New Patch?

I played the Legendary Edition many times and there are only a few minor glitches and no major bug. At least not in my playtroughs.

So from what kind of issue you are talking about?

Why not check out OP's link? There are lots of answers to your question there.

It's a tricky one. If you start to unravel too many old bugs, it's hard to know what else will come undone.

At the very least, the achievements should work and the game should get you to the end. I'll put backwards walking mechs down as 'charm'.

I am trying to gently poke about behind the scenes to find out about patching plans, though if I do find out I likely won't be able to say anything about it.

As it stands I know nothing (I'm not unable to say something).

Well at least most old bugs that don't hamper player progress would have been great to have fixed by now, but as you said and what I have experienced in my Electronic Engineering classes when you try to fix one bad line you end up damamging the entire project so it makes you do multiple attemps and even accept one small thing that doesn't affect progress.

What the ME1 LE is amazing and that automatically means that the other games are as well, don't demand much of a Remaster from glorious studio Bioware (end sarcasm). 

The MELE is a glorious rendition of our best Trilogy but like the original ME3 and ME2 Arrival DLC they should have taken a bit of their time if they were including 2 and 3 as part of the package as it is, it feels like the original goal was individual releases by a date and then the other two got added as well and Bioware had to use some of it's magic to deliver the product. I have beaten multiple times the games and I have Platinumed all three (missing Paramour 3 for the romance not triggering post Collectors Base as the original release in ME2) on the PS4 but quite frankly, there comes a time when you just get tired of replaying ME2 and ME3 and finding new issues with every new run (because the mind is already used to familiar sights it tend to deviate and do a more critical analysis of the games and spot things that aren't supposed to be there in the first place). 

It's still frustrating that after doing everything to not side with Cerberus: blowing up the Collectors Base, saving David, helping Jack destroy the base on Pragia after giving her access to those files, saving David and not sending Cerberus evidence to them of that dead operative (keeping the data for ourselves or sending it to Anderson) Jack treats one like we helped Cerberus (modders have made a scene that acknowledges those choices and prevents her from punching you) as well leaving the Virmire Survivor in full distrust mode from the start like, I am actually thrilled to have at least one person who is concerned about the things Cerberus could have done to Shepard (Miranda admits to almost placing a mind control chip only to be stopped by TIM and the Alliance kept the Commander Cerberus files under wraps as they were part of what the player would be charged on top of the Alpha Relay incident) only James and Anderson knew. The VS could have actually visited the Commander IF the player took the anti Cerberus route (as leaving the Collectors Base intact amounts to nothing) but it was clear from the Bioware point of view that they needed an antagonist amongst Shepard group and hastily wrote that for either of the VS.

Hello man great to see you here as well, I should have used my Answers HQ username but decided to keep things fresh, I am thankful for that wonderful look into game development and as I accept all the points given they had a second chance with the LE and still they shipped ME3 with mostly the same bugs although the part where Ken and Gabby have their banter isn't an issue for me as they have always done their arc if we have them on board.

Spaghetti code in turn is usually caused by crunch time, as things get done in a more and more hasty manner by horribly overworked devs as the deadline looms ever closer like a ten foot bony guy in a robe with a scythe on his shoulder. And crunch time is caused by management deciding features and deadlines without consulting anyone from tech about how realistic (or not) their ideas are. The product gets delivered in a somewhat functioning state, devs go on vacation (or therapy) so someone else has to fix it, and the lesson management takes from it is "Hey it worked again" (unless it's a complete disaster like Anthem).

Sure, but was that the case for Bioware back then? They supported ME for a few years after each release if I recall and in this particular case the amount of work is far less than it takes to build a new game (99% of the code is already there and has been reused) its not ridiculous to think bugs which were raised in 2007 would have been addressed in 2021. Sure they haven't worked on ME1 from the time it was released to now but they did have common game-breaking bugs publicly listed/raised. Work should have been done to resolve these bugs. For example the biotic bug in ME1, if you fight Saryn and you or your squadmates use power at the first stage of the fight then the game often crashes. I have had this happen to me with the original ME1 on Xbox and MELE on PC. It doesn't happen to everyone but its common enough that a lot of people have complained about it.it doesn't look like Bioware ever bothered to look at this.

Or a more recent bug being ME3 can't play well over 120FPS (shield bug in which ur shield doesn't regenerate). This was flagged towards the end of the ME3 life cycle where PC's were becoming powerful enough to run the game at over 120FPS. Modern PC's can easily run the game at 240FPS consistently,the trouble is the game is broken at that frame rate and makes the experience not fun at all (funnily enough this isn't a problem with ME1 or ME2)

I like to see a patch fixing ems issues.

Admiral Xen gives 25 warassets, yet it's not available in the remaster
getting 100 war assets for scanning resources in ME2. I've tried numerous ways to get that 100. I did it once on the ps3, and when I did the exact same thing in the next playthrough I only got 25. The same thing happened with the remaster. I've gotten 25 on all playthroughs.
Since 7500 is required for the breath scene, it invalidates a few of my playthroughs since I can't get the same result as I did on the ps3. I like to see the requirement dropped. If 3100 is required before the remaster, and readiness is at 100%, with the remaster, make getting the breath scene be 6200.

A quick cash grab at the cost of reputation, long term that impacts them. Sure going through old code might be time consuming (especially if it doesn't follow their current coding standards/practice) but that's what a competent software company would do (that would normally be the case even in game development).

I feel fans are way too quick to let the devs off the hook and don't hold them into account, long term that results in lazy and rushed releases and not the quality people expect. Is it a challenge fixing old bugs? Sure, does it need to be done? Yes especially if you are releasing that old code with a fresher paint job and are expecting people to pay modern prices...

They should have replaced Diana Allers with Barney Stinson. Then it would have been...

wait for it...

Legen... dary!