Do you still believe we'll get a Sequel to Andromeda? Or a Reboot like Tomb Raider/Mirror's Edge?

It's no skin of your nose whether or not they make an MEA2 then.  Just don't buy it if it comes out and it won't exist for you.

My only concern is that they may want to ditch the continuity with the same protagonist over a few titles. It's one of the things i love about Mass Effect games and to a lesser extent Wolfenstein. It would be a shame since they kept the decision tree minimal with little to no impact over the world so it wouldn't be hard to take the players decisions into account when moving the story forward. Not to mention it's a perfect setup for a sequel.

If they want the world to develop fast they could simply hop the post Rannoch sentient Geth onboard the Quarian ark. Have the DLC save the ark and convince the Ai to accept the Geth. As we know from the OT the Geth are really good with building stuff really fast so they could help move things forward (In one of the dialogues with Tali she tells Shepard that the Geth can build stuff in months that would take the Quarians years), terraforming the world will be Meridian's job. The Ai just has to build on those worlds.

A 5-10 year gap should be more than enough to see major changes in the world. Heck they managed to almost finish the Nexus with little to no resources and personnel in 14 months.

You know that whining about whining is still whining, right?

As noted above, people are entitled to their own opinions, and this is a forum for discussing them, which was set up by fans after EA/Bioware removed that possibility by closing the original BSN and trying to get us all to communicate ideas in less than 140 characters. This is a fan site, but that doesn't mean we all have to be fanboys and girls. And anybody who knows me knows I can't do 140 characters - apologies in advance to those of you missing your Ritalin...

When I post, it is to give my own opinion, not to jump on a bandwagon or dismiss others or whine about them just because I don't agree with them. I couldn't really give a crap what anybody else thinks my motivation is - I'm too old for that shit. I'm a Mass Effect-obsessive, even if I'm currently a slightly disgruntled one. I'm also happy for people who enjoy the game, even if I'm not one of them. I gave it an 8/10 in one of the other polls, though I was being much more generous than I really feel. I was assuming Quarian DLC was still part of the provisional picture at that stage, and without DLC this game would struggle to get an objective 7/10.

Unlike you I didn't start playing a great game in March - I started playing a game which was released as a full-price Beta in an unacceptably bad state. There will undeniably be fallout for that with subsequent EA/Bioware releases. Pun intended, as the game was comparable to Fallout 4 on release. FO4 had patches, DLC, mods, and a fanbase 'used to that kind of thing' - most of which doesn't apply to MEA. The fact that many of its bugs have been fixed and that its combat mechanics are actually pretty good doesn't increase replayability or the quality of the unfocused writing, or get rid of Cora, or to a lesser extent Liam or Gil. They got Drack, Jaal and Vetra 'right' as characters, and against my original fears I'll concede that Peebee was actually well-written too. The others are terrible, and it's still a messy game where enemy factions created by different teams fight for screen time, without ever developing personalities worth being interested in, or hating with a passion like the Geth. And, most importantly for me, the suspension of disbelief required to go along with the SAM/illegal AI narrative is way beyond my capabilities. I was raised on 2001, War Games, Terminator and The Matrix, and have a loathing of AI to the point that I'm not able to turn a blind eye to it just because mah mom got sick. Mrs Ryder wasn't the only one who got sick.

Would I trust them to make a better sequel? Nope. Does a part of me still hope they will? I don't know, probably not, because of my views on Artificial Intelligence and its illegality. I can't see where they could take a sequel that wouldn't anger me. I chose Destroy maybe 9 times out of 11 when playing the OT. But would I begrudge any of the rest of you a sequel you could enjoy? Absolutely not. I mean, I have no interest whatsoever in Dragon Age games, but I don't want them to not make DA4 just because I think they lost the run of themselves with MEA, and were scared for whatever reason to delay its release. I hope, for the benefit of the DA players among you, that they will get their shit together and give you something decent, but I think I'm pretty much done. I have no interest in a Destiny clone, especially one with 'Dylan' as a working title as it's such an insult to one of the true originals of our time. As I said earlier I would probably buy a remastered OT, but I've lost my faith in Bioware to be able produce anything new of decent quality. If you want to dismiss me as a whiner that's your business, but I suspect time will prove me right, though that in itself saddens me.

My take on the Tomb Raider reboots: the first was superb, the second unbearably dull, repetitive, whining and ultimately unplayable more than once, despite the beauty of the presentation. An Uncharted 2 facsimile, without the fun. A third game is set up very nicely, but, at the risk of inflaming those of more politically correct views than myself, it would be quite nice to have just a teensy-weensy bit of actual human attractiveness, if not - dare I say the word? - sexiness about the main character. Sara Ryder being geeky or goofy is one thing, but this is Lara Croft we're talking about. Her incessant daddy-issues-contemplation in the second game was painful to put up with. The third really needs to lighten the tone.

Okay I'm genuinely curious as to what you mean by a "mass effect ending." In addition the writers who work on Mass effect now are not the same ones who did ME3s ending so it's not their story either.

Yeah no not happening. The OT and Milky Way is done. Andromeda is the way forward.

Andromeda is dead, killed by the reaction to the game.  Its a shame, since I really like the game, but there's absolutely no chance of a sequel.  

If there's any value left in the IP, its in the Milky Way.  Selling a sequel to a trilogy that's often portrayed as one of the greatest ever is clearly easier than selling a sequel to a game that's portrayed as one of the worst.

You realise your viewpoint is just as selfish?

I think you need to look up what selfish means. Constantly throwing shade in a game, berating people who like it that's selfish not what he said.

MEA was the reboot. It depends on EA if it'll get a sequel or not, if ME is dropped.

Then, there's no value in the IP, period.  The OT is done... the fans killed it trying to force Bioware into changing the ending to ME3.  They are getting what they deserve if EA just shelves it and forgets it.  Enjoy what you've got.  If there's no DLC coming and no sequel to Andromeda coming, there is nothing more coming, period... except mulltiplayer.  The upside... this silly "war" will at last be over for good.

Think about it - If EA cannot see enough profit in making even 1 SP DLC for a game that had initial sales higher than either ME1 or ME2 and has already the plot perfectly set up for said DLC built right into the main game; they are certainly not going to see a profit to be made in remaking 3 old games on a new engine as well as rewriting a significant portion of the final game... particularly when there have been significant amounts of criticism heaped on all 3 of those games for various "deficits" - e.g. lousy combat in ME1, planet scanning in ME2, autodialogue in ME3.  It just ain't gonna happen.

You spoke for me. I agree.