First time in Andromeda

Sure. Let's start with first of all if the Western World hadn't punished the Ottoman Empire (weak military, worried about survival) for resembling modern Europe (reliant on America's military) by breaking seizing their land at the end of World War 1 then entered a secret agreement to break up the country and divide them up with little regard to race, linguistic capabilities and other factors to distribute in secret to European powerhouses, say like, for example, creating the BRITISH MANDATE OF PALESTINE, then many of these issues wouldn't exist right now. Then we can continue with if the Western world wasn't as interested in keeping those borders in place that would lessen tensions for starters. The Ottoman Empire ruled for 700 years in the area that's currently overrun by chaos, they didn't do it because the region is ungovernable. Afghanistan you can blame on an American and Russian powergrab, Iran you can blame on a backlash against CIA intereference in their Government. In other words, most of the reason the region is unstable is due to England, America, France, and Russia. In other words, a simple way to reduce regional instability is for outside influences to leave the Middle East alone and to let them resolve their own issues, instead of (for example) Syria being a stage for America, Russia, and all of Europe to confront each other over. If you had actually listened to many people in the Middle East during that conflict you would have heard a distinct wish for outside influences to BUTT OUT. Let's start here, your rebuttal on why the lessening of outside influences wouldn't change much in the Middle East if you would please.

Do you hear yourself? You fling out a bunch of issues you obviously have no clue about and tie them to Dragon Age 2 in ways nobody can see but you and you expect people to be impressed? I can detect your ignorance on these matters a mile away, and you just chuck them out willy nilly. I'm not interested whether you're offended by my "I know more than you" thing, how about you don't talk about stuff you don't know much about if you don't want people confronting you over them.

Your argument that I said Dragon Age 2 is "less realistic" is a strawman. Congratulations.

You don't present any argument as to why the resolution of events in Dragon Age 2 would mean the resolution of all social issues. It doesn't. You are not meant to solve all of Kirkwall's problems, you are not the savior. The resolution of events in Dragon Age 2 could easily be accomplished without touching the balance of social forces.

If the Chantry leads an Exalted March to deal with the mages then I do believe the problem would be solved.

I have zero interest in whether you want to continue the argument. I do have an interest in making sure your suspect reasoning doesn't flood the forum. You don't need to solve all of Kirkwall's social issues, the complexity of political tensions has little to do with your lack of choices, and the game would still have ended in Act 1 if you killed Anders