KOTOR Remake confirmed, PS5/PC timed Exclusivity

I understand them changing the Limp Bizkit reference



although, if they had the balls, they'd keep it in, but that's the extent to the changes I would allow, in terms of dialogue. That's it.

Ki Adi posting time!

Now it is because of SCIENCE.

Depends on the situation as I remembe rRise of the Tomb Raider getting a staggered release because of timed agreements. XBox got i tfirs tthen PC had to wait 6 months then PS had to wai t a full yea rafte rXbox's initial release t ob eable to ge ttheir hands on it. We're not normally privvy t oal that info bu that's often how i tends up in situations like that.

I’m not going to debate how the younger crowd is split, but why should we assume that the people that like it are faking it? It’s best if we all realize that the fact that we don’t like something, doesn’t mean that nobody else would, even if it’s something overall unpopular.

I still don’t think they mean to overhaul the game completely, story wise (combat is more likely to change a lot), but it’s something we can just wait and see how it goes. If what you’re all fearing will be proven to be true, I won’t buy the remake, but there’s nothing that can be done about it.

As I said earlier, with the high chances of changing happening with a remake, the fact that this was announced as a remake and not a remaster should’ve given pause to everyone that isn’t okay with any kind of changes. 

I don’t see it happening, without causing even more issues for the the same modern audiences.

I also don’t see how younger people, used to think shows like GOT, are going to have an issue with that.

The only people who i see the change being an issue for are rpg purists, and or fans of the og game. The designation Modern Audience sounds like it's a euphemism for appealing to new/casual players who might feel like they're being punished because of the choices that they made. It's one thing for a player to see their favorite character die in a television show, but it's another for them to realize that their decisions had determined their favorite character's fate. If the devs keep things the same i doubt many players will choose the darkside path after learning about what we know. If the devs plan to counteract a potential disparity amongst light vs dark players i wonder if they'll include options to condition your companions for the darkside path (ME2's loyalty missions) or only give the player more rewards for the darkside path.

What amazes me about these two remakes is that RE2's character personalities remained similar to the original game's, while RE3 changed Jill's, Carlos', Nicholai's and even Nemesis' personas.

They were made by different dev team, but all under Capcom.

RE3 was developed by another team but Capcom's personnel still consulted RE3's team. What makes the differences in both remake's design philosophy more bizarre is Capcom's reaction. 3make's team was originally tasked to develop RE4's remake but Capcom pulled the plug on them, and that makes me question if Capcom's consultation somehow screwed up at their job.

Yeap. DooM and GlooM after the release is done... if there is any reason to do so