inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 29, 2018 23:33:39 GMT
I don't buy the premise that you can play as an agender woman. I don't think we have enough agency in the game to do that. NPCs won't see you that way. (Old argument on this board. I wonder if Sylvius is reading this thread.) Concerning principles of interpretation, I've always though that the useful approach to contradictory or incoherent source material is to use the most workable available interpretation. Since we've got to do something with TIB's tavern talk -- it doesn't really work either way -- we ought to pick an interpretation of that conversation which doesn't cause problems for interpreting DA:O too. NPC's won't see you in what way? There are many ways people can be agender, and one of those ways is by not caring about gender. For example, some agender people prefer gender neutral pronouns, some don't care what pronouns you use. Because of this, it's possible to play as an agender person who doesn't rely (poor word. Need maybe) external verification* of a specific gender identity. Does that make sense? NPCs won't need to use gender neutral pronouns or stop calling you "sister" because the protagonist doesn't care. This freedom of character is one of the great things about Origins ... which they did away with in DA:2 That's a fine philosophy (regarding interpretation). I was just commenting on how it's not useful to delve too deeply into Qunari lore. Gives people headaches *Verification is a poor word. Confirmation maybe? I feel like I've left my vocabulary and writing ability somewhere stupid. Like in an oven or something. Excuse me while I go look for it
|
|
inherit
3439
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:37:09 GMT
9,653
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,050
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Jan 30, 2018 0:12:54 GMT
Are you saying that you didn't find any of the Gamergate stuff Jade Dreamer mentions? Yes that's what I posted (see bolded). Not to say Vavra or someone from his company didn't say it just I didn't see it which is why I ask for the source. Could be the tweet was from years past GamerGate was a few years back. Or could be from some article somewhere or from anyone who said Vavra said that. Seems reasonable, no? Well, "and found no quotes from him that says ""we've considered, but we cut it because it was not important enough and f**k it." or anything similar" sounded more like it was about the development of the game. But since you didn't find anything at all, I guess this is over unless Jade Dreamer comes up with something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 0:21:37 GMT
I saw the tweets quoted on this forum, but I did not save the link to the post. Sorry about that, I guess I should have archived.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 0:29:49 GMT
Okay, here is the link:
|
|
inherit
3439
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:37:09 GMT
9,653
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,050
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Jan 30, 2018 0:31:07 GMT
I don't buy the premise that you can play as an agender woman. I don't think we have enough agency in the game to do that. NPCs won't see you that way. (Old argument on this board. I wonder if Sylvius is reading this thread.) Concerning principles of interpretation, I've always though that the useful approach to contradictory or incoherent source material is to use the most workable available interpretation. Since we've got to do something with TIB's tavern talk -- it doesn't really work either way -- we ought to pick an interpretation of that conversation which doesn't cause problems for interpreting DA:O too. NPC's won't see you in what way? There are many ways people can be agender, and one of those ways is by not caring about gender. For example, some agender people prefer gender neutral pronouns, some don't care what pronouns you use. Because of this, it's possible to play as an agender person who doesn't rely (poor word. Need maybe) external verification* of a specific gender identity. Does that make sense? NPCs won't need to use gender neutral pronouns or stop calling you "sister" because the protagonist doesn't care. This freedom of character is one of the great things about Origins ... which they did away with in DA:2 That's a fine philosophy (regarding interpretation). I was just commenting on how it's not useful to delve too deeply into Qunari lore. Gives people headaches *Verification is a poor word. Confirmation maybe? I feel like I've left my vocabulary and writing ability somewhere stupid. Like in an oven or something. Excuse me while I go look for it NPCs won't see the PC as being agender --- agendered? Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as being gendered even if you take specific route X through the dialogue tree without a lot of players falling into that dialogue path by accident. I'm not sure of any way to implement this without an explicit conversation. This is sort of related to the debate about PC vocal tone in nonvoiced games. The NPCs must respond to what the writers thought the PC line sounded like, not what the player thinks it sounded like. This can be a prpblem if a line looks ironic to the player but non-ironic to the writer, which happens a couple of times in DA:O since sometimes the PC is joking with Alistair and sometimes he isn't, and a player can guess wrong as to which is happening at a given moment.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 0:50:01 GMT
NPCs won't see the PC as being agender --- agendered? Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as being gendered even if you take specific route X through the dialogue tree without a lot of players falling into that dialogue path by accident. I'm not sure of any way to implement this without an explicit conversation. This is sort of related to the debate about PC vocal tone in nonvoiced games. The NPCs must respond to what the writers thought the PC line sounded like, not what the player thinks it sounded like. This can be a prpblem if a line looks ironic to the player but non-ironic to the writer, which happens a couple of times in DA:O since sometimes the PC is joking with Alistair and sometimes he isn't, and a player can guess wrong as to which is happening at a given moment. It wouldn't matter if NPCs recognise the player as agender or not, it doesn't relate to the player's ability to play agendered in this particular instance. Because in this particular instance the protagonist doesn't care about the recognition of NPCs. The game may or may not have been meant to be played this way, but it's possible if you wish. People who say that the female protagonist has to be socially female are incorrect. The pertinent question is whether Sten sees you portray yourself in the role of a woman while in your party. You say that Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as gendered, but I disagree here. You can get the conversation without Sten seeing the player adopt a female role. You can go through the conversation with Sten without taking a female role. You can do all of this without projecting female. Not to sound harsh, but if vocal tone isn't conveyed through the writing then ... the writers need to write better? Voiced protagonists are easier, but precision is sorta part of what writing is all about :S
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 0:52:41 GMT
Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as being gendered even if you take specific route X through the dialogue tree without a lot of players falling into that dialogue path by accident. I'm not sure of any way to implement this without an explicit conversation. To clarify, it's not about Sten seeing you as gendered, it's whether Sten sees that gender as female. That's what is important. Going by the Aqun-athlock in Inquisition, Sten needs to see you in female persona. As a social woman before he embarks on that conversation with you. EDIT: What I'm saying is that doesn't always happen, which indicates (to me) that he's referring to the character's sex and not gender.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 1:02:15 GMT
NPCs won't see the PC as being agender --- agendered? Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as being gendered even if you take specific route X through the dialogue tree without a lot of players falling into that dialogue path by accident. I'm not sure of any way to implement this without an explicit conversation. And to clarify even further, not being recognised socially as male does not automatically mean being recognised socially as female. Remember he called you a woman, which defenders of the notion that he was talking about gender would like to have you believe that this was an indication of the protagonist being a social female. To gather evidence for this means more than not being recognised all the time as a social male, and if you deprive Sten of any indication that you identify (gender wise) as a woman when he's around, he has nothing to go by when making that statement. Other than the character's sex, that is.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 1:08:30 GMT
It's obvious to me the Qunari was retconned after Origins. But you can headcanon it away with reasons that connect Inquisition and Origins ... kinda. Maybe. Possibly. But the difference between the Qunari as portrayed in Inquisition and the Qunari as portrayed in Origins is great enough to jerk me right out of the story/game.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:45:27 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 2:18:10 GMT
Thanks Jade. Ok, so Vavra is not on Anita's side regarding GamersGate. From that you leaped to: "we've considered, but we cut it because it was not important enough and f**k it." and " The female PC is not important"? Okay well I'm not buying it Jade. Not agreeing with Anita does not make one anti-female. There is nothing that states game developers have to be on one end of the political spectrum. From what I can tell he made a game that's historical fiction and one that aligns with his interests. His company hired a historian to get the game details including housing, work, clothes as accurate as possible and also hired an historical combat specialist. Seems to me then he wants a male lead because the majority were male at that time. If he went for a realistic male knight, a nobleman of a good family, a scion of a known one from the period, I would have bought the argument that maybe, yes, he wanted an accurate depiction of historic events. But he easily rejects the historic truth in terms of choosing a peasant boy that rises to be a knight, but he cannot bring himself to make a backstory that will fit both a male and a female, even though the game is FPS, so the additional investment is minimal, for PC voice. I do not know if it is true, but in the thread that is dedicated to the game, the other posters mention that there were plans for a female lead, that they even agree the warrior females historically existed in the period, but that was cut. In favor of the peasant boy whose village was burned, and he became a knight. So, yes, just another game developer who is very happy to quote the historic truth in order to say that girls don’t wield swords and not move on past it & let everyone, male and female, dream our own dreams. Defending people who try to protect videogames against the female participation because they are going to spoil the boys’ fun is just another thing. I am not angry about this, more sad and disappointed. Maybe I was right to quit gaming, because things did not change all that much since 1999.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:43:17 GMT
36,887
colfoley
19,123
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jan 30, 2018 2:27:19 GMT
...Dorian was two games ago and I do not know of any of their other characters who have not been fully realized. Man you know me, i liked andromeda. i liked it's characters much. But do not tell me that changing the sexuality of some characters over the years, or shoehorning diverse characters is not done in a way that feels forced. This things in order to work well in a game should feel natural. Also The priority should not be identity politics, but the game itself. What do you think anita is there for? game design? Or spreading nonsense and giving a message? She is someone who is connected to the game industry, however loosely, probably likes BioWare, so they gave her a tour. Many of us should be so lucky. I doubt she is giving them marching orders or anything, again they are probably of similar political mindsets, but again I do not know if it is effecting the game and based on their last games, especially Inquisition I'd say not. As for the rest, I am sure you are reffering to Jaal? Again its whatever, a potentially annoying change to the character but considering he was never really on my romance list it never effected me personally. Whether its the best thing for the character *shrugs* don't really comment.
|
|
inherit
3439
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:37:09 GMT
9,653
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,050
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Jan 30, 2018 2:39:15 GMT
NPCs won't see the PC as being agender --- agendered? Sten can't fail to perceive the PC as being gendered even if you take specific route X through the dialogue tree without a lot of players falling into that dialogue path by accident. I'm not sure of any way to implement this without an explicit conversation. And to clarify even further, not being recognised socially as male does not automatically mean being recognised socially as female. Remember he called you a woman, which defenders of the notion that he was talking about gender would like to have you believe that this was an indication of the protagonist being a social female. To gather evidence for this means more than not being recognised all the time as a social male, and if you deprive Sten of any indication that you identify (gender wise) as a woman when he's around, he has nothing to go by when making that statement. Other than the character's sex, that is. So Sten judges the Inquisitor's gender the same way everybody else does, then. I'm not sure what this can prove. As for what's obvious here, I thought Sten's conversations in Origins were obviously designed to hide stuff. Sort of like ME1's Sovereign convo, which was designed to hide Bio having no idea what the Reapers were up to. So I was pretty sure that the qunari weren't going to be running a garden-variety sex-and-birth caste system.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 2:49:43 GMT
So Sten judges the Inquisitor's gender the same way everybody else does, then. I'm not sure what this can prove. As for what's obvious here, I thought Sten's conversations in Origins were obviously designed to hide stuff. Sort of like ME1's Sovereign convo, which was designed to hide Bio having no idea what the Reapers were up to. So I was pretty sure that the qunari weren't going to be running a garden-variety sex-and-birth caste system. You mean by her sex? I agree completely. Sten does seem to judge the Warden's gender by her sex. Which means when he talks about "women aren't warriors", wouldn't that also mean he's talking about their sex? And now where does that leave Inquisition's lore? To me Sten's conversations in Origins were incomplete thoughts. You could attribute that to the writers hiding things, but much more likely (in my opinion) the lore wasn't completely developed at that time. Which would explain why Inquisition Qunari feel much different to Origin's Qunari.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 2:57:36 GMT
Nothing wrong with Inquisition's Qunari I'd like to add, I just prefer Origin's take. Like Iakus said, more oppressive and more frightening.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:43:17 GMT
36,887
colfoley
19,123
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jan 30, 2018 3:07:56 GMT
Nothing wrong with Inquisition's Qunari I'd like to add, I just prefer Origin's take. Like Iakus said, more oppressive and more frightening. At the risk of being late to the party and since I do not like talking about this issue, especially given it does seem to be contray to the topic of the thread...I never really saw the Qunari in Origins being contradicted by the Qunari in Inquisition. Remember IB is not a reliable narrator in this case, he is in active internal conflict over the nature of the Qun, possibly considering defecting and thus would want to present the Qun in the best light. And, he is a spy. But I wouldn't be surprised if his take is accurate. The Qun, remember, is all about the personal definitions of the Qun. Nothing really matters to the Qun. Bilogical and physical reality is ignored, if you are a boy you're a boy, a girl, a girl. I do not think the Qun would have any trouble calling one or the other if it felt so. In other words being a boy or a girl, or a plate, isn't a manner of definition outside of what the Qun calls it.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 3:15:42 GMT
Remember IB is not a reliable narrator in this case, he is in active internal conflict over the nature of the Qun, possibly considering defecting and thus would want to present the Qun in the best light. And, he is a spy. But I wouldn't be surprised if his take is accurate. The Qun, remember, is all about the personal definitions of the Qun. Nothing really matters to the Qun. Bilogical and physical reality is ignored, if you are a boy you're a boy, a girl, a girl. I do not think the Qun would have any trouble calling one or the other if it felt so. In other words being a boy or a girl, or a plate, isn't a manner of definition outside of what the Qun calls it. Yes, the only explanations that would fit within canon seem to be fault with Sten's portrayal of the Qun (through either ignorance or otherwise) or as you just pointed out Iron Bull (which I never really considered before this thread). Fault with Sten seems to be the most popular choice (with Iron Bull being considered accurate.)
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:43:17 GMT
36,887
colfoley
19,123
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jan 30, 2018 3:22:54 GMT
Remember IB is not a reliable narrator in this case, he is in active internal conflict over the nature of the Qun, possibly considering defecting and thus would want to present the Qun in the best light. And, he is a spy. But I wouldn't be surprised if his take is accurate. The Qun, remember, is all about the personal definitions of the Qun. Nothing really matters to the Qun. Bilogical and physical reality is ignored, if you are a boy you're a boy, a girl, a girl. I do not think the Qun would have any trouble calling one or the other if it felt so. In other words being a boy or a girl, or a plate, isn't a manner of definition outside of what the Qun calls it. Yes, the only explanations that would fit within canon seem to be fault with Sten's portrayal of the Qun (through either ignorance or otherwise) or as you just pointed out Iron Bull (which I never really considered before this thread). Fault with Sten seems to be the most popular choice (with Iron Bull being considered accurate.) Funny I never actually considered that Sten would be the innaccurate one. Heh actually I just realized in the end it might not actually matter. Again my Qun lore is not air tight but as far as I know the Qun is divided into three seperate parts of their society, with the Tamsaraans having ultimate control on who gets defined as what in terms of job role or life title. But here's the interesting part, which I just thought, they could both be right because they could both be from different parts of the Qun and their individual parts of the Qun might have different opinions on issues particular to Krem. For spies it might be useful to have people be ' gender fluid', for soldiers it would not be of any use at all.
|
|
inherit
8885
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:57:53 GMT
7,564
river82
5,221
July 2017
river82
|
Post by river82 on Jan 30, 2018 3:27:22 GMT
Heh actually I just realized in the end it might not actually matter. Again my Qun lore is not air tight but as far as I know the Qun is divided into three seperate parts of their society, with the Tamsaraans having ultimate control on who gets defined as what in terms of job role or life title. But here's the interesting part, which I just thought, they could both be right because they could both be from different parts of the Qun and their individual parts of the Qun might have different opinions on issues particular to Krem. For spies it might be useful to have people be ' gender fluid', for soldiers it would not be of any use at all. You know you can headcanon pretty much anything if you try, right xD
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:43:17 GMT
36,887
colfoley
19,123
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jan 30, 2018 3:30:13 GMT
Heh actually I just realized in the end it might not actually matter. Again my Qun lore is not air tight but as far as I know the Qun is divided into three seperate parts of their society, with the Tamsaraans having ultimate control on who gets defined as what in terms of job role or life title. But here's the interesting part, which I just thought, they could both be right because they could both be from different parts of the Qun and their individual parts of the Qun might have different opinions on issues particular to Krem. For spies it might be useful to have people be ' gender fluid', for soldiers it would not be of any use at all. You know you can headcanon pretty much anything if you try, right xD True. BioWare ven encourages that sort of thing. As repugnant as I personally find the Qun I actually find it quite fascinating and conversations there of. Its like every bad collectovist ideology all crammed into one.
|
|
inherit
Now with HESH rounds!
912
0
6,638
The Biotic Trebuchet
Stolen by inquisition forces.
2,616
Aug 11, 2016 22:59:51 GMT
August 2016
thebioticbread
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Trebuchet_MkIV
[(e^x )- 4]
69
|
Post by The Biotic Trebuchet on Jan 30, 2018 3:31:30 GMT
|
|
warrior
N3
I don't like MP!
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 717 Likes: 1,021
inherit
5264
0
Jun 26, 2017 22:00:50 GMT
1,021
warrior
I don't like MP!
717
Mar 20, 2017 22:14:03 GMT
March 2017
warrior
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by warrior on Jan 30, 2018 4:50:31 GMT
The historical accuracy of being a witcher? Really? L M F A O
|
|
warrior
N3
I don't like MP!
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 717 Likes: 1,021
inherit
5264
0
Jun 26, 2017 22:00:50 GMT
1,021
warrior
I don't like MP!
717
Mar 20, 2017 22:14:03 GMT
March 2017
warrior
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by warrior on Jan 30, 2018 5:01:50 GMT
The historical accuracy of being a witcher? Really? No one would think you dumb(er) if you asked what game we are talking about. The game in question is "Kingdom Come Deliverance". Though many have made 'historical accuracy' arguments to explain why The Witcher's depiction of women--as well as its near total exclusion of POC--is necessary, only because its world is inspired by medieval mythology. I'd be surprised if you weren't aware.
|
|
inherit
3439
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:37:09 GMT
9,653
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,050
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Jan 30, 2018 5:26:13 GMT
So Sten judges the Inquisitor's gender the same way everybody else does, then. I'm not sure what this can prove. As for what's obvious here, I thought Sten's conversations in Origins were obviously designed to hide stuff. Sort of like ME1's Sovereign convo, which was designed to hide Bio having no idea what the Reapers were up to. So I was pretty sure that the qunari weren't going to be running a garden-variety sex-and-birth caste system. You mean by her sex? I agree completely. Sten does seem to judge the Warden's gender by her sex. Which means when he talks about "women aren't warriors", wouldn't that also mean he's talking about their sex? And now where does that leave Inquisition's lore? To me Sten's conversations in Origins were incomplete thoughts. You could attribute that to the writers hiding things, but much more likely (in my opinion) the lore wasn't completely developed at that time. Which would explain why Inquisition Qunari feel much different to Origin's Qunari. My point was more that DA:O doesn't give a player tools to separate sex and gender, so NPCs will never see a character with a sex/gender mismatch (DAI's slightly more flexible here, particularly WRT hair, but most DAI outfits are still gendered.) As for design intent, we'll have to wait for an interview; how Bio developed this part of the lore would certainly be an interesting question for a design panel. But writing lore in a way that it can easily be misinterpreted by the player -- or rather, in a way that lets the writers pull the rug out from under the player -- has been a thing elsewhere in DA.
|
|
inherit
4588
0
Nov 25, 2024 20:19:45 GMT
3,170
therevanchist25
1,826
Mar 15, 2017 23:07:06 GMT
March 2017
therevanchist25
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem
|
Post by therevanchist25 on Jan 30, 2018 5:31:13 GMT
To everyone claiming Kingdom Come is not historically accurate due to the protagonist being a peasant boy, tell me something. How did the Nobles become Noble in the first place hm? The first member of a Noble Family to rise to the ranks of Nobility, what do you think they were? I'll tell you what they weren't, Nobles. They were lesser people who did something remarkable, that earned them Nobility as a reward.
|
|
inherit
3439
0
Member is Online
Nov 25, 2024 21:37:09 GMT
9,653
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,050
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Jan 30, 2018 5:38:06 GMT
To everyone claiming Kingdom Come is not historically accurate due to the protagonist being a peasant boy, tell me something. How did the Nobles become Noble in the first place hm? The first member of a Noble Family to rise to the ranks of Nobility, what do you think they were? I'll tell you what they weren't, Nobles. They were lesser people who did something remarkable, that earned them Nobility as a reward. Well, it was more typical for the earliest nobles to be members of a Frankish war band who kicked out the Roman overlords and enserfed the Roman underclass -- or rather, kept the late Roman social structure working pretty much the way it was except with lower taxation, and slotted themselves in at the top. (Or Vikings, etc., depending on the place. Normans did it twice; once in Normandy and once in England. Edit: forgot about Sicily, but IIRC that was about the same.)
|
|