Eurogamer claiming a source has told them no DLC is coming out...

Look at halo mcc, assassins creed unity, Arkansas knight, I could list more but those games got shat on for being nothing but buggy P.O.S (mcc being one I'm still furious about). You're pretty much making a stereotype that bad games get passes and good games get bombed by people with an agenda when in reality you have to piss people off to have a game bomb. I won't argue the point further cause I honestly don't care, to many people let their feelings get in the way with this kind of discussion cause of their love for a franchise and dislike for another. (Everyone probably says this) and I'm the biggest ME fan out there but this game has much more than technical issues that made it a disappointment. The bugs and unpolished aspects weren't my own issues, I didn't like the story(played it safe and rehashed what the other games already did), the characters and how some things got downgraded. I know of the bugs and animations (pre patch) but they weren't my own issues cause I'm very tolerant of that after mcc and a few other games being so bug heavy.

furthermore, you're not really fun to talk to if all you do is reference murder on the devs. Why not ignore it? You do think they're a "minority" don't you? It comes with the job, bioware are able to handle it and they're not even close to being the only ones to get threatened, those people doing the threats are a joke anyways, they can talk all they want but I don't see "game developer found dead" on the news.

Not really.  If those articles are wrong, and DLC comes out, I'll reinstall.  I have unlimited GB's from my ISP, and the install speed was around 15 MB/s when the trial version came out.  No harm, no foul.  In the meantime, I could use the HD space.  As I explained in my post, I've played the game before and after the major patches, and my considered review after 80+ hours is, "Meh". I've played better, I've played worse.  I'll play the DLC if it comes out, just to tie up loose ends.


Sooooo....on one hand, the gaming media is apparently an insatiable mob who want to destroy not just games, but also studios and developers, for nothing more than sheer spite, AND, according to the GamerGate crowd, they're also a pack of shameless money-grubbing man-haters who are engaged in an incestuous relationship with the gaming media that would make the Lannisters and Targaryans blush?  I'm.....somewhat confused.

VtM: Bloodlines. That was a hell of a car crash pre-fan-fixes. Loves that game.

By "they", I'm pretty sure @fluffymothsiren meant specific section of online crowd who just enjoys spreading misinformation to cause failures of games and companies, just to enjoy in misery of others and/or out of some petty revenge fantasy born out of irrational and illogical reasons.


Also Kotaku reporters? Respected?
LOL!

... or they just really don't know because EA's Board of Directors has been bunkered down and not made an actual decision on the matter yet.

ETA:  ... or they just really don't know yet because they've got some new VAs for the DLC that can't or won't sign because of the VA strike and they have no idea when the VA strike will end to enable them to finish producction... and they don't want to announce anything before they actually know themselves what's going to happen.

Exactly right.

Since Bioware has neither confirmed nor denied future DLC, I'll wait to hear from them rather than take any notice of the various dodgy articles on the Internet.

GTA 4 was at least playable on release.

Arkham Knight, in other hand, had to have been completely pulled away from Steam and then re-released. That game was massively broken on release, as small 3rd party Ukrainian software studio didn't had enough time nor manpower to port that game properly to PC.

But hey, I got complete edition of that game when it was all fixed up and on steam winter sale.
So I can't complain personally, but I just know history.