

I wouldn't be surprised if you're one of the "10s" on metacritic.

The only way I would ever take metacritic seriously is if metacritic some how implimented a screening system that proves the user put in an adequate amount of time into a game to prove they are at least familiar enough with the game to actually review it. In the case of MEA they would have to get all the planets 100 percent viable (which is actually very easy),complete squad loyalty quests, complete the main quest, and played at least ten hours of the multiplayer. By these standards even I would not qualify to review the game since I have only dabbled in multiplayer and am in no way qualified to review the mp aspect of the game. Overall having these standards set as a minimum would eliminate probably 90 percent of the troll reviews as the people qualified to review the game would put an honest effort into their review. It would not eliminate all the troll reviews but the overall user reviews collectively would actually have a degree of validity. Of course I doubt they could actually impliment that kind of screening process but it would be ideal.

For me, the metacritic user score never meant something, like NEVER

I would give the game Dying light a 4 or 5 out of 10, yeah 50% at best considering I had to force myself for finishing it because techland made so many changes like the skill threee that I hated and the "no fast travel" rules which was already bad in the vanilla game, but became even worse in the dlc the following. Even if dead island was not my favorite game, it still had enjoyable moments but they were nowhere to be seen in dying light, at least for me.

Well on metacritic it has a score of an 8 out of 10 (well 7.8 and 7.9 but still) : www.metacritic.com/game/pc/dying-light

Saying that I disagree with that score is an understatement because its one of the rare game that I really got bored with it and would have probably not finished, if it was not for the fact that I just paid 30 canadian dollar for the complete edition and pretty much wanted the game to finish as soon as possible.

While for mass effect andromeda, A game that I enjoyed, I did not wanted it to finish and I wanted more, it has the low score on metacritic. Especially by these kind of guys who only puts 0 and 10 in their reviews : www.metacritic.com/user/kotaryu

www.metacritic.com/user/Nareke

For them a game is either perfect or absolute shit,. Oh and of course they reviewed more than one version the same day the MEA was released, so if their rating is true, they bought TWO and even THREE version of the game and had the time to review all of them and puts 0 to all of them, less than 24 hours after the release which is of course totally enough to review a game and the multiple versions of it...


I would love if people realize that the metacritic user score is no better than any other sites who has user score, just like for the movie bloodrayne made by UWE BOLL who has right now a metacritic user score of 7.7 out of 10 : www.metacritic.com/movie/bloodrayne

Yes a movie made by UWE BOLL (by the way calling him the next ed wood is an insult to ed wood, at least that guy made me laugh) is good according to the metacritic users...

Metacritic only have a summary for the "professional review score" the user score is just like any other sites, anyone can create an account or even multiple ones in that regards.

Its like that propagandist movie god's not dead, who as of now has a 76% rating on rotten tomatoes, even if it's problems are not only that it is propaganda.

www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gods_not_dead/

I don't see why people seems to think that the user score proves anything, it does not. If I think a game is good I am not going to rework my brain if the majority says they think the products is bad. And that also works in reverse, People may tell me again and again that dying light is good, I am not going to change my thoughts on it, I think its bad. Everyone can think otherwise but the metacritic userscore is not an undeniable truth and nobody has to think like the majority or a review score.

The same way jim sterling putted reviews that many times were completely different than the opinion of some user score :

These patched don't really fix what's wrong with the game .It.just makes it more polished. I grade it an 8 before.and it stays an 8.

Your posting history.

Kotoreffect is not one of the tens...anywhere.

It doesn't, it only goes to the point that metacritic is flawed.