Eurogamer claiming a source has told them no DLC is coming out...

They could wrap up the loose ends in the books of course, but the problem is: not everyone reads the books. There are probably way more players who would buy a DLC than read the accompanying books.

I just want to ask who the hell is anyone to make any commentary on what other people choose to believe? I mean exactly who do you think you are calling people delusional because they wish to imagine, hope, dream, want something? All I see when I see these people feeling so righteous in their need to tell people to stifle their desires and face that they might not get what they want are a bunch of people that lack imagination, lack the ability to believe what they do not see, and get off on pushing down people for whatever sick reason. Nobody has to face reality if they don't like it or if they want something more for themselves. Not facing reality and imagining what other people could is the SOLE reason we have so many innovations and wonderful things in the world today. This forum exists because this kind of communication was imagined. The internet was imagined and now it exists. Video games were once imagined and now they are commonplace. So many amazing things exist in the world today because they were imagined and even when others didn't think or believe they were possible, the dreamers persisted in their dreams, despite evidence as to whether or not what they imagined ever could be.

There is no benefit in facing reality. Not in this case. Not in far too many cases. Dream big. Dream often. And don't let naysayers bring you down.

Of course, but have many people, money and effort it will take to write a book comparing to making a DLC ?
It happens to my favorite sci-fi series, Babylon 5, after Crusade season 1 fail... the whole universe go from the screen into books, and we have to live with that.

You know what EA is thinking at this point?

"You can't buy this kind of press."

Honestly, why confirm or deny anything when the online press is giving you so much free coverage on a game that was released 4 months ago that it makes your marketing department look tame? The only thing EA has really made a statement about was that they had never worked with SN and that's probably because an investor probably asked, "who the hell is Sinclair?"

It might have all been said, of course, but what's at least dubious about this article, imho, is how it refuses to go any deeper than Sinclair Networks and Steve Reese's 'guy(s) behind it'. I mean, it's not as if Qolx excellent investigative work didn't go any further. The piece has Steve Reese happily chatting how he met Patrick Sinclair and how Jorg Kellar did this or that. Patrick Sinclair and Jorg Kellar probably don't exist.

But what I love even more is how Eurogamer tries to add weight to its article by adding hot air:

"An EA spokesperson confirmed to Eurogamer neither EA or BioWare had previously known of Sinclair Networks."

Er.., didn't Melo and Gamble sort of blurt it out to the world through Twitter?

sauce t ogo with your turnips then.

Who the hell is Sinclair ? He is a commander of the Babylon 5, taken by a Minbari, recognized and respected, because....  he was also known as a .................. 1000 years ago .............................................................

Let's also not forget to add that people asked for improvements to the Character creator and were given it too.

You know I was thinking the exact same thing.
It is serving to keep it on websites and Twitter, and discussed every other week when other games are forgotten.

It is quite convenient really isn't it.

With the same reply! They couldn't talk about it until 2 days before the patch. All they said was they were looking into it. 2 months go by and nothing.

DLC is the same. JOH blind sighted a lot of people.

You're right. As much as we want to get on Suikoden's back about his posts, he screenshotted it all. Also, the victory dance!