OWL CAT Games; Pathfinder Kingmaker, Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous, Rogue Trader

Ah ok so I am guessing any already established settlements in the Stolen Lands (if there are any) would be mostly made up of outcasts and outsiders with a looser set of laws? Still hard to imagine a Kobold as the founder of a kingdom and the hero of the campaign.

Yeah, "wretched hive of scum and villainy"-type stuff.

From what I've read, there have been numerous attempts to settle the land, all failed.  So now the place is full of monsters, bandits,  fey creatures, etc.

Edit:  And yes, we were told there would be romances in the game.  Though not who the options are.  Heck we haven't been told all the companions, yet!  Though apparently non-companions can be romanced as well

In official materials I have rarely seen it.

In campaigns I see it all the time, on the whim of the GM.

Personally I rarely go for the official materials for DnD or Pathfinder.

Not surprised it's sarenae.

What's the companion list so far?

I like it better than faerun and ebberon.

it's also the only setting where you can teleport your party across vast distances instead of paying to use a train...and the teleportation is easier for some reason.

Eberron is just wholly inconsistent for me, poorly implemented use of fantasy and tech. Rather play Arcanum and that game is a bug-filled, convoluted mess. 

If you want to live out your fantasies of being in a biker gang, then play Vampire the Masquerade/Requiem. Otherwise keep your useless armor with stupid studs put of my tabletop!

Rhetzok has a halberd and he's going to take your head off regardless of how many pretty studs you have in your leather armor!

Arcane trickster is a prestige class that requires levels in rogue/wizard or being a bard. Since Rogue/Wizard is a horrible idea, it is likely said companion is a bard.

On the first page you made a post involving archetypes (Which I'm too lazy to quote properly):

In Pathfinder an archetype is an optional way to further customize your character. In Pathfinder a Witch is a base class (I could use Magus since there is a companion with that class, who is also a half-orc so I can guarantee you he's going to suck, but I'm currently playing a Witch so it's easier). Anyways, the witch is similar to the 3.5 Warlock in that she makes a pact with a patron (of which there is a rather large list) which provides her with Hexes (a supernatural ability that confounds DMs everywhere) as well as a familiar that hosts the power of that patron.

At first level the witch receives her first hex, at second level and every two levels after the Witch gains another hex (of which I will guess the witch will not receive all of the hexes they actually get in tabletop). However, if the player takes the Gravewalker Witch archetype does not gain a hex at first, fourth, and eighth level or the familiar. Instead, the Witch gains a Creepy Doll(tm) and replaces the hexes with an aura, the ability to take control of any undead within that aura, the ability to possess any controlled undead inside that aura, and finally the ability to deliver touch attacks to any enemy standing in the aura through the Creepy Doll(tm). On a side note, the Creepy Doll (tm) is made out of the skin of (formerly) living creatures.

Bards have stealth too. The only thing rogues get that bards don't is trapfinding, but the bards spells compensate for that.

If she is a wizard/rogue then she'll be the second worst companion mechanically behind the half orc magus.

True, but if the entire world setting makes no sense to me, I tend to drop it completely. This is what I do with more or less all of the world settings save for Golarion, which has potential and I can at least focus on a few things here and there.

I'm going to assume poorly.

So will we be able to make custom companions for a full custom party somewhat like in Pillars of Eternity? Never really took to any of the companions in Pillars so having the option to supplement your party with custom members was nice to have.