Andromeda was a financial success.

No, the main problem is a "journalist" changing their article repeatedly (including the title) and that "journalist" attacking members of some small internet fan site. This "journalist" also has a history of being wrong and lashing out at folks. 

Quoting another user.

"*Yoda *Really? Inside information you must have hmmm? Proof you have? No? Stop spreading rumors you must."

But I believe this discussion have gone long enough. I only say that people should try to open the possibility that Jason is indeed right. That his article is not made up and that he doesn't have an agenda against people or Bioware. 

No. The main problem here is that you think it's fine to believe random users on a internet board talking about things that cannot be proven yet think you can call an article by a journalist baseless rumor  simply because parts of it weren't officially adressed by EA.

This might help web.archive.org/web/20170510195120/http://kotaku.com/sources-bioware-montreal-downsized-mass-effect-put-on-1795100285

Bioware Montreal moved to another building. What's hard to understand about that?

GET OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR LEVEL HEAD AND COMMON SENSE

No kidding. You know that Youngyea Youtuber? He basically said MEA was "barely mentioned" in the earnings report. However, I don't know if he understands what "significant contributer" means.😑

Why is there so much aggressivity from those who absolutely believe that there will be DLC, that MEA was a financial success, etc. and why is there so much misinformation or outright lies?

Kotaku's article that is so heavily criticized never said Mass Effect was dead. Here's an except from their article:
"That doesn’t mean there will never be another Mass Effect game, of course. It’s unlikely that BioWare will kill the popular sci-fi franchise. But BioWare is letting Mass Effect sit for a while rather than putting staff on Andromeda’s follow-up right away, those sources said."
kotaku.com/sources-bioware-montreal-downsized-mass-effect-put-on-1795100285

Yet all I read is "Kotaku is clickbait claiming ME is dead!!" I take Kotaku's articles as possible but am neither so quick to dismiss it (and believe blindly the contrary) nor do I believe what they say to be undisputed fact. But what they say only lines up with everything else we've seen/heard.

It seems some people really are in an echo chamber, only hearing what they want to hear, becoming aggressive (perhaps "triggered" is a better word) every time someone gives a more nuanced analysis of the situation. Basically to them, MEA was an undisputed financial success, no other way to see the situation, and we should expect to see a buttload of DLC and a sequel soon.

There's a difference between being hopeful and looking at these numbers as a good sign, and outright believing that your conclusion is the only valid one, discarding any discordant analyses or counter arguments. Destructoid's analysis of these good numbers take into account the weak line-up of Q1 2016 and ask the good questions. Are these results in line with their expectations? Did the game under, out, or perform as well as they expected to? These are points that need to be taken into consideration, but people here don't want to.

Remember when the Tomb Raider reboot sold well, becoming one of the best-selling game of the franchise, yet was still considered a failure by Square Enix?
www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-03-26-tomb-raider-has-sold-3-4-million-copies-failed-to-hit-expectations

These "good numbers" mean nothing without the correct perspective. I would not be so hasty to jump to conclusions, and I certainly would not be part of those insulting sites that have come to a different one.

It's profitable to hate ME: A it seems.

Let's be honest dude, when EA says they're happy with MEA's performance and how it made money, there are people on here that tried to argue that meant it was the opposite. I'm amazed that they're not trying to argue this means Anthem has been cancelled.