Why Mass Effect Andromeda is Well written.

A. That is a character attack by definition. Rather amusing how it is followed up with another character attack in the form of "you're a special snowflake!!!1"

B. I am no movie buff so that reference is out of my ball game, like you and firearms, for example.

Emotional was top left and Casual was bottom left. Logical was top right and Professional bottom right. Sometimes you didn't have the full range of options, but most times you did.

A. Where exactly did I call you a snowflake? I meant what I said. Getting offended by every little thing is not good for you.
B. Okay.

Exactly.

...We've got six pages so far about something that's entirely subjective, don't we?

Well, that's the same as waifu wars (Garrus for life), so I'm not shocked.

Personally, I feel like Andromeda was middle of the line as far as Bioware games go. The overall plot was quite good, some of the beats worked quite well, some of them fell flat, there's some great moments and characters, there's times where I want to shake Vetra and yell "SAY SOMETHING INTERESTING GODDAMNIT I LIKE YOU ALREADY BUT PLEASE HAVE SOME SPARKLE", and there's a few hiccups (Only a pathfinder can save us! ...Really? Have you considered using Cora's magic dirt converter and patience yes I know you can't but omigawd nexus leaders get it together).

But there's no line as bad as "You're just a machine! And machines can be broken!", and nothing quite so contrived as "Hey, let's jam everyone in this very small shuttle while the ship's integrating systems, yes this is a lovely idea" so I love it.

I acknowledge that. As I said before, people are completely free to like whatever they want. But judging the quality of something based on how much you like it is not objective at all. I can proclaim that Ride To Hell: Retribution is the best game ever, and I am free to hold that opinion, but not many people would probably agree with me, right? Because objectively, it is not a good game.

I thought that this was an objective discussion, but I suppose that is not the case.

Yeah I remember some early trailer showing even Miranda on Thesia.

The problem with Saren is that for all his build up as this ruthless tough as nails rouge Specter, he's actually just a glorified henchman, hell Saren basically even admits to this on Virmire and he's barely even in the game, but in game Saren is a 2D character with hatred for humans and worked with Anderson on a mission that got Anderson barred from becoming a Specter and that is all we know about him in game. If you want all the details you have to read Mass Effect: Revelation prose novel and Mass Effect: Evolution comic book mini-series then MAYBE he becomes a slightly more complex character. 

Sure the Archon is a 2D villain but he explain his reasons why he's doing it's because he wants to exalt the whole cluster and those that he can't or don't want to he will kill. He's got a goal and he moves the plot along which is what a villain is supposed to do.

What exactly is wrong with that scene?

Look at the op and there's your answer.

Yeah that was pre patch, but yeah I don't see anything wrong.

Isn't something like this also a huge no-no in a debate?

No hard feelings here, btw. This all started because I said that the OP needed to have higher standards if they think that Andromeda is well written, which you called a "sophomoric character attack", despite the fact that it wasn't meant as an "attack" on the OP's person at all. You made this personal for some reason, which I didn't mean to. Just so you know.