Why the Characters of Mass Effect Andromeda are well written.

They are only bad to you.

Personally, I think the Dragon Age series generally outdoes the Mass Effect series including in regards to characters but that's just my personal opinion.  

I don't care too much about the title but it's content. As long as the poster writes a good argument than I don't have a problem.

I think that's a more recent trend though.  You'd be hardpressed to find people who thought that after ME2 and DA2 released

Well did you interview everyone who played the game about Liam's dialogue?

I did. I get what you're saying but I've always considered Dragon Age to have been better than Mass Effect in terms of quality between the two. Don't get me, I'm not saying that there's never any lapses in aspects of Dragon Age or that everything about Mass Effect is terrible: I just generally feel like there's more thought put into Dragon Age's writing and effort into its worldbuilding including its prominent races. At its best and worst, I consider Dragon Age to be better than Mass Effect at its best and worst. It's something I could have a longer post about but that would be for another thread least I derail this one.

There's also the problem that the series dropped even things that were set up. Additionally, there was the inconsistent or indecisive portrayal of certain things like Cerberus or even aspects of prominent races like the asari. 

While I consider Mass Effect: Andromeda to be flawed, I do think the developers tried to take things to heart and better elements that were lacking in the previous games like a consistent course for the story with laid-out plotlines. Does it need improvement? Yes, but I still think it does some things better than the trilogy did and that the things that stand to be improved can be so in future installments. I think discarding the Andromeda story would be to throw out the champagne with the cork. Review the feedback, consider it and then refine what worked and improve what did not. As I see it, the DLC to Dragon Age: Inquisition showed the value in this method. 

Ryder feels like a protagonist treated more consistently by the story than Shepard was although the true test of that would be in future games. I do think Ryder is a more set character but I can accept that for Ryder because Ryder has never been portrayed as anything but that. Basically, it's not a change that contradicts established characterization and player agency like what happened to Shepard in Mass Effect 3 and arguably, Mass Effect 2. I would have liked further control of Ryder and the addition of more renegade options but that is something that could be added in future installments should Ryder continue as the protagonist. As it is, I think Ryder has a decent start as a set protagonist.  

I also do adore that Ryder is allowed to be more interested in science and generally, more emotive. 

Eh, I'd say that even DA2's writing is overall stronger than most of Mass Effect. But then I'm squarely in the ME2-is-vastly-overrated crowd. 

I assume you did the interview, since you are the one that affirmed that his dialogues are bad ONLY to me. 

I just can't agree.  DA2 is a trainwreck on nearly every level.  Maybe the character writing can be put next to ME's, but that would be it.