My view on the ending morality

At least we can agree that the Intelligence is not as smart as it thinks it is.

That's part of the problem. You can't trust it and you can't leave it unchecked. The Reapers are unchecked. Their logic is flawed. Regardless of what they think they are doing, they're doing it wrong and they won't stop doing it wrong.

No. The reapers are not honest. They had a simple task: The leviathans needed lesser species to pay tribute, because these lesser species may be wiped out by synthetics. Instead of keeping the tribute flowing, the Intelligence stabbed them in the back and harvested the leviathans.

Currently we cannot understand an AI, which doesn't follow logic. But that is because we only know primitive computers, which can mimic intelligence by logic. However, theoretically there should be no difference between an artificial intelligence and one driven by a biochemical computer, which we know as a brain.

I disagree on trusting it. This is a creature that has cost the lives of innumerable people, the extinction of advanced sentient species, the lives of comrades in arms, men and women of the alliance, friends, potential loved ones and even waged a personal vendetta against Shepard. And now it oh so innocently asks us to choose the option that doesn't kill it, while not even asking its Reapers for a cease fire, during the most crucial moment of any cycle ever. The one moment it would require doing something to earn some fucking trust. So no, there is no display of good will. And it can go fuck itself for the sins and crimes it has committed. There is no justification to keep it alive. It is dangerous, broken and untrustworthy.

If you choose Synthesis, the moment the Initiative tries to get back to the Milky Way, it will get steamrolled by the Reapers.

They can't even turn them green, where some semblance of their former self can be retained. What they can. they will turn into husks, hopefully less aware than the Synthesis ones, and the rest will be mercifully killed. But co-existing or surviving the encounter is completely 100% out of the question.

And I wonder how many times it tried it, barring that one time.

You’re confusing what trust means. There is a difference between trust and approval. You can trust people you don’t approve of, and you can approve of people you don’t trust. As for their atrocious actions, I’m not interested in discussing ethics with war criminals, so let’s keep it to the subject being discussed. Also you’re a liar. Anyone who chooses Destroy trusts it, when that is the option you should trust least from it since that negatively affects them. They literally allow you to point a gun to their head and pull the trigger if you want.

Let me refresh your memory:
“To solve this problem, we created an intelligence with the mandate to preserve life at any cost.”

The Intelligence’s mission was never to worry about tribute, but preserve life. It deemed the Leviathans as worth the cost for that directive.

Also:
“There was no mistake. It still serves its purpose.”

So clearly despite them no longer getting tribute, they don’t see the Catalyst as failing its mission. Which means the tribute wasn’t the mission.

Sure it is. Most of what your post contained are lines from the game I already know, so no need to read them.

You should be able to express your opinion without being rude, so by all means present.
Here, I’ll start: Your argument in that link is just your subjective opinion, not objective fact, as those lines can mean other things.

I did. I just disagree with you on it.

Or better yet, not make the damned thing in the first place.

Or even better, tune down on the demands of the tributes so that your thralls don't end up building AIs to help manage with the ever increasing demands of tributes.