Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2021 20:46:37 GMT
If that's the case, then someone moved the armor from London to that location with no sign of any battle damage especially after being shot by Harbinger. Sure it could mean Shepard would return, but I would say why they wouldn't show Shepard is not to have male or female show up. That way no one would be upset that they showed female instead of male or the other way around. I'm sure there are many versions from people on what they believe about the teaser, but with yours, what explanation about the reaper in the background and the one t'soni walks on? If Shepard is on an arc headed for Andromeda, that might be a good thing. Play as Shepard showing the duck how it's done. Likely has little Ryder end up being the janitor to keep the ship clean. I was going to respond in kind to the tenor of this post but then I realized a Shepard/ Ryder tag team would be hella bad ass and now I kinda want it. I wonder how people would feel about a Shepard/Alec Ryder tag team?... maybe the duck grows up to become a truly badass raptor (like his/her father).
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:01:18 GMT
36,901
colfoley
19,127
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jun 19, 2021 20:52:28 GMT
I was going to respond in kind to the tenor of this post but then I realized a Shepard/ Ryder tag team would be hella bad ass and now I kinda want it. I wonder how people would feel about a Shepard/Alec Ryder tag team?... maybe the duck grows up to become a truly badass raptor (like his/her father). See I already consider my Ryder to pretty much be a mega bad ass. Probably not on the Shepard level yet but the only thing Ryder is lacking is seasoning and experience and well he got a lot of that in Andromeda so it would be a shame to not see what kind of character that could lead to in a sequal. As that was pretty much the whole point of Andromeda Ryder learning to grow into his new responsibilities and what he was able to do in that game is quite frankly inspiring....and bad ass.
|
|
andydandymandy
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 285 Likes: 686
inherit
9775
0
686
andydandymandy
285
February 2018
andydandymandy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by andydandymandy on Jun 19, 2021 21:48:38 GMT
Anyone else having this issue? I feel like the MET is just written so much better... There's a lot more serious moments and drama, whereas Andromeda feels like it takes the piss out of its own story and characters. Like a real light hearted story where no one really dies except the bad guy and your dad who you never cared about coz he was around for like 5 seconds. I'd only played through MEA once, but the trilogy I've played through countless times. Although admittedly I've only played ME3 like 5 times. But 95% of MET was golden, golden enough that I'm obsessed enough to spend time on these forums talking about it. But it just feels like it ends there. MEA feels like the heart and soul is gone, now it's just a pretty graphics MEMEfest.
Honestly I would rather play MEA than ME1. It's just a better game in every way possible, I'm shocked by how poor the writing is in ME1 the characters are boring the galaxy is lifeless, the main quest is dull as dirt, Saren is a lame villain, most of the side quests are annoying and some are nothing more than glorified fetch quests. Shepard acts like a super naive or as an idiot or a just a racist and a fascist. ME2 and ME3 have are slightly better games because of all the universe building and ditching the reboot of BSG "realism" story for a more traditional sci-fi story.
ME1 was released at the right time to right audience, there was no major sci-fi space opera at that time in TV and movies, other than Doctor Who and that was show rebooted the year before ME1 came out, and it's only major competitor was Halo which has a good single player story (or so I've been told) but let be honest Halo is and will always be more famous for it's multiplayer than the quest of Master Chief, and by the time ME3 debuted sci-fi space opera were starting to make a come back with the Star Trek, Dr. Who, and Guardians of the Galaxy was coming out soon and new shows were coming out as well. I think that played a larger role in the success of the MET than a lot of people think and if ME1 was released two years later it's possible that it would've been another a cult classic like Jade Empire which is a fun and decent game but not successful enough for a sequel.
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren?
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:01:18 GMT
36,901
colfoley
19,127
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jun 19, 2021 23:47:55 GMT
Honestly I would rather play MEA than ME1. It's just a better game in every way possible, I'm shocked by how poor the writing is in ME1 the characters are boring the galaxy is lifeless, the main quest is dull as dirt, Saren is a lame villain, most of the side quests are annoying and some are nothing more than glorified fetch quests. Shepard acts like a super naive or as an idiot or a just a racist and a fascist. ME2 and ME3 have are slightly better games because of all the universe building and ditching the reboot of BSG "realism" story for a more traditional sci-fi story.
ME1 was released at the right time to right audience, there was no major sci-fi space opera at that time in TV and movies, other than Doctor Who and that was show rebooted the year before ME1 came out, and it's only major competitor was Halo which has a good single player story (or so I've been told) but let be honest Halo is and will always be more famous for it's multiplayer than the quest of Master Chief, and by the time ME3 debuted sci-fi space opera were starting to make a come back with the Star Trek, Dr. Who, and Guardians of the Galaxy was coming out soon and new shows were coming out as well. I think that played a larger role in the success of the MET than a lot of people think and if ME1 was released two years later it's possible that it would've been another a cult classic like Jade Empire which is a fun and decent game but not successful enough for a sequel.
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? Apparently. I don't know what the mystery is its up there in black and white.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Jun 20, 2021 0:38:53 GMT
Honestly I would rather play MEA than ME1. It's just a better game in every way possible, I'm shocked by how poor the writing is in ME1 the characters are boring the galaxy is lifeless, the main quest is dull as dirt, Saren is a lame villain, most of the side quests are annoying and some are nothing more than glorified fetch quests. Shepard acts like a super naive or as an idiot or a just a racist and a fascist. ME2 and ME3 have are slightly better games because of all the universe building and ditching the reboot of BSG "realism" story for a more traditional sci-fi story.
ME1 was released at the right time to right audience, there was no major sci-fi space opera at that time in TV and movies, other than Doctor Who and that was show rebooted the year before ME1 came out, and it's only major competitor was Halo which has a good single player story (or so I've been told) but let be honest Halo is and will always be more famous for it's multiplayer than the quest of Master Chief, and by the time ME3 debuted sci-fi space opera were starting to make a come back with the Star Trek, Dr. Who, and Guardians of the Galaxy was coming out soon and new shows were coming out as well. I think that played a larger role in the success of the MET than a lot of people think and if ME1 was released two years later it's possible that it would've been another a cult classic like Jade Empire which is a fun and decent game but not successful enough for a sequel.
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? Oh please, they aren't the worst. Sovereign and Harbinger are worse villains for example, since they don't even really have characters or motivations or anything.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:01:18 GMT
36,901
colfoley
19,127
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Jun 20, 2021 0:41:04 GMT
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? Oh please, they aren't the worst. Sovereign and Harbinger are worse villains for example, since they don't even really have characters or motivations or anything. Collectors as an aggregrate get my vote.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Jun 20, 2021 1:09:03 GMT
Oh please, they aren't the worst. Sovereign and Harbinger are worse villains for example, since they don't even really have characters or motivations or anything. Collectors as an aggregate get my vote. They were just husks. The only one to show anything beyond mindless mook were the ones possessed by Harbinger, so they fall under him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 1:25:50 GMT
Honestly I would rather play MEA than ME1. It's just a better game in every way possible, I'm shocked by how poor the writing is in ME1 the characters are boring the galaxy is lifeless, the main quest is dull as dirt, Saren is a lame villain, most of the side quests are annoying and some are nothing more than glorified fetch quests. Shepard acts like a super naive or as an idiot or a just a racist and a fascist. ME2 and ME3 have are slightly better games because of all the universe building and ditching the reboot of BSG "realism" story for a more traditional sci-fi story.
ME1 was released at the right time to right audience, there was no major sci-fi space opera at that time in TV and movies, other than Doctor Who and that was show rebooted the year before ME1 came out, and it's only major competitor was Halo which has a good single player story (or so I've been told) but let be honest Halo is and will always be more famous for it's multiplayer than the quest of Master Chief, and by the time ME3 debuted sci-fi space opera were starting to make a come back with the Star Trek, Dr. Who, and Guardians of the Galaxy was coming out soon and new shows were coming out as well. I think that played a larger role in the success of the MET than a lot of people think and if ME1 was released two years later it's possible that it would've been another a cult classic like Jade Empire which is a fun and decent game but not successful enough for a sequel.
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? This sounds the only determining factor in your book is the nature of the villain... ignoring that colfoley cited several other factors on which his/her opinion is based. Personally, I don't think Saren is a particularly orginal or strong or well-written villain. To me, he's really just a stereotypical villain and I was extremely disappointed when the final confrontation amounted to Shepard spouting off a one-liner that causes him to kill himself. The MET also has Kai Leng as a villain... and I think he probably ranks lower than the Archon.
The Archon is probably equivalent to Harbinger... who really doesn't have a personality beyond of bit of trash talking. The heir apparent villain in Andromeda was Primus... who we know disagrees with the kett leadership and at least tried to betray the Archon by cutting a deal with Ryder in order to come into his power over the kett. I consider it a shame that we may never find out where Bioware was headed in his character development. Another villain in Andromeda was Akksul, who was a more fully developed villain than Saren and whose downfall was more interesting that Saren just offing himself after a one-liner. Akksul watched his power slip away from him as his followers saw who he really was.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Jun 20, 2021 3:28:08 GMT
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? This sounds the only determining factor in your book is the nature of the villain... ignoring that colfoley cited several other factors on which his/her opinion is based. Personally, I don't think Saren is a particularly orginal or strong or well-written villain. To me, he's really just a stereotypical villain and I was extremely disappointed when the final confrontation amounted to Shepard spouting off a one-liner that causes him to kill himself. The MET also has Kai Leng as a villain... and I think he probably ranks lower than the Archon.
The Archon is probably equivalent to Harbinger... who really doesn't have a personality beyond of bit of trash talking. The heir apparent villain in Andromeda was Primus... who we know disagrees with the kett leadership and at least tried to betray the Archon by cutting a deal with Ryder in order to come into his power over the kett. I consider it a shame that we may never find out where Bioware was headed in his character development. Another villain in Andromeda was Akksul, who was a more fully developed villain than Saren and whose downfall was more interesting that Saren just offing himself after a one-liner. Akksul watched his power slip away from him as his followers saw who he really was.
That outcome with Saren is only possible if you use maxed Paragon or Renegade options. Which, as you mentioned concerning the situation on Virmire with Wrex, its actually the non-preferred outcome to an otherwise superior scenario. If you don't pick those options then Saren rejects Shepard's logic and you have to fight him as Saren, and then has hopper-Saren.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
24,097
smilesja
14,567
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Jun 20, 2021 4:22:05 GMT
Honestly I would rather play MEA than ME1. It's just a better game in every way possible, I'm shocked by how poor the writing is in ME1 the characters are boring the galaxy is lifeless, the main quest is dull as dirt, Saren is a lame villain, most of the side quests are annoying and some are nothing more than glorified fetch quests. Shepard acts like a super naive or as an idiot or a just a racist and a fascist. ME2 and ME3 have are slightly better games because of all the universe building and ditching the reboot of BSG "realism" story for a more traditional sci-fi story.
ME1 was released at the right time to right audience, there was no major sci-fi space opera at that time in TV and movies, other than Doctor Who and that was show rebooted the year before ME1 came out, and it's only major competitor was Halo which has a good single player story (or so I've been told) but let be honest Halo is and will always be more famous for it's multiplayer than the quest of Master Chief, and by the time ME3 debuted sci-fi space opera were starting to make a come back with the Star Trek, Dr. Who, and Guardians of the Galaxy was coming out soon and new shows were coming out as well. I think that played a larger role in the success of the MET than a lot of people think and if ME1 was released two years later it's possible that it would've been another a cult classic like Jade Empire which is a fun and decent game but not successful enough for a sequel.
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 8:35:46 GMT
This sounds the only determining factor in your book is the nature of the villain... ignoring that colfoley cited several other factors on which his/her opinion is based. Personally, I don't think Saren is a particularly orginal or strong or well-written villain. To me, he's really just a stereotypical villain and I was extremely disappointed when the final confrontation amounted to Shepard spouting off a one-liner that causes him to kill himself. The MET also has Kai Leng as a villain... and I think he probably ranks lower than the Archon.
The Archon is probably equivalent to Harbinger... who really doesn't have a personality beyond of bit of trash talking. The heir apparent villain in Andromeda was Primus... who we know disagrees with the kett leadership and at least tried to betray the Archon by cutting a deal with Ryder in order to come into his power over the kett. I consider it a shame that we may never find out where Bioware was headed in his character development. Another villain in Andromeda was Akksul, who was a more fully developed villain than Saren and whose downfall was more interesting that Saren just offing himself after a one-liner. Akksul watched his power slip away from him as his followers saw who he really was.
That outcome with Saren is only possible if you use maxed Paragon or Renegade options. Which, as you mentioned concerning the situation on Virmire with Wrex, its actually the non-preferred outcome to an otherwise superior scenario. If you don't pick those options then Saren rejects Shepard's logic and you have to fight him as Saren, and then has hopper-Saren. Actually, you can charm/intimidate Saren at the end with only 9 points of either if you charmed/intimidated him on Virmire (which requires only 7 points). Jeong is the only character in the game where the player must have 12 charm/intimidate points to talk them down. I would also argue that taking down Archon is the "superior encounter" combat-wise overall. I would have loved to have been able to fire some shots at the Archon directly, but the overall battle in Andromeda was a lot more challenging and fun than the final 2 battles in the OT ME1. They have spiced it up a bit in the legendary edition by adding some random geth to both encounters, but it still doesn't get my adrenaline flowing the way the final battle in Andromeda does. Who knows... maybe in 14 years they'll remaster Andromeda and allow you to shoot Archon directly at the end of the battle rather than frying him electrically via a computer terminal.
|
|
quarianmasterrace
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
PSN: QuarianMasteRace
Posts: 175 Likes: 612
inherit
11914
0
Jun 30, 2024 13:27:10 GMT
612
quarianmasterrace
175
May 14, 2021 21:10:25 GMT
May 2021
quarianmasterrace
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
QuarianMasteRace
|
Post by quarianmasterrace on Jun 20, 2021 10:23:20 GMT
You say Saren is a lame villain while saying Andromeda is the better game, even though Andromeda has the Archon as the main villain, who is neck and neck with Corypheus in Dragon Age Inquisition as the two worst villains in BioWare history. Are you saying The Archon is a better villain than Saren? Oh please, they aren't the worst. Sovereign and Harbinger are worse villains for example, since they don't even really have characters or motivations or anything. The funny monke guy has a character beyond "muahahah im evul badmans im gonna assimilate u"? Could've fooled me. They're the same sort of one dimensional villain but the Reapers had superior audiovisual designs with loads of screen presence. It's why they became iconic despite being one dimensional. Archon's writer knows this, as he tries way too hard to ape Sovereign (e.g. introduced with "I won't explain what you can't understand" vs "rudimentary creatures of flesh and blood, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding) yet lacks any of the presence to justify it because he's just some scrawny humanoid dude not a gigantic alien starship looking thing. He just ends up looking like an edgelord spouting off one liners with that, seeing as he just explained to us his motivation is to find the guy who activated the vault so he can maybe figure out how to do it too. Little late to try going back to being all mysterious. Constantly getting hit with idiot balls so the protagonist can win and getting clowned on in general makes him pretty similar to Cory or Malak actually. It doesn't help that instead of any intimidation factor, he looks like a cute monke that needs you to feed him some orange slices.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 11:16:38 GMT
Oh please, they aren't the worst. Sovereign and Harbinger are worse villains for example, since they don't even really have characters or motivations or anything. The funny monke guy has a character beyond "muahahah im evul badmans im gonna assimilate u"? Could've fooled me. They're the same sort of one dimensional villain but the Reapers had superior audiovisual designs with loads of screen presence. It's why they became iconic despite being one dimensional. Archon's writer knows this, as he tries way too hard to ape Sovereign (e.g. introduced with "I won't explain what you can't understand" vs "rudimentary creatures of flesh and blood, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding) yet lacks any of the presence to justify it because he's just some scrawny humanoid dude not a gigantic alien starship looking thing. He just ends up looking like an edgelord spouting off one liners with that, seeing as he just explained to us his motivation is to find the guy who activated the vault so he can maybe figure out how to do it too. Little late to try going back to being all mysterious. Constantly getting hit with idiot balls so the protagonist can win and getting clowned on in general makes him pretty similar to Cory or Malak actually. It doesn't help that instead of any intimidation factor, he looks like a cute monke that needs you to feed him some orange slices. I agree that the biggest problem with Archon is that he doesn't appear intimidating enough... so that actually brings us back to the one big criticism people had with Andromeda... facial animations. It would have perhaps been more to the point if Archon had actually morphed into an organic Architect... instead of doing the Doc Ock impersonation from Spider-man 2.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Jun 20, 2021 12:32:31 GMT
ah yes Archie. What a joke. Had I been the Archon, I would have fired on the salarian ship while the duck was stuck in the stasis field or whatever it was called. Then I would have left some troops behind on the Nexus while I take the Hyperion for a joy ride forcing the Ryder duck to choose to save. Then again, I would likely have exalted the little one after stabbing them with my giant needle. I found him more intimidating when first seen where he doesn't say anything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 13:12:19 GMT
ah yes Archie. What a joke. Had I been the Archon, I would have fired on the salarian ship while the duck was stuck in the stasis field or whatever it was called. Then I would have left some troops behind on the Nexus while I take the Hyperion for a joy ride forcing the Ryder duck to choose to save. Then again, I would likely have exalted the little one after stabbing them with my giant needle. I found him more intimidating when first seen where he doesn't say anything. Ryder wasn't still on the Salarian ship when the Archon captured them... he/she was in the area of the Archon's ship where they had interrogated several Salarians and the Moshae... so you would have blown up your own ship to kill Ryder. Also, he wanted to keep the Salarian "test subjects" that were still aboard the Salarian vessels as viable test subjects.
There is also no proof that Archon successfully boarded Nexus. He boarded Hyperion. They were linked (and for convenience to the player, easily accessed via the tram); but they were two separate vessels. We are told that Hyperion had no weapons, but it's never made clear what nature of defenses Nexus might have. Also, defenses don't have to be offensive in nature to be highly effective as defenses. Perhaps a vastly superior defense system that we just haven't been shown yet
The Citadel, apparently, was able to clam-up and pose a significant barrier to Sovereign; yet the only defenses we ever saw were a few small garden-variety turrets... of the same type we see at a number of colonies in ME2... all of which failed to defend themselves from mere collectors... even after the Alliance added a Guardian laser to one of them.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Jun 20, 2021 13:56:57 GMT
Ryder wasn't still on the Salarian ship when the Archon captured them... he/she was in the area of the Archon's ship where they had interrogated several Salarians and the Moshae... so you would have blown up your own ship to kill Ryder. Read what I posted. I said I would fire on the salarian ship while Ryder was trapped in the stasis field. He would have come to the conclusion that he wasn't get anymore from them then he already had. There is no proof I said he was the Nexus. Again, read what I posted. Ah yes the defenses discussion, again. If the Nexus had any defenses, whatever they might be, why isn't there any sign of a battle surrounding the Nexus? Did plot show up giving all the characters the script to the game to not fight back except the handful seen when controlling Ryder sister/brother? This has to do with what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 14:08:44 GMT
Ryder wasn't still on the Salarian ship when the Archon captured them... he/she was in the area of the Archon's ship where they had interrogated several Salarians and the Moshae... so you would have blown up your own ship to kill Ryder. Read what I posted. I said I would fire on the salarian ship while Ryder was trapped in the stasis field. He would have come to the conclusion that he wasn't get anymore from them then he already had. There is no proof I said he was the Nexus. Again, read what I posted. Ah yes the defenses discussion, again. If the Nexus had any defenses, whatever they might be, why isn't there any sign of a battle surrounding the Nexus? Did plot show up giving all the characters the script to the game to not fight back except the handful seen when controlling Ryder sister/brother? This has to do with what? 1) Ryder and crew sneak aboard the Salarian ship and then cross over onto the Archon's ship using the tether that Archon has between the two ships as a conduit. What stasis field?... Archon doesn't know Tempest is there yet.
2) The attack at the end of the game occurs completely on Hyperion. When does Archon ever board Nexus in the game?
3) You're thinking of offensive weapons on Nexus, not defensive defenses that could prevent a boarding without a battle. The Citadel could prevent the Reapers from invading, apparently, by simply clam-shelling closed and the relay being closed. Why couldn't there be a similar defense on Nexus... and when Archon arrives and finds Nexus impenetrable, he diverts his attention to just taking Hyperion.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Jun 20, 2021 14:22:21 GMT
1) Ryder and crew sneak aboard the Salarian ship and then cross over onto the Archon's ship. What' stasis field... Archon doesn't know Tempest is there yet./ Obviously you didn't read my post. You don't remember the duck being trapped in that field on Archie's ship? You don't remember when Archie stuck that needle in the duck? I'm having a hard time reading my post saying Archie was on the Nexus. If you can, post a link where I said Archie was on the Nexus? Wrong. I've never suggested having offensive weapons, The same for the ships traveling to Andromeda. I've always gone with defensive. I have suggested why not use something similar to what we have today. Something what the Navy uses. Look it up if you want more information.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 14:27:38 GMT
1) Ryder and crew sneak aboard the Salarian ship and then cross over onto the Archon's ship. What' stasis field... Archon doesn't know Tempest is there yet./ Obviously you didn't read my post. You don't remember the duck being trapped in that field on Archie's ship? You don't remember when Archie stuck that needle in the duck? I'm having a hard time reading my post saying Archie was on the Nexus. If you can, post a link where I said Archie was on the Nexus? Wrong. I've never suggested having offensive weapons, The same for the ships traveling to Andromeda. I've always gone with defensive. I have suggested why not use something similar to what we have today. Something what the Navy uses. Look it up if you want more information. You're the one mis-remembering. Ryder was on Archon's ship when he stuck the needle in him and he "was clinically dead for 28 seconds." He had snuck onto the Archon's ship from the salarian vessel using the tether as conduit. Go look up Youtube video and refresh your memory.
Archie was not on the Nexus. Again, look at a Youtube video since you obviously refuse to play the game.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Jun 20, 2021 14:40:15 GMT
You're the one mis-remembering. Ryder was on Archon's ship when he stuck the needle in him and he "was clinically dead for 28 seconds." He had snuck onto the Archon's ship from the salarian vessel using the tether as conduit. Go look up Youtube video and refresh your memory. Yes Ryder was on Archon's ship when stuck with the needle. I never said he/she wasn't. I never said Archon was on the Nexus
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 14:44:59 GMT
You're the one mis-remembering. Ryder was on Archon's ship when he stuck the needle in him and he "was clinically dead for 28 seconds." He had snuck onto the Archon's ship from the salarian vessel using the tether as conduit. Go look up Youtube video and refresh your memory. Yes Ryder was on Archon's ship when stuck with the needle. I never said he/she wasn't. I never said Archon was on the Nexus 1) OK progress - Archon won't fire on the Salarian vessel because, at that point in time, he thinks the Salarian pathfinder is still in stasis somewhere on the vessel. He doesn't know that Ryder found her and revived her. Also, there are numerous other Salarians on the vessel, which he could exalt. You say he would have concluded there was nothing more to be gained from that vessel, but the very fact that it was tethered when Ryder arrived indicates that he believed there was still something of value on that ship.
2) You said he would leave troops on Nexus... but if he could not board Nexus, he couldn't leave troops there either.
|
|
14thcommander
N2
Your Fave Vanguard Knucklehead
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Posts: 220 Likes: 612
inherit
11921
0
Jan 17, 2023 15:41:11 GMT
612
14thcommander
Your Fave Vanguard Knucklehead
220
May 16, 2021 15:14:45 GMT
May 2021
14thcommander
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by 14thcommander on Jun 20, 2021 15:21:04 GMT
Listen, even if you don't think the morality system or the choices that carry over are that important to you gameplay wise, it is used as a selling point and as something that is unique to MET. Hence, why it's one of the main selling point. When businesses try to get you to buy their thing instead of the other guy's thing, they will throw the unique parts of it in your face first and show you what differentiates their game from the other games. Before I even played the first one I knew about Paragon/Renegade Shepards and the choices. I never said anything about choices carrying over. I was just talking about the P/R morality system. Choices carrying over are absolutely a huge part. Heck that’s one of my main concerns with both DA4 and ME5. Same, I have no idea how they're going to go about that in the next games. And some people have said DA4 got a rocky start and the original idea got scrapped once and they started over.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Jun 20, 2021 15:49:09 GMT
You said he would leave troops on Nexus... but if he could not board Nexus, he couldn't leave troops there either.] Why would him not being on the Nexus prevent leaving troops on the Nexus?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11913
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:23:20 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2021 18:44:47 GMT
You said he would leave troops on Nexus... but if he could not board Nexus, he couldn't leave troops there either.] Why would him not being on the Nexus prevent leaving troops on the Nexus? Why couldn't the Reapers just stick geth troops on the Citadel without first finding the conduit? The whole ME1 was on the Reapers not being able to access the Citadel without some sort of "inside mole" - the keepers - first unlocking its defenses and opening the relay. You're the one who has always defended that the ME1 story makes sense.
So... for all we know, the Nexus could have a similar defense barrier-type mechanism that stopped the Archon from setting foot on the Nexus itself. The only difference is that it's not the keepers who have the key to opening the Nexus up and/or locking it down tight. It's likely Tann or even Kesh.
Either that or you have to admit that ME1 makes no sense because obviously the Reaper laser-eye weapons are more powerful than anything the Kett have and Sovereign should have, therefore, been able to get through to "boarding" the Citadel without having to first 1) spends eons scouring the galaxy for allies and 2) without first finding the Conduit... regardless of whether or not the keepers listened to the signal he sent them to open the relay.
Bottom line - You can't leave troops on a ship you can't board.
|
|
Exile Isan
N3
You must gather your party before venturing forth.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
XBL Gamertag: ExileIsan
Posts: 623 Likes: 1,858
inherit
3410
0
1,858
Exile Isan
You must gather your party before venturing forth.
623
February 2017
exileisan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ExileIsan
|
Post by Exile Isan on Jun 20, 2021 19:56:23 GMT
Or didn't have any reason to board. The Archon wanted SAM and Scott/Sara, who are both on the Hyperion. He had no reason to take control of the Nexus as it wasn't relevant to his plans of controlling Meridian. Only the Hyperion was.
|
|