What score this game deserved after latest patches?

I'm sorry but what? Don't get me wrong, I want this game to succeed as much as you do but how can you honestly say that Bioware should open a bottle of champagne because Andromeda got a 72 (PC rating) on Metacritic? First of all, Metacritic lists both European and American ratings. If what Jclosed says about the general differences between both continents in rating entertainment products is true it means the 72 Andromeda received isn't high or good at all. American ratings should, when American criticasters thought Andromeda was a good game, have upped the ratings more to the 80/85 side but that apparently didn't happen. Apart from that there is also the fact that we're dealing with the Mass Effect Brand here, which can be regarded as one of the flagship brands (next to Dragon Age) of Bioware. Regardless of what the 72 rating actually means, how can it not be dissapointing that a mainline Mass Effect game received it? If I were Bioware I would be aiming for 80 atleast but even then I would be dissapointed. Mass Effect 2 is regarded as one of the best games of all time whereas Andromeda might not even be nominated for the Game of the Year award if the industry pumps out a few other solid titles. Nothing to be proud of in that department. I also don't think that 'the huge hurdles this game faced' is a solid argument. Those hurdles came from none other than Bioware and EA themselves so they are the only ones to blame. Nothing else made the development as difficult as it was except the decisions of key policymakers in both companies.  The only ones who 'might' be happy with a 72 would be the lower-end developers because they probably saw it coming but if I were a director I would resign my position with a rating like this. Being happy with a 72 seems like 'aiming for mediocrity'. If that's what's good enough for you I respect that. But it most certainly doesn't make me happy, and if Bioware really wants to be top dog in the gaming world, it shouldn't make them happy as well.

So is this game a disaster or massive failure? No. Are the ratings dissapointing? I'd argue that it's difficult to say otherwise. The only exception I can think of is when you're someone who's happy with a 6 for a subject for which you normally get a 9. Because that's how Andromeda relates to the other ME games when it comes to ratings. Apart from what the critics say, you are, of course, free to give your own, higher, rating to this game. Opinions are, in the end, personal after all. So there's nothing wrong with that. I just can't really believe that Bioware can be truly happy with how everything transpired the last few months.

My score won't change because the writing can't be patched. My biggest issue with this game is it's incosistent tone, dull characters and lack of RP options. If the Kotaku Article is to be believed they only spent around 2 years writing for Andromeda, and that would explain a lot. Not enough time and resources to do a second pass and flesh out the setting and characters more. Which is a shame, because there is huge potential, but it will remain untapped. 

Well with that logic, then I can say that people who seem to always support/defend the game ALSO has an agenda. If the haters have an agenda to take down ME/Bioware then the "supporters" has an agenda to defend MEA and ensure that all is well and there will be DLC and there will be a  MEA2. 

It goes both ways then. 

Haha seeing once again all the users who hate on MEA in this thread is making me smh, since all they do is hate on it in every thread that might have good things to say about the game. I see trolls more than disgruntled fans and can't take them seriously anymore.

Basically if the exact same people didn't make negative threads about MEA, and the exact same people didn't trash it in every thread they post in, I would believe they are honest. However they stopped being believable when they went overboard with their dislike of the game and it's almost a sad obsession now for them to hound anyone who likes it. I'm not even going to talk to them anymore. Trolls don't understand human language well, so logic fails them when it's used against them.

For me it's 7,5/10 and it could become a solid 8 with a couple of good DLC, a score that in my case is more than enough to justify the money and the hours that I invested in it. I spent 80 hours on Beyond Divinity and 150 hours in Two Worlds 1-2, how could I ever consider wasted the time that I spent on Andromeda? I just wish that I could shut off most of the open world content and the endless backtracking among planets which in my case was what lowered its score.
But the main story imho is fine, not astonishing perhaps, but not half bad. The same goes for the companions: maybe they are not the best bunch of characters ever written but I think they are still better than the best companions that any other company can actually write. Which is also not difficult considering that most of the other developers don't even try.

9/10. I've got great enjoy even without any patches, and now my score still the same.

As I said, some have stated quite clearly that they do have an agenda... a long standing hate on for Bioware.  Who am I to argue with them.  When they've stated their agenda, I do consider that agenda when I consider their opinions related to the game.  It discredits them to some degree.  If you want to give them equal weight as anyone else, that's your choice.  I quite frankly don't care what your opinion of my opinion is.

Metacritic was metabombed in the early going... nothing undoes that and the effect is that the metacritic score is lower than it would have been had that metabombing (by people with an agenda) not occurred.  Therefore, that source of data, IMO, is tainted.  Also, IMO, starting numerous threads here to beleagure a point (as opposed to just adding posts to a thread one has started previously) indicates an agenda; and so I don't consider the opinions of those individuals as highly as others who don't engage in that sort of behavior.

I rate the game based on my own experience and my own liking the game as I experienced it (which was starting after the 1.06 patch).  What goes into that opinion of my own is my interest in the story (including in the genre of story it is), my interest in the chracters in the story, how well the game runs and looks on my system, how much I'm enjoying the puzzles and sidequests in the game, how much I'm enjoying the combat in the game and comparing to my personal experiences with other games.  Your experiences may be different.  Your rating may be different... and I don't consider your rating when generating my own. 

I'm not insane and resent having my sanity questioned by anyone based merely on how I rate a game.

I concur.

My vote remained a 7.5 out of 10.
Enjoyable and fair but there are bugs and unpolished things here and there. Nothing major but certainly it doesn't feel this game had the polishing that should deserve.

Storywise certain part were underwhelming while others were quite good. The squad was good and fun at times, especially Drack, Peebee, Cora and Vetra. Jaal was ok, Liam was terrible. I'm willing to give them a second game to grow more on me.

My two main issues with this game excluding the lack of polishing and certain quests are fundamentally two.

1)You can't just RP as a Renegade or at least a less symphatetic person. The Ryders are simply too polite and diplomatic IMO. I had fun with Renegade Shepard and would have loved more decision like that. I want a confrontational/sarcastic tone option.

2)The music is really subpar in comparison to the trilogy. I hardly remember a track from this game and this because you can barely hear it while exploring. I want the ME:OT consistent music that you can hear throughout the level and not the dynamic or situational variant they went for. I don't like that approach. I want specific soundtrack for specific planets that I can hear over and over and enjoy and remember.

These last two issues take away one point each from the final score. The last 0,5 is because of the bugs.

Hope for a better sequel.

I love how you keep posting "facts" without proof.

From where I am standing I'm appreciating the framework they delivered. But for one reason or another they failed at filling that framework. The only real improvement I notice is the combat. But that's also what least interests me about the game.

If the Kotaku article is right and I have no reason to doubt it, they managed to put out a solid game against all odds. Kudos to them for doing that. But in my opinion it doesn't rise up to previous titles.