What score this game deserved after latest patches?

@title answer: scores don't change post launch, first impression means nothing if people just allow passes and change scores post launch.

Personally I'd wait for it to go on sale, it's so far past launch it's bound to anyways, has nothing to do with it being a bad game either, it's an alright game. 50% off right now isn't bad either though.

I wòuld give it 8/10.

The patches have fixed a few annoyances, and the combat was always good.

It's a good, solid game.

It's still a 7/10. Great combat but everything else is just meh or flat out terrible.

I gave it a 6/10 before the patches in the review thread. I still give it a 6/10

I'd give it 66% because it feels like 34% of the game is missing.

A solid 4/10.

8-8.5/10

probably 8ish
50% seems like an ok price to me

With that being said, I would give it a 6.5/10

My main reasons are that this game relies on the concept of open environment exploration and their environments just seems dull. When in hub areas, NPCs just stand there like props which is very archaic compared to the standards of a 2017 game. I need to be brought into the game and MEA just does not do that for me. Also the story seems dull and the characters are too happy go lucky. The only thing the game does well is combat, but I play a Mass Effect game for other reasons than combat. 

Horizon and Zelda were better games as indicated by professional AND user review scores. 

That's because it was Nintendo version of Skyrim lol

Finally someone who has all their eggs in one basket!

...seriously? 9.5/10, and I'm feeling like being a critic today.


Eeeeeeuh, Witcher. Have fun playing a franchise set in the universe whose original creator basically called you a retard.

...I like that argument. Prepare to hear about it every time anyone compares the Witcher with a BW game.

I only played Witcher 3 and how does the creator calling someone a retard make the game worse. And someone at Bioware made racist post about white people and I like MEA.