inherit
231
0
Jan 20, 2022 14:46:14 GMT
1,841
goishen
twitch.tv/goishen
2,360
August 2016
goishen
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
goishen
|
Post by goishen on Sept 16, 2016 16:34:26 GMT
I suspect that the lack of weaponry on the Mako emphasizes the point that this is not a military expedition. I reckon we have limited access to any kind of advanced military vehicles or equipment. It's all about exploration and colonization. Even the Tempest, as I understand it, is not a Warship. Obviously it's going to be a shooter which implies there will be a lot of combat but I guess we need to build on our combat ability. We aren't an elite squad of N7 quality fighters fighting on the front line of a Galactic war with all the latest advanced weaponry at our beck and call. It's a different mindset and an unarmed Mako is part of that. I suspect that it's merely a time/size/weight/tech issue. Yah, we are gonna build something, carry it across billions of light years, to shoot maybe nobody. No, we are gonna build a vehicle, put the plans on the ship for the cannons, and then once we get there shoot them if need be. It could be we're shooting spit balls when they're firing plasma ultra sonic 9000 beams at us. If that's the case, then what's the use in constructing the cannons in the first place?
|
|
inherit
217
0
3,339
General Mahad
You'll be peeling goddamn potatoes for the rest of your miserable excuse for a military career!
2,074
August 2016
vaas
|
Post by General Mahad on Sept 16, 2016 17:01:39 GMT
I suspect that the lack of weaponry on the Mako emphasizes the point that this is not a military expedition. I reckon we have limited access to any kind of advanced military vehicles or equipment. It's all about exploration and colonization. Even the Tempest, as I understand it, is not a Warship. Obviously it's going to be a shooter which implies there will be a lot of combat but I guess we need to build on our combat ability. We aren't an elite squad of N7 quality fighters fighting on the front line of a Galactic war with all the latest advanced weaponry at our beck and call. It's a different mindset and an unarmed Mako is part of that. I kinda like it. An emphasis on exploration and not warfare, kinda like the first Mass Effect.
|
|
inherit
299
0
6,534
AlleluiaElizabeth
2,659
August 2016
alleluiaelizabeth
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by AlleluiaElizabeth on Sept 16, 2016 17:53:07 GMT
You can have an emphasis on exploration, not warfare, and still have guns on your vehicle. Nothing says you have to use the guns on innocent people. But if the Andromedan equivalent of a Thresher Maw ambushes me while exploring, I'd like to be able to shoot it without having to get out of my vehicle and expose my team, thank you.
This is actually even more important if Ryder's team is supposedly not the "combat elite" of the galaxy that Shepard's apparently is now considered. Maws either took out or nearly took out Shepard multiple times. For a not!Shepard, every advantage you can get would be important.
|
|
inherit
168
0
14,267
Rascoth
4,264
August 2016
rascoth
|
Post by Rascoth on Sept 16, 2016 17:55:49 GMT
I'm not totally sure what the obsession over having cannons is. Defense reasons aside, the only time the cannons were "necessary" was actually none. Okay, no, there was a time or two with the Thresher Maw where you had to kill it in order to find out what happened at the particular site but for the most part, the cannons didn't have a real use. Anything smaller than the Threshers could be handled on foot, assuming there was adequate coverage. Well, if you were determinated (and wanted additional exp), Threshers could be handled on foot as well. But truth be told, I would like at least small gun on the Mako.
|
|
Monk
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: MonkMcMueller
PSN: Monk_McMueller
Prime Posts: 600, something, something
Posts: 1,074 Likes: 1,370
inherit
347
0
1,370
Monk
1,074
August 2016
monkmcmueller
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
MonkMcMueller
Monk_McMueller
600, something, something
|
Post by Monk on Sept 16, 2016 18:12:30 GMT
Well, if you were determinated (and wanted additional exp), Threshers could be handled on foot as well. Nice! It reminds me of pistol whipping Hunters to death in the original Halo. It could be done, just took some determination. And proper footing.
|
|
Thrombin
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Posts: 895 Likes: 1,300
inherit
1491
0
Aug 14, 2019 15:29:00 GMT
1,300
Thrombin
895
Sept 8, 2016 11:35:16 GMT
September 2016
thrombin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
|
Post by Thrombin on Sept 17, 2016 20:56:48 GMT
You can have an emphasis on exploration, not warfare, and still have guns on your vehicle. Nothing says you have to use the guns on innocent people. But if the Andromedan equivalent of a Thresher Maw ambushes me while exploring, I'd like to be able to shoot it without having to get out of my vehicle and expose my team, thank you. This is actually even more important if Ryder's team is supposedly not the "combat elite" of the galaxy that Shepard's apparently is now considered. Maws either took out or nearly took out Shepard multiple times. For a not!Shepard, every advantage you can get would be important. We don't really know the circumstances yet, though. My guess is that this group of civilians decided to leave the Milky Way after the first Reaper, Sovereign attacked the Citadel and it became clear (to those who believed Shepard, anyway), that this was the beginning of the end of civilization. That would have given them a maximum of three years to get the expedition together and leave the Galaxy. They may have had limited ships, limited room on those ships, limited funds and limited access to military equipment. It's all very well saying that they should have guns on their vehicles but 'should have' and 'able to have' are two different things. In any case, they are invaders of the Andromeda Galaxy. They need to look as unthreatening as possible when exploring if they're not going to evoke shoot now ask questions later responses from the natives!
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 17, 2016 21:09:41 GMT
In any case, they are invaders of the Andromeda Galaxy. They need to look as unthreatening as possible when exploring if they're not going to evoke shoot now ask questions later responses from the natives! Then have concealed weapons rather than none at all. Plus I don't but the we want to look nonthreatening when we will be carrying an arsenal on our backs. I doubt any alien race will be like "Carrying up to five different weapons on your person is something peaceful people do, but a single gun on their IFV? That's too far."
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,293
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 17, 2016 21:14:23 GMT
Looking unthreatening is all well and good, but the enemy may not see it that way especially if you happen to be roaming around their area
|
|
Thrombin
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Posts: 895 Likes: 1,300
inherit
1491
0
Aug 14, 2019 15:29:00 GMT
1,300
Thrombin
895
Sept 8, 2016 11:35:16 GMT
September 2016
thrombin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
|
Post by Thrombin on Sept 17, 2016 23:44:17 GMT
In any case, they are invaders of the Andromeda Galaxy. They need to look as unthreatening as possible when exploring if they're not going to evoke shoot now ask questions later responses from the natives! Then have concealed weapons rather than none at all. Plus I don't but the we want to look nonthreatening when we will be carrying an arsenal on our backs. I doubt any alien race will be like "Carrying up to five different weapons on your person is something peaceful people do, but a single gun on their IFV? That's too far." Maybe they do have concealed weapons. All we know is that the picture doesn't show any and we've been told it won't have a cannon. For that matter, the crew is something of a concealed weapon anyway! It's true that the exigencies of the gameplay may require the party to look more threatening than would generally be sensible (depending on the circumstances) but it's not inconcievable that Bioware thought of that and only requires the squad in combat gear when it won't be an issue.
|
|
Thrombin
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Posts: 895 Likes: 1,300
inherit
1491
0
Aug 14, 2019 15:29:00 GMT
1,300
Thrombin
895
Sept 8, 2016 11:35:16 GMT
September 2016
thrombin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
|
Post by Thrombin on Sept 17, 2016 23:58:40 GMT
Looking unthreatening is all well and good, but the enemy may not see it that way especially if you happen to be roaming around their area True but, the way I see it, if the planet you land on is inhabited then it's just you against an entire planet's defense forces. No amount of weapons will help if the authorities decide you're a threat and there's no better way to make you look like a threat than to be driving a heavily armed tank around their backyard! Plus, if it's a civilian expedition then supplying the expedition with an All Terrain Vehicle is one thing, supplying it with a tank is another thing entirely. It's like explorers arranging an expedition up the Amazon and deciding to bring an Apache Attack helicopter with in case they run into hostile natives. I seriously doubt that happens however useful such a helicopter might be! The thing is, we know the Mako is not heavily armed based on what we've seen and what we've been told. So I just prefer to spend my energy coming up with reasons for why that might be the case rather than coming up with reasons for why it shouldn't be!
|
|
inherit
131
0
Dec 17, 2018 14:01:15 GMT
1,803
Ahriman
1,503
August 2016
ahriman
|
Post by Ahriman on Sept 18, 2016 0:08:20 GMT
True but, the way I see it, if the planet you land on is inhabited then it's just you against an entire planet's defense forces. No amount of weapons will help if the authorities decide you're a threat and there's no better way to make you look like a threat than to be driving a heavily armed tank around their backyard! Well, then it's time to call orbital bombardment to prove our peaceful intentions.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,293
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 18, 2016 0:20:53 GMT
True but, the way I see it, if the planet you land on is inhabited then it's just you against an entire planet's defense forces. No amount of weapons will help if the authorities decide you're a threat and there's no better way to make you look like a threat than to be driving a heavily armed tank around their backyard! So rather go in defenseless? Good luck. And even if you're outnumbered or they have weapons that would eliminate you very easily, at least you have something instead of nothing. Sure the crew may have weapons with them. They have to get out of the vehicle to use them. They will be exposed to enemy fire. But they could use the mako as cover. Sure. Until heavy weapons fire destroy the mako and Ryder and squad become dust. Its possible that it could get out of trouble seeing how fast it looks in the trailer, but what it couldn't for whatever reason. What do you do? Except that vehicle is usually heavily armed and if it comes under fire, it will call for support, if needed. The AH-64 Apache shows up and fires at the enemy. I have seen an AH-64 Apache Helicopter when I was in Iraq and Kuwait. It will do a lot of damage. It doesn't have to be heavily armed. I've even posted in the thread it doesn't need a cannon. Just have a gatling gun so in case the mako comes under attack, it can fire back giving it that bit of time to call in reinforements, most likely the tempest, to provide cover fire for the mako so it can get away. Or it can be used to at least have the enemy get to cover allowing the mako to get out of trouble faster than it got itself in trouble
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 18, 2016 4:36:54 GMT
True but, the way I see it, if the planet you land on is inhabited then it's just you against an entire planet's defense forces. No amount of weapons will help if the authorities decide you're a threat and there's no better way to make you look like a threat than to be driving a heavily armed tank around their backyard! Well, then it's time to call orbital bombardment to prove our peaceful intentions. It worked for the Sangheili in Halo 3. They glassed half of Africa to show they were friends with humans(by saving us from a Flood infestation).
|
|
inherit
410
0
Nov 23, 2024 11:57:59 GMT
3,503
Sartoz
6,890
August 2016
sartoz
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.hVm-5wNStlyTEXjhwDoa_wHaEK%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=8f745a5f30b08f8231ddb64664df7375d23cc10878aa50d66fec54e9d570c7e2&ipo=images
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Sartoz on Sept 18, 2016 5:29:37 GMT
<<<<<<<<<<(0)>>>>>>>>>>
From the NEOGAF survey leak posted in April of 2015.
"Explore the surfaces of 100s of planets in the Helius Cluster in your versatile land vehicle, the Mako. Whether you are looking for a place to set up a colony, searching for a Remnant vault or attacking a Khet Outpost, you will enjoy getting there in your Mako. Equip and upgrade your Mako in dozens of ways, like adding turbo boosters, upgrading your shield generator or adding a Hostile Detector to your radar to create the ultimate planetary exploration vehicle. Finally, get your Mako looking the way you want with a custom paintjob"
Remember that the studio had about a year, to change their mind, before the studio froze (after EA PLAY ?) all new features and started polishing ME:A. Given this Hostile Detector + attacking a Khet Outpost, I really don't understand Bio's rationale for giving us a semi-naked Mako. On the other hand, the level design may exclude all hostile fauna and combat is restricted to fighting our enemies.
|
|
inherit
535
0
4,337
clips7
MiNd...ExPaNsIoN....
1,829
August 2016
clips7
Blackgas7
|
Post by clips7 on Sept 18, 2016 8:09:25 GMT
I haven't read the several pages that has transpired already, but i think at the very least this vehicle will be armed with light weapons to protect itself. Even in that latest vid it displayed them running from hostiles and that Asari firing her weapon at the enemy. It just depends on what direction they want to go in. Will these segments of exploration be combat free or will they be staged with combat levels or both?
I remember in ME2 there was simple assignments where you would go to a planet just to briefly power up a satellite with no to very little combat involved, but you still had your arsenal of weapons. It would kinda make sense for the crew to have decent firepower when landing on these planets because you never know what you are going to expect.
|
|
Thrombin
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Posts: 895 Likes: 1,300
inherit
1491
0
Aug 14, 2019 15:29:00 GMT
1,300
Thrombin
895
Sept 8, 2016 11:35:16 GMT
September 2016
thrombin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
|
Post by Thrombin on Sept 18, 2016 17:13:35 GMT
True but, the way I see it, if the planet you land on is inhabited then it's just you against an entire planet's defense forces. No amount of weapons will help if the authorities decide you're a threat and there's no better way to make you look like a threat than to be driving a heavily armed tank around their backyard! So rather go in defenseless? Good luck. And even if you're outnumbered or they have weapons that would eliminate you very easily, at least you have something instead of nothing. Sure the crew may have weapons with them. They have to get out of the vehicle to use them. They will be exposed to enemy fire. But they could use the mako as cover. Sure. Until heavy weapons fire destroy the mako and Ryder and squad become dust. Its possible that it could get out of trouble seeing how fast it looks in the trailer, but what it couldn't for whatever reason. What do you do? I didn't say go in completely defenseless but it's just one of several reasons I mentioned that might explain why the Mako they use is not armed with a heavy cannon. It's function is to get around the planet not to fight things and certainly not to provoke hostile intentions. Would you advise AirForce One to go on a state visit to Russia surrounded by a couple of fighter jets on the grounds that the President shouldn't be defenseless? I don't think it works that way! I think you missed my point. My point is it would be great if non-military expeditions up the Amazon could have access to an AH-64 Apache but they don't and they don't for the very good reason that there's no way a civilian expedition could ever get access to one! Which is a possible reason why the Andromeda expedition might not have an armed Mako. For example, they may be prohibitively expensive, embargoed against non-military use or may require specialised training to operate which non-military personnel don't have. Or, maybe, the Alliance have just nabbed them all because they're preparing for the Reapers on the quiet and can't afford to let any out of their hands! Presumably the Mako has to be air-tight so any Gatling Gun equivalent is going to need to be self-contained and automated on the outside of the vehicle and I would have thought we'd have seen such a thing in the visuals if it existed (unless it's a pop-up job ala James Bond!). I wouldn't have a problem with the Mako being armed I'm just coming up with reasons to explain what we know about it currently, which suggests that it isn't. I just don't feel we can say that the way the Mako is now is wrong when we don't know the circumstances behind it's use or the expedition's resources in general. I'm giving Bioware the benefit of the doubt by coming up with reasons that might explain what we know.
|
|
bshep
N5
We destroy them or they destroy us.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: MasterDassJennir
Prime Posts: 1876
Prime Likes: 376
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 7,936
inherit
269
0
7,936
bshep
We destroy them or they destroy us.
4,444
August 2016
bshep
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
MasterDassJennir
1876
376
|
Post by bshep on Sept 18, 2016 19:23:09 GMT
So far everything we know(which is almost nothing by the way) seems to imply we aren't going as a military expedition.
|
|
inherit
410
0
Nov 23, 2024 11:57:59 GMT
3,503
Sartoz
6,890
August 2016
sartoz
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.hVm-5wNStlyTEXjhwDoa_wHaEK%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=8f745a5f30b08f8231ddb64664df7375d23cc10878aa50d66fec54e9d570c7e2&ipo=images
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Sartoz on Sept 18, 2016 19:35:58 GMT
So far everything we know(which is almost nothing by the way) seems to imply we aren't going as a military expedition. <<<<<<<<<<(0)>>>>>>>>> Flynn said the opening of the game shows us fleeing to another galaxy. I don't equate fleeing with conquering. PS: Flynn's interview was done shortly after the presentation at the Sony event.
|
|
bshep
N5
We destroy them or they destroy us.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: MasterDassJennir
Prime Posts: 1876
Prime Likes: 376
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 7,936
inherit
269
0
7,936
bshep
We destroy them or they destroy us.
4,444
August 2016
bshep
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
MasterDassJennir
1876
376
|
Post by bshep on Sept 18, 2016 19:40:57 GMT
So far everything we know(which is almost nothing by the way) seems to imply we aren't going as a military expedition. <<<<<<<<<<(0)>>>>>>>>> Flynn said the opening of the game shows us fleeing to another galaxy. I don't equate fleeing with conquering. PS: Flynn's interview was done shortly after the presentation at the Sony event. I remember that. I found curious how he choose to say we fled the Milky Way.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,293
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 18, 2016 21:58:51 GMT
I didn't say go in completely defenseless but it's just one of several reasons I mentioned that might explain why the Mako they use is not armed with a heavy cannon. Why are you stuck on this cannon thing? I don't see the mako having a cannon, at least not a large one since the size of the mako wouldn't support the weight? I would rather have a gatling gun or something like the M60 machine gun on each side No one is saying to promote hostilities or to fight things, but you have to be aware that you're in an unknown area that might have enemies that fire first ask questions later attitude. They wouldn't care about your peaceful intentions Yes. Not on every flight does it have an escort, but it has happened That's a poor comparison. We know a lot about the amazon, but nothing about Andromeda or the area that will be explored in that galaxy That's a lame excuse. If the cost prevented to add any defenses than the they should never of started a project like that. One of the first things they should consider is defenses since they're entering a place they know nothing about. Having defenses at least gives you the opportunity to escape or to survive long enough to call for reinforcements. Are you also suggesting the ships have no defenses when they leave for Andromeda because of cost issues? It would be a very short game if they don't if they come under attack as soon as they enter Andromeda. I would buy the game if they did that just for the laugh. Have it like the mako in ME1. The only reason it would need to be air-tight is for any hazardous environments the player encounters. I have an idea why. The new mako looks cool. I will admit that. And its fast. So they may have it to where the mako can out run any enemy fire it encounters instead of having to add a cannon or a machine gun. That might work until the mako gets hit by heavy weapons fire. I too would be curious to the reason the mako wouldn't have any weapons.
|
|
Thrombin
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Posts: 895 Likes: 1,300
inherit
1491
0
Aug 14, 2019 15:29:00 GMT
1,300
Thrombin
895
Sept 8, 2016 11:35:16 GMT
September 2016
thrombin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
|
Post by Thrombin on Sept 19, 2016 11:06:24 GMT
I didn't say go in completely defenseless but it's just one of several reasons I mentioned that might explain why the Mako they use is not armed with a heavy cannon. Why are you stuck on this cannon thing? I don't see the mako having a cannon, at least not a large one since the size of the mako wouldn't support the weight? I would rather have a gatling gun or something like the M60 machine gun on each side The reference to the cannon is a) because the old Mako in ME1 had one and because that’s what Bioware specifically said the new one didn’t have. They haven’t said it doesn’t have smaller arms hidden somewhere so I’m not trying to support their absence only the cannon’s absence! Presumably it still has shields and armour and speed. It’s not defenceless just offenseless The point is, it’s not a military vehicle it’s a transport vehicle. Why shouldn’t a civilian expedition have transport vehicles that aren’t loaded for bear? It seems perfectly reasonable to me. Even the army have trucks and jeeps that don’t have weapons on them. Maybe, but it seems to me that flying an American fighter plane into Russian airspace would be asking for it to be shot down and tantamount to a declaration of war. It’s a provocation and it wouldn’t be logical to be so provocative on a diplomatic mission. I used the Amazon example because I just watched the first episode of Hooten and the Lady which rather emphasized the dangers of the Amazon! But what we know of the dangers isn’t the point. The point is, even if we wanted military hardware for something like that it would be extremely difficult for any civilian expedition to get hold of it. That’s why they don’t have them. Why waste time with hacking your way through the undergrowth risking snakes and dangerous animals if you can just drive through in a tank? Because it would be completely impractical to try to get hold of a tank! Well, also because the trees would get in the way. But you know what I mean Assuming they are leaving the Galaxy to escape the Reapers they don’t have any choice on the matter. If they can’t get hold of military hardware then they still need to get the hell out of Dodge, as they say! I imagine they do have a certain amount of offensive capability but maybe they had to ration it and maybe the Mako didn’t make the cut. Plus, let’s not confuse defense with offense. The Mako is a tough nut to crack with its armour and its shields, its speed and manouverability and its self-repairing omnigel. It has plenty of defensive capability. It can survive and flee and call for support just as well with or without guns. But they’re not planning on invading Andromeda. Their survival is probably going to depend on co-operating with the natives, not fighting them. Offensive weaponry isn’t necessarily going to be their number one priority when outfitting the mission. Works for me
|
|
inherit
950
0
128
anddill
90
August 2016
anddill
|
Post by anddill on Sept 19, 2016 12:44:54 GMT
You don't need obvious weapons. Like others say´d before, they can wreck your mission. Better to hide them under the seat. If there´s something to shoot at, you can leave the vehicle, spread out in the terrain and fire your mass effect hand weapons, which, if you follow the lore, have the punch of an todays gatling gun.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,293
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 19, 2016 13:44:22 GMT
The reference to the cannon is a) because the old Mako in ME1 had one and because that’s what Bioware specifically said the new one didn’t have. They haven’t said it doesn’t have smaller arms hidden somewhere so I’m not trying to support their absence only the cannon’s absence! So what that ME1 mako had a cannon? Didn't they say no cannon about 2 years ago? Either way, I don't see the vehicle having a large cannon because it looks like it couldn't support the weight You go ahead and presumably have you shields and armor. That can help for only so long. Having weapons will give it more time to get away, survive while waiting for reinforements or maybe able to defeat the enemy depending on how large a force is attacking While that is true, they can be fitted with weapons if need to be and they're also near other vehicles that do have weapons mounted on that vehicle. Maybe nothing. You were incorrect in your example I don't know what the hooten and the lady thing is so that means nothing to me. Knowing the dangers is the point. It helps to know what you face instead of going in blind. Is it possible that no matter how well Ryder is prepared that the enemy could wipe us out very easily? Yes At least you have something to defend yourself with. That's all you can do. I don't agree. The trailers show no reapers. The trailers show Earth in good condition. The trailers shows the ships built. I would say there's no panic at all. The latest trailer with the shuttles heading to them are most likely carrying the last of any volunteers and supplies before the ships head to Andromeda. At that point they have everything they need. Defenses for the mako and anything else would be the last thing that should be rationed. What? ME1 mako may of been tough, but it still could be destroyed. Small arms fire could destroy it. The thrasher maw can destroy it by hitting it one time. It had no speed and the maneuverability wasn't that great. But it did have the cannon and smalls arms fire that can rotate 360° to deal with the enemy which helped a lot Maybe. Is there a reason for making that comment? I don't believe anyone has ever mentioned invading Andromeda except you. I'm sure we will get help from the natives, but having weapons to defend yourself helps just in case.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 19, 2016 13:53:23 GMT
It makes no sense to me to name something that is toothless, as in doesn't have any offensive armaments, after an apex predator and put it in the same classification as offensive vehicles like the M35 Mako and the M44 Hammerhead. If you are going to have it just be a glorified RC car fine, but at least give it a designation and classification that is appropriate.
|
|
Monk
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: MonkMcMueller
PSN: Monk_McMueller
Prime Posts: 600, something, something
Posts: 1,074 Likes: 1,370
inherit
347
0
1,370
Monk
1,074
August 2016
monkmcmueller
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
MonkMcMueller
Monk_McMueller
600, something, something
|
Post by Monk on Sept 19, 2016 14:23:49 GMT
It's also a possibility that we're incorrectly dealing with a humvee/hummer situation. I say incorrectly as there's no obvious name-change, though this might be part of the info we get on N7 Day/on release with the Codex. It's quite possibly it's the Mako M35E, the 'E' standing for "Explorer" edition.
|
|