Any news about Mass Effect Andromeda 2 ??

Beyond how it looks, one of the barriers for entry to some people to play and get through ME1 is the combat system.  While you could clean the game's rough visual patches and really make it shine, if there was game that needed a reboot to it's combat its ME1.  I think if they dedicate some resources to updating and modernizing certain aspects of the game (combat, inventory, mini-games) you could probably have something and possibly generate some genuine excitement towards the franchise again but, waiting behind that initial enthusiasm, if the inevitable baggage that comes with ME2 and ME3.  I don't know if a simple re-master would suffice in the case of the Mass Effect Trilogy.  Would they take the re-master as opportunity to highlight Cerberus more in ME1 since they will be such a huge presence in ME2 and ME3?  Do you find ways to incorporate new animations in the end game related to your choices or maybe add more scenes in ME3 that relate to your ME2 companions?  Maybe add a mission related to Kal Reeger's sacrifice?    

I think this is exactly why EA would be dumber then they look if they go for the remake/reboot option because everyone is going to have different tastes in what should change, improved, or be removed from the game to make it received well.

They never did any huge DLCs that were connected to the main story so I don't see them doing one, ever. And if I remember correctly, the DLC wasn't planned for MEA.

ME1 DLCs were so insignificant that I see them nearly non-existent. But it's my opinion. I'd rather have no DLC and better story than short DLCs that changes nearly nothing in the gameplay. The only good thing that came out from MET DLCs was higher EMS at the very end which saves my Shepard's life since I don't play online. 

As for MEA, I don't even see any sense in DLC. Quarian Arc? Would be better to deal in MEA2 as one of the Priority Missions... but of course they had to do a novel/comic about it. Which is a shame. Ryders' Mom? Once again - MEA2 or even MEA3 Priority Mission. Benefactor is also way too big for a DLC. So if they planned anything, it was most likely another game but it could've changed not because of the score. Studios had some problems which no media knew about for the time being and I think that was the main reason for putting MEA2 on hiatus and delay other MEA stuff. As for the score itself, I don't believe BW and EA would actually believe it's entirely the game's fault. Bad press is the problem here. And so much wrong statements in comparsation to MET. People forgot how glitchy and buggy MET was (and still is because BW never fixed many things out there) and yet they compared MEA to MET saying MEA is a failrure when it's clearly not.

The problem with MEA is that 95% of what they left unanswered and people would like to be a part of DLC is way too connected to the main story. As for the Angara, I agree. They could've made a DLC but as I said, studios had some problems no one knew about for a long time. They also never said anything about DLCs coming up and if I remember correctly, one person said there won't be any DLCs for MEA before the game premiered.

As for the game selling unwell... www.pcgamesn.com/mass-effect-andromeda/mass-effect-andromeda-sales-numbers
and
Mass Effect: Andromeda was the third-best-selling game of March 2017. It led the United Kingdom in physical sales during its first two weeks of release. As of August, it was the seventh best-selling game of the year, just above Resident Evil 7: Biohazard and just below Injustice 2. However, it eventually dropped out of the year-end top ten. The game had the second-best physical launch in the series after Mass Effect 3. Its digital sales had only single-digit percentage point improvements over Mass Effect 3 (which sold 349,000 PC digital copies alone in its opening quarter) in their respective opening quarters despite a significant growth in industry digital sales since then.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_Effect:_Andromeda#Sales

ME1 DLCs are not my fav so I do only Bring Down the Sky so I can get Balak's help in ME3. ME2 I love LofSB, Arrival and Overload (with the first 2 being regionally blocked for me on xbox... but fortunately I bought the entire trilogy with all DLC Bundles on PC not long ago so now I even have Sophie in ME3). In ME3 I absolutely love Citadel DLC, like Leviathan and From the Ashes. Omega is kinda meh even though I adore Aria. I wish I could've brought Liara with me to this one. I bet her and Aria's banters would be great.

[1] I didn't say that initially, but since you bring it up, yeah.  I would say that the only things that really set the original trilogy apart were the universe building, story and characters.  No one was writing articles gushing about the tepid third person shooter combat or how wonderful it was to scan planets.  Did the game play improve throughout the series?  In some ways, yes.  But never in any way that elevated it above "acceptable".  What would you expect them to bring forward in an A2 that they didn't already try to bring forward into A1?

[2] I don't think our expectations or desires will matter, frankly.  We, meaning current Mass Effect fans, are simply too divided in our opinions on what we want to even think about attempting to please us as a group.  And, regardless of how we felt about ME:A as fans, if EA as a business had any interest in continuing down that road the franchise wouldn't currently be on the shelf and the studio that developed it wouldn't have been dissolved and folded into other studios.

Frankly, I would be surprised to see them even start officially thinking about a new ME inside of five years.  Assuming they even get that chance, I doubt anyone would want them to rush it out (because we've seen how well that has worked in the past), so another three, maybe four years of development.  That puts them roughly a decade past the release of the installment that got the franchise shuttered in the first place, and almost fifteen years after the divisive conclusion of the iconic trilogy.  After that  kind of time, and with backlash no matter what they do, what reason would they have to even attempt to appeal to the apparently irreconcilable fragments of the old school Mass Effect fans?  It might make more sense, from a business perspective, to reboot the entire franchise and attempt to appeal to a new generation of fans, on new generation consoles and with new game play preferences in mind, and sweep up any old school fans drawn in by nostalgia and hype.

Numbers point to it selling well, despite it's reception.  PC sales through EA's "Origin" store are proprietary and are not disclosed in the sales charts so that number is unknown but, when you consider the estimate in sales for physical copies for it's first quarter of release is 2.5 mil units and then add in digital sales on XBone and PS4 and PC sales through Origin they are likely at or near the 5-6 million units that Aaron Flynn projected at the anniversary of its release (03/21/2017).  Mass Effect Andromeda's sales were highlighted as a success in two respective investor calls (in 5/2017 for Q4 2016 and in 08/2017 for Q1 2017) which is not some BS public relations and marketing huddle as there are real consequences for misleading your investors.

With that said, the question then becomes why was Andromeda's future cut short if it moved units and generated revenue?  Per reports, BioWare Montreal struggled to get the project off the ground and communication between Edmonton and Montreal would lag due to the time difference.  In the end, BioWare Montreal had to be rescued during the production of ME:A as Mac Walters was assigned to take over late in production and delivered what we got 18 months later.  Add this to the reception of the game, the resources spent to fix it's glitches and animations issues, and uncertainty in regards to post-release reception, I can see why BioWare would want to get reorganized and focus on making sure "Anthem" is delivered in it's best state possible so the same mistakes aren't repeated.  They are moving into a larger, more modern studio in downtown Edmonton soon and I would be curious to see if they don't use that as an opportunity to expand their dev team as to not only produce content on "Anthem" and "DA4" but future "Mass Effect" projects as well.

The Trilogy doesn't work on PS4 so it does need a remaster one way or another

Hah, well maybe they'll just wait until the ps5...

This. There's a reason it was given to Montreal.

I think they pushed back the novels and did rewrites the cover the things they had intended to cover in DLC, like the Quarians for example.  Pulling the plug is a bigger deal for this game because they are trying to reset the series and get some traction with new players.  It's like when they tried to bring back 24 without Jack Bauer, I doubt they get a second chance at that one.  EA could just come to conclusion that people won't accept this without Shepard.  When they stopped support an EA exec said if they bring back ME it had to be something fresh and relevant.  That says another reboot to me.  I've never heard anyone talking about the groundwork they laid in Andromeda, or building on anything.  It's more I love Mass Edfect and would like to make another game if EA lets us.