Gil VS Kallo

Love Kallo as a character, and I respect his feelings, but I thought that siding with Gil was the right thing.

I also think their scene with 'sharing the blueprints' was one of the most touching and well-executed scenes I've seen in my 80 hours of PT.

I sided with Gil because the changes he was making were basically upgrades and improving the ship. Even Kallo acknowledges that. However, to be honest, I wanted to side with Kallo, because I liked him more. But objectively (from my perspective) had to put safety and the needs of the Tempest first.

[brc]
Yeah, Kallo sharing the blueprints was actually executed well.

Gil.

Shepard modified the Normandy because it wouldnt hold up as it was.

Ken and Gabby Adams EDI teamed up to modify the Normandy.

EDI modified herself as the mission changed.

The Geth upgraded their guns.

Its just what you do.

The real choice is '' work together you idiots '' and even the game pushes the two to make up and work together. If I'm feeling logical, I go with Gil, if I'm feeling emotional, I go with Kallo. Depends on my mood :poker:

first Kallo then Gil, then Kallo

i totally respect Kallo's design, but some updates could help the Tempest and the crew to survive

Gil. It's the difference between design and real world application. In that case Gil has the most experience.

I sided with Gill. I respect Kallo's opinion and Gill shouldn't modify the ship without notifying the team, and especially Kallo, but he's right that the design documents shouldn't be a holy grail. Even the best designs can improve from incorporating field experiences. This is especially true because the Andromeda galaxy was, and still is, a big unknown. It is not more than logical that some things, like the Scourge, couldn't be anticipated by the design team. In this case it would be a shame to not upgrade your ship. We've seen this in Mass Effect 2, where even though the SR2 was a major enhancement over the SR1 there were still upgrades avaiable, even though the SR2 was literally state-of-the-art. You could stick to your principles and choose not to upgrade because the ship is already very good and the designs are nice, but in ME2 this literally costs lifes. Even though this isn't the case in ME:A (I think), it would still be stupid not to upgrade where possible to avoid the same consequences. In the end Kallo should acknowledge that no design is absolutely perfect and that modifications are therefore warranted to help the team survive.

Gil. Making adjustments, even ones that alter the original specs, is a necessity. While I understand where Kallo is coming from, not implementing upgrades could get the crew killed.

Kallo, Gil is just too reckless and don't know the ship the way Kallo does. Upgrade the ship all you want but talk to Kallo first to make sure it's safe. I'm sidings with Gil in my 3rd playthrough to see this cut scene. 

I sympathize with poor Kallo, but it's Gil all the way. If Gil was incompetent, then yeah we'd have a huge issue, but IMO there is no indication that he is (granted, Tempest = lots of brand new tech, so where did all his experience come from? Honestly, I feel I just have to go with it). Gil is doing his job, Kallo is interfering. If Kallo has a serious concern, he ought to take it up with a superior (Cora or Ryder), not be like, "it's fine, it's fine, go pathfind" until there is a full-on confrontation with a co-worker.