Rumours of Mass Effect Trilogy Trilogy Remaster: What would you like to see?

Mostly, not entirely. Just like TLJ is a bad movie, but it only really shits the bed, once it kills Luke Skywalker. But even keeping Luke alive, would not have made it a good movie. It's still the worst movie in the franchise.

True. The possibility of a continuation or an open ending would alleviate a lot of the complaints. There's always next time and that would allow for a "next time", unlike the ending we got.

Not quite. I don't agree that it's dumb. I'd argue its masterfully executed, from exposition, to dialogue, to cinematography, the character vignettes, the missions, everything. ME2 makes sure that every concession you made going from ME1 to ME2 was worth the sacrifice. It is an absolute marvel. Individually. ME would be much smaller a franchise, had ME2 not existed, the way it did. ME3 is where it turns really dumb. Butchering characters, dumb dialogue, plot contrivances and character benchings. ME3 starts terribly (we fight or we die), plateaus with Mars, peaks at Tuchanka, dives off a cliff with Rannoch, no pun intended Talimancers, has some individual brights spots, are largely pertaining to ME2 crew members, but never recovers and on top of that, it then Amber Turds the endings. There is maybe 2 worthwhile concessions in the entire game and everything else is "why couldn't we get more of this" which is usually ME2 crew stuff, "instead of this" which is entirely lackluster Cerberus plots that contribute nothing to the story, but Bioware needed them to pad their game and distract from the fact that the Reapers are extras in their own game.

So no, I don't agree how you equate ME2 and ME3, in terms of content.

Liara and ME1 aside, it still surprises me that Bioware would be wiling to stick their hand in the ME3 buzzsaw again.

To be honest, TLJ or Mass Effect argument, we all agree that what was lacking on those two was planning all the way to the end.

You could argue that the second movie/game of the trilogy was a waste or not, that depends on your opinion, ofc, but in the end, it's all about opinion. People somehow think that "10/10", "Legendary Rating", "1/10", "Bad Game" are universal things and tend to base  their opinion and speech around that: "hey, people say it's good, so you must like it".

In the end, we all want a remaster. And we all gonna play the hell of it when/if it comes out

I know that I would love a remaster of Fallout 1 and 2 (because I never got to play those games).

Or would that be classed as a remake?

I've been watching that guy on YouTube who does the Fallout lore vids and I wish I could play it, those games look very interesting to play.

Please do. Despite many fans liking the endings and considering ME3 the best entry of the series, Bioware can still learn from some mistakes made along the way and look back on the whole situation with another eyes.

And that's me being truly optimistic. Andromeda was, in some way or the other, a step to a different direction, and that's mostly (not gonna say all of it, since who knows, maybe Bioware did intend to move to Andromeda regardless) because of the endgame situation.

It's time to move on from the whole debate. But to do so, it's to accept it and say "hey, we screwed up, but we won't deny the remasterization pledges just because people will be onto us again."

Kinda off-topic, but I'm a bit eager to see the upcoming Bioware 25 years book.