I think a 5+ year Break for MEA2 is a good thing

If you start only now to hate them then you are a part of the problem, sorry to pinpoint that.

DA2 did help the haters rise in number and have growing sub communities. But the ME3 case is a total absurdity, that is players reactions was just hysteria. A hero of a RPG series dying was the real problem for most of those that contributed to destroy ME3. But hero death was a great design choice, adult and anti Hollywood crap. For the sophisticated arguing about this end it's just blah blah, colors problem is fake problem it's words that matter, players surprise is a fake problem since very first step of ME3 the ending is started to be build, that an AI is cause of all makes sense, and so on. I agree some details that mostly no players quoted was a problem but not such a big deal to destroy a game. The worst is the free extended end DLC fix almost all complains, and most players continue argue without consider it.

Then came DAi, perhaps I got a wrong view of the game but I get discouraged and waited about 2 years before to play it. And ok first hours with the game was burdened by many aspects. But when I found how organize myself the gameplay flow so it is fun for me, then I realized how I have been manipulated by haters.

My current believing is Bioware is soon dead and I don't have the will to struggle explain why for different tastes no way The Witcher 3 or Skyrim can compete with ME3, DAI and even MEA. That Bioware could be uneven in writing quality but only one AAA RPG dev really does better, CDP, and certainly not Obsidian nor Inxile and even less Larian. That companions could be sometime questonable, but still 20 to 30 of the best companions ever done are all made by Bioware. Perhaps some design shift could have disturb some players, still full ME series, MEA, DAO, DA2, BG2, all have ridiculously better combats than any Bethesda RPG, than any Obsidian RPG. Even a game as Divine Divinity acclaimed for the combats design is in fact a half failure because 50% of combats have a weak light design and the combat system can't fix that, and in last areas it's becoming worse and worse to the point that most Bioware RPG have better combats on a full play.

But nope it didn't count and Bioware is going silently to a tomb, and crap stupid haters believing they know the blueprint that must be done to make a good RPG, stupid, they don't evven realize the huge number of RPG classic that don't match their rigid blueprint.

Yeah it seems no one wants to be mature, think for themselves or act intelligent. They want to be spoon-fed everything without working for it, like a hungry baby crying and screaming for their mother to fix things, but can't communicate how.

I love when people compare a long-time trilogy that expanded your hero's story and introduced new characters to a game that's just beginning.

I keep saying this and I ´ ll say it again. Those people are seriously ill and should seek professional help.

Definitely... I am totally blaming them for giving me a great game that I'm thoroughly enjoying and having fun playing.

My credit/blame goes where it has been earned and is deserved.  Over the 5 years before ME:A's release many tried to stop any other ME game from ever being released.  They've been campaigning to basically shut down the company for all that time as well.  So, despite all the shit Bioware endured over those years, they released a game I very much enjoy.  I have it now... and no one can take it away from me.

I can't blame Bioware for being tired of the fan abuse they take, but I do hope they overcome it one more time even though those same "fans" are already working hard to prevent the release of another ME game... some things never change.  I want Bioware to know that I, for one, will be waiting with excited anticipation for the next installment to Ryder's story.  You're not perfect, Bioware; but IMO, you're damn good at what you do.

Your enjoyment of the game has nothing to do with what I said. That Andromeda failed to meet expectations from the general fanbase, critics and most importantly, EA's, it doesn't mean the game can't be enjoyed. 

Mass Effect being put on ice is not because some people wanted it to fail, but because the game wasn't good enough. It's simple, really. That choice wasn't made by Bioware because they were tired, because by EA because they thought it was the best thing to do.

But where's the proof that me a is being put on ice because of the reception?

But where's the proof that me a is being put on ice because of the reception?

The story is very generic... Not sure how that can be debated.

The majority of players were fans of the trilogy's story, while Andromeda is incredibly decisive. This should warrent a change and you should realise that even as a fan of the story and characters in Ansromeda.

If an article by a credible journalist isn't enough for you, just wait. Time will tell, just like it told of Andromda's troubled development. 

Is this really the argument against it? It had multiple edits?

Anyway, if MEA has more than 1 singleplayer DLC, then you're right. But it won't.  

I don't care for the edits, but it contradicts itself. Why say the franchise is on ice but then say EA was happy with it and still has strong expectations for the franchise? Either the article is there for attention(click bait), or EA is lieing.

Kind of why I've said they need to give an official statement or this just keeps getting brought up.