Dragon Age Inquisition Game of the Year Edition Remastered?

I'd say the stiff facial animations are even more noticeable now, with all these games using advanced motion capture.

If they make a bundle like how they did with ME:LE, what do you think it should be named? Dragon Age: Epic Edition?

I don't ever see it happening.

Neither do I tbh.

Actually DAO and 2 aren't on the Unreal engine yes the ME trilogy is but DAO and 2 used Bioware's own engine. The same engine I believe they used for Baldur's Gate and all that. It's only from DAI onwards they went full on Frostbite Whilst I think I'd like to see DAO and 2 in nicer shinie rgraphics I jus tdon' tsee it happening because ME has always been popula rwhereas the DA series has always played second fiddle. Also the DA games ar muc bigger in terms of size and maps thatn say any of the ME games are I think so would require a lot more work.

Indeed that's one of the main erasons why I don' t think i twill happen because it's likely to bring DAO and 2 up to modern standards they'd likely have to look at a full remake rather than remaster. I'm not sayin gthe ywon' tconsider it on eda ybut right now I don't think they will. I could of cfourse be wrong because who knows what's going through Bioware's heads as I didn't think they'd necessarily remaster the ME trilogy but then they decided to go do just that. With the trilogy I guessthey co8uld get awa ywit hit because the gamepla ymechanics uused for it are pretty modern even if the graphics was a litle weak in som eareas but then in the4se cases we haqve to remember tha tthese  games aer 2 generations old s othey ewre always going to show their age a bit by now though tbh I neve thought the graphics were bad even by todays standards the graphics still stand up to a point, I will admit DAO and DA2 are weak graphics wise  but I think it would just require too muc hwork for them to consider it.

I think it might make it impossible, as far as a genuine remaster is concerned. BioWare’s proprietary engines from back then were hard to maintain at the time they were abandoned circa 2011, allegedly. And many of the programmers that worked on and maintained those engines have probably moved on.

There’s no updated version of the engine they could update to, which is the trick they used for the MELE.

They could potentially include updated textures and such, but we couldn’t expect much more from visual improvement, as you say. To do anything drastic they’d probably have to rebuild the whole game in a modern engine.

Now, they could potentially wrap the existing games all together in some sort of software wrapper that just launches each of them, but what would be the point?

DAI hasn't aged yet. I can see some bug fixes or maybe better hair, but it really doesn't need to be changed yet. I wouldn't be willing to pay 3rd time for this game based on these changes.

When it comes to DAO and especially DA2, I don't believe they can be upgraded. Both games would need to be re-made from scratch. I am interested in seeing DAO and DA2 as a beautiful modernized game - but purely visually.

I wouldn't want the story line, choices, characters, dialogues to be changed in the slightest - luckily these things could be kept.

I still don't see how it would work for Dragon Age. When I found out that the Legendary Edition was mostly an engine upgrade and a few tweaks it made sense to me. My experiences with Dragon Age is that there would need to be more work for it to work even as a remaster that I think makes it a less desirable outcome. Dragon Age: Origins was made using BioWare's internal engine Eclipse and Dragon Age 2 used an upgraded version of it called Lycium, and of course everyone knows that they used Frostbite for Inquisition. So there are three different game engines for any kind of remaster and I bet Eclipse and Lycium are like Unreal 3 and Unreal 4 even though they have similarities they are incompatible. With Mass Effect all three games were released using a version of Unreal 3 so they just upgraded the game engine for all three games to the last release of Unreal 3 with the assets from Mass Effect 2 and 3.

So if they are going to do anything for Origins or Dragon Age 2 it probably would require a remake for how many people are still fluent with BioWare's designed game engines this far out from Dragon Age 2 and how easily can they be updated. Now that gets into more expensive territory for it would be close to the cost of making a new game instead of having a small dedicated team work on it for a few months to a year. Then you get into the what if territory of who would make the game, for if you are looking at two or three years of development for each game do you outsource it to another company that might miss what people liked or what needed to be updated or even make changes that kill what BioWare put into the games that we liked. If its BioWare that would probably mean that any new game in the IPs is on hold for a period of time to get it done and we can see the reaction to Dragon Age: Inquisition being close to a decade out now.

Don't get me wrong, I would like to have an updated version of Dragon Age: Origins that I can play on my PC for I have given up on the game because of issues I have constantly now which I blame on Windows Vista. Even a slightly expanded Dragon Age 2 would be nice, but I just don't see the situation allowing it to happen with the amount of work to be done and the unknown market around the games.