Noble or commoner human

You have a point but DA2 came out 10 years ago and even in that comparatively short time attitudes have changed about what is perceived as acceptable in products for entertainment. Also, many of the people involved with those early entries in the universe, including the lead writer, have now left so the way things are depicted is going to be entirely at the discretion of those on the current writing team.

What is noticeable from Tevinter Nights is that there is now an anti-slavery faction in Tevinter when there has never been any suggestion of this in the past. (Why would Dorian have considered slavery in the way he did and never thought to question it if there was an anti-slavery faction promoting the southern viewpoint in Tevinter?)  Yet apparently some members of the Venatori only joined that organisation because they thought it was anti-slavery. I know Calpernia had a personal ideal of this sort and did free a number of slaves to be on her team but I find it hard to imagine Venatori like Erimond buying into her aims or anyone who was trying to restore the glory of Ancient Tevinter. This seems borne out by the fact that with Calpernia out of the way, the leaders of the Venatori have now no qualms about abusing the slaves in their ownership and those few who allegedly did think slave freedom was part of the agenda, have now left the organisation. So it does appear the writers are now framing the situation as the bad guys favour slavery and the good guys don't, bearing in mind Dorian has now freed all his slaves, having been persuaded of the error of the attitude he expressed to the Inquisitor. At the very least I think they are going to play down the fact that certain people, like Maevaris, still think Dorian's action was rather quaint.

So I think it is highly unlikely that will be creating a human noble protagonist who starts the game as a keeper of slaves, unless they use that to introduce the idea of them experiencing a dramatic fall from grace at the very beginning, so they are stripped of their citizenship and end up in the slave market. That would fulfill the requirement for them to start the game with no power and be able to show the power structure within Tevinter at the same time. In fact, if they were going to allow different races, they could all start off within the same introductory story but as different roles within the household. For example, they could be a Tal'Vashoth bodyguard, an elven slave or a dwarven overseer. All would end up in the slave market along with their master. Then either the city is attacked by the Qunari with the PC escaping in the ensuing chaos, or (if we start off in Minrathous) the PC is "purchased" by an interested party, who promises to liberate them but for a price.

Hanako, you are actually EXACTLY the person I was thinking of when I composed that entire post. All I ever see you do (when you aren't bitching about how DA4 is already ruined) is criticise fictional oppressed people for not licking the boot and begging for more.

The Chantry conducted an exalted march on Rivain literally between the second and third games, and it is complicit in the Orlesian invasion of Ferelden, which occurred in Loghain's lifetime, and it's abuse of mages and elves is ONGOING. It's not ancient at all. If you don't understand that much, and can't make an argument without 1) lying about the content we're discussing and 2) lying about my own arguments (which I can just scroll up and read), then please, please god, just don't reply to me at all.

Oh, so NOW all of a sudden we're caring about children?

But not the mutant children who get torn from their families and locked up in rape dungeons and then eventually slaughtered because the first enchanter got too uppity. Only the important children.

Don't presume to fucking lecture me about the deaths of innocents, when it's clear you're willing to swallow literally any atrocity as long as it's in the name of the setting's obvious stand-in for white Christianity.

Lily was also making plans to run away. Nothing's stopping priests from leaving if they want. I'll concede that Templars have been leashed by an addictive substance, but that only excuses not running away, it does not excuse literally everything else they do, and I'm not just referring to the "corrupt" ones, the system is abusive at its core.

And to be clear, I do not "deny" that Anders may have killed people that might conceivably be called "innocent", I have made the calculated decision to not care about that, because nobody who brings this point up ever does so in good faith. What upsets people isn't that Anders kills "innocents", they don't give a single flying fuck about the innumerable innocent mages, elves or innocent anyone else who died due to the abuse or negligence or exalted marches of the Chantry, so clearly they don't care about "innocents" at all. What actually upsets them is that Anders acted at all, instead of waiting for the people stepping on his neck to just miraculously stop of their own accord.

It's the same old song, no matter what the context,  fictional or real. Whenever oppressed people fight back in any meaningful, effective way that actually works, they get criticised. There's never a "right" way to rebel, or protest, or defend themselves. The only "moral" thing an oppressed person can do is die while waiting for their oppressors to change their minds.

Oppressors are not entitled to infinite time to change their minds, and the oppressed are not obligated to be patient. If some of the people Anders killed might have eventually one day been swayed by reasoned debate, tough. They already had plenty of time, and anyone who argues otherwise is just transparently attempting to reinforce oppression. 

Panda I don't know what Templar Apologist you've mistaken me for but thankfully, I'm not one of them. 
(Although I'm beginning to lean in that direction with all these whataboutery """""""arguments"""""" they'd have to deal with alongside Anders apologists.)

So again, explain to us how the kiddies Anders blew to bits had ample enough time to change their minds on a conflict they were too young to understand.

But if the templars don't do what they're told then they'll end up like Samson (begging in the streets for 'dwarf dust'). Lyrium is like heroin. They can't function without it. So the templars are victims of this corrupt system just like the mages. Also, whether what Anders did works or doesn't work depends entirely on player choices: if both your Hawke and the Inquisitor choose to side with the templars instead of the mages then all Anders' terrorist attack accomplished was getting hundreds of mages killed (as well as all the other innocent lives lost not only in the initial explosion but also in the conflict between mages and the templars). 

It's curious to me how you make assumptions about what "upsets" people. I'm not upset by anything that happens in this fictional world. But I don't like hypocrisy or double-standards. Two wrongs don't make a right. 

Lol "the elves are notoriously bad with their own history".

Well golly-gee, I wonder why.