inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Oct 24, 2016 14:29:54 GMT
Yes. The mission in ME3 when rescuing the ex-Cerberus scientists Yeah, but even then he is still forgettable...I really did enjoy that entire level. Forgettable or not, he still did what the ME3 squadmates failed to do
|
|
inherit
Psi-Cop
38
0
Feb 21, 2019 15:55:45 GMT
10,231
CrutchCricket
The Emperor Daft Serious
4,577
August 2016
crutchcricket
CrutchCricket
Mass Effect Trilogy
|
Post by CrutchCricket on Oct 24, 2016 14:59:47 GMT
Honestly, Jacob only looks bad when compared to everyone else. We have genetically engineered perfect humans and krogan, genius scientists and engineers, master assassins and thiefs, thousand year old asari, geth... and then there's Jacob. He's an everyman. He's got biotics but he's far outclassed. He's a soldier but he's far outclassed there too. Unlike everyone else on the ship apart from Kelly, and the nameless crew, he's just a regular dude.
So yeah, obviously he looks dull and uninteresting. Look at his competition. There's nothing wrong with Jacob, but there's nothing particularly right either. He's just there.
|
|
inherit
Psi-Cop
38
0
Feb 21, 2019 15:55:45 GMT
10,231
CrutchCricket
The Emperor Daft Serious
4,577
August 2016
crutchcricket
CrutchCricket
Mass Effect Trilogy
|
Post by CrutchCricket on Oct 24, 2016 15:08:52 GMT
He's a Cerberus operative on a Cerberus ship. The last time I check, ME2 didn't let Shepard steal the ship out of its factory and airlock all the Cerberus crew to rejoin the Alliance. Kinda dumb to start ME2 with just only Miranda on the ship unless you prefer Kai Leng as a squadmate. So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. Yeah, but even then he is still forgettable...I really did enjoy that entire level. Forgettable or not, he still did what the ME3 squadmates failed to do Which is...?
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Oct 24, 2016 15:13:49 GMT
Provide cover fire for Brynn and Shepard. Brynn, without any regards to her own safety, ran out to help Shepard while Jacob, without hesitation, provided cover for both to get back in the shuttle
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 24, 2016 15:22:21 GMT
He's a Cerberus operative on a Cerberus ship. The last time I check, ME2 didn't let Shepard steal the ship out of its factory and airlock all the Cerberus crew to rejoin the Alliance. Kinda dumb to start ME2 with just only Miranda on the ship unless you prefer Kai Leng as a squadmate. So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. Forgettable or not, he still did what the ME3 squadmates failed to do Which is...? I've said this before, but I always wished it was more like the cinematic trailer... where Shep is recruiting on his own, while TIM and Miranda are taking notice from a distance. I would be willing to bet this might've been a real plot idea floating around at Bioware once. In which case, Miranda alone would've been great to come into the team with false pretenses at first. Like a Brooks. My own idea is it'd have been cool if you eventually weed out her motivations and one of you has to the option to win the other to their particular side. Needless to say though, Jacob wouldn't be a factor in any of this. Nor would Lazarus for that matter (but I won't get into this here).
|
|
aoibhealfae
N3
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 811 Likes: 1,190
inherit
1157
0
1,190
aoibhealfae
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
811
Aug 23, 2016 19:19:58 GMT
August 2016
aoibhealfae
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by aoibhealfae on Oct 24, 2016 15:42:19 GMT
He's a Cerberus operative on a Cerberus ship. The last time I check, ME2 didn't let Shepard steal the ship out of its factory and airlock all the Cerberus crew to rejoin the Alliance. Kinda dumb to start ME2 with just only Miranda on the ship unless you prefer Kai Leng as a squadmate. So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. I think you forget that Jacob is a Cerberus loyalist. He even talk about Cerberus being fantastic because they don't judge him for screwing all his female bosses. He's okay with Collector's Base being given to Illusive Man because it was in the interest of humanity. He went back to Cerberus after Normandy got impounded by Alliance and hook up with his Cerberus girlfriend on Mumbai and made a safehouse on Gellix for Cerberus personnel and their family. He merely cut ties with TIM but he came back for the Cerberus folks because he believe in their ideals and he even let Dr Archer stay with him. Miranda became Normandy XO because she's a Project Leader for Lazarus whose main function was to allocate all fund on Shepard's reconstruction and then her main function on the ship was to send reports about Shepard to Illusive Man like an overqualified secretary. She found out about Cerberus because her 'daddy' fund the organization and apparently she rebelled against her father by working for that organization. She's hardly a believer like Jacob and she never form attachment to them.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 24, 2016 15:56:18 GMT
So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. I think you forget that Jacob is a Cerberus loyalist. He even talk about Cerberus being fantastic because they don't judge him for screwing all his female bosses. He's okay with Collector's Base being given to Illusive Man because it was in the interest of humanity. He went back to Cerberus after Normandy got impounded by Alliance and hook up with his Cerberus girlfriend on Mumbai and made a safehouse on Gellix for Cerberus personnel and their family. He merely cut ties with TIM but he came back for the Cerberus folks because he believe in their ideals and he even let Dr Archer stay with him. Miranda became Normandy XO because she's a Project Leader for Lazarus whose main function was to allocate all fund on Shepard's reconstruction and then her main function on the ship was to send reports about Shepard to Illusive Man like an overqualified secretary. She found out about Cerberus because her 'daddy' fund the organization and apparently she rebelled against her father by working for that organization. She's hardly a believer like Jacob and she never form attachment to them. Interesting perspective.. never quite thought about it like this, but maybe you're right. One thing I do think of Miranda is she's almost like (Akuze) Shep and Jack, but doesn't know it yet. "You talk like you're a tool to be used.. by your father.. by Cerberus." Breaking her from this is the best thing I can do, personally. edit: Scratch that.. Not just Sole Survivor. All Shepards are labrats that after Lazarus.
|
|
inherit
Psi-Cop
38
0
Feb 21, 2019 15:55:45 GMT
10,231
CrutchCricket
The Emperor Daft Serious
4,577
August 2016
crutchcricket
CrutchCricket
Mass Effect Trilogy
|
Post by CrutchCricket on Oct 24, 2016 16:31:31 GMT
Miranda became Normandy XO because she's a Project Leader for Lazarus whose main function was to allocate all fund on Shepard's reconstruction and then her main function on the ship was to send reports about Shepard to Illusive Man like an overqualified secretary. She found out about Cerberus because her 'daddy' fund the organization and apparently she rebelled against her father by working for that organization. She's hardly a believer like Jacob and she never form attachment to them. You're kidding me right? So did you skip all the conversations with her too? The ones where she talks about believing in Cerberus' goal of advancing humanity, telling Shepard she misjudged him and maybe he misjudged Cerberus as well, saying she liked her work because she always envied the STG for their operational freedom, defending Cerberus on every known operation to date and providing justification for their actions, all that? Or how about being only a handful of people to get facetime with TIM? Jacob is a grunt who has clear and stated reservations about Cerberus' more extreme measures, unlike Miranda who mostly justifies them in ME2. The only reason he didn't personally get assassins on his ass once leaving Cerberus is because he was too low ranking to bother with. He didn't know anything that could be a threat, he didn't matter, one way or another. And defending the Gellix scientists doesn't mean he supports Cerberus, far from it. The scientists are good people and brilliant in their fields. They're valuable on their own and that's what Jacob responds to. He protects them from Cerberus, not because of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 17:00:07 GMT
He's a Cerberus operative on a Cerberus ship. The last time I check, ME2 didn't let Shepard steal the ship out of its factory and airlock all the Cerberus crew to rejoin the Alliance. Kinda dumb to start ME2 with just only Miranda on the ship unless you prefer Kai Leng as a squadmate. So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. Forgettable or not, he still did what the ME3 squadmates failed to do Which is...? It's not that the player can't get through a mission with only one squad mate... it's that Freedom's Progress is a continuation of the tutorial on how to do combat in ME2 and that combat normally will involve 2 squad mates throughout the entire game. One also needs to consider just how radically the 2 person squad controls were changed between ME1 and ME2. For example, both new and seasoned ME1 players needed to learn about sending squad mates to different cover positions and "taking point." That's why I said earlier that his "positioning" in the game was important... purely from a mechanical standpoint of teaching the player during the first couple of segments how to play the rest of the game. Wilson briefly served the same sort of role regarding using Medi-Gel and powers... until he was shot and replaced on that 2-person squad with Miranda. There was, however, no real need to direct either him or Jacob into particular cover during that brief combat sequence where you have the two of them with you. I did say that they could have "pulled a Wilson" and killed Jacob whenever the next squad mate was recruited; however, unless they wrote in a death for Jacob on every possible recruitment mission in that first batch, they would be dictating the order in which the player would have to recruit their squad mates. That is, the player would have had no choice but to recruit Mordin first rather than it just being strongly hinted that it's what they should do. Far simpler in my mind if they just had of added some "spice" into Jacob's background or character... perhaps borrowing elements from Zaeed's past and eliminating that DLC entirely.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 24, 2016 17:06:29 GMT
So you hate Cerberus but are more ok with Miranda a leader of Cerberus than Jacob, a grunt with doubts? On the flipside, I don't see why you couldn't just start with Miranda. Surely the player can get through one mission with just a single squadmate. And if you get Zaeed's DLC you could instantly get a squadmate after the first conversation on Omega. Which is...? It's not that the player can't get through a mission with only one squad mate... it's that Freedom's Progress is a continuation of the tutorial on how to do combat in ME2 and that combat normally will involve 2 squad mates throughout the entire game. That's why I said earlier that his "positioning" in the game was important... purely from a mechanical standpoint of teaching the player during the first couple of segments how to play the rest of the game. Wilson briefly served the same sort of role until he was shot and replaced on that 2-person squad with Miranda. I did say that they could have "pulled a Wilson" and killed Jacob whenever the next squad mate was recruited; however, unless they wrote in a death for Jacob on every possible recruitment mission in that first batch, they would be dictating the order in which the player would have to recruit their squad mates. That is, the player would have had no choice but to recruit Mordin first rather than it just being strongly hinted that it's what they should do. Far simpler in my mind if they just had of added some "spice" into Jacob's background or character... perhaps borrowing elements from Zaeed's past and eliminating that DLC entirely. Personally, I would have written this whole story around the Geth. And Legion would be the first crewmate. It's funny that he was the first thing ever shown about ME2 at one time.. I'd like to pick their brains on what ideas were floating around once. Because I don't think the Lazarus project was their first idea. Drew even said something along these lines... making the suggestion that maybe Shep was a cyborg.
|
|
aoibhealfae
N3
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 811 Likes: 1,190
inherit
1157
0
1,190
aoibhealfae
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
811
Aug 23, 2016 19:19:58 GMT
August 2016
aoibhealfae
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by aoibhealfae on Oct 24, 2016 17:08:26 GMT
You're kidding me right? So did you skip all the conversations with her too? The ones where she talks about believing in Cerberus' goal of advancing humanity, telling Shepard she misjudged him and maybe he misjudged Cerberus as well, saying she liked her work because she always envied the STG for their operational freedom, defending Cerberus on every known operation to date and providing justification for their actions, all that? Or how about being only a handful of people to get facetime with TIM? Jacob is a grunt who has clear and stated reservations about Cerberus' more extreme measures, unlike Miranda who mostly justifies them in ME2. The only reason he didn't personally get assassins on his ass once leaving Cerberus is because he was too low ranking to bother with. He didn't know anything that could be a threat, he didn't matter, one way or another. And defending the Gellix scientists doesn't mean he supports Cerberus, far from it. The scientists are good people and brilliant in their fields. They're valuable on their own and that's what Jacob responds to. He protects them from Cerberus, not because of it. And what she's done with that afterwards? "Sorry, Jack. I quit." All her conversation was like reading out of a pamphlet, because that's what she do, being the Cerberus smiling and sexy PR for Shepard. She's only with Cerberus because she felt the organization find her worthy and valued to them as an employee who kick ass and look pretty. But the moment she turned against them, they didn't hesitate about trying to kill her. Unlike Jacob, she didn't bother to save her Cerberus friends from TIM's implants and death squad because she have none. At the end of the day, all she care about was saving her clone sister from Cerberus Auschwitz. Cerberus extend farther than just TIM and his jacked-up implanted flunkies. Jacob and the Cerberus strays are still Cerberus in their own way. Jacob believed in their ideologies but he doesn't agree with what TIM become and did to the organization. Cerberus did good for humanity. Cerberus have good people. Cerberus do a lot of thing for humanity what Alliance and the Council failed. Listen to Brynn talking about her work and wanting to do what she does because she love it despite the reputation surrounding Cerberus and their ethical and moral issues about human and alien experimentation. They subscribe with the whole "ends justify the means" and they get away from it because they do it in remote colonies without regulations or restrictions and they're very well-funded. Dr Archer did terrible things to his own brother and he's still considered as "good people" in Jacob's mind. What they do for their experiments and life works are very likely criminal and unethical or else they wouldn't be known as Cerberus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 17:19:19 GMT
It's not that the player can't get through a mission with only one squad mate... it's that Freedom's Progress is a continuation of the tutorial on how to do combat in ME2 and that combat normally will involve 2 squad mates throughout the entire game. That's why I said earlier that his "positioning" in the game was important... purely from a mechanical standpoint of teaching the player during the first couple of segments how to play the rest of the game. Wilson briefly served the same sort of role until he was shot and replaced on that 2-person squad with Miranda. I did say that they could have "pulled a Wilson" and killed Jacob whenever the next squad mate was recruited; however, unless they wrote in a death for Jacob on every possible recruitment mission in that first batch, they would be dictating the order in which the player would have to recruit their squad mates. That is, the player would have had no choice but to recruit Mordin first rather than it just being strongly hinted that it's what they should do. Far simpler in my mind if they just had of added some "spice" into Jacob's background or character... perhaps borrowing elements from Zaeed's past and eliminating that DLC entirely. Personally, I would have written this whole story around the Geth. And Legion would be the first crewmate. It's funny that he was the first thing ever shown about ME2 at one time.. I'd like to pick their brains on what ideas were floating around once. Because I don't think the Lazarus project was their first idea. Drew even said something along these lines... making the suggestion that maybe Shep was a cyborg. It would have just been a different game with a completely different story then wouldn't it? There still would have been, IMO, 2 squad mates for the basic combat tutorial since that was the focus of the combat mechanics of the game. It happened much the same way in ME1... we lost Jenkins and picked up Ashley... and in ME3... we lost Anderson as a squad mate and picked up the VS and James. We learn how to move the character and just shoot either with just the PC and one squad mate, then learn squad control using two squad mates... followed by the recruitment of other team members to give us a selection of different squad mates to choose from.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 24, 2016 17:22:41 GMT
Personally, I would have written this whole story around the Geth. And Legion would be the first crewmate. It's funny that he was the first thing ever shown about ME2 at one time.. I'd like to pick their brains on what ideas were floating around once. Because I don't think the Lazarus project was their first idea. Drew even said something along these lines... making the suggestion that maybe Shep was a cyborg. It would have just been a different game with a completely different story then wouldn't it? There still would have been, IMO, 2 squad mates for the basic combat tutorial since that was the focus of the combat mechanics of the game. It happened much the same way in ME1... we lost Jenkins and picked up Ashley... and in ME3... we lost Anderson as a squad mate and picked up the VS and James. First combat tutorial mission = 2 squad mates followed by the recruitment of other team members to give us a selection of different squad mates to choose from. Somewhat different, yes. It'd have none of the Stupidity of Lazarus, for one. And Miranda could come in later as a spy, instead of some glorified secretary. Some things would be similar. Say, for example, if Legion was the one who rescued you and informed you about the Collectors and the Geth gave you a ship --- that would still cause distrust if you went to the Alliance or Council. You were now working with the Geth instead of Cerberus... but that would be just as alarming. So then Shep would try to find people on his own. That part of the story would stay the same too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 17:27:35 GMT
It would have just been a different game with a completely different story then wouldn't it? There still would have been, IMO, 2 squad mates for the basic combat tutorial since that was the focus of the combat mechanics of the game. It happened much the same way in ME1... we lost Jenkins and picked up Ashley... and in ME3... we lost Anderson as a squad mate and picked up the VS and James. First combat tutorial mission = 2 squad mates followed by the recruitment of other team members to give us a selection of different squad mates to choose from. Somewhat different, yes. It'd have none of the Stupidity of Lazarus, for one. And Miranda could come in later as a spy, instead of some glorified secretary. Some things would be similar. Say, for example, if Legion was the one who rescued you and informed you about the Collectors and the Geth gave you a ship --- that would still cause distrust if you went to the Alliance or Council. You were now working with the Geth instead of Cerberus... but that would be just as alarming. So then Shep would try to find people on his own. That part of the story would stay the same too. ... but we'll never really know, will we... because that story wasn't actually written. If "ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas non-denominational holiday of unspecified ethnic origin.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 24, 2016 17:30:19 GMT
Somewhat different, yes. It'd have none of the Stupidity of Lazarus, for one. And Miranda could come in later as a spy, instead of some glorified secretary. Some things would be similar. Say, for example, if Legion was the one who rescued you and informed you about the Collectors and the Geth gave you a ship --- that would still cause distrust if you went to the Alliance or Council. You were now working with the Geth instead of Cerberus... but that would be just as alarming. So then Shep would try to find people on his own. That part of the story would stay the same too. ... but we'll never really know, will we... because that story wasn't actually written. If "ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas non-denominational holiday of unspecified ethnic origin. You're no fun I'm just saying some of this Lazarus stuff sucks and I bet it wasn't the first thing on Bioware's minds either. Telling from Drew K's comments and the original trailer (where TIM and Miranda are outsiders, watching you recruit people without their help). I'm merely making a story out of that alternative trailer scenario. Even by going in that direction, they didn't do it any justice anyways. Lazarus is hand waved away, despite being extremely remarkable, and Jacob is just a big pile of Fail. When I first played, I thought it was stupid... if it wasn't for the rest of the game (the non story.. the recruitments), I'd have hated it. But it was because of these things that it ends up being my favorite -- and many other people's favorite. So it was never the story that won anyone over, per se.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 17:56:22 GMT
... but we'll never really know, will we... because that story wasn't actually written. If "ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas non-denominational holiday of unspecified ethnic origin. You're no fun I'm just saying some of this Lazarus stuff sucks and I bet it wasn't the first thing on Bioware's minds either. Telling from Drew K's comments and the original trailer (where TIM and Miranda are outsiders, watching you recruit people without their help). I'm merely making a story out of that alternative trailer scenario. Even by going in that direction, they didn't do it any justice anyways. Lazarus is hand waved away, despite being extremely remarkable, and Jacob is just a big pile of Fail. When I first played, I thought it was stupid... if it wasn't for the rest of the game (the non story.. the recruitments), I'd have hated it. But it was because of these things that it ends up being my favorite -- and many other people's favorite. So it was never the story that won anyone over, per se. Awe... I was trying to be... because part of the issue with Jacob, I think, is that they really had no idea how to write an interesting black character without stepping on ethnic toes somewhere... so they blanded him out. I do agree the geth angle would be an intriguing story angle; and maybe someday, they'll write that story... might be under a different IP or in a different cluster of the Mass Effect universe or as a totally overhauled "reboot" of the ME Trilogy franchise. I also agree that the Lazarus Project was a dumb way to start ME2 and Jacob's personality is certainly not my favorite in the game. I have a really tough time playing through ME2 with a FemShep expressly because of Jacob's personality and Jen Hale's inflection in the lines needed to talk to him. I wouldn't axe him though... I'd change his personality instead. Still, if the theoretical question is simply cutting 3 squad mates, I wouldn't cut Jacob because of that early game play role he fills. I'd cut the two DLC characters (Kasumi and Zaeed) because they're DLC and their story arcs are designed to not be critical to the overall story anyways. Then I'd cut Samara (because I see her background arc as being the most expendable and her being a mother living just to kill off her children is not a story arc that I personally like anyways).
|
|
inherit
Psi-Cop
38
0
Feb 21, 2019 15:55:45 GMT
10,231
CrutchCricket
The Emperor Daft Serious
4,577
August 2016
crutchcricket
CrutchCricket
Mass Effect Trilogy
|
Post by CrutchCricket on Oct 24, 2016 18:20:35 GMT
It's not that the player can't get through a mission with only one squad mate... it's that Freedom's Progress is a continuation of the tutorial on how to do combat in ME2 and that combat normally will involve 2 squad mates throughout the entire game. One also needs to consider just how radically the 2 person squad controls were changed between ME1 and ME2. For example, both new and seasoned ME1 players needed to learn about sending squad mates to different cover positions and "taking point." That's why I said earlier that his "positioning" in the game was important... purely from a mechanical standpoint of teaching the player during the first couple of segments how to play the rest of the game. Wilson briefly served the same sort of role regarding using Medi-Gel and powers... until he was shot and replaced on that 2-person squad with Miranda. There was, however, no real need to direct either him or Jacob into particular cover during that brief combat sequence where you have the two of them with you. I did say that they could have "pulled a Wilson" and killed Jacob whenever the next squad mate was recruited; however, unless they wrote in a death for Jacob on every possible recruitment mission in that first batch, they would be dictating the order in which the player would have to recruit their squad mates. That is, the player would have had no choice but to recruit Mordin first rather than it just being strongly hinted that it's what they should do. Far simpler in my mind if they just had of added some "spice" into Jacob's background or character... perhaps borrowing elements from Zaeed's past and eliminating that DLC entirely. I barely remember the mechanics of that or how they differ from ME1 beyond changing my controls to be more like ME1 (for example space to open the menu and arrows to tell the squad to move to a position). But is there anything in that that requires the presence of two squadmates? I assume the same point could be gotten across with one. But having never used the mechanics much beyond that, I'll take your word for it. And what she's done with that afterwards? "Sorry, Jack. I quit." All her conversation was like reading out of a pamphlet, because that's what she do, being the Cerberus smiling and sexy PR for Shepard. She's only with Cerberus because she felt the organization find her worthy and valued to them as an employee who kick ass and look pretty. But the moment she turned against them, they didn't hesitate about trying to kill her. Unlike Jacob, she didn't bother to save her Cerberus friends from TIM's implants and death squad because she have none. At the end of the day, all she care about was saving her clone sister from Cerberus Auschwitz. Cerberus extend farther than just TIM and his jacked-up implanted flunkies. Jacob and the Cerberus strays are still Cerberus in their own way. Jacob believed in their ideologies but he doesn't agree with what TIM become and did to the organization. Cerberus did good for humanity. Cerberus have good people. Cerberus do a lot of thing for humanity what Alliance and the Council failed. Listen to Brynn talking about her work and wanting to do what she does because she love it despite the reputation surrounding Cerberus and their ethical and moral issues about human and alien experimentation. They subscribe with the whole "ends justify the means" and they get away from it because they do it in remote colonies without regulations or restrictions and they're very well-funded. Dr Archer did terrible things to his own brother and he's still considered as "good people" in Jacob's mind. What they do for their experiments and life works are very likely criminal and unethical or else they wouldn't be known as Cerberus. So not forming personal relationships with other Cerberus members means she never believed in the organization's goals? Seriously, where do you come up with this stuff? You're starting to sound like a gothboy alt (pro tip: that's not a good thing). No, the renegade scientists are not Cerberus, they are renegade scientists. When Cerberus reorganized into the second Galactic notEmpire, any ambiguity or multiple interpretations of Cerberus went out the window. And it's pure hypocrisy that you list Brynn gushing about being fullfilled professionally as a good thing yet dismiss Miranda as reading from a pamphlet for the exact same thing. You want to hate a character, fine. But don't misinterpret/dismiss their character with a straight face then turn around and praise another for the same shit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 19:02:37 GMT
It's not that the player can't get through a mission with only one squad mate... it's that Freedom's Progress is a continuation of the tutorial on how to do combat in ME2 and that combat normally will involve 2 squad mates throughout the entire game. One also needs to consider just how radically the 2 person squad controls were changed between ME1 and ME2. For example, both new and seasoned ME1 players needed to learn about sending squad mates to different cover positions and "taking point." That's why I said earlier that his "positioning" in the game was important... purely from a mechanical standpoint of teaching the player during the first couple of segments how to play the rest of the game. Wilson briefly served the same sort of role regarding using Medi-Gel and powers... until he was shot and replaced on that 2-person squad with Miranda. There was, however, no real need to direct either him or Jacob into particular cover during that brief combat sequence where you have the two of them with you. I did say that they could have "pulled a Wilson" and killed Jacob whenever the next squad mate was recruited; however, unless they wrote in a death for Jacob on every possible recruitment mission in that first batch, they would be dictating the order in which the player would have to recruit their squad mates. That is, the player would have had no choice but to recruit Mordin first rather than it just being strongly hinted that it's what they should do. Far simpler in my mind if they just had of added some "spice" into Jacob's background or character... perhaps borrowing elements from Zaeed's past and eliminating that DLC entirely. I barely remember the mechanics of that or how they differ from ME1 beyond changing my controls to be more like ME1 (for example space to open the menu and arrows to tell the squad to move to a position). But is there anything in that that requires the presence of two squadmates? I assume the same point could be gotten across with one. But having never used the mechanics much beyond that, I'll take your word for it. And what she's done with that afterwards? "Sorry, Jack. I quit." All her conversation was like reading out of a pamphlet, because that's what she do, being the Cerberus smiling and sexy PR for Shepard. She's only with Cerberus because she felt the organization find her worthy and valued to them as an employee who kick ass and look pretty. But the moment she turned against them, they didn't hesitate about trying to kill her. Unlike Jacob, she didn't bother to save her Cerberus friends from TIM's implants and death squad because she have none. At the end of the day, all she care about was saving her clone sister from Cerberus Auschwitz. Cerberus extend farther than just TIM and his jacked-up implanted flunkies. Jacob and the Cerberus strays are still Cerberus in their own way. Jacob believed in their ideologies but he doesn't agree with what TIM become and did to the organization. Cerberus did good for humanity. Cerberus have good people. Cerberus do a lot of thing for humanity what Alliance and the Council failed. Listen to Brynn talking about her work and wanting to do what she does because she love it despite the reputation surrounding Cerberus and their ethical and moral issues about human and alien experimentation. They subscribe with the whole "ends justify the means" and they get away from it because they do it in remote colonies without regulations or restrictions and they're very well-funded. Dr Archer did terrible things to his own brother and he's still considered as "good people" in Jacob's mind. What they do for their experiments and life works are very likely criminal and unethical or else they wouldn't be known as Cerberus. So not forming personal relationships with other Cerberus members means she never believed in the organization's goals? Seriously, where do you come up with this stuff? You're starting to sound like a gothboy alt (pro tip: that's not a good thing). No, the renegade scientists are not Cerberus, they are renegade scientists. When Cerberus reorganized into the second Galactic notEmpire, any ambiguity or multiple interpretations of Cerberus went out the window. And it's pure hypocrisy that you list Brynn gushing about being fullfilled professionally as a good thing yet dismiss Miranda as reading from a pamphlet for the exact same thing. You want to hate a character, fine. But don't misinterpret/dismiss their character with a straight face then turn around and praise another for the same shit. In ME1, the two squad mates cannot be positioned individually in separate places (at least on the Xbox 360). You press "up" on the D-pad while aiming at the location and BOTH squadmates will go there. In ME2, you can position each squad mate in different locations by pressing either left or right on the D-pad, left ordering the squad mate who is on the left side the power wheel and right ordering the one on the right separately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 9:58:05 GMT
You're kidding me right? So did you skip all the conversations with her too? The ones where she talks about believing in Cerberus' goal of advancing humanity, telling Shepard she misjudged him and maybe he misjudged Cerberus as well, saying she liked her work because she always envied the STG for their operational freedom, defending Cerberus on every known operation to date and providing justification for their actions, all that? Or how about being only a handful of people to get facetime with TIM? Jacob is a grunt who has clear and stated reservations about Cerberus' more extreme measures, unlike Miranda who mostly justifies them in ME2. The only reason he didn't personally get assassins on his ass once leaving Cerberus is because he was too low ranking to bother with. He didn't know anything that could be a threat, he didn't matter, one way or another. And defending the Gellix scientists doesn't mean he supports Cerberus, far from it. The scientists are good people and brilliant in their fields. They're valuable on their own and that's what Jacob responds to. He protects them from Cerberus, not because of it. And what she's done with that afterwards? "Sorry, Jack. I quit." All her conversation was like reading out of a pamphlet, because that's what she do, being the Cerberus smiling and sexy PR for Shepard. She's only with Cerberus because she felt the organization find her worthy and valued to them as an employee who kick ass and look pretty. But the moment she turned against them, they didn't hesitate about trying to kill her. Unlike Jacob, she didn't bother to save her Cerberus friends from TIM's implants and death squad because she have none. At the end of the day, all she care about was saving her clone sister from Cerberus Auschwitz. Cerberus extend farther than just TIM and his jacked-up implanted flunkies. Jacob and the Cerberus strays are still Cerberus in their own way. Jacob believed in their ideologies but he doesn't agree with what TIM become and did to the organization. Cerberus did good for humanity. Cerberus have good people. Cerberus do a lot of thing for humanity what Alliance and the Council failed. Listen to Brynn talking about her work and wanting to do what she does because she love it despite the reputation surrounding Cerberus and their ethical and moral issues about human and alien experimentation. They subscribe with the whole "ends justify the means" and they get away from it because they do it in remote colonies without regulations or restrictions and they're very well-funded. Dr Archer did terrible things to his own brother and he's still considered as "good people" in Jacob's mind. What they do for their experiments and life works are very likely criminal and unethical or else they wouldn't be known as Cerberus. Your bias towards Miranda is quite glaring, and whenever someone views a character like Kaidan through the same fundamental and biased lense, your very quick to jump to Kaidan's defence as to why the character is more rounded. Writing Miranda off, her entire development and story, as just someone who is "pretty" with "daddy issues" is ignorant and it reflects a double standard, since you don't view other characters as fundamentally. Having an opinion on a character is one thing, to just whittle away the characters in game development and arc to just the base impression of the character doesn't inform posts with anything useful to say or contribute to the discussion. Its clear you prefer characters over others. But if you are going to defend one for being basic, then criticise another character for the same fault, don't be surprised if people like myself and others call it out.
|
|
aoibhealfae
N3
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 811 Likes: 1,190
inherit
1157
0
1,190
aoibhealfae
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
811
Aug 23, 2016 19:19:58 GMT
August 2016
aoibhealfae
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by aoibhealfae on Oct 25, 2016 14:17:46 GMT
Mass Effect characters aren't equally written and often time there's several writers handling on character in the trilogy and whether they're successful with their characters is subjective to me. Its just so happened that some of the characters I happened to like are written in depth are also the ones people dislike and often hated and given the most ridiculous brush off one-liners because out of failure to understand them or that they're unlikable or simply just "boring".
Miranda's primarily goal in her life was to escape and to confront her domineering father to save herself and her sister. She is an independent woman herself and she never was dependent on Cerberus like Jacob does and it will always take a secondary place in her personal narrative. But it doesn't change the fact that her entire narrative in ME2 and ME3 was to be emotionally vulnerable and inadequate so she could dependent on you as a player to resolve her problems in exchange for good favors and sex which happened to be the most common denominator especially with majority of romanceable characters in this game. And it so happen, I find her creation and her father's experimentation to be the most fascinating aspect of her. It explained her preoccupation with being the perfect woman and her desire to see her sister to have a normal life and family because those are the things she couldn't have and it does explain all the comments about her extensive alteration.
I often interpret characters in depth whenever I play each playthrough and I like to explore as much as I can find about them and review these character as a person themselves. Kaidan is just a character who happened to be consistently well-written throughout the game and complex enough for me to still figuring him out as I play the game. I like to write about him because of his writing, his acting, his portrayal inspired me to do so and he's actually my third favourite character in the trilogy under FemShep and Wrex. I can't say he have daddy issues because he have none. He love his parents. His father was killed in action and he hated that he wasn't there on Earth for his mother. I can't say that I have to be told that he is made to be perfect and that he would use his sexuality and masculinity to get whatever he wanted. I could decide it for myself that he is sexy and handsome without the camera forcing me to view him sexually. All of his achievements was just him by being good at being a soldier and not because how he was genetically modified to be perfect at everything. And I CAN say that the Alliance matters to him because he didn't drop everything to join Shepard and he even accused her of betraying everything they believe in. I don't see Miranda accusing Shepard for betraying Cerberus or whine about ruining her entire career. Cerberus does not define her as a person which does for Jacob.
You are free to write about whatever that you like. But its not my job to make myself gush about the character you like nor was to hate the character you hate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1255
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 15:14:47 GMT
Why are you good folks even talking about Kaiden? He is not on the ME2 cast list, so he was already, so to speak, cut. To be honest, the arguments of the NPC likes and dislikes are moot point. You can only accept what other people like or dislike and rationalizing it is completely pointless. There is simply no objective criteria there, and never will be.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Oct 25, 2016 16:45:28 GMT
Personally, I would have written this whole story around the Geth. And Legion would be the first crewmate. It's funny that he was the first thing ever shown about ME2 at one time.. I'd like to pick their brains on what ideas were floating around once. Because I don't think the Lazarus project was their first idea. Drew even said something along these lines... making the suggestion that maybe Shep was a cyborg. Was that video suggesting Shepard was going to come back as one of the geth? Robocop Shepard? I'm glad that didn't follow up on that one.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Oct 25, 2016 16:48:37 GMT
Personally, I would have written this whole story around the Geth. And Legion would be the first crewmate. It's funny that he was the first thing ever shown about ME2 at one time.. I'd like to pick their brains on what ideas were floating around once. Because I don't think the Lazarus project was their first idea. Drew even said something along these lines... making the suggestion that maybe Shep was a cyborg. Was that video suggesting Shepard was going to come back as one of the geth? Robocop Shepard? I'm glad that didn't follow up on that one. No, it's still Legion.. but at the time, no one knew what it meant. I just liked that these early trailers didn't have Cerberus quite at the forefront yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 22:12:34 GMT
Mass Effect characters aren't equally written and often time there's several writers handling on character in the trilogy and whether they're successful with their characters is subjective to me. Its just so happened that some of the characters I happened to like are written in depth are also the ones people dislike and often hated and given the most ridiculous brush off one-liners because out of failure to understand them or that they're unlikable or simply just "boring". Miranda's primarily goal in her life was to escape and to confront her domineering father to save herself and her sister. She is an independent woman herself and she never was dependent on Cerberus like Jacob does and it will always take a secondary place in her personal narrative. But it doesn't change the fact that her entire narrative in ME2 and ME3 was to be emotionally vulnerable and inadequate so she could dependent on you as a player to resolve her problems in exchange for good favors and sex which happened to be the most common denominator especially with majority of romanceable characters in this game. And it so happen, I find her creation and her father's experimentation to be the most fascinating aspect of her. It explained her preoccupation with being the perfect woman and her desire to see her sister to have a normal life and family because those are the things she couldn't have and it does explain all the comments about her extensive alteration. I often interpret characters in depth whenever I play each playthrough and I like to explore as much as I can find about them and review these character as a person themselves. Kaidan is just a character who happened to be consistently well-written throughout the game and complex enough for me to still figuring him out as I play the game. I like to write about him because of his writing, his acting, his portrayal inspired me to do so and he's actually my third favourite character in the trilogy under FemShep and Wrex. I can't say he have daddy issues because he have none. He love his parents. His father was killed in action and he hated that he wasn't there on Earth for his mother. I can't say that I have to be told that he is made to be perfect and that he would use his sexuality and masculinity to get whatever he wanted. I could decide it for myself that he is sexy and handsome without the camera forcing me to view him sexually. All of his achievements was just him by being good at being a soldier and not because how he was genetically modified to be perfect at everything. And I CAN say that the Alliance matters to him because he didn't drop everything to join Shepard and he even accused her of betraying everything they believe in. I don't see Miranda accusing Shepard for betraying Cerberus or whine about ruining her entire career. Cerberus does not define her as a person which does for Jacob. You are free to write about whatever that you like. But its not my job to make myself gush about the character you like nor was to hate the character you hate. I'm glad you defend Kaidan, cause as a fan of his character as well, I find it frustrating when the character can be written off so to speak. I don't mind it when people dislike a character I like, or vice versa. I really only find it disappointing when the character is just labelled as one note. Even Zaeed, who is close to being fairly one-note, can be interpreted and viewed as more to that, so I prefer it when these characters aren't just lazily written off this way. I mean, I don't like Ashley, but I wouldn't ignore the character's development across the trilogy, and the qualities of the character others like about her. I appreciate you expanded your views on Miranda's character, I really only took issue with the initially labelling of the character as one-note as I iterated in my other post.
|
|
jtav
N2
Posts: 58 Likes: 94
inherit
762
0
Nov 23, 2020 20:45:33 GMT
94
jtav
58
August 2016
jtav
|
Post by jtav on Oct 26, 2016 0:09:29 GMT
For personal "I really don't like this character"
Garrus Grunt Zaaeed
For "cool idea but you actually have nothing to do with the story and we're on a budget here"
Samara Thane Kasumi
|
|