Rumours of Mass Effect Trilogy Trilogy Remaster: What would you like to see?

My guess is because Control is the Illusive Man/Cerberus mindset. Destroy is Anderson. And Synthesis is Saren.

So in other words, there is only one sane option, lol.

That's right, destroy.

In one of the early concepts of ME3, it showed the Normandy bridge with Jack in there, as she was supposed to be a party member, but according to one of the "Art Of" books, she was scrapped in favour of Tali. Also, there's a Miranda mod on PC that restores her content and makes her a full recruitable squadmate.

False. I acknowledge that many people liked ME3. The case could not be broken otherwise.

You, otoh, are claiming (without evidence) it's just a tiny vocal minority who didn't like it.



Umm...what?   


Mission chain A

Yes, I know. I'm trying to fix them. But one can only quote so much on Proboards before it starts rebelling.

As far as I can see it for me the only way to have the Rachni or any other major choice have the impact it should have is a nullification approach in the game it is offered.  So no matter what the Rachni are dead by the end of Mass Effect 1.  You can kill her during the Mission or during some other mission in the game even at the very end she dies helping to defeat Sovereign.  At that point you can have something to demonstrate the choice such as a cinematic or a conversation between a few members of the crew and that gives that choice weight.  I just don't think it is possible to have something that can have such a significant impact on the game or at least development cycle to be really able to carry forward without it not feeling like a major choice anymore.  The Collector Base could be that you destroy it or if you choose to keep it the destruction of the Human Reaper caused the station to malfunction sending a beam out to the relay causing it to become unstable and unreachable and you can have some fancy cinematic of Joker frantically flying the ship out of the area while everything else is being destroyed.

I think that is why there didn't feel like there was the same major choice in Andromeda is BioWare saw all the complaints and didn't want to raise expectations of players, but of course there were people that took it as "lazy writing".

Regardless of what Bioware could do and I'd just like to interject that Anthem was also the best they could do, if the end result is not satisfactory, it means nothing. I do not say this to diminish anyone's work, but there's no award for "best game made [under circumstances]".


I've given many ideas, which all end with Hanako Ikezawa posting a gif of an anime girl going no and backing away. Because he likes what Bioware gave him and will not accept any alternative, even if it means the death of ME, the closure of Bioware and at the cost of hundreds of people's jobs.

Oh wait. That did happen.

You all you have done is complain about how it wasn't done to your satifaction while comparing ME3 to games that have only surface level simlarities.

Posting an interview isn't the same as telling me how you would work the Rachni into the over all story while still allowing them to be removed completely to allow the narrative to flow smoothly while still respecting player's choices and not picking canonical choices from previous games. Which you have already stated you are against.

To me they did. With the Rachni I would have appreciated two different side missions for the different choices instead of just a different set of dialogue for the Rachni Queen, but I understand there is only so much they could have done. A lot of the complaining about things in general I normally see as a response to what players were saying loudly in the past about the prior games and trying to find some reason to justify their complaints.