Is there a way Bioware can even solve the problem of animations in their future games?

If I was this picky about everything as people were picky about these animations, I would be complaining about why the word ' bunch' seems to be the only unit designating more than one in the US. Its like everyone is brainwashed so they all have to say everything the same way.

Same goes with ' I got this'  and 'awesome'. 

I would call that bad dialogue choice. 

People in the thread are already confused about saying there are the supposed issues with generally praised combat - and I have to ask what exactly is wrong with writing and where does the "lack of attention of detail occurs"... I mean - I'm fairly sure we only got to see 10 hours of the game - many things WILL lack details that will be filled in later. That's sort of how big RPGs work, and we're yet to see how well it works in MEA.

The dialogue I'm not even touching, because I know that's a very subjective thing. Some people love some stuff other people despise, and it will not just be limited to dialogue, but whole companions as well.

... When? We have a few comments from dazed folks still waking up from a nap after Hyperion hits the energy cloud and a few minor characters taking their time off when shuttles are being prepared to descend on H7. There's nothing that I recall that sticks out as abrupt tonal shifts - if anything, the initial good spirits shows naivete of fresh arrivals, who don't yet realize just how f*cked they are. You know.. like Titanic.

Erm... the same can be said via character, so obviously there's self-awareness there. That's not to say that there are limits to what 'backup plans' can do in a situation where pretty much everything goes wrong.

I'm not arguing about eyeballs - the darting and tracking could use work. As for blinking in rhythm with the speech... that's what people do?

I have no experience with shooters so for me this is all new, but I feel I can't yet asses it all considering that there are obviously skill power-ups, mods, weapons and gear that will be unlock later in the game.

the far too large map areas, about half the romances, and the MP

Multiplayer is very popular and will never get cut so that's just unfeasible.

Exploration and Large Maps =/= Animations. They do not dip into the same workload or chain of development. They could reduce the size of the maps and it would make no difference.

The only sensible one is cutting romance as you said, but those are a unique draw to BioWare games. Also, given that BioWare games lean heavily towards companions and relationship-building, not having romances would be contrived. They also don't constitute a significant amount of content for it to matter.

I am personally fine with them deciding to narrow their scope. No need to focus too much on open world stuff. Do only 600 speaking characters instead of 1200 but do them good. But that's just me. i know there are some people who like bioware trying to do open world designs.

We as gamer don't deserve them to fix it.

I am very sad

Telling me I'm not reading while you obviously keep ignoring my points totally. First of all, yes, I'm talking about witcher and ME1, because YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THOSE GAMES in your posts. Obviously I didn't want to take other games as example, because that would make no sense and you would sure say "what does that game have anything to do with it?" You were talking about witcher and ME1 before I even put my first comment here. Besides, I have put bunch of different analogies to make a point, so it's not just talking about witcher, but I guess you didn't read that, because then you couldn't blame me on talking about witcher all the time, lol. And then I'm not reading....

You weren't comparing games? Let's see on of your quotes:
"In fact, I was quite amused when people juxtaposed some of the animations from MEA to character from ME1, because the major difference between them wasn't animation per se; it was the fact that the character had dark eyes, dark brows and a very heavy eyeliner, which has accentuated all of the minuscule eyelid movements... Heck, even effing Geralt has eyeliner in TW3."  - LOL
I don't throw a fit about people analysing for the sake of analysing. THE ONLY POINT I'm trying to make and you keep ignoring it so conveniantely is, that you insist on ignoring how people percieve what's a good animation and what not. People say they prefer X animations (yeah I'll use X instead of certain game, so you don't lose it), so you decide they are wrong and tell them they are exaggerating. Your quote -> "... See, this is what I mean when I say overreaction or confirmation bias. Looking for stuff with a microscope.."
Isn't that hilarious? You need a microscope to see that Cora can't walk for shit? Every average Joe can spot that silly animations in a second, therefore your claim it's exaggerationn is nonsense. So, with your logic, people should pause that scene and inspect it thoroughly to examine how's lightning, how's environment, how's atmosphere etc in order to make out why she walks like that. So, if people say they don't like animation, it's because it looks bad, not because circumstances were harsh. It's Bioware's job to acknowledge all those factors that will affect the scene when it's played and make sure it doesn't affect it in bad way. I understand that this thread is about finding a solution, it's ok to present suggestion, but it's silly to say "you are exaggerating" because you don't agree with people about certain animations. If you ignore the problem and say Cora walk is fine, then how is that a solution? A lot of people obviously think it's not fine.

But does Nova sacrifice the shielding in Andromeda? That tradeoff is the reason there was no cooldown for it in ME3. 

You can evolve it to do that yes.