Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 12, 2020 0:39:49 GMT
I have no clue what I said this time that leads you to assume it is time for this kind of usual diatribe of yours. Offended with my assumption on the Chantry? How come to have this focus on magopocalypse, unless you somehow want to imply that this particular organisation is in some way necessary for dealing with magic according to your view, which it is not for reasons I would consider... obvious? Is this piece of smugness an attempt to justify the rest of your post or something? Since when did an "average Thedosian" ever had any remotely useful (or any, really) knowledge about magic? Not offended, no. I just had a thought in response to your post. Is that... wrong now? And since I've never made this particular argument on the forum before I'm not sure what you mean by 'usual'. Your statement just implied that the Chantry is a main obstacle on the way to a world with greater safety and liberty for 'everybody', and I feel like that notion seriously underestimates how uninterested human beings generally are in safety and liberty for others than themselves and their own, particularly people noticeably different from themselves, completely regardless of the Chantry's influence. Whether or not you're right about the Chantry and everything they represent, you still need to contend with human nature in a quasi-medieval world where one particular kind of people have way more destructive potential than everybody else. You're talking about dynamics that we're having a lot of trouble understanding and dealing with right now, even without mages and Chantries. Getting rid of a corrupt church in the state Thedas is in doesn't even begin to address the problem you say you're interested in solving, and could quickly exacerbate it if not done very carefully and thoughtfully. Mage towers are problematic, sure, but things can quickly get way worse than that without Chantry supervision. That's all I was saying. There's no need to be so defensive and uncivil. The average Thedasian doesn't need to know a single useful thing about magic to know that it's factually a threat to them. Which history tells them, modern and ancient. Which is all they need to know to feel like they have to take action to protect themselves. Actions which could easily take shapes way worse and more dangerous and counterproductive - and cruel - than what the Chantry is, if the Chantry isn't already there to do the job of making them feel safer. You see? That's all I wanted to point out. Please don't shoot the messenger. Why should we draw comparison to America? In nearly every country where guns *are* illegal or difficult to acquire, gun violence is not a problem, and the general populace is not clamouring for access to guns to protect them from the minority that owns guns. Besides which, America's gun obsession never stemmed from a lack of access to guns, because there has never been a point in American history where guns were illegal or difficult to acquire. The argument about a minority of gun wielders terrorising the general US populace has never been anything but a hypothetical. America's situation is unique, not representative of humanity as a whole, and there's no reason for Thedas to emulate America, especially not if the mage issue is supposed to be saying something remotely cogent about human nature. Thedas is pretty much nothing like America? Fereldan=Britain Orlais=France Tevinter = India and the other -stans I'm not comparing Thedas directly to America. I'm pointing out that the specific mechanics of fear of others' destructive potential and desire to arm yourself against that threat potentially having worse consequences than what you were actually afraid of in the first place, which is a universal issue and is apparent on some level in every society, because human nature, but which is particularly obvious in America's current gun crisis, just as an example, are things Thedas have to struggle with as well. Those dynamics of public fear and desire to feel safe by potentially very dangerous means need to be considered if one intends to shape Thedas into a place where nobody feels they have reason to fear the mages to the point of allowing them to live free and safe lives of their own. And our primary solution to those unfortunate tendencies - strictly regulating people's access to weapons all around - is fundamentally not a possibility with mages. If modern people are having issues just with somebody else owning a gun, why would you expect Thedasians to be cool with some of their neighbors being able to conjure tornadoes of fire and turn people into walking bombs in a split-second, corrupt church propaganda or no corrupt church propaganda?
|
|
inherit
2754
0
6,009
Son of Dorn
Fortifying everything.
6,304
Jan 11, 2017 14:17:27 GMT
January 2017
doomlolz
Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Son of Dorn on Oct 12, 2020 1:24:43 GMT
Thedas is pretty much nothing like America? Fereldan=Britain Orlais=France Tevinter = India and the other -stans I wonder which nation in Thedas is based on the Vikings?
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
24,514
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
12,684
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by phoray on Oct 12, 2020 1:25:30 GMT
I wonder which nation in Thedas is based on the Vikings? The people across the sea?
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 1:25:36 GMT
Well I expect people to regard other humans differently from guns. There's a gulf of difference between restricting access to weapons and restricting a person's freedom of movement and communication.
Many people will be fearful and bigoted for literally any reason. The remedy, as it is for all forms of bigotry, is exposure and education (and shunning the staunch holdouts till they die off). I don't believe anyone here is saying that dismantling the Chantry would cure anti-mage sentiment overnight, I certainly don't believe that, but the Chantry is a clear and obvious barrier to improving the relationship between mages and non-mages, not only because they fearmonger, but because they monopolise and restrict (or even destroy) access to magic and the research of magic.
The Avvar and Rivaini had a societal model and practices that allowed mages to remain integrated into their society. Their methods should be studied, hopefully without the involvement of the Chantry, who would only skew the process with their bias (if not suppress it entirely).
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Oct 12, 2020 1:26:24 GMT
Thedas is pretty much nothing like America? Fereldan=Britain Orlais=France Tevinter = India and the other -stans I think Tevinter mostly takes influence from Ancient Rome. Their unique terminology (Altus, Laetan, etc) is derived from Latin. Specifically the Eastern Roman Empire aka the Byzantine Empire.
|
|
inherit
2754
0
6,009
Son of Dorn
Fortifying everything.
6,304
Jan 11, 2017 14:17:27 GMT
January 2017
doomlolz
Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Son of Dorn on Oct 12, 2020 1:27:45 GMT
I wonder which nation in Thedas is based on the Vikings? The people across the sea? Which one?
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Oct 12, 2020 1:28:15 GMT
I wonder which nation in Thedas is based on the Vikings? The people across the sea? I'd say more the Avaar. For people across the sea, I'm hoping they have moe non-European inspirations behind them. I remember Gaider talked aout maybe doing that when asked why there weren't any Asian people in Dragon Age.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,817
colfoley
18,711
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 12, 2020 1:37:32 GMT
1. This is pretty much my assessment even when taking the books into consideration. I don't really see any issue with the Mage rebellion picking up sticks and moving out to Ferelden, especially when they were the only ones who probably would've given them sanctuary...outside of Tevinter and we know how well that would've worked. We also know why the Venatori were also near the Temple of Sacred Ashes in the first place so there isn't any conflict here, no forgetting things happened. 2. Lels is pretty much biased in favor of mages and biased towards them. And Cullen's description seems accurate A. he was a Templar...he should know...and B. his description matches what we already know about the Templars in universe. They 'weaken' magic/ the fade. They 'reinforce' reality. As for their position in Thedas is concerned...I really don't see how any group in universe sees them as paragons of virtue aside from maybe people within the Chantry hiearchy, and the Templars themselves...even there opinions seem mixed. If I were to draw a general consensus from what I have seen and read on Thedas then the opinion of Templars are generally negative, most of the 'common man' characters we have seen of the setting seem to either be genuinely afraid of them, trying to keep their heads low, or tired of the mage, Templar conflict et all. 3. Star Wars reference aside it is certainly an interesting perspective that I hadn't really considered...however I still feel it ignores the complexity of the situation and the previous two games of buildup. Neither the Templars or the mages have ever been portrayed as being 'paragons of virtue' in the setting, they both of their good bits and they both of their issues. The mages while being an oppressed minority can still be victim to demonic possession and turned into a WMD. Origins makes it clear, DA 2 makes that clear, TVN it was again shocking how easy such a thing *could* happen. Even if the mage in question is an otherwise descent person desire, or rage, or fear, or guilt, or regret is always out there somewhere just waiting to pounce. Let alone the tendency of those with power (which mages have in heaps) to abuse said power. And the Templars while some see their mission as being just protectors, for the safety of mages just as much as the rest of Thedas, they are also encouraged to be jailors and given the bias and bigotry that is encouraged, both by the Chantry itself and by some within the organization, it makes a situation ripe for abuse even under the best of circumstances. Oh and this does not touch on the drug addled nature of said Templars. 4) This is the reason why the whole mage Templar thing is my favorite example of its type across fiction. Because both sides genuinely have things about them that make any solution complex. Thedas has a lot of good reason to fear mages, but the solution of the Chantry is like taking a sledgehammer to a shot glass. Whatever long term solution we do get (if any are offered from here on our) it has to keep in mind the safety and liberty of everyone. 2) Well, as I said, she was made that way so we have at least one person who doesn't go full-blown templar (nonsense) rhetoric. In-game we learn these things either via Cole or Solas/Cassandra banter (I don't know the conditions for the latter, i.e. if it can fire before that war room conversation). These descripitions come from characters who don't have templar abilties, hinting that the Order (Cassandra is entirely different issue, as spirit warrior/SoT, her abilities are most surely straighforward magic, so that's kinda off anyway) doesn't really understand the intricacies of their abilities. Which is nothing new for Chantry agents, anyway. Gaider's description on how Evangeline does her stuff pretty much sound like magic. My original pre-DAI theory was that templars basically use lyrium (the "essence of magic") to emulate one particular magical effect - dispel - and add some enchanted trinkets to that. #Meredith raided her own repository. Also, Lels and Josi use arguments and are not mages. Cullen is like, "I'm templar, yup templarz" immediately. I guess we played to different games then. Kirkwall's chapter/garrison isn't overly popular, but that's due to Meredith power-grabbing up to a point that it affect "ordinary" people. Else, how was that about "Champions of the Just" again? Oh, and by DAI, most templars are AWOL anyway.
3) The Star Wars reference was just an example. Take a different pick if you want where a character gets either shit dumped on them or is made OOC so someone else doesn't appear that bad anymore.
As I said, "mages vs. templars" is not a truely valid comparison, even if just for the reasons I've stated.
For TVN, I'm not sure which story you are referencing, since it has been a while on my part for most of the stories. If it is hair demons, well, that is squarely on Lucanis and his sense of "poetic justice", destroying the Solas fade blocker globe. I doubt all of Forfex' victims who got transformed into hair demons were mages before.
4) Safety and liberty for everyone is something I consider pretty much impossible under Chantry rule, unless you are an orlesian noble perhaps, but even those need to stay ahead of their peers and all the butter knives. As for non-humans, mages, infidels and all other undesireables... well... LMFAO?
This comes down to a couple of factors. 1. Cullen has been a Templar for years, he has been training with the order for years and years ever since he was a young (pre teen ? ) boy. He has a very intimate understanding of what it means to be a Templar and what they are capable of. He was also the 2IC for the Kirkwall circle so he was also internally well respected. If anything Leiliana and Josie's motives seem a little suspect to me given that Lel should know better given her experience with Templars and Josie would be ignorant on the subject. 2. Cullen's description matches up with what we have seen in the previous two games and even further expanded on in Inquisition (my understanding anyways). Templars are specialists in disrupting and dealing with magical problems, weakening it, reinforcing reality, etc. All of which could be very useful in stopping the breach. To call this 'nonsense Templar rhetoric' certainly seems biased in the extreme. And yes they may not fully know the ins and outs of their abilities but then I do not need to understand how exactly a gun works in order to shoot an intruder dead *looks at the above conversation...chortles* Champions of the Just is a line in the Chant of Light...all of the main quests in DAI was inspired by the Chant of light. If its not a truly valid comparison then why did you make it in the first place? In either case though, at least for me, it does not really work. In neither case were any of the characters ruined (I still like both Han and Fiona, loved Luke), and none of the new characters needed any help being awesome, they were great in their own right. Adding flaws to characters and having them make mistakes isn't ruining a character, I tend to think it actually improves them. And yes, which is why I will be sorely tempted to drive a arrow into Lucanis's eye if I ever meet him in game. I disagree with that assessment. Granted the Chantry also has a looooonnnnnng way to go before it can become a true force for liberty and safety for all members of theodosian society but they are far more along the road then any other major organization or race in the setting. (Unless of course the Qun is also a perverted version of what it once was)...you know as odd as this sounds I am going to shift gears majorly here kind of mid stream and mid sentence so bear with me. And granted I still maintain the above to be true from a certain perspective, after all the Chantry has had its history of reformers and those who have treated other races and the oppressed kindly, and even today that is especially true given most of the leadership options of the modern organization have seen the problems with Chantry dogma and are working to change/ reform it in their varying ways. However given how much the Chantry has been a problem organizationally and given how much Dragon Age seems to look down on organizations in general (Solas's speech at the end of Tresspasser) I think it would be better to distinguish between Andrastanism and The Chantry. The Chantry is a corrupt continent spanning organization which tends to encourage people's worse instincts but Andrastianism...if we are to believe a whole host of historical figures we have bumped into and statements in the lore...was very tolerant of other people's beliefs and existance. Now the question then becomes can the chantry be brought in line with the original intentions of Andrastae or will the organization need to be disbanded and we start from scratch (like we can already do with the Templars), only time will tell...but yes as of now freedom/safety is more possible along those lines then under any of the other major organizations on the continent, especially the Qun. I have no clue what I said this time that leads you to assume it is time for this kind of usual diatribe of yours. Offended with my assumption on the Chantry? How come to have this focus on magopocalypse, unless you somehow want to imply that this particular organisation is in some way necessary for dealing with magic according to your view, which it is not for reasons I would consider... obvious? Is this piece of smugness an attempt to justify the rest of your post or something? Since when did an "average Thedosian" ever had any remotely useful (or any, really) knowledge about magic? Not offended, no. I just had a thought in response to your post. Is that... wrong now? And since I've never made this particular argument on the forum before I'm not sure what you mean by 'usual'. Your statement just implied that the Chantry is a main obstacle on the way to a world with greater safety and liberty for 'everybody', and I feel like that notion seriously underestimates how uninterested human beings generally are in safety and liberty for others than themselves and their own, particularly people noticeably different from themselves, completely regardless of the Chantry's influence. Whether or not you're right about the Chantry and everything they represent, you still need to contend with human nature in a quasi-medieval world where one particular kind of people have way more destructive potential than everybody else. You're talking about dynamics that we're having a lot of trouble understanding and dealing with right now, even without mages and Chantries. Getting rid of a corrupt church in the state Thedas is in doesn't even begin to address the problem you say you're interested in solving, and could quickly exacerbate it if not done very carefully and thoughtfully. Mage towers are problematic, sure, but things can quickly get way worse than that without Chantry supervision. That's all I was saying. There's no need to be so defensive and uncivil. The average Thedasian doesn't need to know a single useful thing about magic to know that it's factually a threat to them. Which history tells them, modern and ancient. Which is all they need to know to feel like they have to take action to protect themselves. Actions which could easily take shapes way worse and more dangerous and counterproductive - and cruel - than what the Chantry is, if the Chantry isn't already there to do the job of making them feel safer. You see? That's all I wanted to point out. Please don't shoot the messenger. Why should we draw comparison to America? In nearly every country where guns *are* illegal or difficult to acquire, gun violence is not a problem, and the general populace is not clamouring for access to guns to protect them from the minority that owns guns. Besides which, America's gun obsession never stemmed from a lack of access to guns, because there has never been a point in American history where guns were illegal or difficult to acquire. The argument about a minority of gun wielders terrorising the general US populace has never been anything but a hypothetical. America's situation is unique, not representative of humanity as a whole, and there's no reason for Thedas to emulate America, especially not if the mage issue is supposed to be saying something remotely cogent about human nature. Thedas is pretty much nothing like America? Fereldan=Britain Orlais=France Tevinter = India and the other -stans I'm not comparing Thedas directly to America. I'm pointing out that the specific mechanics of fear of others' destructive potential and desire to arm yourself against that threat potentially having worse consequences than what you were actually afraid of in the first place, which is a universal issue and is apparent on some level in every society, because human nature, but which is particularly obvious in America's current gun crisis, just as an example, are things Thedas have to struggle with as well. Those dynamics of public fear and desire to feel safe by potentially very dangerous means need to be considered if one intends to shape Thedas into a place where nobody feels they have reason to fear the mages to the point of allowing them to live free and safe lives of their own. And our primary solution to those unfortunate tendencies - strictly regulating people's access to weapons all around - is fundamentally not a possibility with mages. If modern people are having issues just with somebody else owning a gun, why would you expect Thedasians to be cool with some of their neighbors being able to conjure tornadoes of fire and turn people into walking bombs in a split-second, corrupt church propaganda or no corrupt church propaganda? This post makes me remember/ makes me feel compelled to point out that remember what happened when the Chantry was removed from the situation? Death, destruction, mayhem, general war and nastiness. Seemed the Chantry was a moderating influence on the Templars...even despite their issues.
|
|
inherit
2754
0
6,009
Son of Dorn
Fortifying everything.
6,304
Jan 11, 2017 14:17:27 GMT
January 2017
doomlolz
Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Son of Dorn on Oct 12, 2020 1:39:02 GMT
The people across the sea? I'd say more the Avaar. For people across the sea, I'm hoping they have moe non-European inspirations behind them. I remember Gaider talked aout maybe doing that when asked why there weren't any Asian people in Dragon Age. This is who the Avaar are based on: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarian_kingdoms
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 1:41:10 GMT
I'm kind of wary of any in-game justification for Thedas not having people of Asian appearance until now. And making them different from the other people of Thedas in some sort of mystical/mysterious way is... not great.
Given that they never should have been excluded in the first place, I think they should just be folded in with the other humans of Thedas. No comment or justification is required.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 1:44:18 GMT
colfoleyPersonally I don't give credit to people for mitigating problems they caused, lol.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Oct 12, 2020 1:50:50 GMT
I'm kind of wary of any in-game justification for Thedas not having people of Asian appearance until now. And making them different from the other people of Thedas in some sort of mystical/mysterious way is... not great. Given that they never should have been excluded in the first place, I think they should just be folded in with the other humans of Thedas. No comment or justification is required. Don't see why they'd need to be different in a mystical/magical way. All humans in Thedas came from other continents, so just have them be from another. I do agree that they should avoid making them exotic like that though, since yeah implications unpleasant.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,817
colfoley
18,711
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 12, 2020 1:55:39 GMT
colfoley Personally I don't give credit to people for mitigating problems they caused, lol. Meaning? Edit: Nevermind I figured it out, had to refamileriaze myself with the word 'mitigating'.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 1:56:48 GMT
I'm kind of wary of any in-game justification for Thedas not having people of Asian appearance until now. And making them different from the other people of Thedas in some sort of mystical/mysterious way is... not great. Given that they never should have been excluded in the first place, I think they should just be folded in with the other humans of Thedas. No comment or justification is required. Don't see why they'd need to be different in a mystical/magical way. All humans in Thedas came from other continents, so just have them be from another. I do agree that they should avoid making them exotic like that though, since yeah implications unpleasant. I was under the impression that the humans of Thedas all migrated at once from the same continent (assuming they migrated at all and aren't creations of Ghilamagillagorilla or whatever), and that most of the existing human civilizations are offshoots of Tevinter. That's why I think it would be weird/uncool to have the people with Asian characteristics be from some new place.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 12, 2020 2:10:54 GMT
Well I expect people to regard other humans differently from guns. There's a gulf of difference between restricting access to weapons and restricting a person's freedom of movement and communication. Many people will be fearful and bigoted for literally any reason. The remedy, as it is for all forms of bigotry, is exposure and education (and shunning the staunch holdouts till they die off). I don't believe anyone here is saying that dismantling the Chantry would cure anti-mage sentiment overnight, I certainly don't believe that, but the Chantry is a clear and obvious barrier to improving the relationship between mages and non-mages, not only because they fearmonger, but because they monopolise and restrict (or even destroy) access to magic and the research of magic. The Avvar and Rivaini had a societal model and practices that allowed mages to remain integrated into their society. Their methods should be studied, hopefully without the involvement of the Chantry, who would only skew the process with their bias (if not suppress it entirely). I wouldn't. Your instinct to want to feel safe is generally way stronger than your instinct to want to see people you have no love for treated fairly. I shouldn't have to point out our tendencies to dehumanize and shun people who even just feel like they're threatening our positions to you. And that's us, four hundred years into the Enlightenment, living the safest and most comfortable lives that have ever been lived. And unlike anything people use to discriminate against each other in real life, no amount of exposure and education is actually going to make mages safe for normal people to be around. Without specific countermeasures there will continue to be accidents and blunders and the occasional actually malicious mage, and they won't be forgotten by the terrified farmers and merchants and craftsmen and soldiers of Thedas who want their families to be safe more than anything else in the world. Unless you're talking about lying to and brainwashing people into pretending that incidents don't happen, which is more insane than anything the Chantry is doing. Personally, I find the Chantry an incredibly restrained and moderate organization considering what we know human societies are capable of when they feel threatened by any particular "kind" of person, for valid reasons or not. Take away the Chantry and their methods without a better alternative already prepared to be implemented, and you open the door wide for even worse responses from Thedas' population in their sudden panic to protect themselves from magic and magical disasters. We barely know anything about the Avvar and Rivaini and how copacetic their relationships with mages really are, and whether or not their strategies can be emulated by the rest of Thedas. As you say, studying them would be a great idea for hopefully figuring out how to improve the situation. I'd only argue for tearing the Chantry down after we've done so, rather than before. And I'd expect there to be many voices within the Chantry who would whole-heartedly endorse that project for all the same reasons. I was under the impression that the humans of Thedas all migrated at once from the same continent (assuming they migrated at all and aren't creations of Ghilamagillagorilla or whatever), and that most of the existing human civilizations are offshoots of Tevinter. That's why I think it would be weird/uncool to have the people with Asian characteristics be from some new place. I don't follow. If all humans migrated at once from some continent, and Asian-looking people clearly weren't among them, and Asian-looking people suddenly turn up in the franchise, then it makes perfect sense for them to be an earlier off-shoot of humanity coming from a disconnected land, doesn't it? That's how different races have evolved historically, by geographic isolation. How is that weird or uncool? There're all kinds of things you could explore with it. The Qunari and the recency of their arrival and the mystery surrounding where they come from is a pretty cool part of the setting. Why couldn't you do something equally interesting with a new faction who look like Asians?
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 2:25:16 GMT
I don't believe the Chantry at large would endorse such research at all, or they would have done it already, instead of slaughtering the Rivaini for their violation of doctrine.
As much as the Chantry appears/claims to be a neutral organization working purely for the good of mankind, they did little/nothing to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the mages in their "care", and the benefits of having a monopoly over mages and magic (which would be undermined if society at large started to fear mages less) should be obvious.
I have never believed that the main actors in the Chantry were acting out of any genuine belief in their doctrine (which they violate when it suits them), or the interests of the public. I have always believed them to be acting in the interests of the Chantry as an organization, to maintain and increase its hold over Thedas.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 12, 2020 2:32:14 GMT
I don't believe the Chantry at large would endorse such research at all, or they would have done it already, instead of slaughtering the Rivaini for their violation of doctrine. As much as the Chantry appears/claims to be a neutral organization working purely for the good of mankind, they did little/nothing to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the mages in their "care", and the benefits of having a monopoly over mages and magic (which would be undermined if society at large started to fear mages less) should be obvious. I have never believed that the main actors in the Chantry were acting out of any genuine belief in their doctrine (which they violate when it suits them), or the interests of the public. I have always believed them to be acting in the interests of the Chantry as an organization, to maintain and increase its hold over Thedas. I don't necessarily disagree with any of those things, and didn't say anything to the contrary. I just find it hard to believe that there aren't also plenty of people within the Chantry who are there with good intentions and would embrace the chance to improve the mages' lot without endangering citizens. We simply meet too many sensible and good-natured clerics vs. obstinate and corrupt ones for it not to be the case.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 2:43:53 GMT
I don't believe the Chantry at large would endorse such research at all, or they would have done it already, instead of slaughtering the Rivaini for their violation of doctrine. As much as the Chantry appears/claims to be a neutral organization working purely for the good of mankind, they did little/nothing to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the mages in their "care", and the benefits of having a monopoly over mages and magic (which would be undermined if society at large started to fear mages less) should be obvious. I have never believed that the main actors in the Chantry were acting out of any genuine belief in their doctrine (which they violate when it suits them), or the interests of the public. I have always believed them to be acting in the interests of the Chantry as an organization, to maintain and increase its hold over Thedas. I don't necessarily disagree with any of those things, and didn't say anything to the contrary. I just find it hard to believe that there aren't also plenty of people within the Chantry who are there with good intentions and would embrace the chance to improve the mages' lot without endangering citizens. We simply meet too many sensible and good-natured clerics vs. obstinate and corrupt ones for it not to be the case. The good-natured ones I would expect to mostly be too invested in their beliefs to entertain the idea of research that might contradict them. And my own metric for sensibility includes parameters like "doesn't believe in invisible sky-men just because a moldy old poem said to". I still think the best way to conduct an unbiased study is to do it without Chantry affiliation. They have a history of suppressing research, ever since Origins. It's just better to leave them out.
|
|
Captain Obvious
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
Posts: 454 Likes: 474
inherit
10192
0
Oct 28, 2024 14:36:08 GMT
474
Captain Obvious
454
May 29, 2018 21:25:13 GMT
May 2018
forumking
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 12, 2020 2:47:26 GMT
Thedas is pretty much nothing like America? Fereldan=Britain Orlais=France Tevinter = India and the other -stans I think Tevinter mostly takes influence from Ancient Rome. Their unique terminology (Altus, Laetan, etc) is derived from Latin. It's obviously based off the Byzantine Empire. I mean, obviously to me, anyways.
IMHO
(Please don't hurt me.)
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 12, 2020 2:52:05 GMT
I think Tevinter mostly takes influence from Ancient Rome. Their unique terminology (Altus, Laetan, etc) is derived from Latin. It's obviously based off the Byzantine Empire. I mean, obviously to me, anyways.
IMHO
(Please don't hurt me.)
I don't know much about the Byzantine, so I'll defer to your authority as an arbiter of all things obvious.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,817
colfoley
18,711
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 12, 2020 2:56:29 GMT
It's obviously based off the Byzantine Empire. I mean, obviously to me, anyways.
IMHO
(Please don't hurt me.)
I don't know much about the Byzantine, so I'll defer to your authority as an arbiter of all things obvious. What the gyrating panda said.
|
|
Captain Obvious
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
Posts: 454 Likes: 474
inherit
10192
0
Oct 28, 2024 14:36:08 GMT
474
Captain Obvious
454
May 29, 2018 21:25:13 GMT
May 2018
forumking
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 12, 2020 2:56:34 GMT
It's obviously based off the Byzantine Empire. I mean, obviously to me, anyways.
IMHO
(Please don't hurt me.)
I don't know much about the Byzantine, so I'll defer to your authority as an arbiter of all things obvious. I'm actually half-serious since a lot of people have pretty much made that connection and told me about it. And I am quite the history buff, though I'm certainly no expert. It's pretty obvious from what "Freddie Mercury" (I genuinely forgot his name) tells you of the Tevinter Imperium that they're sort of like the Roman Republic and yet "not what they used to be" in terms of prestige and power. So... basically Byzantium... which was essentially the Roman Empire before Edward Gibbons decided to rename it or some shit like that. I don't know the particulars of the historiography so don't @ me. But yeah, I suspect that Tevinter is more analogous to the Roman Empire post-Fall of Rome.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,817
colfoley
18,711
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 12, 2020 2:59:34 GMT
A Youtuber I watched has made the same comparison and I generally find his analysis well regarded so I 'agree' with his assessment even though I am not that familiar with Byzantium either.
|
|
telanadas
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 317 Likes: 619
inherit
11510
0
619
telanadas
317
May 2020
mistberry
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by telanadas on Oct 12, 2020 3:02:26 GMT
By the time I reached the chamber the demon was pretty easy to kill, so why would the Venatori have any use for it? So may be he thought something or someone else was there. Why did the scattered shards, only visible to occulara give entrance to the place? When were they scattered? Why were they invisible except to the occulara? Most of the answers will probably turn out to be the writers thought it was an interesting device and the mechanics of how they got there were never properly thought through. However, to put that much effort into developing a quest that ultimately has no significance does seem rather strange. Yeah I've wondered a lot about maybe if it ties into the sinner too. They probably left it all intentionally vague so they could expand on it later at some point. But there is an altar at the main Venatori camp in the hissing wastes which looks very similar to the one in the temple which makes me think Corypheus knew a lot more about these old gods than he let on...maybe his plans include bringing them back somehow.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 12, 2020 3:26:35 GMT
The good-natured ones I would expect to mostly be too invested in their beliefs to entertain the idea of research that might contradict them. And my own metric for sensibility includes parameters like "doesn't believe in invisible sky-men just because a moldy old poem said to". I still think the best way to conduct an unbiased study is to do it without Chantry affiliation. They have a history of suppressing research, ever since Origins. It's just better to leave them out. Again, several of the ones we've met have been more sensible than that. And I've always thought that that metric for sensibility can only sensibly be applied after the scientific revolution, when we collectively realized that there were physical answers to be found beyond the moldy old poems that taught us how to have a civilization in the first place. And even now, only in places that message has gotten to and taken root. If you'd lived in the 1300s, or anywhere today where popular culture hasn't caught up yet, you'd have believed in invisible sky-men too, and it wouldn't have been your fault just for not pulling the scientific method and critical theory straight out of your ass without any cultural buildup. I agree that zero Chantry affiliation would be best, but they unfortunately seem to represent the most learned and educated people on the continent. And anyone else you may send from outside their umbrella would just be biased against them, rather than for them, which could prove even more dangerous. It wasn't as easy as "just find someone independent to verify the Church's claims and objectively compare their models with potential alternatives" historically, either.
|
|