No wonder Andromeda sucks. Because the game formula they copied, The Witcher 3, sucks!

Dude, I have access to both console and pc games. For Skyrim, I was just too impatient to await my new CPU and RAM upgrades - and I badly need something to wash off the bad taste of TW3. But for online games like Dark Souls and Mass Effect, console is the way to go because folks not on your friend list can actually communicate with each other. Send/Receive glorious hate mail we do. As well as more folks with mic. That's what my point was, not all is perfect on both sides of the pond.

upgrade your toaster. Oh boy do I remember wayyy wayyy back in the early days of BioWare wherein CDPR advertised their First game the Witcher 1 running on Bioware's engine... people bashed them disrespected them. How the tables have turned.

if you jumped immediately into the WORLD OF THE WITCHER WITH 3 and then complain of being lost or bored then you are one of the most idiotic blokes I've met online. I admit I STARTED WITH ME3 and got lost so I forced myself to play the first two games and it was worth it. I discovered the Witcher after the horrible / mediocre ending of ME 3 since I felt empty after playing it.

I started with Witcher 2 and then Witcher 1 then 3... it was worth it. It is how continuing role playing games are meant to be played.

Andromeda was supposed to be a reboot of the franchise but is mediocre as hell. I'd rather get abused by starbrat than to replay this abomination.

Here enjoy my screenshot:

Maybe it's time moderators stepped up a bit. This is getting embarassing.

Geralt doesn't go around planets to do heaps of generic fetch quests with uninteresting companions lol. You should play Horizon, that game only has to load when you fast travel, die or enter a cut scene. 

You kind of missed the point...

Are you another one of those who thinks art is all subjective?

Not lost and bored because TW3 is a very linear game by design. And that's what I'm talking about here, game play and open world design, among other things related to. So not exactly saying TW3 is not entirely worth it, but to someone who values strong game play aspects in his RPGs, it makes it very difficult to keep pushing on with this game.

You totally missed the point as to what he was talking about.

"Not lost and bored because TW3 is a very linear game by design."



good god. What where you expecting? Where you expecting Geralt of Rivia to have long black hair wearing a THONG in combat while summoning Satan himself?! it's called "THE WORLD OF THE WITCHER"for a god damn reason. 


CLAIMS to be disappointed with linearity and gameplay... never understood the concept in the first place. This is why I seldom talk to people who jumped immediately into the World of the Witcher especially with 3 without playing the previous titles first. More so who has never read the books.


In this conversation I have learned that you sir are either:

1. a serious Bethesda/BioWare fan which is not bad but are blind and worship them by riding their dicks without giving them proper criticism and feedback and would zealously defend them against any other competitors

2. A good troll

3. Not a real RPG player


Listen, I don't play or stick to one genre of games only. I play almost every genre including flight simulators like DCS and IL-2 STURMOVIK ... and I know when I experience good gameplay or see a good game. The first game to really peak my interest was the Half Life series from Valve and despite the protagonist not speaking out, they manage to bloody tell a fucking story with great gameplay for everyone to enjoy. Then we had the Medal of Honor series which also influenced me alot as well. The Witcher was weird for me at first coming from Asia dominated by Japanese Role Playing games most of the time, but the Witcher was spot on in capturing politics, brutality, and even superstition/folklore of Europe [REAL EUROPE] and I was blown away by this. Even games like Chrono trigger despite its age and simplicity I never fail to respect them and the great story telling it gave.

Skyrim and New Vegas which is my first elder scrolls and fallout btw totally blew me away with player freedom.[Though alot of Elder scrolls veterans told me that it doesn't hold a candle to Morrowind and Oblivion and considered it one of the worst in the franchise same applies to Fallout 4]

these are the things which you fail to see. You fail to see what CDPR wanted the Witcher to be in the first place. To respect the source material and inject Polish culture / European culture into it. The execution was perfect since it didn't just want to be another elder scrolls game. IT WANTED TO BE A WITCHER GAME. The open world formula is already laid out since time-immemorial, they just had to tweak it or make it unique for their goals or the aim they have in mind i.e. EUROPEAN accuracy.

Even something like FFXV which is one of the reasons why I really wanted to get a PS4 in the first place had issues of development and it showed. The leading antagonist STELLA NOX FLEURET was changed to some random red hair dude which turned me off and Luna Freya being another generic damsel in distress. Despite such, I still respect the decision of the game developers and would buy it on Steam when it gets released soon.



then we have Andromeda.... ooohhhh Andromeda the amount of inconsistencies here is mind boggling.

Why are you posting pictures of Disney World on a Bioware forum...strange...

Eh, same here. I loved it at the time, and I still enjoying it (tho I think a good portion of that is nostalgia). And yes, New Vegas is one of my all-time favs. I always merely musing over the OP's inconsistency. He claims to only enjoying things that are of an extremely high quality and yet greatly enjoyed Fallout 3.