Do you prefer ANDROMEDA? or Milkyway?

Milky Way

i am in the camp of having a good mass effect game regardless if it is in Andromeda or Milk Way. Or if it is Pre, Con Current or Post Shepard Mass Effect Trilogy. A good Mass Effect game is worth every penny.

I think they should finish the story started in "Mass Effect Andromeda" to tie up the loose narrative threads and set up for exploration outside the Heleus Cluster with a new protagonist.

I took the first option, which isn't really an option, but it serves my purposes.

Are you asking what setting we'd prefer for the next game? You really didn't make it clear.

If so then Andromeda.

I'd rather we hadn't gone to Andromeda at all, there was still a ton of possibilities for Milky Way. And Andromeda wasn't as interesting as it could be, it may as well have been some area in Milky Way. Still, since we moved to a new galaxy, we shouldn't go back after just one game, especially considering all the loose ends in MEA.

I think the MW was a much better setting, at least compared to what we have seen of Andromeda(one cluster) but I still would prefer they continue in Andromeda.

While i prefer MW as a setting that's only because Andromeda as it was represented in the last game was a lot less fleshed out and inspired which needn't necessarily be the case in a hypothetical future Mass Effect game. Would be pretty ballsy to return to Andromeda however I doubt it would carry Andromeda in the title especially if the story is unrelated.

My personal preference would be to re-create the old setting in Andromeda by shifting the time-line 500 years and having the milky way species build a new Mass relay network connecting their new homeworlds (re-establishing the council, spectres) and citadel space. Develop Andromedean citadel space as a geo-political and cultural setting and platform/infrastructure to rival the last and support further exploration of the great unknown that way we'd have the strengths of both settings in essentially a soft-reboot.

Well......which Milky Way? I want the post-Destroy one.

I don't think that's necessarily the case.  Firstly, I don't think that having only the Destroy ending to Mass Effect 3 was ever Bioware's intention.  That is, if the idea themikefest is taken into account and everything that was cut from ME3 is realized, we were probably always headed towards a "post-Destroyed" Milky Way rather than a "post-Destroy (choice) Milky Way (we-win, Reapers are dead, Shepard lives utopia).  I think Bioware's plan for the series was to head to a much darker place than that.  If the dark energy plot is considered, the nuances of ME3's endings were always "irrelevant" to Bioware's plan.  The ending choices of ME1 were always irrelevant to ME2 and ME3.  The ending details of ME2 were always irrelevant to ME3.  Why would, all of a sudden, the ending nuances of ME3 be so relevant to whatever ideas Bioware had for possibly continuing the franchise beyond that game?  It's the fan base that went off on that tangent.

From each game's ending, only 1 thing mattered going forward and that was the thing the player had no choice in happening:

ME1 - Saren was defeated and Sovereign blown apart.  Whether or not the player saved the council or not didn't matter.  Whether they appointed Anderson or Udina didn't matter.
ME2 - Shepard survived the Suicide Mission.  It didn't matter who else of the squad survived.  It didn't matter whether Shepard destroyed the Collector Base or gave it to TIM.
ME3 - What matters is what happens in all cases where the game is completed (see proviso below)... The Crucible is fired and a wave of dark energy is released across the galaxy.  The rest doesn't matter... and I believe, it never really did with respect to any plans for future stories in ME that Bioware were concocting even before ME3 was released.

In ME2, they did have 1 "throw away" ending where you could technically complete the game - If Shepard died during the SM, you were given a closing cut scene, BUT you could not import that file into ME3.  Similarly, in ME3, I think they wrote 1 "throw away" ending (after being pressured into writing the EC by the fans).  That ending is Refuse - again technically, you complete the game, but I believe the only endings they were consider valid for going forward with the story were the other 3 where the crucible was fired.  I don't think it was ever in the plans to "show us" the ramifications of Shepard's choice in any future ME games.  I think the original plan for ME4 was to bring us back at a point in time AFTER that dark energy release had completely destroyed everything anyways.

It would not be hard to bring Shepard back. For the guy to tell the story, and give the details of what happened on the Citadel, after Shepard took the magic carpet ride up to lala land, someone had to have been there, and survive to tell the first story.

The guy does say the details have changed. It happened a long time ago. So those details can be anything.