dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Feb 16, 2017 1:01:38 GMT
Also, related but "real world" type thing...Elon Musk has recently stated that the only way we'll get around AI overtaking us is by becoming them. Here's the link. Something to ponder when having these discussions.
|
|
inherit
2608
0
May 28, 2017 10:42:47 GMT
72
anehforaneh
66
January 2017
anehforaneh
|
Post by anehforaneh on Feb 16, 2017 1:21:36 GMT
Also, related but "real world" type thing...Elon Musk has recently stated that the only way we'll get around AI overtaking us is by becoming them. Here's the link. Something to ponder when having these discussions. The guy's brilliant, but sometimes he comes across like an idiot. He once said that we are all cyborgs because we have cellphones.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Feb 16, 2017 1:27:37 GMT
Also, related but "real world" type thing...Elon Musk has recently stated that the only way we'll get around AI overtaking us is by becoming them. Here's the link. Something to ponder when having these discussions. The guy's brilliant, but sometimes he comes across like an idiot. He once said that we are all cyborgs because we have cellphones. Previous things I've read from him said we should fear AI - and other articles I read discuss aggressive AI (that is, they're aggressive if it's the best route to their goal but will cooperate if that's what works best). Anyway, I just like to throw in stuff I read about into these discussions. I'm already pretty much anti-Synthesis but I like to see what else is out there that can weigh in. I should mention that I might favor Synthesis as a personal goal (though from a transhumanist perspective I'd favor genetic engineering) but not as a requirement for all.
|
|
inherit
2608
0
May 28, 2017 10:42:47 GMT
72
anehforaneh
66
January 2017
anehforaneh
|
Post by anehforaneh on Feb 16, 2017 1:32:29 GMT
I also have issue with calling this type of interface with machines as "evolution." It's really nothing more than just another tool. It be like saying a bookstand is human evolution because it allows us to read a book without holding it.
If the interface eventually allows humans to communicate with machines without wires, transmitters, etc. (Like otaku or something) Then yeah!, that's evolution... but not if we still need to use some device to achieve the effect.
|
|
inherit
2608
0
May 28, 2017 10:42:47 GMT
72
anehforaneh
66
January 2017
anehforaneh
|
Post by anehforaneh on Feb 16, 2017 1:40:02 GMT
I should mention that I might favor Synthesis as a personal goal (though from a transhumanist perspective I'd favor genetic engineering) but not as a requirement for all. Agree. The transhumanist movement is intriguing, but scary as fuck. Upload your brain to a machine. Okay, but then if the machine breaks? Until we develop much, MUCH better hardware/software it is inferior to the organic brain. Genetics holds much more potential without the very real risk of literally losing our humanity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 13:53:21 GMT
Completely disagree with all of this. The Stargazer scene didn't show anything definitively. It actually supported the idea that all Mass Relays were gone because they talk about going to the stars as if that's something special (which it is to a kid, but what about gramps?) and in that it also didn't confirm or deny the fate of the synthetics but the previous scene on the jungle does because EDI doesn't exit the ship, but she does in Control. It is presented as bad and the Catalyst's dialogue isn't depicted as deceptive, perhaps ambiguous but I always interpreted him as "the god that speaks the absolute truth" and that truth was meant to be written so we would believe it, but the writing just didn't follow suit because Mac had written it and he's got a problem or two about being articulate. I still don't see why you found the Catalyst's reasoning any more trustworthy that you found Saren's. The bad guy believing something doesn't make that something true. I should mention that I was always assuming that we'd find some sort of huge programming error at the bottom of everything, because of the idiocy of the Reapers' methods. Nothing about the ending gave me any reason to reconsider that idea. As for the Stargazer scene, why should it recap what we already know about synthetics? And of course, relays have nothing whatsoever to do with the possibility of interstellar travel; MEU mass effect drives are better than Star Trek warp drives even without relays. I think the possibility of a "programming error" playing a role at the end of everything is actually foreshadowed in ME1 during Vigil's speech: Vigil: I am an advanced non-organic analysis system with personality overprints from Kisad Ishan, head overseer of the Ilos research facility. Shepard: Why did you bring me here. Vigil: You must break a cycle that has continued for millions of years. But to stop it you must understand or you will make the same mistakes we did. .... Vigil: To conserve resources, everyone was put into cryogenic stasis. I was programmed to monitor the facility and wake the staff when the danger had passed. But the genocide of an entire species is a long, slow process. Years passed. Decades. Centuries. The reapers persisted. And my energy reserves were dwindling. Shepard (If selected): You should have fought. Vigil: We were a few hundred against a galacitc invasion fleet. Our only hope was to remain undetected. I began to disable the lift support of non-essential personnel. First support staff, then security. One by one, their pods were shut down to conserve energy. Eventually, only the stasis pods of the top scientists remained active.... Shepard (if selected): You were programmed to protect them. Not kill them! Vigil: This outcome was not completely unforeseen. My actions were the result of contingency programming entered upon my creation.
Why is the bold stuff relevant... It's was sets the order in which the pods were shut down. Could things have been different had Vigil just reactivated a lowly "support staff" person first to help find a way to recharge power supplies to the facility... eventually, perhaps, keeping the facility fully powered and saving everyone in the end?
|
|
inherit
2608
0
May 28, 2017 10:42:47 GMT
72
anehforaneh
66
January 2017
anehforaneh
|
Post by anehforaneh on Feb 16, 2017 15:24:13 GMT
Could things have been different had Vigil just reactivated a lowly "support staff" person first to help find a way to recharge power supplies to the facility... eventually, perhaps, keeping the facility fully powered and saving everyone in the end? This is an excellent point. "Uh oh! Power's running low. Let me kill a bunch of people instead of seeing if they can't do something about it." Sounds like faulty logic to me. Or really short sighted programming if Vigil was just "following orders."
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Feb 16, 2017 15:33:09 GMT
Could things have been different had Vigil just reactivated a lowly "support staff" person first to help find a way to recharge power supplies to the facility... eventually, perhaps, keeping the facility fully powered and saving everyone in the end? This is an excellent point. "Uh oh! Power's running low. Let me kill a bunch of people instead of seeing if they can't do something about it." Sounds like faulty logic to me. Or really short sighted programming if Vigil was just "following orders." Vigil is a machine. Clearly, it was trying to kill organics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 15:40:31 GMT
This is an excellent point. "Uh oh! Power's running low. Let me kill a bunch of people instead of seeing if they can't do something about it." Sounds like faulty logic to me. Or really short sighted programming if Vigil was just "following orders." Vigil is a machine. Clearly, it was trying to kill organics. Smarty pants. No, but he was clearly programmed not to wake anyone up until after the danger had passed... and that's the flaw.
|
|
LadyCass
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
Prime Posts: 94
Prime Likes: 25
Posts: 51 Likes: 97
inherit
1333
0
97
LadyCass
51
August 2016
ladyfalcia
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
94
25
|
Post by LadyCass on Feb 17, 2017 18:03:32 GMT
What inputs would you have put into place? I would have probably started with asking for solutions to be given, rather than asking it to implement it with no oversight. I also would have asked for tactics to make the situation less likely, rather than impossible. So, something like, "Give us the five most likely tactics we can implement that will minimise the impact of this phenomenon on our tithe input, in descending order of effectiveness." -- Regarding the discussion on absolutes, simply the phrase "There will absolutely be people", isn't true over a long enough time period. Eventually the sun will explode, destroying Earth, though us wiping ourselves out is far more likely. Even if we manage to move out into the galaxy and escape that fate, the heat death of the Universe gets everyone and everything. Here's something that did confuse me though. Wouldn't destroying the Citadel outright have freed the Reapers from the Starkid's control? Why was controlling the Reapers an option but freeing them wasn't?
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Feb 17, 2017 18:43:25 GMT
What inputs would you have put into place? I would have probably started with asking for solutions to be given, rather than asking it to implement it with no oversight. I also would have asked for tactics to make the situation less likely, rather than impossible. So, something like, "Give us the five most likely tactics we can implement that will minimise the impact of this phenomenon on our tithe input, in descending order of effectiveness." -- Regarding the discussion on absolutes, simply the phrase "There will absolutely be people", isn't true over a long enough time period. Eventually the sun will explode, destroying Earth, though us wiping ourselves out is far more likely. Even if we manage to move out into the galaxy and escape that fate, the heat death of the Universe gets everyone and everything. Here's something that did confuse me though. Wouldn't destroying the Citadel outright have freed the Reapers from the Starkid's control? Why was controlling the Reapers an option but freeing them wasn't? And what about if the tactics involve removing you the creator from the picture permanently? Particularly because they help perpetuate the very problem they are looking to solve just on a different level. Because the general treatment of organic life has towards synthetic life is the same kind that Leviathan has toward fellow organic life. All it would take is one race or races figuring out a way to block their telepathic capabilities and to develop their technology on par with them and a revolution would be inevitable. I don't think you understand what you are trying to say by minimize the impact. We are talking about an evolutionary arms race that Synthetic life has the advantage in. Who don't need to sleep, eat, who can be mass produced in factories. Who can communicate, process data and react at rates that an organic body would be incapable of. Minimizing at the best case senerie would be the Batarians, Volus, Elcor, Vorcha, Quarians and Krogan are killed off. Mean while the Asari, Salarian, Turian and Human focusing all their capability to prevent the Syntheic race(s) from advancing any farther. For the eventual destruction that waits them. You seem to be treating in your my Synthteic life the same as any organic life. Capable of the same limitations all life has. The fact is they are not the same. Do you know what Moore's Law is? Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years. Which basically means every 2 years technology gets faster and smaller. It isn't an infinite growth because of system we are using has it's limitations. But AI's by their very nature are not standardized integrated circuits. They are a quantum computer (least how they are described in game) and are vastly different. Those have much higher limitations and their capabilities are only limited to their hardware they are currently using. EDI is best example of this because by every measurable definition the body she stole is far better then any organic body. Won't need years of training to be able to shoot with sniper like accuracy. All she needs is the right targeting software and boom instant head shot every time. And every time their technology advances so to will the bodies they are able to create and control. Your right eventually the sun will explode or expand and wipe out all life on this planet. So why should anyone care what happens then? Lets just say fuck all this and get a purge started. Destroy targets the Reapers. The Citadel is just a byproduct of the explosion. They are also the product of the Catalyst and agree with the the Catalyst. Leaving them alone wouldn't solve anything as long as the problem still exists.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2017 18:50:54 GMT
What inputs would you have put into place? I would have probably started with asking for solutions to be given, rather than asking it to implement it with no oversight. I also would have asked for tactics to make the situation less likely, rather than impossible. So, something like, "Give us the five most likely tactics we can implement that will minimise the impact of this phenomenon on our tithe input, in descending order of effectiveness." -- Regarding the discussion on absolutes, simply the phrase "There will absolutely be people", isn't true over a long enough time period. Eventually the sun will explode, destroying Earth, though us wiping ourselves out is far more likely. Even if we manage to move out into the galaxy and escape that fate, the heat death of the Universe gets everyone and everything. Here's something that did confuse me though. Wouldn't destroying the Citadel outright have freed the Reapers from the Starkid's control? Why was controlling the Reapers an option but freeing them wasn't? I tend to imagine that controlling something "as one sees fit" implicitly includes an option to "see fit" to not control them at all (in essence, to free them and grant them free wlll) or to control them in such a way that they are ultimately destroyed or persuades them to destroy themselves. One can perhaps question whether or not the Catalyst ever had that level of absolute control over the Reapers or, even over itself, being a programmed entity. Of course, unless it does have that level of control, it probably cannot pass on that level of control over to Shepard. Furthermore, Shepard's control would certainly end the moment a decision to either free or destroy the Reapers under his/her control was made. However, Shepard would have the ability to decide the timing of that... it could be immediate upon taking control or infinitely some time into the future. Once that sort of decision was made, it would, however, reduce The Shepard into a very powerless immortal god.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Feb 17, 2017 19:00:26 GMT
Here's something that did confuse me though. Wouldn't destroying the Citadel outright have freed the Reapers from the Starkid's control? Why was controlling the Reapers an option but freeing them wasn't? I remember a thread talking about that a few years ago. If that was possible, the catalyst could download itself into one of the reapers and continue what its doing. I would be curious how long it would take to destroy the Citadel completely. Would the reapers give the fleets time to do that? The Citadel does have engines. Just have Shepard get in the drivers seat and drive it into the sun. Though doing that doesn't guarantee the reapers will stop. But its an option. The other thing is, what about all the people on the Citadel? If there was enough time before the reapers move the Citadel to save the people....Of course how long would it take to evacuate those millions. It would also mean Shepard learned that the thing was part of the Citadel. Would destroying the Citadel effect the relays?
|
|
LadyCass
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
Prime Posts: 94
Prime Likes: 25
Posts: 51 Likes: 97
inherit
1333
0
97
LadyCass
51
August 2016
ladyfalcia
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
94
25
|
Post by LadyCass on Feb 17, 2017 21:21:27 GMT
gothpunkboy89 - I'm not sure we're having the same discussion. I was hypothesising how a system might have come to the same conclusions as the Starkid AI did. I chose to make the assumption that it had a problem given to it to solve based on absolute terms and with certain restrictions because that helps the logic line up. It's a theory that neatly explains why the Starkid had the beliefs it did, but it is pure conjecture. His explanations are incomplete, biased and possibly dishonest. You seem to be having an argument about Destroy vs Synthesis? I'll admit, the Evangelion reference didn't help me work out what you were saying, sorry, I've not seen it and isn't that the one which is infamous for being a bit incoherent? Did you think my theory doesn't hold up? Which part would you like to refute? As for the inputs, they're less likely to cause trouble as you're asking for opinions, so you can choose not to implement any options that come with caveats such as ceasing to exist. This is, again, assuming an AI that is following the wishes of it's masters, as the Starkid AI at least seems to be. What the Starkid's five options might be, I have no idea. @upupandaway - that makes sense, I would like to think that my Shephard may have given the Reapers free will, dying in the process. themikefest - To be honest, that sounds awesome, finding out that the AI is the Citadel and then "killing" it in an epic sacrifice by plunging into a sun? Hell yeah I'd play that ending. The innocents on the Citadel though, if there are any left alive, that would be very dark.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Feb 17, 2017 21:33:53 GMT
gothpunkboy89 - I'm not sure we're having the same discussion. I was hypothesising how a system might have come to the same conclusions as the Starkid AI did. I chose to make the assumption that it had a problem given to it to solve based on absolute terms and with certain restrictions because that helps the logic line up. It's a theory that neatly explains why the Starkid had the beliefs it did, but it is pure conjecture. His explanations are incomplete, biased and possibly dishonest. You seem to be having an argument about Destroy vs Synthesis? I'll admit, the Evangelion reference didn't help me work out what you were saying, sorry, I've not seen it and isn't that the one which is infamous for being a bit incoherent? Did you think my theory doesn't hold up? Which part would you like to refute? As for the inputs, they're less likely to cause trouble as you're asking for opinions, so you can choose not to implement any options that come with caveats such as ceasing to exist. This is, again, assuming an AI that is following the wishes of it's masters, as the Starkid AI at least seems to be. What the Starkid's five options might be, I have no idea. Well that is kind of the point. When the problem is based off fundamental aspects of each respective group. Suggesting changes won't be capable of minimizing anything.
|
|
LadyCass
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
Prime Posts: 94
Prime Likes: 25
Posts: 51 Likes: 97
inherit
1333
0
97
LadyCass
51
August 2016
ladyfalcia
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
94
25
|
Post by LadyCass on Feb 17, 2017 21:58:19 GMT
Well that is kind of the point. When the problem is based off fundamental aspects of each respective group. Suggesting changes won't be capable of minimizing anything. Okay, I'm going to assume you mean organics and synthetics by "each respective group" rather than Leviathans and the Starkid AI, please let me know if I'm wrong. If you're saying that any suggestions the Starkid AI, with my inputs, gives would be inefficient because they preclude the idea of the Leviathans a) not existing and not getting tithes, then yes, that's possible. It's also possible the only solution it gives that has a decent margin of success is unpalatable to the Leviathans for whatever reason and they choose not to implement it.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Feb 19, 2017 13:23:08 GMT
Well that is kind of the point. When the problem is based off fundamental aspects of each respective group. Suggesting changes won't be capable of minimizing anything. Okay, I'm going to assume you mean organics and synthetics by "each respective group" rather than Leviathans and the Starkid AI, please let me know if I'm wrong. If you're saying that any suggestions the Starkid AI, with my inputs, gives would be inefficient because they preclude the idea of the Leviathans a) not existing and not getting tithes, then yes, that's possible. It's also possible the only solution it gives that has a decent margin of success is unpalatable to the Leviathans for whatever reason and they choose not to implement it. But the reason the Catalyst did what it did wasn't because a few suggestions would change anything. Leviathan isn't the only one to blame. Remember Leviathan created the Catalyst to deal with the problem their thrall races were having. But Leviathan held the same mentality towards fellow organic races as organic races tend to have towards synthetics. That they are subservient and exist to serve them. Even if Leviathan forced change on their Thralls the second the Thrall races figure out a way to break Leviathan's hold over them the destructive cycle will start again. And the very nature of how Leviathan controls the Thralls means a revolution against them will happen eventually.
|
|
LadyCass
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
Prime Posts: 94
Prime Likes: 25
Posts: 51 Likes: 97
inherit
1333
0
97
LadyCass
51
August 2016
ladyfalcia
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights
94
25
|
Post by LadyCass on Feb 19, 2017 14:12:05 GMT
But the reason the Catalyst did what it did wasn't because a few suggestions would change anything. Leviathan isn't the only one to blame. Remember Leviathan created the Catalyst to deal with the problem their thrall races were having. But Leviathan held the same mentality towards fellow organic races as organic races tend to have towards synthetics. That they are subservient and exist to serve them. Even if Leviathan forced change on their Thralls the second the Thrall races figure out a way to break Leviathan's hold over them the destructive cycle will start again. And the very nature of how Leviathan controls the Thralls means a revolution against them will happen eventually. The Leviathan are definitely to blame for the Reapers, specifically. As I stated before, I have no idea what suggestions the Catalyst would come up with those parameters, or if they would be at all effective. I hypothesised that changing the inputs would mean there would be no Reapers (again, using the assumptions I stated), as it would not feel the need for such an absolute solution, and also because the Leviathans would be very unlikely to implement that solution. If the suggestions would be effective depends a lot on how much information the AI has, and what solutions are available within the set parameters, and also what the actual problem is. Maybe it's as simple as giving synthetics rights as soon as they become sentient. Maybe all synthetic technology has to include elements which the Leviathans can hijack in the same way they can do to organics. Maybe a zero tolerance policy on AI in general so they never get a foothold (ironic if the Catalyst provides this option, I know). However, I don't really know, and I certainly couldn't rate these options in order of effectiveness. My point was that the Leviathans could have asked the Catalyst to stop organics warring with each other with those original parameters and would have probably gotten something similar to the Reapers as the solution. The bigger and more definite a solution, the less finesse it has. Solving absolute problems is only really possible in maths or physics. As an example, imagine if you had an ant farm and you were told that you had to make sure that no ant ever killed another ant. Trying to control the ants is possible if very difficult, but a single slip up means your solution fails irretrievably. But if you kill every single ant then you can't fail.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Feb 19, 2017 14:52:08 GMT
But the reason the Catalyst did what it did wasn't because a few suggestions would change anything. Leviathan isn't the only one to blame. Remember Leviathan created the Catalyst to deal with the problem their thrall races were having. But Leviathan held the same mentality towards fellow organic races as organic races tend to have towards synthetics. That they are subservient and exist to serve them. Even if Leviathan forced change on their Thralls the second the Thrall races figure out a way to break Leviathan's hold over them the destructive cycle will start again. And the very nature of how Leviathan controls the Thralls means a revolution against them will happen eventually. The Leviathan are definitely to blame for the Reapers, specifically. As I stated before, I have no idea what suggestions the Catalyst would come up with those parameters, or if they would be at all effective. I hypothesised that changing the inputs would mean there would be no Reapers (again, using the assumptions I stated), as it would not feel the need for such an absolute solution, and also because the Leviathans would be very unlikely to implement that solution. If the suggestions would be effective depends a lot on how much information the AI has, and what solutions are available within the set parameters, and also what the actual problem is. Maybe it's as simple as giving synthetics rights as soon as they become sentient. Maybe all synthetic technology has to include elements which the Leviathans can hijack in the same way they can do to organics. Maybe a zero tolerance policy on AI in general so they never get a foothold (ironic if the Catalyst provides this option, I know). However, I don't really know, and I certainly couldn't rate these options in order of effectiveness. My point was that the Leviathans could have asked the Catalyst to stop organics warring with each other with those original parameters and would have probably gotten something similar to the Reapers as the solution. The bigger and more definite a solution, the less finesse it has. Solving absolute problems is only really possible in maths or physics. As an example, imagine if you had an ant farm and you were told that you had to make sure that no ant ever killed another ant. Trying to control the ants is possible if very difficult, but a single slip up means your solution fails irretrievably. But if you kill every single ant then you can't fail. Then your trying to create your own argument that has no basis of events or possible events taking place in the game world. Your final example at the end shows you aren't on the same page as events or possible events and their outcomes happening in the game world. The Catalyst isn't trying to stop a single ant from killing another single ant in an ant farm. It is trying to stop a single ant species from killing off all other ant species in the world. Or to put it another way humans wiping out all life on earth besides humans. Possibly going beyond that and make it so only one specific human race (color/ethnicity/religious views, etc) exists on the planet as the only living being more complex then bacteria. Leviathan is responsible for the Reapers only so far as they created the Catalyst to solve the problem it saw. Everything else they aren't directly responsible for because they didn't ask it to create the Reapers. And the Catalyst is an AI. Meaning it is a fully function being capable of forming and creating it's own thoughts. Claiming Leviathan is responsible for all their actions is a lot like claiming it is all Dylann Roof's parent's fault that he walked into a black church in Charleston and shot several black church goes because he is a racist fuck head. Yes they did create him but they didn't tell him to grow up to be a racist fuck waffle and to go to a historically black church and have him shoot several black worshipers. You also ignore that the Catalyst directly states that they tried several attempts to solve the problem. Reaper solution wasn't their first responds. It was the final responds after several tried and failed attempts. Including created short term peace that still ultimately failed in the long run. Which could be anywhere from a couple of years to 1,000 years before it failed and the fighting started again. The time frame is never directly addressed but it is made clear peace is never long term. So boom come the Reapers for the only possible long term solution by preventing the conflict from reaching the start up point to start with. While preserving and archiving the races and societies that developed during each cycle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 15:01:44 GMT
As an example, imagine if you had an ant farm and you were told that you had to make sure that no ant ever killed another ant. Trying to control the ants is possible if very difficult, but a single slip up means your solution fails irretrievably. But if you kill every single ant then you can't fail. The Catalyst (and by extension, the Reapers) have generally failed to "kill every single ant" in both the Leviathan cycle and in the Prothean cycle; nor do they actually undertake to "kill every single ant" in that they intentionally leave the more primitive species to evolve further. That's sort of something that doesn't bode well for the success of the Destroy ending... The data indicate that it is unlikely that the organics of this cycle will be successful in destroying every single Reaper... let alone every single synthetic with just the first (i.e. test) firing of a weapon that has been in development for several cycles and not even been (as far as we know) ever successfully even completed. It is even ambiguous as to whether or not earlier versions of the Crucible had ever been fired. The Catalyst does indicate that they had "tried" solutions similar to Synthesis in the past... and, allegedly, the circumstance that causes him to offer it as an option to Shepard is that the mere docking of the Crucible changed the variables and introduced new possibilities. Vigil indicated that no offer to negotiate a peace (even one based on a surrender) had ever been made to the Protheans and that is one cycle we know did not complete a version of the crucible. Undeniably, however, this cycle's version of the crucible must be different in some way because the Catalyst does acknowledge that Shepard is the first organic to ever stand where he was standing at that moment... however, it doesn't preclude a synthetic from having stood there before Shepard.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Feb 19, 2017 22:06:07 GMT
Undeniably, however, this cycle's version of the crucible must be different in some way because the Catalyst does acknowledge that Shepard is the first organic to ever stand where he was standing at that moment... however, it doesn't preclude a synthetic from having stood there before Shepard. To be honest, an organic could have stood where Shepard, Anderson and TIM stood but not in the RGB place. Absolutely anything is possible. Hell, someone like TIM could have made it up there but only had the Destroy option because Control would be out (indoctrination) and Synthesis doesn't seem to be a thing in most, if not all except one, cycles. We just don't know. Evidence suggests that that Crucible has never before worked. If I were to take a stab at it, I'd say the point of the Catalyst is two-fold: 1) it can generate enormous power and 2) being a mass relay (alpha, maybe?), it can send the Crucible waves to all of the other relays. Without both of those factors, the Crucible might work but not on the scale necessary to defeat the Reapers. The above is a reason why I think the Catalyst was never intended to include the Intelligence by the races who contributed to building the Crucible. For that to be true, the Intelligence would have to be the primary motivator of the Crucible in order to facilitate some endgame of its own devising. I assume prior races did not know of the Intelligence, or that it was an intrinsic part of the Citadel. Calling the Intelligence the "Catalyst" is a mistake. Either the Intelligence generated the whole Crucible idea or it took it over for its own purposes.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Feb 19, 2017 22:17:45 GMT
It didn't matter who faced the thing. Just had to be organic. An organic was needed to activate the crucible because the thing can't do it
Leviathan calls the thing intelligence. The thing calls itself catalyst. Which one is right? Still curious why the protheans called the Citadel, catalyst when throughout the trilogy it was always called Citadel. Sovereign, both vi's on Ilos say Citadel, Javik says Citadel. Its only vendetta that calls it catalyst. I wonder if the group building the crucible at that time used that as a code word and the word catalyst was just a coincidence?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 23:10:23 GMT
It didn't matter who faced the thing. Just had to be organic. An organic was needed to activate the crucible because the thing can't do it Leviathan calls the thing intelligence. The thing calls itself catalyst. Which one is right? Still curious why the protheans called the Citadel, catalyst when throughout the trilogy it was always called Citadel. Sovereign, both vi's on Ilos say Citadel, Javik says Citadel. Its only vendetta that calls it catalyst. I wonder if the group building the crucible at that time used that as a code word and the word catalyst was just a coincidence? So... an intelligent person cannot be a catalyst for change? I have no problem with it being called both an intelligence and a catalyst. I also believe that a certain sequence of events can also be described as being a catalyst for change. Shepard himself/herself is actually a catalyst by virtue of the fact that it is he/she who "altered the variables." The term "crucible" also plays into this overarching idea of causing change: "a place or situation in which concentrated forces interact to cause or influence change or development" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crucible). What evidence do you have that a synthetic (say a geth) could not have activated it had they been the one standing there instead of Shepard. We know the Catalyst cannot act on it's own, but it doesn't say a different synthetic could never act... and he only says that Shepard is the first organic to ever stand there. He never says that a different synthetic has never stood there before. If a synthetic were standing in the same spot as Shepard (say Legion), with the exact same choices being posed to them... what would they have chosen?
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Feb 19, 2017 23:20:53 GMT
So... an intelligent person cannot be a catalyst for change? Person? What person are you referring to? The catalyst/intelligence is just a thing. Not a person.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 14:48:24 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 23:42:18 GMT
So... an intelligent person cannot be a catalyst for change? Person? What person are you referring to? The catalyst/intelligence is just a thing. Not a person. It's meant to illustrate a real life application of the two terms - "intelligence" and "catalyst"... They aren't mutually exclusive IRL, so why would they have to be mutually exclusive in the game?
|
|