inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 18:18:56 GMT
onto someone who doesn't want it. He's addicted and suffering so badly he thinks he's failing at his duties. He wants to be back on it, everything in his body screams to be back on it. It's only his pride that tells him to try not being on it, because he believes in Andraste but he no longer trusts the Chantry. I wouldn't have minded their being a drawback to his being on it, but I don't think he should have outright died. Maybe without an income from the inquisition to support his lyrium habit, he would have had to go back to being a Templar to financially support his drug fix. That sounds awful to me, but doesn't actually kill him
|
|
inherit
749
0
3,852
Iddy
3,859
August 2016
iddy
|
Post by Iddy on Apr 6, 2018 19:04:51 GMT
Ehh... can't say I like that. You go from being a defender of the world to being a defender of the Chantry. No point in keeping the Inquisition alive then.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 20:27:09 GMT
onto someone who doesn't want it. He's addicted and suffering so badly he thinks he's failing at his duties. He wants to be back on it, everything in his body screams to be back on it. It's only his pride that tells him to try not being on it, because he believes in Andraste but he no longer trusts the Chantry. I wouldn't have minded their being a drawback to his being on it, but I don't think he should have outright died. Maybe without an income from the inquisition to support his lyrium habit, he would have had to go back to being a Templar to financially support his drug fix. That sounds awful to me, but doesn't actually kill him He verbally states when you ask him bluntly if he wants to go back on it and he says no. He prefers to be removed from duty than to stay on duty if he has to take it again. Personally, I sensed mind dominating over the addiction. I think he'd have enough willpower to try and kick the habit again, but not enough health. His reason for doubt was, 'I gave it my all in Kirkwall and I can't give less to the Inq.' Telling him to use it temporarily is guilt tripping him into something he bluntly says he doesn't want. He's already off lyrium for months before he shares the secret with the Inq, so Inq isn't making the decision for him to stop. It's also complete unicorn crap that he doesn't dump the romance with the Inq for the temporary option too. Don't see why he wouldn't use the same logic as with forcing lyrium on him forever option. It's like oh hi I've just fed my bf some drugs. Now he's a lot more focused, sexier and 210% better at beating dawkspawn up with a shield. He'll also magically kick the habit again without any drawback when I snap my fingers and declare him cured. Win all around. What kind of kiss ass, sparklypoo option is that for a completely immoral action. Ehh... can't say I like that. You go from being a defender of the world to being a defender of the Chantry. No point in keeping the Inquisition alive then.
Can't say I like that either since he left the Chantry because he no longer trusts it and then he gets sucked right back into serving it. But, you get this option if you tell him immediately that you don't want him on lyrium. It's bogus to have the same ending for no lyrium and temporary on lyrium.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 20:34:58 GMT
You see it as bogus and I see it as a chance for role-playing a person who does put the Inquisition over the welfare of her lover.
I see it as bogus that there isn't any drawback to his going through withdrawals. If you want reality, he should have been at least temporarily removed from service to deal with it. Yet the power of "you can do it!" Created a withdrawal free Utopia of success
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 20:56:30 GMT
You see it as bogus and I see it as a chance for role-playing a person who does put the Inquisition over the welfare of her lover. 1) If they do, then they shouldn't be allowed to continue romancing him. Do put the Inq welfare 1st by not distracting him from duty. 2) Depends on the perspective of what is better for the Inq, having mindless lyrium addicted zombies on their side who can one day sell you for a bigger offer of lyrium or someone with integrity and their mind in tact. I see it as bogus that there isn't any drawback to his going through withdrawals. If you want reality, he should have been at least temporarily removed from service to deal with it. Yet the power of "you can do it!" Created a withdrawal free Utopia of success Cassandra is the judge of that and she judges him capable. I think you can trust a Seeker to decide if he's losing it or not. That's what their argument scene is about. Cullen asks to be re-evaluated and removed. When he feels unsure, he refers to the competent authority and prefers to lose his job to ensure he doesn't endanger anyone (which speaks in favour of him beating the addiction) than to go back on lyrium in order to perform his job better. edit: Actually, I wouldn't have minded his temporary removal from duty. (more romantic cut - scenes and drama :amirite: )
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 20:59:26 GMT
*shrugs* you feel very strongly about this. I don't. in other news, I found another sweet cullen comic by same artist as last time. Cullen and headaches
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 21:03:59 GMT
*shrugs* you feel very strongly about this. I don't. Let's also convince Lelilana then to temporarily poison the Ashes and let her know you'll somehow fix it later. Instead of attacking you, she can perform bard striptease for the Warden in gratitude. Everything is ok as long as it's temporary.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 21:09:24 GMT
*shrugs* you feel very strongly about this. I don't. Let's also convince Lelilana then to temporarily poison the Ashes and let her know you'll somehow fix it later. Instead of attacking you, she can perform bard striptease for the Warden in gratitude. Everything is ok as long as it's temporary. Leliana is a nutcracker that shouldn't be in charge of anything. I've written long posts on her insanity. I think we can both agree we prefer nuanced outcomes. Bioware thrives on the morally grey. Cullen isn't going to leave his gf when she agrees with him that he needs to be at his best right now. She also supports him getting off it at a later date. He can literally die from withdrawals. You take your stance as a person with metaknowledge, you know he'll kick the addiction with no consequences to his service to the Inquisition. But if you're truly roleplaying, and strip away the metaknowledge, he could literally die within another week and you will be short a commander of your forces.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 21:27:42 GMT
But if you're truly roleplaying, and strip away the metaknowledge, he could literally die within another week and you will be short a commander of your forces. Without meta-knowledge, he can die from going back on lyrium too and I don't mean the end of the game. He can easily lose his mind next week by resuming lyrium and then you'll be left without the commander of your forces. Lyrium is not something you casually go off of or go back to without your mind and body suffering. Actually, I didn't know whether there would be consequences in the game or not when I advised him against it the 1st time I was playing. I actually thought what you suggested, that he might temporarily get removed from duty. I would not have objected to such outcome. Leliana is a nutcracker that shouldn't be in charge of anything. I've written long posts on her insanity. Now I wander what's your stance on her as the Divine. Cullen isn't going to leave his gf when she agrees with him that he needs to be at his best right now. Except he does dump the Inq if you force him on lyrium without a promise to deal with it later. The reason for temporary and forever is exactly the same - to be at his best now.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 21:32:46 GMT
Without meta-knowledge, he can die from going back on lyrium too and I don't mean the end of the game. He can easily lose his mind next week by resuming lyrium and then you'll be left without the commander of your forces. .... I think your lack of lore education is showing. No one dies from a Lyrium Addiction as if it's crack or meth. You lose your mind over many years, as in, it'll take until Cullen is gray haired before you see the signs of it. If it was actually life threatening to be on, it wouldn't be a good drug to leash them with. Only Lyrium that will kill you is the red stuff. My stance on a Leliana Divine is that it's a Feel Good Choice on the Surface that makes me uneasy. I feel like Bioware is ignoring how insane she is, it's possible Hardened Leliana is the truth of it whereas Soft Leliana is just there to make people who choose her feel better. If Cassandra was willing to start allowing other races into the Chantry, I'd back her 100% because her moderate beliefs and personality appeal to me much more. And I don't even like her as much as I used to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 21:41:23 GMT
I think your lack of lore education is showing. No one dies from a Lyrium Addiction as if it's crack or meth. Except he was on lyrium for 10 years prior to that in Kirwall (actually from the very start of his career before he even turned 20, it was just more abusive and intense in Kirkwall). He's not starting a new process. He's resuming an old habit, which has already harmed him. You don't know how switching it off and 'starving' yourself and then going back to it might affect the mind. One doze might be enough to drive someone insane. And if you force him to take lyrium forever option then in the end slides he's found in Kirkwall as a drooling, disgraceful lunatic at the end of his life within two years. That was fast deterioration. So no he doesn't live to the grey hair. He literally dies in a dumpster completely insane in a very short time period. Also, without the metaknowlege you don't even know how long it would take you to defeat Corypheus. That 'temporary' promise might be futile if it takes you twenty years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 21:56:10 GMT
My stance on a Leliana Divine is that it's a Feel Good Choice on the Surface that makes me uneasy. I feel like Bioware is ignoring how insane she is, it's possible Hardened Leliana is the truth of it whereas Soft Leliana is just there to make people who choose her feel better. If Cassandra was willing to start allowing other races into the Chantry, I'd back her 100% because her moderate beliefs and personality appeal to me much more. And I don't even like her as much as I used to. Fair enough. I don't strongly like any of the three options in any event. Of the given options, I probably favour Cass a bit more, but there was a conversation between her and Dorian where he asked her whether she would grab and drag him to the Circle given the chance and she said 'without hesitation,' which made me very uneasy.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 22:02:06 GMT
Except he was on lyrium for 10 years prior to that in Kirwall. He's not starting a new process. He's resuming an old habit, which has already harmed him. You don't know how switching it off and 'starving' yourself and then going back to it might affect the mind. One doze might be enough to drive someone insane. I think it's a bit odd to state that I don't know when, if that's true, you don't know either. The Inky doesn't know either. She sees a suffering lover with no such cases in her knowledge that Cullen will die from resuming but there are definitely cases of Templars dying without. The Inky can, in fact, be a Templar themselves and see absolutely no reason to be off the stuff. The lover could then argue that being on Lyrium is absolutely irrelevant to being a good person, a good commander. Why not get back on the hog, put the suffering behind you, focus on saving the world, and if it's still important to him a couple years from now, when there is time to breathe and the world is saved, she'll be behind him 100% for good or ill. This is purely a roleplaying debate so it's really all opinions and facts. You find it unbelieveable, and due to a love of Cullen, find anyone who would suggest such a thing reprehensible. So demand that the writers/devs 'punish' the Inky's that would do this. I find it very believeable. ONLY in the case of ORDERING Cullen to take Lyrium should be break up with her. I've taken the middle ground with a non lover before this conversation only once, and it really seemed a empathetic conversation. Some people are actually dying for the inquistion? how can we whinge about Cullen being on lyrium a wee bit longer for the Organization that thousands are dying for?
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 22:03:23 GMT
My stance on a Leliana Divine is that it's a Feel Good Choice on the Surface that makes me uneasy. I feel like Bioware is ignoring how insane she is, it's possible Hardened Leliana is the truth of it whereas Soft Leliana is just there to make people who choose her feel better. If Cassandra was willing to start allowing other races into the Chantry, I'd back her 100% because her moderate beliefs and personality appeal to me much more. And I don't even like her as much as I used to. Fair enough. I don't strongly like any of the three options in any event. Of the given options, I probably favour Cass a bit more, but there was a conversation between her and Dorian where he asked her whether she would grab and drag him to the Circle given the chance and she said 'without hesitation,' which made me very uneasy. Indeed. I also dislike her "I accept differences in faith" comments when they're directly to your face, but in an unguarded moment in the Temple of Mythal it is very clear she thinks any who don't follow andrastianism is being nonsensical
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 22:14:25 GMT
I think it's a bit odd to state that I don't know when, if that's true, you don't know either. The Inky doesn't know either. She sees a suffering lover with no such cases in her knowledge that Cullen will die from resuming but there are definitely cases of Templars dying without. Yes there are cases. Samson is right there as a dazzling display of someone going bonkers long before the red lyrium. Everyone knows that long term effects of lyrium are harmful, it's only a matter of time when. I don't believe the Inq can judge accurately how long Cullen has until resuming an addictive habit will claim his mind. Once again, he started using it before he even turned 20, so the effect is already in his system. The fact that he dies within a couple of years after Inq is proof enough that it can be rapid. Forcing him to take it forever, literally causes his death within a few years. I consider that proof. You're the one arguing that making him take lyrium is a pragmatic choice for the good of the Inq. I'm the one saying it's not necessarily true as he can lose his mind quickly by going back to it. The fact is, Inky doesn't know what would harm his health more, so, it's not a pragmatic reason. 'If I just take this stuff it will make it all be better.' That's completely drug addict logic.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Apr 6, 2018 22:17:31 GMT
There probably should have been a third option where he wanes himself off of using it gradually rather than quitting cold turkey.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 22:20:05 GMT
Cullen being on lyrium a wee bit longer for the Organization that thousands are dying for? 1) How do you know how long it would take Inq to defeat Corypheus without meta-knowledge? That temporary promise might be as good as forever. 2) It is highly arguable in which state of mind he is better qualified to serve Inq. Everyone at Skyhold who talks about Cullen claims he's doing a great job when he's off lyirum. He's the one doubting himself the most.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 22:27:59 GMT
Yes there are cases. Samson is right there as a dazzling display of someone going bonkers. Everyone knows that long term effects of lyrium are harmful, it's only a matter of time when Samson did NOT go bonkers. He is sane in literally every conversation you have with him. He's wrong, but wrong doesn't equal insanity. And he's rationalized all his wrongness because of the Chantry casting him out. It's a matter of time. Decades of time. Forcing him to take it forever causes him to die-- truth. Maybe because there is no one there to limit him on how much to take. But the epilogue slide is super ambiguous about when Scout Harding finally decides to mercy kill him. Could be a couple years. Could be ten. People get addicted, then go sober, then get on again, then go sober again. Sometimes it doesn't stick the first time. But to say he can't realistically ease off a narcotic at a later date ever does not represent reality. I'm not arguing anything but that I'm okay with the choices and outcomes as they are. You are arguing to bring reality into it. so I brought up the fact that, reality is, getting off is more dangerous than staying on in this case, based off many many many cases in the books and games. your core message is simply that anyone that takes the middle ground doesn't really love Cullen, doesn't deserve him, and should be punished by a loss of the relationship. I disagree with anything that paints our fellow fans and players in a negative light because I have a huge peeve with people personally attacking the players when anything, literally anything in the games can be supported by imaginative and creative roleplaying. Also a willingness to explore humanities greys. I'm firmly in the camp that Meredith, Loghain, and Samson were absolutely wrong. But their convictions were believeable ones to have, and if we, as players, want to explore a character with "wrong" convictions as well, I don't think that Bioware should punish that. Otherwise, only goody two shoes vomit inducing heros would ever get to do anything in this game and succeed. And that's not fair to what I love about Bioware games. Edit add: please quit putting words in my mouth or implying the RP reasoning I've given as hypothethical "how could someone do this and still love Cullen?" scenarios are something I personally believe in. I am not the characters I play in my video games. Shouldn't that be obvious?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 22:34:37 GMT
please quit putting words in my mouth or implying the RP reasoning I've given as hypothethical "how could someone do this and still love Cullen?" scenarios are something I personally believe in. I'm not. But this is getting personal, so I'm leaving this conversation. your core message is simply that anyone that takes the middle ground doesn't really love Cullen, doesn't deserve him, and should be punished by a loss of the relationship. A rude and judgemental misinterpretation of my words on your behalf.
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,771
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,202
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Apr 6, 2018 22:43:07 GMT
You're the one arguing that making him take lyrium is a pragmatic choice for the good of the Inq. Let's also convince Lelilana then to temporarily poison the Ashes and let her know you'll somehow fix it later. Instead of attacking you, she can perform bard striptease for the Warden in gratitude. Everything is ok as long as it's temporary. ^^^ Two cases of putting words in my mouth. One was actually in reaction to saying I didn't feel very strongly about debating this, but you tagged me for more anyway by implying I believed that "Everything is ok as long as it's temporary." Something I didn't say at all, therefore I felt prompted to defend myself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 22:49:55 GMT
Two cases of putting words in my mouth. One was actually in reaction to saying I didn't feel very strongly about debating this, but you tagged me for more anyway by implying I believed that "Everything is ok as long as it's temporary." Something I didn't say at all, therefore I felt prompted to defend myself. I'm under impression that you are the one who takes it upon yourself to quote my posts and judge me negatively based on some supposed and imagined harm towards you or someone. My posts were not personal, but you're the one who just revealed that you've started this entire argument with me based on the assumption that I was accusing someone of something. So, your purpose was not to have a hypothetical discussion, but to judge me. I find that rather rude.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 23:10:25 GMT
I disagree with anything that paints our fellow fans and players in a negative light Keep on imagining that I was talking about players and not game dynamics. Yes. I don't like it that the choice of temporary and no lyrium leads to exactly the same ending and same slides. There are other things in the games I don't like that aren't Cullen related. Kindly f*** off with judging me, especially when you're wrongly imagining what my reasons were for stating my opinion.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Apr 6, 2018 23:13:44 GMT
adonniel Reading the exchange, you were the one who started making it rude and personal by having a condescending attitude for other players' choice in some of your posts. phoray even joined in the conversation saying that there should be negative results to keeping Cullen on Lyrium, just not him dying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9145
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 23:26:31 GMT
Reading the exchange, you were the one who started making it rude and personal by having a condescending attitude for other players' choice in some of your posts. I haven't talked about other players. I specifically talked about the game itself and how choosing a middle option affects Inq's relationship with Cullen as well as his future within the game. I dislike how the middle option is reflected within the game. I've made no judgement on people who choose the middle option. Nor have I said anywhere that people shouldn't be allowed to choose it.
phoray revealed that she started this conversation not to discuss various points of view with me, but because she read my words in a certain way and decided that I've formed some opinion towards other players which I don't even hold. In case anyone is doubting this simple truth of life I'll say in very plain words.
OMG the sky is blue and NO I don't think anyone has the right to tell other players which game option they should choose. No, I was not implying that nobody should be allowed to pick temporary use option. That's idiotic beyond words to think you can tell some internet people you've never met before that they're wrong in choose some game option. The grass is also green.
Saying some option sucks and not liking it, doesn't equate to bashing other players.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Apr 6, 2018 23:35:16 GMT
Reading the exchange, you were the one who started making it rude and personal by having a condescending attitude for other players' choice in some of your posts. I haven't talked about other players. I specifically talked about the game itself and how choosing a middle option affects Inq's relationship with Cullen as well as his future within the game. I dislike how the middle option is reflected within the game. I've made no judgement on people who choose the middle option. Nor have I said anywhere that people shouldn't be allowed to choose it. Parts of your post like the one below however definitely read as you insulting other players for their choices rather than just talking about the game. It's like oh hi I've just fed my bf some drugs. Now he's a lot more focused, sexier and 210% better at beating dawkspawn up with a shield. He'll also magically kick the habit again without any drawback when I snap my fingers and declare him cured. Win all around. What kind of kiss ass, sparklypoo option is that for a completely immoral action.
|
|