Noble or commoner human

So like, declaring the Inquisition for a specific goal. I declared in game why I did things, I want to declare all throughout why I'm doing things. And people be like, I HEARD you like MONEY so how about... I HEARD you like HELPING PEOPLE so how about...

I doubt they'll give that as options, since being part of that group they'll just say you feel certain ways about things. 

Show me the evidence in Thedas, or even in our world prior to the modern era? The only example I can think of in Thedas is when the Vael family managed to bring about a peaceful coup in Starkhaven. They did that by organising a sit-in on the Chantry steps, so were utilising people's faith to bring about change, the person they were opposing being a corrupt secular ruler. I also think enough people were suffering under his rule, even the nobility, that they got the necessary support they needed.

I thought something similar might have been possible in Kirkwall if Meredith hadn't been the one who had taken control of secular power because so long as Elthina didn't publicly opposed her then she had tacit Chantry support, which the majority of people would be unwilling to challenge. When I replayed DA2 recently I realised that the writers had rather clouded the issue by making it seem like it was purely Orsino versus Meredith, mages versus Templars, when in fact at the beginning of Act 3 Orsino wasn't arguing for mage freedom but that Meredith should relinquish her hold on secular power. Meredith maintained she would when the city was "safe", which as Orsino rightly said, effectively meant "never". Kirkwall was rapidly heading to be another Tantervale, where everything is run to the strictest Andrastrian standards. The nobility were aware of this, which is why some of them reach out to Hawke if they side with Orsino.

This is why I thought it ironic that Varric thought that siding with the Templars was "defending our way of life", because with the mages out of the way, his shady society of wheeler dealers would have been next on the list. It was his great good fortune that Meredith went nuts. Anders bombing the Chantry brought things to a head much quicker but the Divine was already considering an Exalted March before that. However, it wasn't just the mages that were the problem with Kirkwall, the whole set up was corrupt, which is why the Arishok finally lost his cool. To be honest, the Anders bomb was done for shock value and to ensure that people would be so outraged at least some would side with the Templars. If the writers had focused more on what was actually happening politically and allowed Hawke to maintain a neutral stance on mage versus Templars, even support a moderate Chantry position on mages, whilst opposing Meredith's martial rule, that would have given a third way and the possibility for a resolution that didn't end in bloodshed. In fact, I remember the first time I played the game I did exactly that; tried to occupy the middle ground and work for a peaceful solution. Unfortunately, that doesn't make for exciting game play so clearly that was never going to be an option.