inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 2, 2021 17:35:06 GMT
Yes yes, it was all Solas, and then nobody else ever did anything bad to the elves ever again. Never said that. But yes or no, Solas’s actions caused elves to lose a lot of their history?
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 2, 2021 17:42:07 GMT
It was the elves that told that, though, wasn't it? As we saw in DA:I, elves are notoriously bad with their own history, so I'm not sure we can take it at face value. There are pyramids on Par Vollen, but that doesn't mean the humans didn't exist elsewhere. Well, dwarves history records a time before humans were on Thedas too. And World of Thedas seems to confirm that. Maybe humanity doesn’t know or forgotten that, but consider it’s been thousands of years more likely it just doesn’t matter anymore. Would have liked a game that focuses on exploration. Maybe Josephine helps, since she has wanted to explore beyond the map. But seems Antiva is being wasted on this story in DA4 instead. The dwarves also tell us that memories are often erased. To the point where such things are trivial: Valta was kicked from her position for that. It's hard to imagine humanity not knowing where they came from, especially since Tevinter has an ancient history, there would surely be some kind of record about travelling from Par Vollen. I'm of the theory that humans didn't exist until after the Veil.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Sept 2, 2021 17:46:06 GMT
Statements like "two wrongs don't make a right" are exactly the sort of thing I am talking about. Nobody provides a meaningful alternative, they only criticise Anders for acting. And the same goes for any oppressed person who ever does anything remotely effective , or even ineffective but noticeable. Blowing shit up is "too far", throwing rocks at the authorities who've raided your nightclub and are beating you without provocation is "too far", marching is "too far", chanting is "too far", kneeling during a particular song is "too far". So unless you can finally tell me what the "acceptable" way to protest is, I'm going to write this off as more empty criticism. I don't know whether you're upset by this particular thing or not, I was speaking generally, but obviously you have some kind of an emotional attachment, because you're here, posting on the fan forum. Meaningful alternatives have been provided tons of times over the decade since the game came out. And let’s not equate civil protesters to terrorists okay? Certain groups already do that enough. Oh well how very convenient. You don't need to make an argument because a million imaginary people before you already did. I don't agree with your apparent definition of "terrorist" as "evil", so I'll use it if I want, thanks.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 2, 2021 17:47:18 GMT
Well, dwarves history records a time before humans were on Thedas too. And World of Thedas seems to confirm that. Maybe humanity doesn’t know or forgotten that, but consider it’s been thousands of years more likely it just doesn’t matter anymore. Would have liked a game that focuses on exploration. Maybe Josephine helps, since she has wanted to explore beyond the map. But seems Antiva is being wasted on this story in DA4 instead. The dwarves also tell us that memories are often erased. To the point where such things are trivial: Valta was kicked from her position for that. It's hard to imagine humanity not knowing where they came from, especially since Tevinter has an ancient history, there would surely be some kind of record about travelling from Par Vollen. I'm of the theory that humans didn't exist until after the Veil. People may know. They just don’t care. Same with people in real life. We all came from Africa, but most don't identify as African. Or how Native Americans don’t see themselves as Asian but indigenous to the Americas. After a few thousand years, they are. Same with Thedasian humans. As for Tevinter history, remember they have experienced catastrophic events like the First Blight. We know that lots of records are lost during those, especially the early ones that lasted for centuries. I hope you are wrong, simply because that’s another thing that’s just “because ancient elves.” A lot more interesting and potential to have them be from other continents.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 2, 2021 17:49:19 GMT
Meaningful alternatives have been provided tons of times over the decade since the game came out. And let’s not equate civil protesters to terrorists okay? Certain groups already do that enough. Oh well how very convenient. You don't need to make an argument because a million imaginary people before you already did. I don't agree with your apparent definition of "terrorist" as "evil", so I'll use it if I want, thanks. I have made some of the arguments. Repeatedly. You were even involved in some of those discussions. You mean every scholarly definition of the term? Fair enough.
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 2, 2021 17:53:12 GMT
The dwarves also tell us that memories are often erased. To the point where such things are trivial: Valta was kicked from her position for that. It's hard to imagine humanity not knowing where they came from, especially since Tevinter has an ancient history, there would surely be some kind of record about travelling from Par Vollen. I'm of the theory that humans didn't exist until after the Veil. People may know. They just don’t care. Same with people in real life. We all came from Africa, but most don't identify as African. Or how Native Americans don’t see themselves as Asian but indigenous to the Americas. After a few thousand years, they are. Same with Thedasian humans. As for Tevinter history, remember they have experienced catastrophic events like the First Blight. We know that lots of records are lost during those, especially the early ones that lasted for centuries. I hope you are wrong, simply because that’s another thing that’s just “because ancient elves.” A lot more interesting and potential to have them be from other continents. I'm with you on that, I don't want it to be more ancient elf BS too. The concept of humans before the Veil is a very interesting one, but the world seems so odd and foreign that it's hard to explain humans there without some kind of record.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Sept 2, 2021 17:59:43 GMT
You mean every scholarly definition of the term? Fair enough. Well you might wanna inform google, lol. I can't handle this. You literally just demonstrated an at least partial awareness of how arbitrarily the term "terrorist" is applied, and then you go and say this. I'm going to bed.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Sept 2, 2021 18:02:12 GMT
I never read the comics but in DA2 Fenris says an archon actually banned slavery at one point but was immediatly assasinated. Fenris was basically saying their were magisters who didn't like slavery but if they fought against it they would be killed. So there has been an anti slavery group to a degree since DA2. I think the Archon he was referring to was probably a while back and I he was answering the question does no one try to stop slavery in Tevinter. Even if it was meant to imply there are Magisters who oppose slavery in secret, which I didn't really take from that conversation, it can hardly be an anti-slavery group if no one outside their social circle is aware of it. That's just a bunch of people salving their conscience without doing anything constructive. Considering who Fenris belonged to and what his social circle were capable of, how would Fenris know about the anti-slavery lot? I still think my original point stands. There wasn't an open anti-slavery movement prior to DAI. If there had been, Dorian might have been given cause to question the institution of slavery before he came south, yet he tells us it never occurred to him to do so. Because slavery is so ingrained in Tevinter culture, I do wonder if in fact it is Dorian who is behind the anti-slavery movement, although may be keeping himself one step removed by acting through intermediaries so he doesn't make himself a target. On the other hand, it could be someone completely different, like the Viper.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 2, 2021 18:04:18 GMT
You mean every scholarly definition of the term? Fair enough. Well you might wanna inform google, lol. I can't handle this. You literally just demonstrated an at least partial awareness of how arbitrarily the term "terrorist" is applied, and then you go and say this. I'm going to bed. If you know a definition where a terrorist action can be objectively considered civil, please share. Until then, terrorists and civil protesters can never be the same thing.
|
|
Cyberstrike
N4
is wanting to have some fun!
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
XBL Gamertag: cyberstrike nTo
PSN: cyberstrike-nTo
Prime Posts: 1,732
Prime Likes: 467
Posts: 1,942 Likes: 3,181
inherit
634
0
May 14, 2017 17:50:43 GMT
3,181
Cyberstrike
is wanting to have some fun!
1,942
August 2016
cyberstrike
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
cyberstrike nTo
cyberstrike-nTo
1,732
467
|
Post by Cyberstrike on Sept 2, 2021 18:12:35 GMT
I never read the comics but in DA2 Fenris says an archon actually banned slavery at one point but was immediatly assasinated. Fenris was basically saying their were magisters who didn't like slavery but if they fought against it they would be killed. So there has been an anti slavery group to a degree since DA2. I think the Archon he was referring to was probably a while back and I he was answering the question does no one try to stop slavery in Tevinter. Even if it was meant to imply there are Magisters who oppose slavery in secret, which I didn't really take from that conversation, it can hardly be an anti-slavery group if no one outside their social circle is aware of it. That's just a bunch of people salving their conscience without doing anything constructive. Considering who Fenris belonged to and what his social circle were capable of, how would Fenris know about the anti-slavery lot? I still think my original point stands. There wasn't an open anti-slavery movement prior to DAI. If there had been, Dorian might have been given cause to question the institution of slavery before he came south, yet he tells us it never occurred to him to do so. Because slavery is so ingrained in Tevinter culture, I do wonder if in fact it is Dorian who is behind the anti-slavery movement, although may be keeping himself one step removed by acting through intermediaries so he doesn't make himself a target. On the other hand, it could be someone completely different, like the Viper.
Dorian was leading a reform faction in the Tenviter Senate, so it's possible.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Sept 2, 2021 18:13:06 GMT
Clearly the best possible origin in DA4 will be human noble. Why wouldn't you want to start with the best possible advantages, the superior social status, the best racial advantage and the best moral position? This has been true every game where you have a choice. The only difference between a human noble in Tevinter and elsewhere is that they are a mage, or part of a mage family. The benefits to being a noble are much the same though. However, the writers appear to have discounted this as an option because the "Behind the Scenes" video directly contradicted this as a possibility. They said they were exploring what it is like to have no power. That does point to either an outsider or non-citizen within Tevinter. The dwarves and other lesser races simply can not compete and deserve their impending extinction. This applies especially to the pathetic elves with their whining and self-destructive behavior. If they were misleading us about this lack of power, then there is the possibility there for a dwarven noble option as well because the Ambassadoria have considerable influence in Tevinter. The dwarves are not in immediate threat of extinction so long as they tie their fate to Tevinter and that nation thrives. At present that threat is seen to be the Qun, although to be honest the Magisterium are doing a piss poor job of defending their territory. If Solas succeeds then no one, not even the Altus will survive what he has planned.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Sept 2, 2021 18:16:59 GMT
As for the OP's original question, I've long maintained that I feel the best compromise for DA4'a protagonist would to be a slave of high ranking nobility, maybe even the Archon himself. High enough to be familiar with major players, but still low enough to need to work your way up. May be slave to the Archon would be aiming a bit too high but, since you've introduced the idea, what about the household of the Black Divine? That should be very instructive not simply about the religion but also the politics. As Dorian said, the Black Divine isn't above getting his hands dirty with a bit of assassination of rivals to round off a jolly night out.
|
|
inherit
285
0
1,950
Zemgus
1,251
August 2016
zemgus
|
Post by Zemgus on Sept 2, 2021 18:38:24 GMT
But if the templars don't do what they're told then they'll end up like Samson (begging in the streets for 'dwarf dust'). Lyrium is like heroin. They can't function without it. So the templars are victims of this corrupt system just like the mages. Also, whether what Anders did works or doesn't work depends entirely on player choices: if both your Hawke and the Inquisitor choose to side with the templars instead of the mages then all Anders' terrorist attack accomplished was getting hundreds of mages killed (as well as all the other innocent lives lost not only in the initial explosion but also in the conflict between mages and the templars). It's curious to me how you make assumptions about what "upsets" people. I'm not upset by anything that happens in this fictional world. But I don't like hypocrisy or double-standards. Two wrongs don't make a right. Statements like "two wrongs don't make a right" are exactly the sort of thing I am talking about. Nobody provides a meaningful alternative, they only criticise Anders for acting. And the same goes for any oppressed person who ever does anything remotely effective , or even ineffective but noticeable. Blowing shit up is "too far", throwing rocks at the authorities who've raided your nightclub and are beating you without provocation is "too far", marching is "too far", chanting is "too far", kneeling during a particular song is "too far". So unless you can finally tell me what the "acceptable" way to protest is, I'm going to write this off as more empty criticism. I don't know whether you're upset by this particular thing or not, I was speaking generally, but obviously you have some kind of an emotional attachment, because you're here, posting on the fan forum. If you have to bring real life issues into this I'm all for peaceful protesting. Violence, hateful behavior and rioting on the other hand is not acceptable. Not only is is detrimental to the cause but it also unfortunately makes everyone look bad. Back to Dragon Age. Yes, I have an emotional attachment to these games but I just think it would be rather silly to be upset by optional content in a roleplaying game when there's so many terrible things happening in the real world. Going around comparing people who side with templars to the nazis is beyond ridiculous. I can make every choice in the game and not feel bad at all. After all it's only a game.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Sept 2, 2021 18:45:46 GMT
It's hard to imagine humanity not knowing where they came from, especially since Tevinter has an ancient history, there would surely be some kind of record about travelling from Par Vollen. I'm of the theory that humans didn't exist until after the Veil. This is why I'm hoping that now we are going to the home of the original human civilisation in the north, we may get some answers about this. Dorian told us there are murals in Tevinter that are meant to depict the original dreamers holding foci. If that is the case, then there must be some sort of historical record that the artists were basing their work on. Unless he meant it was actual art dating to that time. Also, if we assume the timeline in WoT was that of human scholars (as was said to be the case in WoT2), then the entry for -3100 says " Records claim humanity arrived in Thedas around this date". It then goes on to say that: "This is disputed by scholars, who ask where humanity came from and why they left?" So whose records were those? Surely not elves? After all theirs is an oral history and whilst they say humans arrived in Par Vollen, there is no date ever given for this, merely that it was before the quickening which is recorded in the timeline as -2850 Ancient. Then the next date given is -2800 concerning the rise of the human Dreamers, so if this is accurate it was relatively speaking only a short time after the human arrival in Thedas. We know from the Avvar that the human barbarians have an oral tradition too and it was likely the same in ancient times, so there is no reason why at least some part of the history of that time shouldn't have been passed down the generations until people started writing it down. The entry about Seheron also gives some hints of a memory of ancient times among the Fog Dancers. I'm hoping we go there too. This seems unlikely. Even leaving the Dalish lore out of the equation there are other references to the humans being around before the Veil. Even the legends of the Fog Dancers describe "learning at the feet of the elves". I suppose this could be elves that didn't go into retreat after the Veil but it sounds very much as though the elves were in charge. Then there is that constellation of a ship that is said to be associated with the Neromenians. They certainly seem to have made their settlements along the coast, pointing to a sea faring people. There are also legends of other human settlements in the islands north of Seheron and Par Vollen, although I suppose that they could have moved there after arriving in Thedas rather than before. The main problem about maintaining the humans arrived after the Veil is that Bioware have pushed their arrival further back in time in the Keep. Now instead of arriving in -3100, they are said to have arrived in -3900, over a thousand years before the elven immortality ends. Since Solas maintains that was all his fault for raising the Veil that doesn't really leave much room for arguing the humans didn't arrive until after it happened.
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 2, 2021 20:29:18 GMT
It's hard to imagine humanity not knowing where they came from, especially since Tevinter has an ancient history, there would surely be some kind of record about travelling from Par Vollen. I'm of the theory that humans didn't exist until after the Veil. This is why I'm hoping that now we are going to the home of the original human civilisation in the north, we may get some answers about this. Dorian told us there are murals in Tevinter that are meant to depict the original dreamers holding foci. If that is the case, then there must be some sort of historical record that the artists were basing their work on. Unless he meant it was actual art dating to that time. Also, if we assume the timeline in WoT was that of human scholars (as was said to be the case in WoT2), then the entry for -3100 says " Records claim humanity arrived in Thedas around this date". It then goes on to say that: "This is disputed by scholars, who ask where humanity came from and why they left?" So whose records were those? Surely not elves? After all theirs is an oral history and whilst they say humans arrived in Par Vollen, there is no date ever given for this, merely that it was before the quickening which is recorded in the timeline as -2850 Ancient. Then the next date given is -2800 concerning the rise of the human Dreamers, so if this is accurate it was relatively speaking only a short time after the human arrival in Thedas. We know from the Avvar that the human barbarians have an oral tradition too and it was likely the same in ancient times, so there is no reason why at least some part of the history of that time shouldn't have been passed down the generations until people started writing it down. The entry about Seheron also gives some hints of a memory of ancient times among the Fog Dancers. I'm hoping we go there too. This seems unlikely. Even leaving the Dalish lore out of the equation there are other references to the humans being around before the Veil. Even the legends of the Fog Dancers describe "learning at the feet of the elves". I suppose this could be elves that didn't go into retreat after the Veil but it sounds very much as though the elves were in charge. Then there is that constellation of a ship that is said to be associated with the Neromenians. They certainly seem to have made their settlements along the coast, pointing to a sea faring people. There are also legends of other human settlements in the islands north of Seheron and Par Vollen, although I suppose that they could have moved there after arriving in Thedas rather than before. The main problem about maintaining the humans arrived after the Veil is that Bioware have pushed their arrival further back in time in the Keep. Now instead of arriving in -3100, they are said to have arrived in -3900, over a thousand years before the elven immortality ends. Since Solas maintains that was all his fault for raising the Veil that doesn't really leave much room for arguing the humans didn't arrive until after it happened. Solas never gave an exact date though, and even during the ancient elves's time, not all elves were immortal. It was just the "gods" I'm not sure that living on the coast means the humans were a "sea-faring" folk. Settlements always gather close to water, and the ocean has both an abundance of fish and a river that will run into that ocean. The problem with non-historical data is that it can be insufferably vague with dates.
|
|
inherit
11247
0
1,639
Buckeldemon
Now stealin' more kidz.
1,200
July 2019
buckeldemon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Buckeldemon on Sept 2, 2021 22:47:40 GMT
So, let me get this right: It is absolutely ok to help a bunch of people to kill innocent children, as long as you don't lift your hand yourself? That's a really weird logic there. And I could draw real life historical events, where evil people tried exactly this (and luckily lost), but I don't want to open that can of worms. Killing is hardly new in Thedas, even crimes that we might consider atrocious. To pretend otherwise is rather silly. A lot of people raising a stink over "killing" or "standing by and allowing killing" are really just trying to say it's only wrong to kill certain kinds of people. The same people who will say "you're standing by and killing innocent children" would be the same people who supported Anders for blowing up a Chantry with random people inside because they don't consider the Chantry to be people and the mages were important so they can kill any non-mages for their cause. The hypocrisy is lost on them, mostly due to cognitive dissonance on a great scale, or because they don't want to admit they like slaughter, provided they are slaughtering people they don't like. How rich. I mean, by that standard you can justify the evil Tevinters, other evil mages and whatever else. People, me included, pointed out, that by enabling to help the templars with the annullment, you are helping to kill innocents and that is a fact. If you feel bad about it or not, is up to you. But what Pessimistic Panda suggested was that the player should personally be forced to kill the innocent people (children and others who do not fight back). And that is what doesn't make sense to me when we're talking about a roleplaying game. What you're talking about is more generic and from that perspective we kill innocent people all the time in these games. No, it would be just "actions/decisions and consequences". What doesn't make sense about it? DA games are RIFE with limitations and points of no return that lock players into choices they made even if they don't like the outcome. If requiring players to commit to something they *said they would do* in order to complete the game is "anti-roleplaying" then everything in DA is anti-roleplaying. Game: "Okay, so this door is for defending the children, and if you go through this other door you will have to kill the children." Player: "I pick the second door." Game: "Okay, here are the children." Player: "Wtf? I'm not doing it!" Game: "But we warned you there were children." Player: "I'm not doing it!" Game: "Okay, well this is a critical path quest and we already locked the door behind you so if you want to move forward you have to kill the children." How is that different from how literally any other video game mission works? Besides the fact that you don't like the content? What are you on about? In DAO you can clearly say you're not making that decision until you see the situation for yourself. So you can agree to help the templars deal with the abominations, but you don't have to agree to help them kill everyone. You can, but you don't have to. In DA2 you have a choice to either spare the mages who surrendered or tell Cullen to kill them all. Again, you have a choice. Eh, it seems that you try to shift the situtation here. DAO is not like that, yes. But DA2 absolutely is. Jesus fucking christ. - When you agree to annulling a circle you are committing to killing children. - Everything you just said 100% proves my point because the game explicitly shows you, before you decide, that there are children in there. - I am obviously not talking about the point where the game lets you "go in and have a lil peekaboo at the situation", I am talking about the point where the game clearly tells you that you now have to decide between killing or not killing children! The hypothetical exchange you seem so confused by was a truncated example of what Origins actually does, which is clearly and explicitly tell you that the group of people you might choose to murder INCLUDES CHILDREN. This is not complicated. I am saying that when a game clearly signposts that making a particular choice means doing something unsavory, players should not be spared the grisly reality of making that choice, and if BioWare doesn't have the stomach to show the reality of those choices, then they shouldn't offer them. I disagree with that because it's not even about Bioware not having the guts to go all in, but the reality is they probably can't do that unless they want the rating to be bumped to A and again, as I said earlier, it would affect the sales negatively. You can just say what you mean which seems to be that because you don't like something you don't want it to be in the game. Eh, that's not an excuse. In that case, don't include such situations at all.
Besides, look at Fallout 3. "We cannot have the player harm kids, so we place a bunch of asshole brats in the game!" I thought I was making it perfectly clear this whole time that I don't like half-ass, bigot-coddling bullshit and I DO want it gone from the games, one way or the other so this is not the "gotcha" that you seem to think it is. I'm entitled to say what I want gone from the games just as much as I am entitled to say what I want added. There are two options I'm willing to accept 1) handle the subject matter properly or 2) don't handle it at all. Which one BioWare picks is up to them, I'm not interested in discussing the practical concerns of either approach. I guess I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. But you absolutely are entitled to your opinion. Though it does seem surprising to me that you apparently are a fan of these games when their thing has always been giving the player difficult choices and embracing the false equivalency instead of black & white approach. Unless they completely change the DNA of the Dragon Age setting I doubt your wishes will come true. FTFY. Yeah yeah, that's the best any of you can ever come up with "not all templars!" "not all clerics!" "not all cops!". I can, will, and do argue that everyone that participates in the Chantry system is complicit in the oppression of mages, and the elven people, and the barbarian tribes, and everyone who was ever invaded by Orlais, because the Chantry helped with that too. And yes that includes Cassandra, Leliana, Giselle and Sebastian and every "nice" Templar we met in DA2. If you choose to work for a system that abuses people, you're complicit! You become complicit on your first fucking day! That's the thing though. According to the World of Thedas it's not always a choice. Unwanted children are given to the Chantry (Lily for example). If your logic here is "guilty by association" then you could say the same thing about mages and that actually proves the templar's point. Might as well blame all the mages for the actions of the Tevinter Imperium while we're at it. Now, if we add "innocent because no choice", are we willing to let anyone get off the hook who grew up under a particular degree of brainwashing? Are we acknowledging that we essentially have a sort of hostage situation on our hands? It's the same old song, no matter what the context, fictional or real. Whenever oppressed people fight back in any meaningful, effective way that actually works, they get criticised. There's never a "right" way to rebel, or protest, or defend themselves. The only "moral" thing an oppressed person can do is die while waiting for their oppressors to change their minds. Oppressors are not entitled to infinite time to change their minds, and the oppressed are not obligated to be patient. If some of the people Anders killed might have eventually one day been swayed by reasoned debate, tough. They already had plenty of time, and anyone who argues otherwise is just transparently attempting to reinforce oppression. "But I want them to wait until I feel the season is convenient for me!!!" Hush now, don't bother panda with logic. It ruins the narrative he wants to tell. It is a while since I played but whatever you decide to do is not technically an Annulment, since that is what Gregoire was waiting for. He had sent to Denerim to get permission from the Grand Cleric there and the reply had not yet arrived. So you can persuade him to let you take a look before the Annulment is enacted,saving whoever you can, or suggest you go in an kill everything that moves as a lost cause. Naturally if you choose the first option then you are trying to save people. Having never taken the second option, I assume that the main difference is that you end up killing Wynne. What happens to the children she is guarding in that case? In DA2 your mercy extends to just 2 mages. Nevertheless this comes after the cut scene showing the Templars killing everyone in their path. There is no suggestion that sparing those two mages is going to extend to anyone else who hasn't become an abomination by now. By the time you get to Orsino, it is fairly certain that all the mages inside the Gallows have been killed, including any children. It is after all the reason Orsino finally loses his reason, which at least makes some sense on the Templar run considering Meredith is there confronting him. Regardless, when you choose your side after the Annulment is declared, if you side with Meredith then you are giving your support to killing every mage in the Circle, even if not all die by your hand. However, you do not really have to confront that reality because the majority of the deaths take place off screen. There is nothing morally grey about that decision. Even Sebastian, who is probably the only surviving member of the Chantry at that point, realises that what Meredith is proposing is both illegal and illogical. The person who is responsible for the atrocity of bombing the Chantry is sitting right there in front of Meredith. He even admitted his guilt. Every bit of blood magic we have encountered in the city up to that point has been committed by apostates outside the Circle. At the time of the bombing, the majority of mages were meant to be locked in the cells at the Gallows (although for some reason the Templars decided to release a whole load of them in contradiction of what we had previously been told). Nevertheless, no one from the Circle was actually implicated in the bombing; Anders even exonerates them by making it clear he acted alone (or with Hawke's help). So calling an Annulment of the Circle is a monstrous injustice. You're applying "reason" to Orsino, who is completely hatstand. I'm not sure we can take his mental state as a reason for anything. Meredith is insane, there's no reason to state otherwise. However, we do see a scene in which the templars escort the mages out, and, if Hawke so chooses, the templars listen. Further, she stays with Hawke the entire time, so there is no reason to believe she is giving other orders elsewhere. You say there is no reason to believe that these three (there's three, BTW, not two, two of them talk, but there are three) mages are the only ones spared, but consider how the templars react. If I'm applying that, it sounds like the templars are simply waiting for the appropriate order. In which case, "spare" has every reason to lead me to believe that there are other survivors. After all, the mages Solas runs into during his quest are from Kirkwall's Circle, and that's true regardless of whether you spared those three mages if you sided with the templars (I don't think the DAKeep asks you that question) Pretty rich bitching about "logic" here, given that one could argue that this scene doesn't make an awful lot of sense. Meredith clearly seems unhappy here. Why is she not pulling rank? Why are the templars deferring to Cullen instead of her? She hasn't started glowing and isn't accusing them of being blood mages yet.
Well, what about me? I am upset that Anders kills innocents, yet I don’t think the way you are describing. I have repeatedly talked about caring about the mages, elves, and other innocent groups. You know, andrastian issues are pretty much on-going. Their stated end goal (which is essentially wiping out all other beliefs) is such a thing. And that is what soured me over even SoftLeliana over time after an initial dose of uwu. There's no mention that she addresses it. Equality for believers, sure. What about the rest? That is the question I asked, which you refused to answer. If you're going to just flat-out fucking lie to me about my own posts, at least try to avoid doing it on the exact same page. EDIT: lol, I just went back and read the rest of your post and it's complete and utter gibberish
That's a question I already answered multiple times to you. If you can't pay attention, then try to be quiet. I'm trying to have a discussion about human origins and you keep whining about elves. Now that's kinda hypocritical, though I guess you are being deliberately ignorant, as oppose to having attention span issues. I mean, talk about whining about your apparently preferred interest group, i.e. pseudo christian theo-fascists. Please Panda, explain to us how the innocent children killed by Anders, who didn't even understand the Mage/Templar, had ample enough time to have had their mind swayed to the other side. Oh, so NOW all of a sudden we're caring about children? But not the mutant children who get torn from their families and locked up in rape dungeons and then eventually slaughtered because the first enchanter got too uppity. Only the important children. Don't presume to fucking lecture me about the deaths of innocents, when it's clear you're willing to swallow literally any atrocity as long as it's in the name of the setting's obvious stand-in for white Christianity. Haven't you heard? Kids cease to be kids (or at least "innocent" kids) once they show magic? Hanako, you are actually EXACTLY the person I was thinking of when I composed that entire post. All I ever see you do (when you aren't bitching about how DA4 is already ruined) is criticise fictional oppressed people for not licking the boot and begging for more. The Chantry conducted an exalted march on Rivain literally between the second and third games, and it is complicit in the Orlesian invasion of Ferelden, which occurred in Loghain's lifetime, and it's abuse of mages and elves is ONGOING. It's not ancient at all. If you don't understand that much, and can't make an argument without 1) lying about the content we're discussing and 2) lying about my own arguments (which I can just scroll up and read), then please, please god, just don't reply to me at all. I have never criticized mages, elves, or any other oppressed group in the game for wanting better lives. And have constantly played in a way that makes their lives better. I just don’t support using actions like mass murder to end it. So you’re full of shit if you think that about me. Eh, we could argue about that, given what I see as a certain degree of apologism for andrastian institutions (i.e. ethnocidial theo-fascists). For me, this just doesn't add up, sorry. Lily was also making plans to run away. Nothing's stopping priests from leaving if they want. I'll concede that Templars have been leashed by an addictive substance, but that only excuses not running away, it does not excuse literally everything else they do, and I'm not just referring to the "corrupt" ones, the system is abusive at its core. And to be clear, I do not "deny" that Anders may have killed people that might conceivably be called "innocent", I have made the calculated decision to not care about that, because nobody who brings this point up ever does so in good faith. What upsets people isn't that Anders kills "innocents", they don't give a single flying fuck about the innumerable innocent mages, elves or innocent anyone else who died due to the abuse or negligence or exalted marches of the Chantry, so clearly they don't care about "innocents" at all. What actually upsets them is that Anders acted at all, instead of waiting for the people stepping on his neck to just miraculously stop of their own accord. It's the same old song, no matter what the context, fictional or real. Whenever oppressed people fight back in any meaningful, effective way that actually works, they get criticised. There's never a "right" way to rebel, or protest, or defend themselves. The only "moral" thing an oppressed person can do is die while waiting for their oppressors to change their minds. Oppressors are not entitled to infinite time to change their minds, and the oppressed are not obligated to be patient. If some of the people Anders killed might have eventually one day been swayed by reasoned debate, tough. They already had plenty of time, and anyone who argues otherwise is just transparently attempting to reinforce oppression. But if the templars don't do what they're told then they'll end up like Samson (begging in the streets for 'dwarf dust'). Lyrium is like heroin. They can't function without it. So the templars are victims of this corrupt system just like the mages. Also, whether what Anders did works or doesn't work depends entirely on player choices: if both your Hawke and the Inquisitor choose to side with the templars instead of the mages then all Anders' terrorist attack accomplished was getting hundreds of mages killed (as well as all the other innocent lives lost not only in the initial explosion but also in the conflict between mages and the templars). It's curious to me how you make assumptions about what "upsets" people. I'm not upset by anything that happens in this fictional world. But I don't like hypocrisy or double-standards. Two wrongs don't make a right. So it is basically yet another hostage situation. "Just like the mages" is a false equivalency anyway. Yes, I'm aware DAI loves it.
I also dislike hypocrisy and double-standards, I guess. Yet I'm apparently in the other trench. Yes yes, it was all Solas, and then nobody else ever did anything bad to the elves ever again. Never said that. But yes or no, Solas’s actions caused elves to lose a lot of their history? Oh, please, yet another gotcha? Come one. Solas' actions sure, and certain human-superiority-complex empires which then prevented most ways of even thinking what could have been before?
Well you might wanna inform google, lol. I can't handle this. You literally just demonstrated an at least partial awareness of how arbitrarily the term "terrorist" is applied, and then you go and say this. I'm going to bed. If you know a definition where a terrorist action can be objectively considered civil, please share. Until then, terrorists and civil protesters can never be the same thing. Eh, by labeling it terrorist (whatever the merits might be) you are already casting a non-civility vote. On a broader sense, don't even let me get started about which kind of fear or violence self-declared "(most) civilised" societies employ to further their political goals.
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 2, 2021 23:01:30 GMT
Meredith is insane, the fact that you would apply logic to her is no different than logic being applied to Orsino. Contrary to popular opinion, you do not have to "glow" and call someone a blood mage to be insane. Tarohne didn't glow. The templars did not support purge the Circle, despite Meredith's order. This is true because Kirkwall mages lived past the events of DA2, we see it in DA:I. I know it runs contrary to your narrative, but it happened. Just because buckel wants his narrative to be true about the people he doesn't like doesn't mean it actually is.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
26,120
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,303
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Sept 2, 2021 23:33:01 GMT
Hellllllo
You guys been discussing anything but the OP for pages.
IF we went commoner, what KIND of commoner? We gonna be a farmer?
If we went slave, what KIND of slave? What if instead of being owned by one, there was sort of a slave ring that simple did general labor? Like, owned by the city itself to do the city work? Keep the magic flames lit?
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,628
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Sept 2, 2021 23:34:03 GMT
IF we went commoner, what KIND of commoner? We gonna be a farmer? I want to be a butcher. Specializing in skinning bunnies.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
26,120
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,303
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Sept 2, 2021 23:35:52 GMT
IF we went commoner, what KIND of commoner? We gonna be a farmer? I want to be a butcher. Specializing in skinning bunnies. How would this angle serve to inform us about the world of Tevinter? This whole thing is assuming a psuedo origin, does this mean we have extra info about the forests because the hunters sell us their catch?
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,628
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Sept 2, 2021 23:59:35 GMT
I want to be a butcher. Specializing in skinning bunnies. How would this angle serve to inform us about the world of Tevinter? This whole thing is assuming a psuedo origin, does this mean we have extra info about the forests because the hunters sell us their catch? Perhaps there is an angle is harvesting materials from animals. As a farmer, you could have knowledge in cultivation, what helps the plants to grow. In case you have a keep, with lands, you could grow herbs and, with your experience as a farmer, you could grow them bigger, etc.
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 3, 2021 0:23:13 GMT
How would this angle serve to inform us about the world of Tevinter? This whole thing is assuming a psuedo origin, does this mean we have extra info about the forests because the hunters sell us their catch? Perhaps there is an angle is harvesting materials from animals. As a farmer, you could have knowledge in cultivation, what helps the plants to grow. In case you have a keep, with lands, you could grow herbs and, with your experience as a farmer, you could grow them bigger, etc. It sounds like you are suggesting a hunter, not a butcher. Although butchers were often community leaders of small villages. Perhaps that's an interesting angle.
|
|
inherit
11247
0
1,639
Buckeldemon
Now stealin' more kidz.
1,200
July 2019
buckeldemon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Buckeldemon on Sept 3, 2021 0:33:11 GMT
Meredith is insane, the fact that you would apply logic to her is no different than logic being applied to Orsino. Contrary to popular opinion, you do not have to "glow" and call someone a blood mage to be insane. Tarohne didn't glow. The templars did not support purge the Circle, despite Meredith's order. This is true because Kirkwall mages lived past the events of DA2, we see it in DA:I. I know it runs contrary to your narrative, but it happened. Just because buckel wants his narrative to be true about the people he doesn't like doesn't mean it actually is. I mean, "insanity of a single person" (while ignoring their backgorund) is a pretty tidy excuse, isn't it? But I've honestly come to... kinda expect nothing else given the previous selectiveness you chose to employ while harping about your perceived selectiveness of others. Glowing's at least a good indicator, I suppose? I mean, imagine how many people I could call "insane" from where I'm sitting if the Pretty Obvious Cues like glowing read isn't a thing (In fact, Tarohne does have a few things that some could see as cues, but eh). I could probably call every single living andrastian "insane". But that's not politically correct I suppose, and I'm usually trying to avoid ableist screeching. Templars are "not supporting purge"? Okay, how did you come up with that one? There's no indication for their lack of support. And while nobody steps forward and declares that they are on board, what we see is a lot of templars... just being busy "purging the circle", apart from possibly that courtyard example (which I suppose hinges on Cullen more than everything else), as well as Cullen's "last minute convenient change of heart" at the finale, to use his own phrasings.
Of course, how could I forget that duskwanderer is supposed to be only legit arbiter of "truhf" and the only one permitted to accuse others of "forcing a narrative" in any case, instead of, you know, merely attempting to force his own interpretations.
But yeah, nice distraction you pulled here. I had a least a bit of fun engaging it, but that's now over again.
If we went slave, what KIND of slave? What if instead of being owned by one, there was sort of a slave ring that simple did general labor? Like, owned by the city itself to do the city work? Keep the magic flames lit? I cannot quite remember if Myrion form TTM mentioned who employed him (yes, I know he isn't a slave anymore, but he said lighting lamps was his job), but that could be a job for a lower-rungs mage. In case of non-mages... how significant is there job/background supposed to be compared to showing us things about Tevinter. Butcher kinda gives me rebellion vibe, thanks to this codex, I guess. I wonder if "the empire" is the owner of the public maintenance slaves... in this case, how they are treated might still be subject to which high-ranking official (I suppose most are Altus?) is calling the shots a.k.a. "Make sure these dumb Lucerni aren't getting to command the maintenance. They will just destroy our empire!"
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,628
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Sept 3, 2021 0:34:37 GMT
Perhaps there is an angle is harvesting materials from animals. As a farmer, you could have knowledge in cultivation, what helps the plants to grow. In case you have a keep, with lands, you could grow herbs and, with your experience as a farmer, you could grow them bigger, etc. It sounds like you are suggesting a hunter, not a butcher. Although butchers were often community leaders of small villages. Perhaps that's an interesting angle. A hunter would be more acquainted with good hunting spots, recognize habitat for particular prey and good ways to kill said prey. A butcher would have more anatomical knowledge experience of a animal carcass. Better allocation of portions, to make the most out of the available meat. How to preserve it, how to clean it from the bone, what to do with the bone, like in the case of marrow, for example. What gets relegated to mince meat is another area of a butcher's expertise, something that a hunter would probably not be equipped to handle. And, off course
|
|
inherit
4406
0
695
duskwanderer
Awesome
1,053
Mar 12, 2017 22:45:38 GMT
March 2017
duskwanderer
|
Post by duskwanderer on Sept 3, 2021 1:09:05 GMT
Meredith is insane, the fact that you would apply logic to her is no different than logic being applied to Orsino. Contrary to popular opinion, you do not have to "glow" and call someone a blood mage to be insane. Tarohne didn't glow. The templars did not support purge the Circle, despite Meredith's order. This is true because Kirkwall mages lived past the events of DA2, we see it in DA:I. I know it runs contrary to your narrative, but it happened. Just because buckel wants his narrative to be true about the people he doesn't like doesn't mean it actually is. I mean, "insanity of a single person" (while ignoring their backgorund) is a pretty tidy excuse, isn't it? But I've honestly come to... kinda expect nothing else given the previous selectiveness you chose to employ while harping about your perceived selectiveness of others. Glowing's at least a good indicator, I suppose? I mean, imagine how many people I could call "insane" from where I'm sitting if the Pretty Obvious Cues like glowing read isn't a thing (In fact, Tarohne does have a few things that some could see as cues, but eh). I could probably call every single living andrastian "insane". But that's not politically correct I suppose, and I'm usually trying to avoid ableist screeching. Templars are "not supporting purge"? Okay, how did you come up with that one? There's no indication for their lack of support. And while nobody steps forward and declares that they are on board, what we see is a lot of templars... just being busy "purging the circle", apart from possibly that courtyard example (which I suppose hinges on Cullen more than everything else), as well as Cullen's "last minute convenient change of heart" at the finale, to use his own phrasings.
Of course, how could I forget that duskwanderer is supposed to be only legit arbiter of "truhf" and the only one permitted to accuse others of "forcing a narrative" in any case, instead of, you know, merely attempting to force his own interpretations.
But yeah, nice distraction you pulled here. I had a least a bit of fun engaging it, but that's now over again.
If we went slave, what KIND of slave? What if instead of being owned by one, there was sort of a slave ring that simple did general labor? Like, owned by the city itself to do the city work? Keep the magic flames lit? I cannot quite remember if Myrion form TTM mentioned who employed him (yes, I know he isn't a slave anymore, but he said lighting lamps was his job), but that could be a job for a lower-rungs mage. In case of non-mages... how significant is there job/background supposed to be compared to showing us things about Tevinter. Butcher kinda gives me rebellion vibe, thanks to this codex, I guess. I wonder if "the empire" is the owner of the public maintenance slaves... in this case, how they are treated might still be subject to which high-ranking official (I suppose most are Altus?) is calling the shots a.k.a. "Make sure these dumb Lucerni aren't getting to command the maintenance. They will just destroy our empire!" How did I come up with it? Because there are mages from Kirkwall in DA:I, which takes place after DA2. You can't be alive in DA:I if you died in DA2. Again, you may not like it because it doesn't support your claims that templars are bad because all Andrastian is bad, but it's the truth. Maybe you should try more basic facts of quests and less rage.
|
|