Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 0:08:15 GMT
I think how absolute the power the Clan Leader wields over the clan is somewhat illusory and depends on the leader. Wrex indicates in ME2 that he pretty much "can't do anything without Clan Leader Uta's approval." The mechanic indicates that if Wrex's ideas fail, they'll just replace him with someone with the next best plan. It seems to me that Clan Leaders lead only if they have earned the approval of their subjects... while their rise to power is not democratic, they don't hold it easily... it's not a master/slave type relationship either. Uta is the Female Clan leader. Wrex's main set up is providing a place that keeps female safe so other clans rally around him. A leader who has absolute power does not ask for the "approval" of anyone... yet Wrex (leader of the strongest male clan) openly acknowledges that he requires female clan leader Uta's approval... it's a telling word. The difference lies in the strength of the Krogan people. From the mechanic's comments it's evident that the Clan leader holds power only as long as the krogan within the clan allow him to. The Krogan people are not afraid to stage a coup to remove a clan leader who isn't getting their desired results. They know they are stronger than their leader. It's a "dictatorship" yes - but not a slave/master dictatorship. It actually functions closer to how democracies function... just without formal voting.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 0:13:29 GMT
Uta is the Female Clan leader. Wrex's main set up is providing a place that keeps female safe so other clans rally around him. A leader who has absolute power does not ask for the "approval" of anyone... yet Wrex (leader of the strongest male clan) openly acknowledges that he requires female clan leader Uta's approval... it's a telling word. The difference lies in the strength of the Krogan people. From the mechanic's comments it's evident that the Clan leader holds power only as long as the krogan within the clan allow him to. The Krogan people are not afraid to stage a coup to remove a clan leader who isn't getting their desired results. They know they are stronger than their leader. It's a "dictatorship" yes - but not a slave/master dictatorship. It actually functions closer to how democracies function... just without formal voting. On a sidenote, it's kind of funny if you bring Javik on the Tuchanka mission. He points out on their wall paintings: "Notice they're on their knees." So much for Eve's vaunted Golden Age. Don't drink the Kool-Aid, dude. Let alone the Kool-Aid being served in this era too. It's just like the male Shaman said. If they were so great, the Krogan would better off in the here and now.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 12, 2016 0:15:44 GMT
So now Wreav is OK. Geez. I like Wreav. I prefer him over Wrex
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 0:18:57 GMT
So now Wreav is OK. Geez. I like Wreav. I prefer him over Wrex I like him in the same way I like Control. It might've been fun to see continuations of those stories -- but as games. Not passively like now. I'm all for drama, like you've seen me say before.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 0:19:29 GMT
A leader who has absolute power does not ask for the "approval" of anyone... yet Wrex (leader of the strongest male clan) openly acknowledges that he requires female clan leader Uta's approval... it's a telling word. The difference lies in the strength of the Krogan people. From the mechanic's comments it's evident that the Clan leader holds power only as long as the krogan within the clan allow him to. The Krogan people are not afraid to stage a coup to remove a clan leader who isn't getting their desired results. They know they are stronger than their leader. It's a "dictatorship" yes - but not a slave/master dictatorship. It actually functions closer to how democracies function... just without formal voting. On a sidenote, it's kind of funny if you bring Javik on the Tuchanka mission. He points out on their wall paintings: "Notice they're on their knees." So much for Eve's vaunted Golden Age. Don't drink the Kool-Aid, dude. Let alone the Kool-Aid being served in this era too. Javik is not the only one who mentions that, I believe. On that issue, I would counter that we have many ancient images from here on earth that show such scenes that represent human "nations" that are long gone. In addition, a similar image could be drawn from any conventional religious service. Worship does not necessarily equate to slavery.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 0:23:41 GMT
On a sidenote, it's kind of funny if you bring Javik on the Tuchanka mission. He points out on their wall paintings: "Notice they're on their knees." So much for Eve's vaunted Golden Age. Don't drink the Kool-Aid, dude. Let alone the Kool-Aid being served in this era too. Javik is not the only one who mentions that, I believe. On that issue, I would counter that we have many ancient images from here on earth that show such scenes that represent human "nations" that are long gone. In addition, a similar image could be drawn from any conventional religious service. Worship does not necessarily equate to slavery. Yeah, but we didn't do that to ourselves. Don't be such a self-hater that you put people on this level. The Krogan are a loony toons level of destruction and self-destruction. And which conventional religious service do you mean? Christianity has a god figure who died miserably and washed people's feet. While Buddhism has a figure who gave up all his cash and started begging for rice.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 12, 2016 1:00:31 GMT
Uta is the Female Clan leader. Wrex's main set up is providing a place that keeps female safe so other clans rally around him. A leader who has absolute power does not ask for the "approval" of anyone... yet Wrex (leader of the strongest male clan) openly acknowledges that he requires female clan leader Uta's approval... it's a telling word. The difference lies in the strength of the Krogan people. From the mechanic's comments it's evident that the Clan leader holds power only as long as the krogan within the clan allow him to. The Krogan people are not afraid to stage a coup to remove a clan leader who isn't getting their desired results. They know they are stronger than their leader. It's a "dictatorship" yes - but not a slave/master dictatorship. It actually functions closer to how democracies function... just without formal voting. Uta is the leader of a different clan. Not the same clan Wrex is in charge of. My statement was leader holds complete power over his own clan. And the arrangement with the Female Clan leader Uta is for benefit to his own clan. Though Wrex does take it a step forward and sets up a system that benefits other clans as well. At least as long as they follow the rules. Other wise they get kicked out and possibly wiped out by Urdnot or on of their ally clans. Yes Krogan can remove a clan leader by killing them. But only if they are strong enough to kill them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 12:32:26 GMT
Javik is not the only one who mentions that, I believe. On that issue, I would counter that we have many ancient images from here on earth that show such scenes that represent human "nations" that are long gone. In addition, a similar image could be drawn from any conventional religious service. Worship does not necessarily equate to slavery. Yeah, but we didn't do that to ourselves. Don't be such a self-hater that you put people on this level. The Krogan are a loony toons level of destruction and self-destruction. And which conventional religious service do you mean? Christianity has a god figure who died miserably and washed people's feet. While Buddhism has a figure who gave up all his cash and started begging for rice. Don't start throwing in personal insults. I'm not any sort of self-hater... I'm trying to discuss this on some sort of academic level. Dictatorships can be of two types really - 1) Power held through absolute domination and 2) Power held but "under continual threat of a coup." It depends on the belief in their own strength held by the people/army supporting the current dictator. System one is where a dictator is not accountable to their people (master/slave relationship) and System 2 is where they are accountable - weaker dictatorships that tend to change hands frequently. Images of people on their knees can and do reflect two sorts of scenarios - that of slaves giving tribute and that of religious followers worshiping a deity. Again, my point is that there are not one, but two sides being presented here at once... leaving it up to the player to make their interpretation. The game will put in hints at different times trying to sway that intepretation in one direction or the other... but both are there. This is, in part, what creates such discordance in the debates on these issues here. It's also what allows for role playing in both "good" and "evil" directions within the same game without mushrooming the amount of variable dialogue to unaffordable levels. My earlier academic question - Is it fair that the people "suffer" for the personality of their dictator?... particularly if the case is the former - an absolute dictator where the people are not strong enough to overthrow that dictator. The genophage is an action (of war) against the people... not the dictator.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1002
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 12:50:00 GMT
All the talk of Wrex's power structure reminds me of another salient point here: Wrex only rules as long as the genophage exists.
Think about it. Urdnot's rise to power was facilitated on making deals with and gaining exclusive control of access to fertile females. As of ME2, no one could challenge Wrex due to sheer attrition; the more fertile females a clan has, the more little krogan it can pop out to fight for it, and fertile females were a limited resource.
Once the genophage is gone, that's no longer the case. Wreav 2.0 or Werylock 2.0 can just have their females popping out kids round the clock (by force, if necessary), and after a couple years they can go and kick Wrex/Urdnot's arse. Now, Wrex could counter this.....by adopting the exact same method of out of control reproduction. Even if he had no intention of rapid and destructive expansionism, it's going to be forced upon him (and every other species dependent on L-amino based worlds) if he wishes to survive as leader of the krogan, and does it really matter if the horde of battletoads who take your planet and eat your population say they're sorry before they do it?
Some will counter "but Wrex is like krogan Jesus!" Yeah, remember what happened to that guy, and how a mere 2000 years later, at best only 2 out of 7 humans on earth today still give a shit about anything he did (and even most of those aren't willing to miss a football game to visit a Jesus related building on any given Sunday)? The idea that there is some kind of universal "messiah" figure that the entirety of the krogan species down to the last individual are going to fall in line behind until the end of time is fucking ludicrous logic (especially given how individualistic, ambitious and aggressive they are). Even as Wrex & Co. are on the way to implement the cure, there are rivals trying to murder him (but oh, I'm sure all the others will get randomly eaten by thresher maws, amirite)? At the very least, he's going to die of old age in the unlikely scenario he isn't killed.
The idiotic "1000 kids per year per female" natural reproductive rate is simply an insurmountable problem. Honestly, Wrex should have been pushing Shepard to sabotage the Genophage even harder than the Dalatrass. His position is based entirely upon exploiting it, and really I thought that was the direction his character was going judging by ME2. Instead, Wrex develops backwards into the same shortsighted mindset he had when confronted with Saren's cure in ME1.
Now, I still cure it with either Wrex or Wreav because I hate pretty much all the same groups the krogan do (sans rachni, who can probably take care of themselves), and want to see them suffer, but the delusion that somehow things will be okay with Wrex (aside from the timely intervention of green beam induced borg assimilation or Reaper space Stalin) is just stupid logic.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 12, 2016 13:10:24 GMT
All the talk of Wrex's power structure reminds me of another salient point here: Wrex only rules as long as the genophage exists. Think about it. Urdnot's rise to power was facilitated on making deals with and gaining exclusive control of access to fertile females. As of ME2, no one could challenge Wrex due to sheer attrition; the more fertile females a clan has, the more little krogan it can pop out to fight for it, and fertile females were a limited resource. Once the genophage is gone, that's no longer the case. Wreav 2.0 or Werylock 2.0 can just have their females popping out kids round the clock (by force, if necessary), and after a couple years they can go and kick Wrex/Urdnot's arse. Now, Wrex could counter this.....by adopting the exact same method of out of control reproduction. Even if he had no intention of rapid and destructive expansionism, it's going to be forced upon him (and every other species dependent on L-amino based worlds) if he wishes to survive as leader of the krogan, and does it really matter if the horde of battletoads who take your planet and eat your population say they're sorry before they do it? Some will counter "but Wrex is like krogan Jesus!" Yeah, remember what happened to that guy, and how a mere 2000 years later, at best only 2 out of 7 humans on earth today still give a shit about anything he did (and even most of those aren't willing to miss a football game to visit a Jesus related building on any given Sunday)? The idea that there is some kind of universal "messiah" figure that the entirety of the krogan species down to the last individual are going to fall in line behind until the end of time is fucking ludicrous logic (especially given how individualistic, ambitious and aggressive they are). Even as Wrex & Co. are on the way to implement the cure, there are rivals trying to murder him (but oh, I'm sure all the others will get randomly eaten by thresher maws, amirite)? At the very least, he's going to die of old age in the unlikely scenario he isn't killed. The idiotic "1000 kids per year per female" natural reproductive rate is simply an insurmountable problem. Honestly, Wrex should have been pushing Shepard to sabotage the Genophage even harder than the Dalatrass. His position is based entirely upon exploiting it, and really I thought that was the direction his character was going judging by ME2. Instead, Wrex develops backwards into the same shortsighted mindset he had when confronted with Saren's cure in ME1. Now, I still cure it with either Wrex or Wreav because I hate pretty much all the same groups the krogan do (sans rachni, who can probably take care of themselves), and want to see them suffer, but the delusion that somehow things will be okay with Wrex (aside from the timely intervention of green beam induced borg assimilation or Reaper space Stalin) is just stupid logic. Excellent points. ME 2 Wrex and ME 3 Wrex are completely different characters in this regard, and given what we are told about the Krogan and their political structure a broad cure of the Genophage for the entire population would invariably destabilize any sort of stability that he had achieved. BioWare wanted to get their 'feelz' for the Krogan arc, but in doing so they set up a powder keg just waiting to explode based on the previous lore that they themselves established.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 14:35:35 GMT
Yeah, but we didn't do that to ourselves. Don't be such a self-hater that you put people on this level. The Krogan are a loony toons level of destruction and self-destruction. And which conventional religious service do you mean? Christianity has a god figure who died miserably and washed people's feet. While Buddhism has a figure who gave up all his cash and started begging for rice. Don't start throwing in personal insults. I'm not any sort of self-hater... I'm trying to discuss this on some sort of academic level. Dictatorships can be of two types really - 1) Power held through absolute domination and 2) Power held but "under continual threat of a coup." It depends on the belief in their own strength held by the people/army supporting the current dictator. System one is where a dictator is not accountable to their people (master/slave relationship) and System 2 is where they are accountable - weaker dictatorships that tend to change hands frequently. Images of people on their knees can and do reflect two sorts of scenarios - that of slaves giving tribute and that of religious followers worshiping a deity. Again, my point is that there are not one, but two sides being presented here at once... leaving it up to the player to make their interpretation. The game will put in hints at different times trying to sway that intepretation in one direction or the other... but both are there. This is, in part, what creates such discordance in the debates on these issues here. It's also what allows for role playing in both "good" and "evil" directions within the same game without mushrooming the amount of variable dialogue to unaffordable levels. My earlier academic question - Is it fair that the people "suffer" for the personality of their dictator?... particularly if the case is the former - an absolute dictator where the people are not strong enough to overthrow that dictator. The genophage is an action (of war) against the people... not the dictator. What personal insult? You wanted to equate humanity to a cartoon. To a race that's like the equivalent of Mountain Dew. EXTREEEEEME. That's the Krogan for you. There's nothing worthy to draw on from here or be academic about. They're created by a bunch of neckbeards at Bioware, who are only being trollish at best. They went too far with it. If anything, I insult them. It's not the kind of world building that I can sympathize with and humanize. I can do this with many elements in Mass Effect, but they pushed it here. Which is why it surprises me how much sympathy it does get. If anything, they remind me more of impersonal forces in nature, rather than any race. Like when you watch scientific documentaries and see the destructive power of gamma ray bursts and supernovas. The Krogan remind me more of this, except in flesh and blood form. Like Galactus in the Marvel comics. Nearly indestructible, planet eating mofos. It's easy to forget if you anthropomorphize and buddy up with individuals.. but that's not the Krogan in general. Especially at their peak.
|
|
Obadiah
N5
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Origin: Obadaya
XBL Gamertag: ObadiahPearce
Posts: 2,677 Likes: 3,624
inherit
658
0
Nov 25, 2024 13:02:34 GMT
3,624
Obadiah
2,677
August 2016
obadiah
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem
Obadaya
ObadiahPearce
|
Post by Obadiah on Sept 12, 2016 14:42:05 GMT
All the talk of Wrex's power structure reminds me of another salient point here: Wrex only rules as long as the genophage exists. Think about it. Urdnot's rise to power was facilitated on making deals with and gaining exclusive control of access to fertile females. As of ME2, no one could challenge Wrex due to sheer attrition; the more fertile females a clan has, the more little krogan it can pop out to fight for it, and fertile females were a limited resource. Once the genophage is gone, that's no longer the case. Wreav 2.0 or Werylock 2.0 can just have their females popping out kids round the clock (by force, if necessary), and after a couple years they can go and kick Wrex/Urdnot's arse. Now, Wrex could counter this.....by adopting the exact same method of out of control reproduction. Even if he had no intention of rapid and destructive expansionism, it's going to be forced upon him (and every other species dependent on L-amino based worlds) if he wishes to survive as leader of the krogan, and does it really matter if the horde of battletoads who take your planet and eat your population say they're sorry before they do it? Some will counter "but Wrex is like krogan Jesus!" Yeah, remember what happened to that guy, and how a mere 2000 years later, at best only 2 out of 7 humans on earth today still give a shit about anything he did (and even most of those aren't willing to miss a football game to visit a Jesus related building on any given Sunday)? The idea that there is some kind of universal "messiah" figure that the entirety of the krogan species down to the last individual are going to fall in line behind until the end of time is fucking ludicrous logic (especially given how individualistic, ambitious and aggressive they are). Even as Wrex & Co. are on the way to implement the cure, there are rivals trying to murder him (but oh, I'm sure all the others will get randomly eaten by thresher maws, amirite)? At the very least, he's going to die of old age in the unlikely scenario he isn't killed. The idiotic "1000 kids per year per female" natural reproductive rate is simply an insurmountable problem. Honestly, Wrex should have been pushing Shepard to sabotage the Genophage even harder than the Dalatrass. His position is based entirely upon exploiting it, and really I thought that was the direction his character was going judging by ME2. Instead, Wrex develops backwards into the same shortsighted mindset he had when confronted with Saren's cure in ME1. Now, I still cure it with either Wrex or Wreav because I hate pretty much all the same groups the krogan do (sans rachni, who can probably take care of themselves), and want to see them suffer, but the delusion that somehow things will be okay with Wrex (aside from the timely intervention of green beam induced borg assimilation or Reaper space Stalin) is just stupid logic. Excellent points. ME 2 Wrex and ME 3 Wrex are completely different characters in this regard, and given what we are told about the Krogan and their political structure a broad cure of the Genophage for the entire population would invariably destabilize any sort of stability that he had achieved. BioWare wanted to get their 'feelz' for the Krogan arc, but in doing so they set up a powder keg just waiting to explode based on the previous lore that they themselves established. Entirely possible, but this is based on the idea that if the Krogan (or ANY faction) did become a problem, the rest of the galaxy couldn't do anything, or wouldn't be doing anything the entire time it took place. The Council already deployed a bioweapon that causes Krogan babies to be born without heartbeats, and at least one group, the Salarians (along with a bunch of humans), is willing to deploy another. Those of you that picked Destroy already decided to fight the AI the next time they emerge. Is there really an argument here that the galaxy would be "helpless" against Krogan aggression?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 15:25:27 GMT
Don't start throwing in personal insults. I'm not any sort of self-hater... I'm trying to discuss this on some sort of academic level. Dictatorships can be of two types really - 1) Power held through absolute domination and 2) Power held but "under continual threat of a coup." It depends on the belief in their own strength held by the people/army supporting the current dictator. System one is where a dictator is not accountable to their people (master/slave relationship) and System 2 is where they are accountable - weaker dictatorships that tend to change hands frequently. Images of people on their knees can and do reflect two sorts of scenarios - that of slaves giving tribute and that of religious followers worshiping a deity. Again, my point is that there are not one, but two sides being presented here at once... leaving it up to the player to make their interpretation. The game will put in hints at different times trying to sway that intepretation in one direction or the other... but both are there. This is, in part, what creates such discordance in the debates on these issues here. It's also what allows for role playing in both "good" and "evil" directions within the same game without mushrooming the amount of variable dialogue to unaffordable levels. My earlier academic question - Is it fair that the people "suffer" for the personality of their dictator?... particularly if the case is the former - an absolute dictator where the people are not strong enough to overthrow that dictator. The genophage is an action (of war) against the people... not the dictator. What personal insult? You wanted to equate humanity to a cartoon. To a race that's like the equivalent of Mountain Dew. EXTREEEEEME. That's the Krogan for you. There's nothing worthy to draw on from here or be academic about. They're created by a bunch of neckbeards at Bioware, who are only being trollish at best. They went too far with it. If anything, I insult them. It's not the kind of world building that I can sympathize with and humanize. I can do this with many elements in Mass Effect, but they pushed it here. Which is why it surprises me how much sympathy it does get. If anything, they remind me more of impersonal forces in nature, rather than any race. Like when you watch scientific documentaries and see the destructive power of gamma ray bursts and supernovas. The Krogan remind me more of this, except in flesh and blood form. Like Galactus in the Marvel comics. Nearly indestructible, planet eating mofos. It's easy to forget if you anthropomorphize and buddy up with individuals.. but that's not the Krogan in general. Especially at their peak. ... and how is calling someone a "self-hater" not a personal insult? I'm not the one getting emotional over the type of population the Krogan people have been represented to be... just pointing out the fact that they have been represented in the game to possibly be two different ways. That among the races presented in the ME universe, the Krogran are the ones presented with similar diversity of opinions to their portrayal of humanity. The other races are presented in a much more one denominational way. Yet, it is the Krogan that players tend to want to portray in a single, stereotypical way. That is, there is this continual, absolute assertion that all krogan are so violent that not a single one can be trusted or reasoned with. Players also frequent absolutely assert that, without any doubts at all, if the krogan numbers are allowed to recover, the entire galaxy is doomed because the Krogan will wipe them. However, the game clearly portrays several krogan than can be trusted and reasoned with and there is absolutely nothing that shows that, even if Wrex is deposed from power that only unreasonably violent krogan would be available to replace him. In Eve, they portray a consideration for the planet environment recovering and an understanding that unlimited expansion is not necessarily a good thing (when she chastises Wrex for mentioning taking on new colonies). In that moment Wrex also indicates that his intention is not to take colonies by force ( by saying "I'm not saying we wouldn't ask first...") Although Wrex is described as a "mutant" - he's a natural mutant of the species... so there are probably others in the population who do think like he does. The future "evolution" of the krogan is not portrayed as a certainty... and, therefore, I don't think, that such certain predictions about the krogan should stand here as the only valid consideration when talking about curing or not curing the genophage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 17:47:21 GMT
Excellent points. ME 2 Wrex and ME 3 Wrex are completely different characters in this regard, and given what we are told about the Krogan and their political structure a broad cure of the Genophage for the entire population would invariably destabilize any sort of stability that he had achieved. BioWare wanted to get their 'feelz' for the Krogan arc, but in doing so they set up a powder keg just waiting to explode based on the previous lore that they themselves established. Entirely possible, but this is based on the idea that if the Krogan (or ANY faction) did become a problem, the rest of the galaxy couldn't do anything, or wouldn't be doing anything the entire time it took place. The Council already deployed a bioweapon that causes Krogan babies to be born without heartbeats, and at least one group, the Salarians (along with a bunch of humans), is willing to deploy another. Those of you that picked Destroy already decided to fight the AI the next time they emerge. Is there really an argument here that the galaxy would be "helpless" against Krogan aggression? The Salarians are also depicted as clearly not having learned any lessons from their mistake in uplifting the Krogan... since they are portrayed as actively experimenting with uplift both the Yahg and the varren.
|
|
inherit
1556
0
Nov 18, 2024 10:01:57 GMT
1,105
Duke Cameron
1,058
Sept 13, 2016 0:28:35 GMT
September 2016
animalboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Duke Cameron on Sept 13, 2016 1:35:03 GMT
I've always cured it, but i really want to go back and do everything needed to save Mordin. I'm tired of crying every time he dies.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 14, 2016 15:01:51 GMT
I don't necessarily think that the Salarians were wrong for uplifting the Krogan in the first place. It was less than ideal, but there was a war for survival going on, and there is no saying that the Krogan would have survived the Rachni held galaxy, or even their own blasted planet without assistance. The Salarians have always been a practical species, and the uplifting of the Krogan served to befit both aliens. The cultural underdevelopment of the Krogan was unfortunate, but we can't throw blame solely at the Salarians' feet here. Either the Krogan would have been uplifted, or they, the Salarians, and Asari would have been wiped out, along with the Turians, Humans, Quarians etc. The rest of the galaxy (save for the Rachni and Leviathans) directly benefited from the uplift, seeing as they are all still alive and kicking into the current era. One can't call the Salarians out as being shortsighted fools, when they literally saved everyone's lives by approaching the Krogan.
As for the repercussions of the Krogan introduction to the greater galaxy, well that's more on the Krogan than anyone else. The situation that brought them up to the level of the rest of the Council races was artificial, but how long are we going to blame the circumstances instead of the individual actions they took? The centuries of lead up to the rebellions saw the Salarians and Asari trying to work with the Krogan, even going so far as to turn their heads and look the other way when the Krogan annexed non-Council species' worlds. At what point are the Krogan culpable for their own actions? Should the Asari and Salarians have just laid down and surrendered when the Krogan started aggressively expanding?
The Krogan certainly weren't ready for uplift, and in many cases they still aren't fit for interstellar society, but that can't be used as a catch-all excuse to throw all blame back on the Salarians.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 14, 2016 18:48:21 GMT
All the talk of Wrex's power structure reminds me of another salient point here: Wrex only rules as long as the genophage exists. Think about it. Urdnot's rise to power was facilitated on making deals with and gaining exclusive control of access to fertile females. As of ME2, no one could challenge Wrex due to sheer attrition; the more fertile females a clan has, the more little krogan it can pop out to fight for it, and fertile females were a limited resource. Once the genophage is gone, that's no longer the case. Wreav 2.0 or Werylock 2.0 can just have their females popping out kids round the clock (by force, if necessary), and after a couple years they can go and kick Wrex/Urdnot's arse. Now, Wrex could counter this.....by adopting the exact same method of out of control reproduction. Even if he had no intention of rapid and destructive expansionism, it's going to be forced upon him (and every other species dependent on L-amino based worlds) if he wishes to survive as leader of the krogan, and does it really matter if the horde of battletoads who take your planet and eat your population say they're sorry before they do it? Some will counter "but Wrex is like krogan Jesus!" Yeah, remember what happened to that guy, and how a mere 2000 years later, at best only 2 out of 7 humans on earth today still give a shit about anything he did (and even most of those aren't willing to miss a football game to visit a Jesus related building on any given Sunday)? The idea that there is some kind of universal "messiah" figure that the entirety of the krogan species down to the last individual are going to fall in line behind until the end of time is fucking ludicrous logic (especially given how individualistic, ambitious and aggressive they are). Even as Wrex & Co. are on the way to implement the cure, there are rivals trying to murder him (but oh, I'm sure all the others will get randomly eaten by thresher maws, amirite)? At the very least, he's going to die of old age in the unlikely scenario he isn't killed. The idiotic "1000 kids per year per female" natural reproductive rate is simply an insurmountable problem. Honestly, Wrex should have been pushing Shepard to sabotage the Genophage even harder than the Dalatrass. His position is based entirely upon exploiting it, and really I thought that was the direction his character was going judging by ME2. Instead, Wrex develops backwards into the same shortsighted mindset he had when confronted with Saren's cure in ME1. Now, I still cure it with either Wrex or Wreav because I hate pretty much all the same groups the krogan do (sans rachni, who can probably take care of themselves), and want to see them suffer, but the delusion that somehow things will be okay with Wrex (aside from the timely intervention of green beam induced borg assimilation or Reaper space Stalin) is just stupid logic. Funny thing is Wrex made truces with other clans to shelter all their fertile Females in protected environment so particularly the smaller ones were not destroyed by larger clans. With many clan leaders clearly agreeing to this set up willingly without any threat of force. There was no exclusive control of access to anything. There was a set of rules everyone had to follow and if you didn't follow it you were kicked out and all allied clans would enforce offending clan to be kicked out. You ignore the fact that Wreav 2.0 or Weryloc 2.0 trying to breed a massive army, Wrex and his allies could do the same. And due to the Krogan Civil War happening the actual Krogan population would remain relatively stable if not actually drop due to the constant warring of the factions. But here is the thing Krogan Females even from ME 2 though Eve certainly shows far more of it don't want to simply be breeding machines for make Krogan. Meaning those females will try and fight. If not killing themselves then defecting to a clan that doesn't treat females as brood sows. Which is were Wrex's side gains the advantage. On top of that Wrex deal with inclusiveness while Wreav and Weryloc were exclusiveness. Basically Wrex welcomed all Clans and was more then willing to let them maintain all their own personal traditions and identity. Wreav and Weryloc only gave a care about their own clan. Weryloc was only going to give their clan the cure and kill anyone who wasn't a part of it. Wreav seems to want to make Urdnot the dominate clan by forcing everyone to follow it at gun point. So when the battle lines are being drawn one side says you have to abandon all your history and serve me. While the other side is asking you to join them and together we can help preserve your history and culture. Wrex would have a lot more clans being willing to take that deal then to abandon their traditions to serve another. And that isn't' even taking into account the galactic community at large which would be firmly behind Wrex over any of the 2.0 groups. Which could vary in help from troops, to air strikes to simply orbital and aerial recon. STG alone could assist with the females attempting to defect from the 2.0 clans. Moving them across the planet to the Wrex allied clans. But Wrex isn't being Krogan Jesus. He is simply pushing the idea that they can be more then simply brutish killing machines. They can regain the glory of old and rise above what they have developed into in the wake of the Krogan Rebellion. I think the key difference is that Jesus guy and the book he is in tells you that you are inherently a terrible person who can only be saved by worshiping an invisible man in the sky. Wrex says that the Krogan race is inherently better then what it has turned into and if everyone works together we can achieve that improvement. Kind of a social movement planting the idea that the Krogan can be better then they are. Compared to religious texts that say you can't be any better unless you follow X rules and worship and praise your insignificant life to the invisible guy in the sky.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 18:59:17 GMT
I don't necessarily think that the Salarians were wrong for uplifting the Krogan in the first place. It was less than ideal, but there was a war for survival going on, and there is no saying that the Krogan would have survived the Rachni held galaxy, or even their own blasted planet without assistance. The Salarians have always been a practical species, and the uplifting of the Krogan served to befit both aliens. The cultural underdevelopment of the Krogan was unfortunate, but we can't throw blame solely at the Salarians' feet here. Either the Krogan would have been uplifted, or they, the Salarians, and Asari would have been wiped out, along with the Turians, Humans, Quarians etc. The rest of the galaxy (save for the Rachni and Leviathans) directly benefited from the uplift, seeing as they are all still alive and kicking into the current era. One can't call the Salarians out as being shortsighted fools, when they literally saved everyone's lives by approaching the Krogan. As for the repercussions of the Krogan introduction to the greater galaxy, well that's more on the Krogan than anyone else. The situation that brought them up to the level of the rest of the Council races was artificial, but how long are we going to blame the circumstances instead of the individual actions they took? The centuries of lead up to the rebellions saw the Salarians and Asari trying to work with the Krogan, even going so far as to turn their heads and look the other way when the Krogan annexed non-Council species' worlds. At what point are the Krogan culpable for their own actions? Should the Asari and Salarians have just laid down and surrendered when the Krogan started aggressively expanding? The Krogan certainly weren't ready for uplift, and in many cases they still aren't fit for interstellar society, but that can't be used as a catch-all excuse to throw all blame back on the Salarians. There are indications given in ME3, however, that the Salarians are just repeating the uplift process on both the Yahg and the Varren... in order to fight - who?... the Reapers? Humans perhaps? Does this sort of continued practice, despite the ramifications of their last uplift project (i.e. the Krogan Rebellions), not qualify them as being both "shortsighted and foolish?"
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 14, 2016 19:24:59 GMT
I don't necessarily think that the Salarians were wrong for uplifting the Krogan in the first place. It was less than ideal, but there was a war for survival going on, and there is no saying that the Krogan would have survived the Rachni held galaxy, or even their own blasted planet without assistance. The Salarians have always been a practical species, and the uplifting of the Krogan served to befit both aliens. The cultural underdevelopment of the Krogan was unfortunate, but we can't throw blame solely at the Salarians' feet here. Either the Krogan would have been uplifted, or they, the Salarians, and Asari would have been wiped out, along with the Turians, Humans, Quarians etc. The rest of the galaxy (save for the Rachni and Leviathans) directly benefited from the uplift, seeing as they are all still alive and kicking into the current era. One can't call the Salarians out as being shortsighted fools, when they literally saved everyone's lives by approaching the Krogan. As for the repercussions of the Krogan introduction to the greater galaxy, well that's more on the Krogan than anyone else. The situation that brought them up to the level of the rest of the Council races was artificial, but how long are we going to blame the circumstances instead of the individual actions they took? The centuries of lead up to the rebellions saw the Salarians and Asari trying to work with the Krogan, even going so far as to turn their heads and look the other way when the Krogan annexed non-Council species' worlds. At what point are the Krogan culpable for their own actions? Should the Asari and Salarians have just laid down and surrendered when the Krogan started aggressively expanding? The Krogan certainly weren't ready for uplift, and in many cases they still aren't fit for interstellar society, but that can't be used as a catch-all excuse to throw all blame back on the Salarians. There are indications given in ME3, however, that the Salarians are just repeating the uplift process on both the Yahg and the Varren... in order to fight - who?... the Reapers? Humans perhaps? Does this sort of continued practice, despite the ramifications of their last uplift project (i.e. the Krogan Rebellions), not qualify them as being both "shortsighted and foolish?" I'm certain the galaxy wouldn't say no to more forces to fight the Reapers; these are the same groups of people that side with the Leviathans should Shepard recruit them after all. Besides, who's going to care that the Yahg might become a problem down the line if the Reapers win and kill everyone? Yes the uplifting of the Krogan did cause massive damage to the galaxy at large, but I didn't see anyone fighting against that fact when the Rachni were clawing at their doorsteps, same thing I imagine would happen with the Reaper invasion. EDIT: The Salarians were also "resurrecting" dinosaurs for the Krogan to ride into battle (I would have loved to see that BTW), reintroducing an extinct species back into the modern galaxy specifically to fight in a war, but you don't see anyone complaining about that either. Their actions in uplift are amoral, but considering the circumstances I would hardly call them foolish.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 20:38:22 GMT
There are indications given in ME3, however, that the Salarians are just repeating the uplift process on both the Yahg and the Varren... in order to fight - who?... the Reapers? Humans perhaps? Does this sort of continued practice, despite the ramifications of their last uplift project (i.e. the Krogan Rebellions), not qualify them as being both "shortsighted and foolish?" I'm certain the galaxy wouldn't say no to more forces to fight the Reapers; these are the same groups of people that side with the Leviathans should Shepard recruit them after all. Besides, who's going to care that the Yahg might become a problem down the line if the Reapers win and kill everyone? Yes the uplifting of the Krogan did cause massive damage to the galaxy at large, but I didn't see anyone fighting against that fact when the Rachni were clawing at their doorsteps, same thing I imagine would happen with the Reaper invasion. EDIT: The Salarians were also "resurrecting" dinosaurs for the Krogan to ride into battle (I would have loved to see that BTW), reintroducing an extinct species back into the modern galaxy specifically to fight in a war, but you don't see anyone complaining about that either. Their actions in uplift are amoral, but considering the circumstances I would hardly call them foolish. Your claim was that they were not shortsighted or foolish in uplifting the Krogan. Please explain how repeating the practice with the yahg, who are intelligent, large, strong and potentially as violent as the Krogan wouldn't be shortsighted or foolish. We haven't been told how rapidly the yahg can reproduce... seems to me they'd be just setting that species up for "being neutered" as well. How effective do you think even uplifted yahg could even possibly be against the Reapers? How effective do you think varren would be? Seems to me that the Salarians just like to uplift species for the heck of it, then neuter them when those species "get uppity." This is the same problem there is with Cerberus trying to breed armies of "expendible shock troops" of different varieties. IMO, it is both shortsighted and foolish. I would also say it is probably unwise to reintroduce the kakliosaurs... and the player does have the option to simply not have Shepard fulfill that very minor fetch quest in the game... which is probably why you're not seeing anyone specifically complaining about it.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 14, 2016 22:24:19 GMT
I'm certain the galaxy wouldn't say no to more forces to fight the Reapers; these are the same groups of people that side with the Leviathans should Shepard recruit them after all. Besides, who's going to care that the Yahg might become a problem down the line if the Reapers win and kill everyone? Yes the uplifting of the Krogan did cause massive damage to the galaxy at large, but I didn't see anyone fighting against that fact when the Rachni were clawing at their doorsteps, same thing I imagine would happen with the Reaper invasion. EDIT: The Salarians were also "resurrecting" dinosaurs for the Krogan to ride into battle (I would have loved to see that BTW), reintroducing an extinct species back into the modern galaxy specifically to fight in a war, but you don't see anyone complaining about that either. Their actions in uplift are amoral, but considering the circumstances I would hardly call them foolish. Your claim was that they were not shortsighted or foolish in uplifting the Krogan. Please explain how repeating the practice with the yahg, who are intelligent, large, strong and potentially as violent as the Krogan wouldn't be shortsighted or foolish. We haven't been told how rapidly the yahg can reproduce... seems to me they'd be just setting that species up for "being neutered" as well. How effective do you think even uplifted yahg could even possibly be against the Reapers? How effective do you think varren would be? Seems to me that the Salarians just like to uplift species for the heck of it, then neuter them when those species "get uppity." This is the same problem there is with Cerberus trying to breed armies of "expendible shock troops" of different varieties. IMO, it is both shortsighted and foolish. I would also say it is probably unwise to reintroduce the kakliosaurs... and the player does have the option to simply not have Shepard fulfill that very minor fetch quest in the game... which is probably why you're not seeing anyone specifically complaining about it. It's not foolish if you consider the alternative to losing the war. At that point, no one knew what the Crucible was, let alone if it would even work, the only thing that everyone knew was that we needed more bodies to fight/stall the Reaper offensive, at least until a better plan could be enacted. Future repercussions can be considered once the very fate of every advanced civilization is not at stake. The Salarians don't uplift other species for kicks either; for all the 'mad scientist' trope that gets thrown at them during the course of the (biased) Genophage Arc they are actually very pragmatic in their approach to the situation. The galaxy needs foot soldiers to fight, and the Yahg would make a perfect addition to the combined forces; strong, extremely intelligent, and by placing their species in the crosshairs of the Reapers their co-operation can be assured. Is it amoral? Extremely. Will there likely be issues with them down the line? More than likely. But if their addition to the fighting tips the war in the galaxy's favor it's all worth it in the end. And if by 'uppity' you mean the Krogan attacks on an allied galaxy during the Rebellions, then that would be squarely on the Krogan. They've been a part of the council for a thousand years at that point, turning around and accusing the uplift of their species at that time is blaming the actions of a fully grown man on his parents. Also, the Krogan were only 'neutered', as you put it, after they had refused any form of diplomacy & appeasement for close to a millennia, and then causing untold devastation on the galaxy with no signs of stopping. If the Yagh choose to follow a similar tactic then the galaxy is well within it's right to defend itself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2016 3:02:04 GMT
Your claim was that they were not shortsighted or foolish in uplifting the Krogan. Please explain how repeating the practice with the yahg, who are intelligent, large, strong and potentially as violent as the Krogan wouldn't be shortsighted or foolish. We haven't been told how rapidly the yahg can reproduce... seems to me they'd be just setting that species up for "being neutered" as well. How effective do you think even uplifted yahg could even possibly be against the Reapers? How effective do you think varren would be? Seems to me that the Salarians just like to uplift species for the heck of it, then neuter them when those species "get uppity." This is the same problem there is with Cerberus trying to breed armies of "expendible shock troops" of different varieties. IMO, it is both shortsighted and foolish. I would also say it is probably unwise to reintroduce the kakliosaurs... and the player does have the option to simply not have Shepard fulfill that very minor fetch quest in the game... which is probably why you're not seeing anyone specifically complaining about it. It's not foolish if you consider the alternative to losing the war. At that point, no one knew what the Crucible was, let alone if it would even work, the only thing that everyone knew was that we needed more bodies to fight/stall the Reaper offensive, at least until a better plan could be enacted. Future repercussions can be considered once the very fate of every advanced civilization is not at stake. The Salarians don't uplift other species for kicks either; for all the 'mad scientist' trope that gets thrown at them during the course of the (biased) Genophage Arc they are actually very pragmatic in their approach to the situation. The galaxy needs foot soldiers to fight, and the Yahg would make a perfect addition to the combined forces; strong, extremely intelligent, and by placing their species in the crosshairs of the Reapers their co-operation can be assured. Is it amoral? Extremely. Will there likely be issues with them down the line? More than likely. But if their addition to the fighting tips the war in the galaxy's favor it's all worth it in the end. And if by 'uppity' you mean the Krogan attacks on an allied galaxy during the Rebellions, then that would be squarely on the Krogan. They've been a part of the council for a thousand years at that point, turning around and accusing the uplift of their species at that time is blaming the actions of a fully grown man on his parents. Also, the Krogan were only 'neutered', as you put it, after they had refused any form of diplomacy & appeasement for close to a millennia, and then causing untold devastation on the galaxy with no signs of stopping. If the Yagh choose to follow a similar tactic then the galaxy is well within it's right to defend itself. Every uplift "project" presented in the game is also presented as having gone badly. With that sort of history evident, the Salarians would be shortsighted and foolish to think that uplifting the yahg or the varren would go any better. Uplifting species to end a war... only to subsequently result in a rebellion of that uplifted species. Even Javik indicates that the Protheans had some similar experiences in their day. I find it ironic that you defend leaving the genophage in place by the virtue of the krogan's past violent actions... making it, in your view, inevitable that they will try to overrun the galaxy. Yet, you also excuse the concept of uplifting further species by ignoring the past indications that the process fails miserably as a means to solve a war... because it leads to another war caused when the uplifted species rebels against the idea of being used as "expendable shock troops."
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 15, 2016 13:06:00 GMT
It's not foolish if you consider the alternative to losing the war. At that point, no one knew what the Crucible was, let alone if it would even work, the only thing that everyone knew was that we needed more bodies to fight/stall the Reaper offensive, at least until a better plan could be enacted. Future repercussions can be considered once the very fate of every advanced civilization is not at stake. The Salarians don't uplift other species for kicks either; for all the 'mad scientist' trope that gets thrown at them during the course of the (biased) Genophage Arc they are actually very pragmatic in their approach to the situation. The galaxy needs foot soldiers to fight, and the Yahg would make a perfect addition to the combined forces; strong, extremely intelligent, and by placing their species in the crosshairs of the Reapers their co-operation can be assured. Is it amoral? Extremely. Will there likely be issues with them down the line? More than likely. But if their addition to the fighting tips the war in the galaxy's favor it's all worth it in the end. And if by 'uppity' you mean the Krogan attacks on an allied galaxy during the Rebellions, then that would be squarely on the Krogan. They've been a part of the council for a thousand years at that point, turning around and accusing the uplift of their species at that time is blaming the actions of a fully grown man on his parents. Also, the Krogan were only 'neutered', as you put it, after they had refused any form of diplomacy & appeasement for close to a millennia, and then causing untold devastation on the galaxy with no signs of stopping. If the Yagh choose to follow a similar tactic then the galaxy is well within it's right to defend itself. Every uplift "project" presented in the game is also presented as having gone badly. With that sort of history evident, the Salarians would be shortsighted and foolish to think that uplifting the yahg or the varren would go any better. Uplifting species to end a war... only to subsequently result in a rebellion of that uplifted species. Even Javik indicates that the Protheans had some similar experiences in their day. I find it ironic that you defend leaving the genophage in place by the virtue of the krogan's past violent actions... making it, in your view, inevitable that they will try to overrun the galaxy. Yet, you also excuse the concept of uplifting further species by ignoring the past indications that the process fails miserably as a means to solve a war... because it leads to another war caused when the uplifted species rebels against the idea of being used as "expendable shock troops." Of course the examples given in-game ended badly, but for all of the finger wagging of folks like Paragon Shepard, they forget the fact that they actually still exist, which is a heck of lot better than being Rachni chow. Hindsight is always 20/20, but the fact of the matter is that the Salarians uplifted the Krogan when there was no alternative, and as far as everyone knew at the time of the Reaper invasion, the galaxy is in a similar situation. And it's not ironic, because that is not why the Krogan rebelled. If they were really so cheesed off about being labeled expendable by the rest of the galaxy then why would they be sending wave after wave of poorly equip Krogan foot soldiers to fight in the rebellions then? They rebelled because they were an aggressive, warlike people that refused to see reason or diplomacy. Hopefully, the Yahg will prove to be more intelligent than that. But again, all of this is a moot point if the Reapers win. Would the galaxy prefer to deal with the potential fallout of an uplifted Yahg, or all be rendered into Reaper smoothie? Those are the only choices available as far as everyone knew.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1122
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 26, 2024 15:49:36 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2016 16:30:36 GMT
Every uplift "project" presented in the game is also presented as having gone badly. With that sort of history evident, the Salarians would be shortsighted and foolish to think that uplifting the yahg or the varren would go any better. Uplifting species to end a war... only to subsequently result in a rebellion of that uplifted species. Even Javik indicates that the Protheans had some similar experiences in their day. I find it ironic that you defend leaving the genophage in place by the virtue of the krogan's past violent actions... making it, in your view, inevitable that they will try to overrun the galaxy. Yet, you also excuse the concept of uplifting further species by ignoring the past indications that the process fails miserably as a means to solve a war... because it leads to another war caused when the uplifted species rebels against the idea of being used as "expendable shock troops." Of course the examples given in-game ended badly, but for all of the finger wagging of folks like Paragon Shepard, they forget the fact that they actually still exist, which is a heck of lot better than being Rachni chow. Hindsight is always 20/20, but the fact of the matter is that the Salarians uplifted the Krogan when there was no alternative, and as far as everyone knew at the time of the Reaper invasion, the galaxy is in a similar situation. And it's not ironic, because that is not why the Krogan rebelled. If they were really so cheesed off about being labeled expendable by the rest of the galaxy then why would they be sending wave after wave of poorly equip Krogan foot soldiers to fight in the rebellions then? They rebelled because they were an aggressive, warlike people that refused to see reason or diplomacy. Hopefully, the Yahg will prove to be more intelligent than that. But again, all of this is a moot point if the Reapers win. Would the galaxy prefer to deal with the potential fallout of an uplifted Yahg, or all be rendered into Reaper smoothie? Those are the only choices available as far as everyone knew. The bottom line here is (and you agree) that it all depends on what little opposing details the player chooses to side with... what side of the Krogan personality presented the player chooses to believe, what side of Salarian "reasoning" the player chooses to believe, etc. The game gives little hints in BOTH directions and the player ultimately discards one set in preference for another. You ignore all the hints that Krogan are able to be reasoned with, that their numbers have been depleted by the genophage to numbers well below the populations of the species who are in control of the galaxy, that the Salarians have a propensity to uplift species in order to throw them into battle and fight their wars for them rather than negotiate with allies on equal terms to strengthen their forces. That is, that "uplift" is the primary tactic for providing troops that the Salarians are bringing to the table to fight the Reaper war. You choose to ignore the "finger wagging" and I don't - both conclusions are "logical" within the confines of the game. The decision to cure the genophage is not made, then, out of "compassion" for the Krogan... but the belief that, in the Krogan, there is already a strong ally capable of helping win the Reaper war... rather than tossing the dice at uplifting yet another species with unpredictable results (and believing that, based on past experiences, the results of the uplift "will go badly.") Even with Krogan birthrates returning to "natural," it would still take them a bit of time to grow their numbers back up to more than 11 billion (to be equal to even just one of the Council species), let alone the 44 Billion needed for them to outstrip the numbers of all the Council species combined. The Krogan are experienced at fighting a war on a galactic level. The issue of Krogan numbers was dealt with once before. There are other factors that limit their viability (food is apparently not available to them on planets like Palaven) and the environment of Tuchanka itself hasn't really improved - so even without a genophage enough Krogan babies may not survive to allow the Krogan to increase their numbers all that rapidly. With regards to further colonies - Krogan seem to enjoy living in harsh environments where the other galactic species don't generally want to colonize anyways. Just allow them to expand to the planets in the galaxy that the other species consider mostly uninhabitable.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 26, 2024 11:18:05 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Sept 15, 2016 17:07:13 GMT
Of course the examples given in-game ended badly, but for all of the finger wagging of folks like Paragon Shepard, they forget the fact that they actually still exist, which is a heck of lot better than being Rachni chow. Hindsight is always 20/20, but the fact of the matter is that the Salarians uplifted the Krogan when there was no alternative, and as far as everyone knew at the time of the Reaper invasion, the galaxy is in a similar situation. And it's not ironic, because that is not why the Krogan rebelled. If they were really so cheesed off about being labeled expendable by the rest of the galaxy then why would they be sending wave after wave of poorly equip Krogan foot soldiers to fight in the rebellions then? They rebelled because they were an aggressive, warlike people that refused to see reason or diplomacy. Hopefully, the Yahg will prove to be more intelligent than that. But again, all of this is a moot point if the Reapers win. Would the galaxy prefer to deal with the potential fallout of an uplifted Yahg, or all be rendered into Reaper smoothie? Those are the only choices available as far as everyone knew. The bottom line here is (and you agree) that it all depends on what little opposing details the player chooses to side with... what side of the Krogan personality presented the player chooses to believe, what side of Salarian "reasoning" the player chooses to believe, etc. The game gives little hints in BOTH directions and the player ultimately discards one set in preference for another. You ignore all the hints that Krogan are able to be reasoned with, that their numbers have been depleted by the genophage to numbers well below the populations of the species who are in control of the galaxy, that the Salarians have a propensity to uplift species in order to throw them into battle and fight their wars for them rather than negotiate with allies on equal terms to strengthen their forces. You choose to ignore the "finger wagging" and I don't - both conclusions are "logical" within the confines of the game. The decision to cure the genophage is not made, then, out of "compassion" for the Krogan... but the belief that, in the Krogan, there is already a strong ally capable of helping win the Reaper war... rather than tossing the dice at uplifting yet another species with unpredictable results (and believing that, based on past experiences, the results of the uplift "will go badly." I'm not ignoring the Krogan at all. By all means bring them into the fight, the galaxy could use the help. I'm arguing from the point that uplifting the Yahg in addition to the Krogan, Rachni, Turians, Quarians, Geth, etc. is something with far more pros than cons considering the state of the galaxy during that time. BioWare just can't seem to write a moral dilemma without making one side look like a bunch of raving lunatics unfortunately. The implications behind the deploying of the Genophage, the depleted numbers of Krogan, and their cure are ultimately irrelevant when looking at the potential assets the galaxy can bring to the table. The politics of the Genophage, and whether it was warranted or not, has no bearing on the current situation. "If only the Genophage hadn't been deployed, then we could have legions of Krogan soldiers to fight the Reapers." Well it was deployed, and not one species (even the Reapers) have access to a time machine, so we have to make due with what we have. If the argument is about what should have been done then the galaxy would be sitting there for a long, long time. If only the Asari weren't hiding the Prothean beacon, if only the Quarians tried to communicate with the Geth, if only the Rachni hadn't been wiped out after the Rachni Wars, if only the Leviathans hadn't made the Catalyst, and by extension the Reapers. Etc. Why not bring the Krogan, and the Yahg into the fight? Relying solely on the Krogan's newly cured birth rate is going to do no one any good (especially the Krogan) if the galaxy is going to have to wait 20+ years for the new generation to take the field. We need soldiers now, and uplifting the Yagh and Varren will give the allied forces a better chance of survival than if they did nothing.
|
|