The biggest problem with Mass Effect's dialogue

I think that bolded part could have been partially solved by having systems come online in stages.

And they did have weapons; they had an armory that was broken into during the uprising. It would be kind of silly to travel that far, without knowing much about what you're getting into, without taking some kind of defenses. And I'm not sure what you're seeing, but every outpost has turrets, so there are defenses.

I guess it's Paragon because it's so honest.

Pourquoi se fatiguer à répondre? Suikoden, Ste100 et Moleman habitent visiblement dans le même logement sous le même pont?

Not just on dialogue,

Remember the shitty side quest of the first mass effect, where you just go out on random  planets, do a side quest where sometime the action of shepard where explain in a text box instead of being shown. Picking up turian badges or asari symbol were certainly not interesting either. The envinronments whatever from the outside and the inside were highly repetitive.

Or the super side quest of mass effect 2, when sometime there was no narration for some of them on the random planets, some of them were explained in an email send to you before, and the results and consequences where also explain in a e mail. 

I remember the blue sun side quest, when you go on the planet, you only saw one blue sun seeing your shuttle coming, goes back to the base and then it ends. No dialogue whatsoever, you just clean the base, pressed a button and that was it.

Yet many people love to claim that mass effect andromeda do the side quest the worst way...

Meeting the elder of the angara religion, the power play between krogan clans on elaaden, the gang wars between sloane kelly and the collective, confronting the angara AI, the criminal investigation on both eladen or Eos, the first human birth of Andromeda etc., I mean Those side quest were quite interesting.

Now don't get me wrong there is some bad side quest like scanning minerals or bodies, but most of them can easily be avoided and are separated in the files "task", but Andromeda has some memorable side quest. For the first and second mass effect, the second you were outside companion quest or main planet, you were there for a long list of boring secondary quest, especially for ME 2.

Definitely all this. MEA doesn't get a free pass on it's quest design - some of them are frankly just too rushed - but tbh the only real issue with MEA's quests were the interference with pacing that occurred. I can see the argument that MEA got its balance between sidequests and main quest missions wrong, but in terms of the actual quests in of themselves there were significantly better than most of the MET's sidequest design, and I've no idea wtf people are talking about when they point to the Trilogy as an example of how to do it. 

I just see you posting your gifs to people who point out any type of criticism. Also, you don't even need to fully play MEA to know there's a lot of issues, a simple YouTube search can show that. That's why your response to Suidoken was weak. He has a point regardless.

Pretty much. I can't recall a quote from MEA, despite the "I will fuck your shit up", something like that. Or else I have to think harder. The writing overall is just there, not memorable. ME had it's share of bad lines, but in compensation, the good one are miles ahead of anything MEA has to offer, that's the trilogy overall - basically.

Il est très intéressant.

I just don't agree with him when it comes to dialogue (and the game in general.)

Eh they wet about the same.

Well one of the reason is that the side quest of the first two mass effect were so badly implemented that the only way to experience them was to force yourself to go into other systems that were not necessary to the main quest. So since you have to force your hand into going into the other systems, most people did not bother and therefore never experienced them. So they suddenly think those shitty quest did not exist, but they fucking did...

I know because during my first playthrought of the first mass effect, I did not experience these side quest because I did not bother with them so I stayed only on the main planets, Its only after tons of playthrought that I decided to do everything and then I realised that I should never leave a main planet. Because the second I did, it became way too much boring.

But the flaws were there in the previous trilogy, they were even worse than in MEA but a lot of people love to have their grip on nostalgia.

The problem I have are the people telling me "bad side quest designs is one of the reson why I disliked MEA" Ok MEA does not have a perfect score in side quest, some of them are bad, but just after that they says that they liked the previous trilogy... like the MET did it well in this area for some reaons, yeah...