Andromeda and SJW influence: Delusional Rage or Unfortunate Reality? (Discussion)

Man, I bet you're just reading that fallacies there are on wikipedia and just copying and paste them to make you sound intelligent (which you clearly are not) 

And it's funny you saying I mock you, yes, I usually mock people that rage like little kids and call me "a piece of shit" out of nowhere because of a based opinion. 
If you think it's ridiculous, fine. I made my point and used logic to make those comparisons and why their core ideas are related, and you copying a list of fallacies from wikipedia won't change that. 

I compared the core ideals of both movements and showing how they are related, and I didn't see a single argument coming from you, you just call if "fallacy" and copying all these terms you're copying from wikipedia. What you're doing is being fallacious while calling the others fallacious.  
When I argued, you just ranted and cursed like the little troll kid you are because you don't have arguments if you can't copy and paste them from wikipedia. 

No you didn't, you accused anarchy65 of saying that anyone who questions the "SJW agenda" is a white supremacist, of tarring everyone who is anti-SJW as a white supremacist (which they didn't, since "some" doesn't mean the same thing as "every/any"). In fact, you didn't say anything about the propriety of bringing up the tragedy in Charlottesville, that was another poster (linksocarina). 

And if you don't want to give any fucks about misrepresenting what other people say, that's fine... but then you don't get to give any fucks about people misrepresenting you. Can't have it both ways. 

Wrong again. There was nothing partisan or biased about my comment, I didn't express any stance on the content of the discussion at all. My point- the one about pots and kettles- holds regardless of content or ideology; if you do X, you don't get to then complain when someone else does X, whatever X happens to be. 

See, the problem is you are illiterate. 

I didn't compare nazis do sjws. I said two things: 
1. Not every anti-sjw is a white nationalist, but every white nationalist is an anti-sjw. Statement is TRUE. 
2. The core ideas of "anti-sjw" and the white nationalists are somehow related (related to privileges and a fear or anger of the unknown or "outsiders")

But you just ignore all that and say I'm saying anti-sjws are just like nazis, when I actually repeated a lot of times that they aren't and that I wasn't comparing people, but core ideas.

I don't know if you do that on bad faith or if you're just illiterate (because you can't argue without copying fallacies from wikipedia), but I'm just going to ignore you from now on because trolls don't deserve attention. 

I don't think accusing him of illiteracy was actually necessary. Demonstrating it would be sufficient, wouldn't it? Everyone reading the thread can see what's going on.

It's the blatant hypocrisy that's ridiculous. You're complaining about stuff that you're continually doing yourself.

So did Alan in this case. 

If someone really believed what you just said there, they wouldn't debate you because then everything you say would be invalidated. Trust me on that one. 

As it stands...I honestly think you are just talking over people instead of at them by the by, which does make it harder to engage civilly for others looking at the sort ridiculous ad hominems between the both of you.