Multiplayer Feedback ~ General discussion

Singleplayer by far. I've put that mode on hold until they fixed all the plot stoppers and non functional quests.
Also on a side note. I still fail to understand why hearing the generic lines in dynasty warriors 8 for the nth makes me more excited than interacting with the peeps on my ship.

One of the best things about this game is a strong lack of tabouleh

Hahaha...Oh you were serious?

Judging by the amount of players I have seen returning in the last few weeks, yes.  I think it's an addiction 

i think I will probbly take a break and see what they do with regards to patching and dlc content.

The loot grind is very unrewarding (n7's are mostly shit tier and it takes 3-4 hours to unlock one.... Rinse repeat 190 times yay) and the gameplay isn't varied or fun enough to keep me grinding when the loot isn't even good. I seriously fear for future dlc content, if they make a significant amount of ultra rares and stick with the I-X character system it will be borderline impossible to unock new items without coughing up hundreds or grinding hours daily for weeks.


In me3 I could play for hours with even a max manifest because the gameplay was actually fun: In this I've been playing the last 2 days to get unlocks not because the gamemplay is fun or enganging. It's so one dimensional compared to me3 where you had a large variety of playstyles. In this most classes just boil down to ultimately kiting enemies around while shooting or camping with a vanquisher and spamming some power cells here and there. It's just not anywhere near as fun as me3. The characters feel like they have no depth and character to them.

Compare the krogan merc to the vorcha sentinel for example. The krogan merc is actually one of my favorite classes in this game but he sucks compared to the vorcha. His flamer is weak, his voicelines are boring, he can't detonate his fire explosions, rage sucks compared to vorcha bloodlust. Meanwhile the vorcha is constantly regenerating health, he can detonate massive fire explosions with cluster grenades, and his voicelines are hilarious. Just 1 example but pretty much every character in mea feels like a lame nerfed versions of characters we had in me3, and they also neglected having most of the cool stuff they added in dlc make a return. I can only assume they are saving the best powers for dlc to sell more packs. It feels like they cut so many features and powers from me3 and we're left with an empty husk of a game in comparison.


It really feels like they didn't try their hardest to make a fun experience, instead it seems like focused on cluttering the loot pool as much as possible to make people desperate to buy crates to get those 1-2 good guns, and they took away a ton of fan favorite guns and powers, again I can only assume they did this so they can reuse it for dlc in the future.

I'm 10,500 apex rating so it's not like I haven't given it a good try. It's just a very empty experience compared to me3mp and they took so many steps backwards while arguably the only thing that is actually better is that movement is less clunky but even movement is buggy, grabbing onto ledges for one.

I'm getting quite annoyed when in Outlaw matches the Flak Cannon spam of the Berserker it's almost as bad as the stunlock from Geth Hunters.

Tried MP, starting character power is pathetic.

It's like I'm begging to be carried through dozens of matches because the starting weapons and powers are so pathetically weak.

Incinerate on Salarian architect has this monstrously long cooldown compared to SP, and it virtually does the same thing for many more times the cooldown.

They then stuck an engineer archetype with that useless barricade for some reason. Who thought it was a great idea to make barricade into a power cell skill, and it bears no synergy with the architect's toolkit whatsoever.

The AI for the Remnant VI is somehow way worse than in SP, it feels like I can't control it at all.

My guess is all weapons do more damag when scoped. And it's absolutely true for MP.

Haven't done any testing, this is just from the top of my head.
All sniper rifles deal more damage scoped.
For some weapons that come with a scope but aren't sniper rifles, like the sandstorm, it doesnt matter.
All weapons are far more accurate when you aren't firing from the hip.

Never noticed that. I don't think that should be the case, it makes no sense for zoom to affect damage. It does, however, affect accuracy, and that affects time to kill. Could that be what you were observing?

I haven't noticed any different damage on non-snipers whether using a scope or not. That would be very unlikely.

Snipers are that way because... well I guess it's to deter you from using snipers in a way that isn't indicative of "sniping". Always seemed like they were trying too hard to force playstyle instead of letting players have fun as they like. The damage you see in the stats is while you're aiming, hipfiring carries up to 50% damage penalty, although weapons like the Raptor seems to have much less penalty.

*that's what she said