inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Mar 28, 2023 23:16:03 GMT
If we ever get to talk to a old god or evanuris then it could be fun to ask them whether or not they are a god, and have them ask you what a god is in turn. We did talk to an Evanuris, though- Solas. And he himself is the source of the revelation that the Evanuris weren't actually gods. I'm not sure how to get much more definitive than that, unless we have some reason to suspect Solas of lying about this.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Mar 28, 2023 23:27:51 GMT
Is it understandable that some people worshipped them as gods? Sure, they were very powerful and probably appeared quite god-like, so those people could be excused for the mistake. But was it right to worship them as gods? Well no, probably not, because they weren't actually gods. As you say, a lot depends on your definition of a god but having a power not available to those who worship them and the ability to respond to requests for aid if they chose to, would seem to be a bare minimum where Thedas is concerned. Look at the Avvar. Their gods are spirits. They know this and seem surprised if you question their definition. Clearly, the named gods are the most powerful spirits that they interact with. There would also appear to be a clear connection between the belief of their followers and the identity of the god. Hakkon is Hakkon because there are enough Avvar who believe in that god and what he is associated with. They were also able to call that spirit into a mortal form to give them more tangible assistance in the physical world. May be that is what happened in the past with the Old Gods. Note also that Ameridan was able to trap Hakkon in a form of stasis prison from which he could not escape without outside assistance. I'm pretty sure there were meant to be some clues there about what may have happened in the past with the Old Gods. Not the least the fact that the Hakkonites chose to call their god into a dragon as his vessel and in ancient times the Neromenians revered dragons and thought their heroes were reborn as dragons. Curiously, this is exactly what the Cult of Andraste at Haven believed had happened with her. So entirely consistent with the beliefs of the ancient barbarians both north and south. Another thing to consider wrt godhood is the idea that gods constitute a separate ontological category, as in the Christian concept of the "Great Chain of Being": gods and divine entities are fundamentally separate, representing a separate ontological class of individuals, that are qualitatively different from other beings in terms of their underlying nature. So on this line of thinking being a god isn't just a matter of what one does, or whether one is worshipped or viewed as divine, but what one is, what ontological category of being or entity one happens to belong to. So its not like a human being could attain enough power or influence to become a god- non-divine entities cannot become divine, any more than humans can become frogs. But surely ancient elves, as a group or species, belonged to the same ontological category (the way all humans belong to the same ontological category), and so either all ancient elves are gods- sharing the same underlying nature or constitution- or none of them are, since they all belong to the same ontological category. So godhood isn't necessarily defined in functional or relational terms, which leaves open the possibility of mistakenly identifying someone as a god- the idea that someone could be worshipping false gods. Which is exactly the picture we're presented with in the case of the Elvhen pantheon.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Mar 29, 2023 4:11:41 GMT
If we ever get to talk to a old god or evanuris then it could be fun to ask them whether or not they are a god, and have them ask you what a god is in turn. We did talk to an Evanuris, though- Solas. And he himself is the source of the revelation that the Evanuris weren't actually gods. I'm not sure how to get much more definitive than that, unless we have some reason to suspect Solas of lying about this. What? Suspect the man who has done nothing but lie to advance his own views and agendas? The man literally known as the God of Deception and everyone else throughout the franchise said to not trust in any way, shape, or form? Surely he’s a beacon of honesty.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Mar 29, 2023 8:04:56 GMT
Whatever constitutes a god in Thedas, the Evanuris were, apparently, not it. Once again, according to Solas. So far as their followers were concerned, they were gods. Now I would also add to the denial they were gods, the testimony of one of the Forgotten Ones, Gelduran: There are no gods only the subject and the object, the acted and the acted upon. Those with the will to earn dominance over others gain the title not by nature but by deeds.This would seem to back up what Solas says about the Evanuris' rise to godhood; it was founded upon deeds rather than being fundamentally different in nature to the other elves. Bearing in mind the fact that the Avvar's "gods" are simply spirits, I'm not sure if it is possible to regard any of the gods in Thedas by real world definitions, although I checked my dictionary and it defines a god as a " superhuman being worshiped and having power over nature and human fortunes". Well the gods of Thedas clearly had power over nature and the fortunes of the worshipers from their own races (and quite possibly other races), so it would seem to boil down to what you regard as superhuman or superelven, etc. Do they have to mostly inhabit a realm to which mortals do not have admittance? The Golden/Eternal City was said to be the home of the gods of the barbarians and the elves. At one time it was accessible (likely with special dispensation from the gods) but the Avvar legend recalls the time when this was made no longer possible (suggesting they were around at the creation of the Veil and have a vague memory of the difference between before and after). The Maker was also said to inhabit the Golden City but was unable to prevent forcible entry to his realm and was forced to flee their corruption. Does that negate him as a god since his power would seem to be inferior to that of the Magisters Sidereal? The other problem with the Maker is that he is so vague and the writers have declared they will never definitively prove him one way or the other. That is all very well but it does mean there is no way of verifying whether he was just another spirit, albeit a powerful one, but not an entity that is distinctly different from any of the other gods we have encountered. The fact that Andraste asserted he was the only true god is neither here nor there, since her testimony is not really any more valid than that of Solas about the Evanuris. Remember, also, that she was allegedly calling out to any god that would help her and the Maker was the only one who answered. That doesn't mean the other gods she appealed to, which seem likely to be similar to those of the Avvar, did not exist but that they just didn't consider her worthy of their attention. Perhaps they were also offended that she didn't choose to appeal to just one of them but rather hedged her bets and made a general supplication. Still, since she was of the same culture as the Avvar, who after all were just an offshoot of the Alamaari, it would seem that when she made her appeal, it is likely she was aware she was seeking the attention of a spirit. It just so happened that a spirit calling itself the Maker chose to answer her and then persuaded her that he was the only genuine god. Remember also that when the Old Gods first offered their assistance to the Neromenians and other barbarian tribes, a condition was that they rejected their worship of the Maker. So, it would seem the spirit gods do require a degree of loyalty among their followers that excludes appealing to alternative gods. Does that make the Maker the only true god simply because he told Andraste so? Also, what power did he ever demonstrate that made him superior to the other "false" gods? He wasn't able to save the Ingrish from the Neromenians, so they turned to an alternative god who could. He ignored the plight of the elves and the dwarves (likely the humans too) under the Evanuris. He allowed the rise of the Imperium and offered no tangible help to anyone until Andraste's universal appeal for assistance. Then he failed to save her from the fire. Remember there was no tradition of martyrdom in Thedas, nor did Andraste predict her death as part of the Maker's plan (although her mother's shade in the Gauntlet seemed to suggest that she had some sort of premonition about her daughter's premature death whilst still in the womb), so this wasn't a demonstration of loyalty to the Maker's will. Then, apparently, following her death, the Maker resumed ignoring the fate of Thedas, even his loyal followers, including the elves who had tried to rescue her. Not exactly an inspiring god. I don't count Drakon's "vision" or any of the other convenient conversion of the powerful, such as Hessarian's politically expedient about face and that of the Altus who supported him. Where was the Maker when Drakon slaughtered all the other Maker worshipers with a different view to his own, or who did not wish to live under his rule, in order to "simplify" the religion? So, whilst the mystery surrounding the Maker is meant to make us think more of God in our reality, I really don't see him that way. Thus, it is either a case of there are no gods in Thedas or you accept the status of the ones who are recognised by their followers as such.
|
|
dayze
N2
Posts: 187 Likes: 81
inherit
1270
0
81
dayze
187
August 2016
dayze
|
Post by dayze on Mar 31, 2023 19:04:33 GMT
Whatever constitutes a god in Thedas, the Evanuris were, apparently, not it. Once again, according to Solas. So far as their followers were concerned, they were gods. Now I would also add to the denial they were gods, the testimony of one of the Forgotten Ones, Gelduran: There are no gods only the subject and the object, the acted and the acted upon. Those with the will to earn dominance over others gain the title not by nature but by deeds.This would seem to back up what Solas says about the Evanuris' rise to godhood; it was founded upon deeds rather than being fundamentally different in nature to the other elves. Bearing in mind the fact that the Avvar's "gods" are simply spirits, I'm not sure if it is possible to regard any of the gods in Thedas by real world definitions, although I checked my dictionary and it defines a god as a " superhuman being worshiped and having power over nature and human fortunes". Well the gods of Thedas clearly had power over nature and the fortunes of the worshipers from their own races (and quite possibly other races), so it would seem to boil down to what you regard as superhuman or superelven, etc. Do they have to mostly inhabit a realm to which mortals do not have admittance? The Golden/Eternal City was said to be the home of the gods of the barbarians and the elves. At one time it was accessible (likely with special dispensation from the gods) but the Avvar legend recalls the time when this was made no longer possible (suggesting they were around at the creation of the Veil and have a vague memory of the difference between before and after). The Maker was also said to inhabit the Golden City but was unable to prevent forcible entry to his realm and was forced to flee their corruption. Does that negate him as a god since his power would seem to be inferior to that of the Magisters Sidereal? The other problem with the Maker is that he is so vague and the writers have declared they will never definitively prove him one way or the other. That is all very well but it does mean there is no way of verifying whether he was just another spirit, albeit a powerful one, but not an entity that is distinctly different from any of the other gods we have encountered. The fact that Andraste asserted he was the only true god is neither here nor there, since her testimony is not really any more valid than that of Solas about the Evanuris. Remember, also, that she was allegedly calling out to any god that would help her and the Maker was the only one who answered. That doesn't mean the other gods she appealed to, which seem likely to be similar to those of the Avvar, did not exist but that they just didn't consider her worthy of their attention. Perhaps they were also offended that she didn't choose to appeal to just one of them but rather hedged her bets and made a general supplication. Still, since she was of the same culture as the Avvar, who after all were just an offshoot of the Alamaari, it would seem that when she made her appeal, it is likely she was aware she was seeking the attention of a spirit. It just so happened that a spirit calling itself the Maker chose to answer her and then persuaded her that he was the only genuine god. Remember also that when the Old Gods first offered their assistance to the Neromenians and other barbarian tribes, a condition was that they rejected their worship of the Maker. So, it would seem the spirit gods do require a degree of loyalty among their followers that excludes appealing to alternative gods. Does that make the Maker the only true god simply because he told Andraste so? Also, what power did he ever demonstrate that made him superior to the other "false" gods? He wasn't able to save the Ingrish from the Neromenians, so they turned to an alternative god who could. He ignored the plight of the elves and the dwarves (likely the humans too) under the Evanuris. He allowed the rise of the Imperium and offered no tangible help to anyone until Andraste's universal appeal for assistance. Then he failed to save her from the fire. Remember there was no tradition of martyrdom in Thedas, nor did Andraste predict her death as part of the Maker's plan (although her mother's shade in the Gauntlet seemed to suggest that she had some sort of premonition about her daughter's premature death whilst still in the womb), so this wasn't a demonstration of loyalty to the Maker's will. Then, apparently, following her death, the Maker resumed ignoring the fate of Thedas, even his loyal followers, including the elves who had tried to rescue her. Not exactly an inspiring god. I don't count Drakon's "vision" or any of the other convenient conversion of the powerful, such as Hessarian's politically expedient about face and that of the Altus who supported him. Where was the Maker when Drakon slaughtered all the other Maker worshipers with a different view to his own, or who did not wish to live under his rule, in order to "simplify" the religion? So, whilst the mystery surrounding the Maker is meant to make us think more of God in our reality, I really don't see him that way. Thus, it is either a case of there are no gods in Thedas or you accept the status of the ones who are recognised by their followers as such. Another thing to think about in regards to the Maker, in the alternate time line where Coryphaeus was unopposed, even when presumably his plan to enter the black city and sit upon it's throne is successful his big move is.....simply sending out demons like he was already getting ready to due via using the wardens as hosts. If gaining the throne is what happened, than the maker is surprisingly limited. He even still seemed to have some use for mages on top of that, presuming gaining the throne gave Cory power akin to the maker.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Apr 10, 2023 22:25:15 GMT
Whatever constitutes a god in Thedas, the Evanuris were, apparently, not it. Once again, according to Solas. So far as their followers were concerned, they were gods. Now I would also add to the denial they were gods, the testimony of one of the Forgotten Ones, Gelduran: There are no gods only the subject and the object, the acted and the acted upon. Those with the will to earn dominance over others gain the title not by nature but by deeds.This would seem to back up what Solas says about the Evanuris' rise to godhood; it was founded upon deeds rather than being fundamentally different in nature to the other elves. Bearing in mind the fact that the Avvar's "gods" are simply spirits, I'm not sure if it is possible to regard any of the gods in Thedas by real world definitions, although I checked my dictionary and it defines a god as a " superhuman being worshiped and having power over nature and human fortunes". Well the gods of Thedas clearly had power over nature and the fortunes of the worshipers from their own races (and quite possibly other races), so it would seem to boil down to what you regard as superhuman or superelven, etc. Do they have to mostly inhabit a realm to which mortals do not have admittance? The Golden/Eternal City was said to be the home of the gods of the barbarians and the elves. At one time it was accessible (likely with special dispensation from the gods) but the Avvar legend recalls the time when this was made no longer possible (suggesting they were around at the creation of the Veil and have a vague memory of the difference between before and after). The Maker was also said to inhabit the Golden City but was unable to prevent forcible entry to his realm and was forced to flee their corruption. Does that negate him as a god since his power would seem to be inferior to that of the Magisters Sidereal? The other problem with the Maker is that he is so vague and the writers have declared they will never definitively prove him one way or the other. That is all very well but it does mean there is no way of verifying whether he was just another spirit, albeit a powerful one, but not an entity that is distinctly different from any of the other gods we have encountered. The fact that Andraste asserted he was the only true god is neither here nor there, since her testimony is not really any more valid than that of Solas about the Evanuris. Remember, also, that she was allegedly calling out to any god that would help her and the Maker was the only one who answered. That doesn't mean the other gods she appealed to, which seem likely to be similar to those of the Avvar, did not exist but that they just didn't consider her worthy of their attention. Perhaps they were also offended that she didn't choose to appeal to just one of them but rather hedged her bets and made a general supplication. Still, since she was of the same culture as the Avvar, who after all were just an offshoot of the Alamaari, it would seem that when she made her appeal, it is likely she was aware she was seeking the attention of a spirit. It just so happened that a spirit calling itself the Maker chose to answer her and then persuaded her that he was the only genuine god. Remember also that when the Old Gods first offered their assistance to the Neromenians and other barbarian tribes, a condition was that they rejected their worship of the Maker. So, it would seem the spirit gods do require a degree of loyalty among their followers that excludes appealing to alternative gods. Does that make the Maker the only true god simply because he told Andraste so? Also, what power did he ever demonstrate that made him superior to the other "false" gods? He wasn't able to save the Ingrish from the Neromenians, so they turned to an alternative god who could. He ignored the plight of the elves and the dwarves (likely the humans too) under the Evanuris. He allowed the rise of the Imperium and offered no tangible help to anyone until Andraste's universal appeal for assistance. Then he failed to save her from the fire. Remember there was no tradition of martyrdom in Thedas, nor did Andraste predict her death as part of the Maker's plan (although her mother's shade in the Gauntlet seemed to suggest that she had some sort of premonition about her daughter's premature death whilst still in the womb), so this wasn't a demonstration of loyalty to the Maker's will. Then, apparently, following her death, the Maker resumed ignoring the fate of Thedas, even his loyal followers, including the elves who had tried to rescue her. Not exactly an inspiring god. I don't count Drakon's "vision" or any of the other convenient conversion of the powerful, such as Hessarian's politically expedient about face and that of the Altus who supported him. Where was the Maker when Drakon slaughtered all the other Maker worshipers with a different view to his own, or who did not wish to live under his rule, in order to "simplify" the religion? So, whilst the mystery surrounding the Maker is meant to make us think more of God in our reality, I really don't see him that way. Thus, it is either a case of there are no gods in Thedas or you accept the status of the ones who are recognised by their followers as such. Good post. I don't entirely disagree, and what disagreement I have is mostly semantic. A few things: - you're certainly right that we only have the word of Solas to go on, wrt the divine status of the Evanuris. And Solas has a track record of not being entirely truthful with the Inquisitor, obviously. But I still find his claim about the Evanuris to be credible, especially since he was one of them, and was closely aligned with another of the Evanuris, Mythal. Not sure what incentive he would have to lie here, and his story about the actions of the Evanuris and their rise to godhood strikes me as both plausible and realistic and has the ring of truth to it. - it may be pedantic to point out, but the fact that the Evanuris were worshipped as gods- which is not in dispute- doesn't necessarily mean that they are therefore gods in fact. Its entirely possible for people to worship false gods: being worshipped as a god doesn't thereby make one a god. And that's exactly what Solas says happened with the Evanuris and their followers: they were regarded and treated as gods by many, even though they were not gods in fact. - I'm not sure the definition of gods as "superhuman being worshiped and having power over nature and human fortunes" is an adequate or particularly useful one. For one thing, "super human" sort of implies anthropocentrism, which would conflict with e.g. animistic gods, pantheistic gods, some kinds of polytheistic pantheons, etc. For another, it means that if people worship any particular supernatural or superhuman entity that has some power over the physical world, then that entity is therefore a god: so if someone worships a demon or poltergeist or some other lower or common supernatural entity (in either the real world, or the world of Thedas/Dragon Age) it is therefore a god; not a great result- this doesn't sound right. It seems the definition is too permissive. I would once again suggest instead the typical understanding of godhood used in the philosophy of religion (Western/English-speaking phil of religion at any rate); we divide godhood/theism into monotheistic and polytheistic gods: monotheistic gods are defined as, roughly, transcendent creators-interveners-sustainers of the physical world (e.g. the Abrahamic god in the real world, the Maker in the DA world), polytheistic gods are beings- usually immanent rather than transcendent- who by their very nature have some domain of influence or responsibility over aspects of nature/the physical world- gods of the sea, or the air, or fertility/reproduction, and so on. So if that is the criteria, then the Maker pretty obviously qualifies as a monotheistic god, if the Maker does in fact exist (and is more or less as depicted in the Chantry's theology), the Avvar pantheon (at least some of them) probably qualifies as legit pantheistic gods (I'd have to brush up on the Avvar religion to say for certain), while the Evanuris do not. Not sure if this is a difference that makes any real difference, and I don't expect the writers to ever confirm the objective/canonical existence or divinity of any of these religions, with the possible exception of the Evanuris, depending on what happens in DA:D. But still. The Evanuris are not gods, even though they were worshipped as gods, assuming Solas is telling us the truth.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
37,525
colfoley
19,292
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Apr 11, 2023 0:30:45 GMT
What is a good but a being who is worshipped by those beneath?
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 11, 2023 8:50:32 GMT
The Evanuris are not gods, even though they were worshipped as gods, assuming Solas is telling us the truth. I would agree with this assessment and, as I pointed out in my previous post, it does not rely solely on the testimony of Solas, since Gelduran, whom the Dalish also considered a god, albeit an evil one, also denies the divinity of the Evanuris. In fact the categorisation of the gods by the Dalish into Creators and Forgotten Ones, together with their respective attributes, does seem to reflect their role in society both in ancient times and from the Dalish perspective as the descendants of Creator supporters. The Creators were responsible for the creation of the elven empire into the incredible magical civilisation that both the Dalish and Solas recall with nostalgia (the magical part anyway), whilst the Forgotten Ones are those who opposed their rule and tried to destroy it, with Solas being part of both camps at one time or another. According to the Dalish both the Creators and the Forgotten Ones were seen as gods. Since both groups were likely leaders of their respective followers, both also likely qualify for the term "Evanuris". It was rather annoying that the writers switched to this term with Solas without anyone requiring him to state exactly to which group he was referring and what his precise relationship was to each. I do get the sense that the Dalish were right and he was playing one side off against the other in order to further his own plans. The thing is, it does seem as though the Evanuris were originally spirits from the Fade that crossed over into the Waking World and adopted mortal forms as part of that process, perhaps to give them greater power and influence over creatures they found there, perhaps simply to anchor them in the world. According to the banishment that was pronounced over the Forbidden Ones by Elgar'nan, part of their crime was that they shed the mortal forms in order to return to the Fade when they fled the conflict the others were engaged in (with the Titans?). Anyway, if the Evanuris were originally spirits, that does make them similar in nature to the Avvar gods and likely the Old Gods as well, the latter also seemingly having mortal bodies that they seemed to have been able to acquire with their own power, whilst the Avvar gods seem to require the action of an intermediary to do so. The existence of Cole may give some clue as to how the Evanuris and Old Gods originally acquired bodies, since his spirit would seem to have taken on the identity of Cole and willed itself into existence rather than possessing the body of the dead human. So, whilst I accept that none of the various pantheons of gods are really "gods" but simply powerful spirits that acquired worshipers who then reinforced their status through their beliefs, I still don't see why the Maker is any different. Even his relationship with Andraste can be found in the story of Tyrdda Brightaxe and the Lady of the Skies. In that saga, Tyrdda is described as a "spirit bride". In other words, her "leaf-eared lover" wasn't in the Waking World but in the Fade and we know from the Solas romance that this can be a very intense and "real" experience. Tyrdda predated Andraste and so it is clear that such a concept was known among the southern barbarians, including Andraste, which is presumably what is meant when she described herself as the "Bride of the Maker". In Tyrdda's story the Lady actually encourages Tyrdda to take a mortal husband in order to have a child that will secure her line, so there would have seemed nothing strange to Andraste in being simultaneously married to both the fade spirit and her earthly husband. In fact, if DG had not specifically denied any link between the two stories, I would have assumed that the Maker was just the Lady appearing to Andraste under a different identity. Despite this denial, I really don't see any difference between these two deities in terms of their interaction with mortal women. Thus, the Maker is a spirit, possibly the original Spirit of Creation so far as Thedas is concerned, because their fundamental attribute is to create, but does that actually mean they are separate from the other spirits? Mind you, it would fit with the narrative given by Andraste, that the Maker created the Fade, the spirits and the Eternal City, then when the spirits failed to follow their lead and create of their own initiative, the Maker created the Waking World as something tangible and permanent and creatures to inhabit it that would reflect his vision. It is possible that the Maker is only able to create without changing his essential nature. This is why he could only advise the Ingrish to flood their fields to protect from the dragon fire of the Neromenians but would not actually take a destructive role against them. Ditto other occasions when the only way to counter his enemies personally would be to destroy them. Hence why he must use mortals or other agencies to act on his behalf. If he became a destroyer, he would no longer be the Maker and the fact that interaction with the emotions of his human followers has not changed him, does point to him being stronger than the other spirits. I leave it up to you to decide if that makes him the only true god.
|
|
dayze
N2
Posts: 187 Likes: 81
inherit
1270
0
81
dayze
187
August 2016
dayze
|
Post by dayze on Apr 11, 2023 16:27:01 GMT
Being "The Forgotten Ones" might mean they were the ones worshipped as gods before the Evanuris came around but have been forgotten by the people.
Maybe the reason the Maker interacts so little with the real world is because it doesn't want its nature to change ala Spirits of Wisdom becoming demons of pride and so forth.
Its also interesting Solas seemed to talk about The Maker in a more philosophical sense unlike the other entities wandering around. The fact that even other "Gods" couldn't tell you if the Maker existed or not is kind of an interesting take.
One of the things I've thought about from time to time is if the Dalish gods are the actual Evanuris or just random spirits that helped them after the fall of their civilization and they tacked the names of their old gods onto them.
Mainly because the things that they taught and gave to the Dalish are for the most part, kind of ho-hum for the Evanuris.....I mean Sylaise teaching about some basic herb training and weaving ropes, could be any random Sylvan doing that. Andruil teaches them to hunt, June teaches them to make bows, arrows and knives....once again that's something any spirit that's been around could do. Ghilan'nain shows them how to domesticate halla and hook them up to a wagon.
Dirthamen, gave them the "secret of knowledge" feels like that could easily be translated as giving them the alphabet or teaching them how to write books.
With what we know of the general nature of the Evanuris, its' all fairly banal.
Considering the Dalish are a post-fall culture, I can definitely see some city elves wandering around in the woods with no idea how to survive and coming across random spirits or even just people who teach them some things to survive and then go on their way.
The Dalish then connect them to the old myths, despite there being no actual connection or even possibly not even being spiritual entities.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Apr 11, 2023 16:53:06 GMT
What is a good but a being who is worshipped by those beneath? Is everyone and everything that is worshipped as a god actually a god; are cult leaders gods, for instance? If people in Dragon Age worshipped a particular demon or shade, would that make it a god? Or is it possible to worship a false god- to worship someone/something as a god, even though they are not in fact a god? I think so. Tbh, I think being worshipped is almost sort of irrelevant, and I actually think its entirely possible to be a god without being worshipped as one at all (e.g. deistic monotheism). Again, I submit that a useful definition for capturing monotheistic god-concepts is a transcendent creator/sustainer of (and occasional intervener in) the physical world. All the major real life monotheisms fit this definition (Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Baha'i), as does the Maker/the Chantry. And the best definition I can think of for polytheistic god-concepts are immanent- but supernatural- entities which have, by their nature or essence, an aspect or element of nature or the physical world (the sea, the air, the harvest, war, etc) as their sphere of influence and responsibility: so, the polytheistic pantheons of Greek, Norse, or Roman religion, and quite likely the Avvar religion in DA. Going back to an ontological hierarchy of divinity like the Great Chain of Being, gods belong to an ontological category not only above humans, but above mere supernatural or superhuman entities such as spirits or demons as well, regardless of whether such beings are worshipped or not. (otoh, this ontological caste system, as it were, isn't necessarily a hard limit: it is possible, in many religion traditions, for a human to become a god, or for someone to be a half or demi-god; for instance the children born of Zeus's relations with human women, or how in the Synoptic Gospels Jesus is adopted as the Son of God sometime during his life- either at his baptism or resurrection depending on which Gospel you're reading... so this may well be the case in the DA universe as well: maybe its possible for a non-god to become a god, in a legitimate and robust sense.. but it seems that, if Solas is telling the truth, the Evanuris failed in this respect)
|
|
inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Apr 11, 2023 17:09:23 GMT
The Evanuris are not gods, even though they were worshipped as gods, assuming Solas is telling us the truth. I would agree with this assessment and, as I pointed out in my previous post, it does not rely solely on the testimony of Solas, since Gelduran, whom the Dalish also considered a god, albeit an evil one, also denies the divinity of the Evanuris. In fact the categorisation of the gods by the Dalish into Creators and Forgotten Ones, together with their respective attributes, does seem to reflect their role in society both in ancient times and from the Dalish perspective as the descendants of Creator supporters. The Creators were responsible for the creation of the elven empire into the incredible magical civilisation that both the Dalish and Solas recall with nostalgia (the magical part anyway), whilst the Forgotten Ones are those who opposed their rule and tried to destroy it, with Solas being part of both camps at one time or another. According to the Dalish both the Creators and the Forgotten Ones were seen as gods. Since both groups were likely leaders of their respective followers, both also likely qualify for the term "Evanuris". It was rather annoying that the writers switched to this term with Solas without anyone requiring him to state exactly to which group he was referring and what his precise relationship was to each. I do get the sense that the Dalish were right and he was playing one side off against the other in order to further his own plans. The thing is, it does seem as though the Evanuris were originally spirits from the Fade that crossed over into the Waking World and adopted mortal forms as part of that process, perhaps to give them greater power and influence over creatures they found there, perhaps simply to anchor them in the world. According to the banishment that was pronounced over the Forbidden Ones by Elgar'nan, part of their crime was that they shed the mortal forms in order to return to the Fade when they fled the conflict the others were engaged in (with the Titans?). Anyway, if the Evanuris were originally spirits, that does make them similar in nature to the Avvar gods and likely the Old Gods as well, the latter also seemingly having mortal bodies that they seemed to have been able to acquire with their own power, whilst the Avvar gods seem to require the action of an intermediary to do so. The existence of Cole may give some clue as to how the Evanuris and Old Gods originally acquired bodies, since his spirit would seem to have taken on the identity of Cole and willed itself into existence rather than possessing the body of the dead human. So, whilst I accept that none of the various pantheons of gods are really "gods" but simply powerful spirits that acquired worshipers who then reinforced their status through their beliefs, I still don't see why the Maker is any different. Even his relationship with Andraste can be found in the story of Tyrdda Brightaxe and the Lady of the Skies. In that saga, Tyrdda is described as a "spirit bride". In other words, her "leaf-eared lover" wasn't in the Waking World but in the Fade and we know from the Solas romance that this can be a very intense and "real" experience. Tyrdda predated Andraste and so it is clear that such a concept was known among the southern barbarians, including Andraste, which is presumably what is meant when she described herself as the "Bride of the Maker". In Tyrdda's story the Lady actually encourages Tyrdda to take a mortal husband in order to have a child that will secure her line, so there would have seemed nothing strange to Andraste in being simultaneously married to both the fade spirit and her earthly husband. In fact, if DG had not specifically denied any link between the two stories, I would have assumed that the Maker was just the Lady appearing to Andraste under a different identity. Despite this denial, I really don't see any difference between these two deities in terms of their interaction with mortal women. Thus, the Maker is a spirit, possibly the original Spirit of Creation so far as Thedas is concerned, because their fundamental attribute is to create, but does that actually mean they are separate from the other spirits? Mind you, it would fit with the narrative given by Andraste, that the Maker created the Fade, the spirits and the Eternal City, then when the spirits failed to follow their lead and create of their own initiative, the Maker created the Waking World as something tangible and permanent and creatures to inhabit it that would reflect his vision. It is possible that the Maker is only able to create without changing his essential nature. This is why he could only advise the Ingrish to flood their fields to protect from the dragon fire of the Neromenians but would not actually take a destructive role against them. Ditto other occasions when the only way to counter his enemies personally would be to destroy them. Hence why he must use mortals or other agencies to act on his behalf. If he became a destroyer, he would no longer be the Maker and the fact that interaction with the emotions of his human followers has not changed him, does point to him being stronger than the other spirits. I leave it up to you to decide if that makes him the only true god. Yeah sorry, you're right about the Gelduran codex entry. But I think this is far weaker evidence than the testimony of Solas, since it remains unclear how literal Gelduran is speaking, and as an enemy of the Evanuris who very likely may have been a peer who was excluded from the elven pantheon/status of godhood has a far more obvious motivation to lie than Solas. But either way the point remains the same: we have plausible grounds to believe that the Evanuris were not gods, and that their rise to (false) godhood is more or less as Solas describes. I have to admit that I'm not anywhere near as familiar with the lore and codex entries on the Chantry and Avvar religion as I am the Elven religion and the old gods. I should do a bit of reading on those topics to get a more comprehensive and clear picture. But my impression of the Maker/Chantry is that its fairly vanilla, standard-fare monotheism: the Maker is a transcendent entity who, by their incredible power, intelligence, and agency/creativity, created and sustains the world that exists (which, in DA, includes the physical world, the Fade, and the Abyss)... supposing the Chantry's theology/claims about the Maker are true. Which is a very big "if", to put it mildly. But the DA writers are probably never going to confirm or disconfirm the existence/true nature of the Maker, so I guess all we can do is speculate. And its entirely possible I'm missing something (or more than one somethings) here.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 11, 2023 17:42:20 GMT
But the DA writers are probably never going to confirm or disconfirm the existence/true nature of the Maker, so I guess all we can do is speculate. And its entirely possible I'm missing something (or more than one somethings) here. The main problem with the Maker is that it was all very well saying they would not prove or disprove him when the other gods were equally vague and not categorically proven. Once they started to confirm the other "gods" really did exist, then that created problems concerning the Maker as stated in Chantry lore because the history of his relationship with his First (spirits) and Second born (mortal) children is that it appears to be contradicted by our known history of the elves and dwarves, not to mention the Titans. The imprisonment of the Old Gods is also problematic if this was meant to have been the action of the Maker because when exactly did it occur? What about the Veil? The Chant implies it was always there separating the two planes of existence but that is not the case unless the Evanuris had found a way to remove/circumvent it and so Solas was really restoring the original status quo. If the Maker is really the origin of the Thedas universe and created everything within it, wouldn't he have prevented his "children" messing around with reality in that way? Was it really a case that so long as they were creating marvels he was okay with it? Alternatively, since they appeared not to acknowledge his contribution to the world, was he just sulking somewhere ignoring the fate of the lesser mortals under the rule of these self proclaimed gods? If he imprisoned the Old Gods for usurping godhood, why didn't he do the same to the Evanuris? To be honest, I think it could be a case of them coming up with the original lore concerning the Maker without really knowing where they wanted to go with it because, as with the choices offered in DAO, they didn't know whether there would ever be more than the original game. Then as the series continued, contradictions started to appear in the story they decided to tell and they just hoped people wouldn't be too bothered or would accept the "unreliable narrator" explanation for the anomalies. It probably wouldn't have been so bad if they had just stuck to the codices in game but instead decided to release the World of Thedas volumes that expanded the lore but in doing so created even more problems, often not keeping the story consistent between different parts of these lore books either. So, we are left with nothing but speculation without ever getting definitive answers.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Dec 11, 2024 12:57:58 GMT
7,459
q5tyhj
humans as ornaments
2,632
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Apr 11, 2023 17:50:56 GMT
But the DA writers are probably never going to confirm or disconfirm the existence/true nature of the Maker, so I guess all we can do is speculate. And its entirely possible I'm missing something (or more than one somethings) here. The main problem with the Maker is that it was all very well saying they would not prove or disprove him when the other gods were equally vague and not categorically proven. Once they started to confirm the other "gods" really did exist, then that created problems concerning the Maker as stated in Chantry lore because the history of his relationship with his First (spirits) and Second born (mortal) children is that it appears to be contradicted by our known history of the elves and dwarves, not to mention the Titans. The imprisonment of the Old Gods is also problematic if this was meant to have been the action of the Maker because when exactly did it occur? What about the Veil? The Chant implies it was always there separating the two planes of existence but that is not the case unless the Evanuris had found a way to remove/circumvent it and so Solas was really restoring the original status quo. If the Maker is really the origin of the Thedas universe and created everything within it, wouldn't he have prevented his "children" messing around with reality in that way? Was it really a case that so long as they were creating marvels he was okay with it? Alternatively, since they appeared not to acknowledge his contribution to the world, was he just sulking somewhere ignoring the fate of the lesser mortals under the rule of these self proclaimed gods? If he imprisoned the Old Gods for usurping godhood, why didn't he do the same to the Evanuris? To be honest, I think it could be a case of them coming up with the original lore concerning the Maker without really knowing where they wanted to go with it because, as with the choices offered in DAO, they didn't know whether there would ever be more than the original game. Then as the series continued, contradictions started to appear in the story they decided to tell and they just hoped people wouldn't be too bothered or would accept the "unreliable narrator" explanation for the anomalies. It probably wouldn't have been so bad if they had just stuck to the codices in game but instead decided to release the World of Thedas volumes that expanded the lore but in doing so created even more problems, often not keeping the story consistent between different parts of these lore books either. So, we are left with nothing but speculation without ever getting definitive answers. Yeah I think a lot of these tensions and apparent contradictions just naturally cropped up the way the story and the lore evolved over time and over three games (often with changing personnel). Sort of just comes with the territory: some things are retconned, some things are changed for narrative or gameplay purposes, new writers want to make their own mark and may not share the same vision as other writers on past games, and so on. My suspicion is that with the Maker, there are (and will continue to be) elements of the lore and Chantry teachings that are called into question or even refuted by new revelations in the game- sort of like what happened with the Elvhen religion. But I suspect they will leave the question of the existence and true nature of the Maker open: we will know that certain things the Chantry teaches about the Maker (and/or Andraste, the old gods, the Magisters Sidereal, etc) are likely false, but not whether there is in fact a divine entity corresponding (at least roughly) to the Chantry's theology RE the Maker. So if the Maker does exist, and if they are at least roughly like the Chantry depicts, then the Maker is a "true" god, in a significant sense (whereas the Evanuris are not)... but those are a couple major "ifs", and ones we're not likely to ever have answered.
|
|
Spectr61
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem
Origin: Spectr61
Posts: 825 Likes: 1,284
inherit
41
0
Nov 28, 2024 19:27:40 GMT
1,284
Spectr61
825
August 2016
spectr61
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem
Spectr61
|
Post by Spectr61 on Apr 12, 2023 18:06:52 GMT
What or who says that godhood in Thedas is defined by our world?
Surely the beings there can define what is, or isn't, a god on their own terms.
|
|
dayze
N2
Posts: 187 Likes: 81
inherit
1270
0
81
dayze
187
August 2016
dayze
|
Post by dayze on Apr 17, 2023 19:28:54 GMT
What or who says that godhood in Thedas is defined by our world? Surely the beings there can define what is, or isn't, a god on their own terms. Honestly even the people of Thedas don't seem to know, entities being gods or just powerful spirits pops up, if you ask the Cult of Andraste they worship a god and if you ask Sten, they worship a giant lizard. The Chantry women specifically refers to the Arch Demon and the Olds gods as "false gods" in denerim in DAO. Solas says the Evanuris weren't gods, but the modern day elves do. To also counter that, Flemeth says "the people bend their knee too quickly" more or less.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 18, 2023 7:38:04 GMT
To also counter that, Flemeth says "the people bend their knee too quickly" more or less. I've never been entirely sure about how this should be interpreted. I know some people think it indicates she had come to reject the designation of godhood and had been behind Solas' rebellion, but it should be remembered that Merrill was bowing to Asha'Bellanar not Mythal. Flemeth questions whether she truly knows her identity and when Merrill replies in the negative, that is when she admonishes her. She likely thinks it true that the People,particularly the modern representatives, are too quick to acknowledge other beings as their superiors, based off no more than the fact that they appear immortal and have the sort of power they imagine their gods had, but that doesn't mean she doesn't think that back in ancient times she was entitled to such veneration.
|
|
qbob
N1
Posts: 5 Likes: 6
inherit
12439
0
6
qbob
5
Apr 19, 2023 18:15:22 GMT
April 2023
qbob
|
Post by qbob on Apr 20, 2023 21:02:50 GMT
I also believe the last two old gods tie to the Evanuris. Though I believe bioware are doing a shock twist and June is the most dangerous Evanuris.
I think the best way to match all Evanuris to old gods, is by matching both up to a demon, as both the Evanuris and the old gods match up to a type of demon.
Mythal desire demon/ mother of vengance Elgnarn rage demon/toth Falon'din hunger demon/urthemeil Dirthamen fear demon/lusacan Andruil despair demon/ Andoral Ghilan'nain envy demon/ zazikel Sylaise sloth demon/ Razikale June pride demon/ Dumat Solas Valor spirit (not pride a name he took to give pride to the slaves he was trying to free)/ dreadwolf.
Desire: Mythal(protector all mother goddess of love). Flemeth mother of vengance (vengance is a desire for revenge). In every game you meet Mythal she gives you a choice to make flemeth even describes mythal as giving her a choice. She also states in Inquistion that morrigan has always had the choice about being mythals host. Also at her temple she is always the voice of reason and aducator for the elvhen she makes judgement and soothes elgnarns rage.
Rage: Elgnarn (the elvhen god of vengance and sun). Toth (the dragon of fire) Is pretty on the nose I'm not saying Elgnarn is weak. He is all rage the description of Mythal always calming him makes him far more likely to be rage and not pride.
Hunger: Falon'din (the elvhen god of death and fortune). Uthemeil (the dragon of beauty) I do not believe they sing songs about Falon'Din's vanity. It is said Falon'Din's appetite for adulation was so great, he began wars to amass more worshippers. The blood of those who wouldn't bow low filled lakes as wide as oceans. Mythal rallied the gods, once the shadow of Falon'Din's hunger stretched across her own people. It was almost too late. Falon'Din only surrendered when his brethren bloodied him. Solas said this about him in temple mythal, he mentions his appetite for adulation. In ancient times, the Feast of Urthemiel was the grandest celebration of the year. The event lasted twelve days. The Old God of Beauty was worshiped primarily by musicians, artists, and poets. Comparing what solas said to this description of Uthemeils celebration you can see the need for adulation.
Fear: Dirthamen (is the elven god of secrets and knowledge, and master of the ravens Fear and Deceit.) Lusacan (Lusacan, the Dragon of Night, calls to you. He lives where it is darkest and waits for the day he will rise. Drink of his blood and know the power in darkness: either fear the Night or wield it.) So Dirthamen has two ravens fear and deceit. We also have the fact in his temple his priests talk about him taking memories from them, just like the fear demon did to Inquisitor in the fade. I will compare that to Lusacan fear the night or wield it.
Despair: Andruil (elven god sacrifice) Andoral (the dragon of slaves) (Andruil, blood and force, your people pray to you. Grant that your eye may not fall upon us. Spare us the moment we become Your prey.) (Andruil, blood and force, save us from the time this weapon is thrown. Your people pray to You. Spare us the moment we become Your sacrifice.) OK compare these statements about Andruil to Andoral being god of slaves and chains. Solas also mentions that she I'd described as goddess of hare reference to a god of sacrifice.
Envy:Ghilan'nain (goddess od guides and navigation) Zazikel (the old god of freedom)
The hunter swore he would find Ghilan'nain and repay her for what she had done to him. He blinded her first, and then bound her as one would bind a kill fresh from the hunt. But because he was cursed, the hunter could not kill her. Instead he left her for dead in the forest. And Ghilan'nain prayed to the gods for help. Andruil sent her hares to Ghilan'nain and they chewed through the ropes that bound her, but Ghilan'nain was still wounded and blind, and could not find her way home. So Andruil turned her into a beautiful white deer—the first halla. That was a story dalish tell, sounds like a god of freedom, but to match her to envy you have to look at those disgusting items she created in Tresspasser dlc. The eye that weeps description (This amulet is heavy for its size, and the metal is clammy and sticks jealously to the flesh.) All of these disgusting Artifacts are hinted at being made by Ghilan'nain and these lines tie her to envy demon.
Sloth: Sylaise Razikale (The god of mystery) In her youth, Sylaise stayed at the home-tree to sing and make art. It is Sylaise who gave us fire and taught us how to use it. It is Sylaise who showed us how to heal with herbs and with magic, and how to ease the passage of infants into this world. And again, it is Sylaise who showed us how to spin the fibers of plants into thread and rope. This is a dalish legend I take this to man she taught them revealed mystery to them all the Evanuris were powerful this idbyhe dalish version they are trying to show what she represents a teacher. Now compare that dalish legend to this about Razikale. To She Who Winds the Skein of Wisdom, we dedicate this citadel. Dragon of Mystery, bestow upon your faithful servants your ineffable truth. Grant us eyes to pierce the darkness and souls to bear the wounds of your labyrinth.
Skein a length of thread loosely coiled or knotted. It is Sylaise who showed us how to spin the fibers of plants into thread and rope. There is no coincidence in any of these descriptions they are carefully written by bioware.
Pride: June Dumat (In silence is the beating heart of wisdom) The Dalish tell that before Sylaise and June came to them, the elves wandered the forests without purpose, eating only the berries and nuts they could find and shivering naked through cold nights. June taught the elves to make all needful thing. Now that means he created the Eluvians their pocket deminsons he created theirs way of life. Thousands of elves channeled raw essence from the Fade into a sphere in the air to create the Grand Sonallium. It was a gift from Blessed Sylaise to Clever June as thanks for a great favor He is described as clever June always or having wisdom as is Dumat. Dumats priests are sworn to silence, and dumats slogan is there is wisdom in silence. We know little of June and his machinations because he has wisdom.
Look upon the Temple of Dumat God of Silence, who speaks to the faithful in dreams No words of desire may sway His will No cry of valor may stand against Him For His Silence conquers all And His Secrets are shared only with the worthy Look upon the Temple of Dumat And fear Him.
No words of desire (mythal) may sway his will No cry of valor (solas) may stand against him For his silence conquers all
On the second day she drowned the giants of the sea, except those in deep waters, for they were too well-wrought, and Pride stopped her hand. He stopped Ghilan'nain destroying darkspawn.
Valor: solas It is pointed out in elven deep road mine the dread wolf statue is in a guard position no a position of reverence. Also in temple of mythal his statue is outside he is guarding Mythal always. He is always a fighter and rebel spirits of valor will fight for what they believe is right he avenged mythal and rebelled freeing the slaves. In his dialogue with Blackwall he gets on like a fellow soldier that understands war but is disgusted by Blackwall dark past because he is a valor spirt. Sorry if this is too long if you made it to the end thanks for reading.
|
|
rekkampum
N2
Gui meɖi naneke o, gake ŋudͻwͻnu le eŋu
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Posts: 230 Likes: 367
inherit
1947
0
Dec 11, 2024 21:08:56 GMT
367
rekkampum
Gui meɖi naneke o, gake ŋudͻwͻnu le eŋu
230
November 2016
rekkampum
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by rekkampum on Apr 26, 2023 12:54:06 GMT
What does everybody think? Are these two who they seem? Is Solas full of shit? Will they get out? If they do, will it be as Razikale and Lusacan, or as Ghilan'nain and Falon'din? Definitely don’t buy the Old Gods are Evanuris argument though I recognize its validity. Solas was honestly only deceptive about his true identity and his ties to it, as Inquisition showed the history he described checked out as far as depictions of it were concerned in the temples and the memories of the event that led to the Elvhen’s demise. At least, it was in-line with what his followers believed about him. Even before Trespasser, Solas will discuss the history of the vallaslin being tied to slavery and attempt to remove them from a Dalish Inky if you romance him. I find it interesting that Solas and Mythal were so close even though she was still an Evanuris herself and also had people essentially slaves devoted in perpetual service to her; not entering the debate about whether her being the “best of them” as a being of Justice reconciles that. I don’t think them being deified necessarily makes them “false” as plenty of RL religions - including my tradition - have people who were deified for what they accomplished and were assigned mythic traits as a result. I see that as Solas’ perspective since he personally didn’t want to be seen that way. The Evanuris - like Solas - are clearly powerful enough to be justifiably considered them by those who choose to believe in them even if they are not solely supernatural beings, and even what remains of Mythal after her being “killed” still demonstrably retains incredible power. The Avvar themselves worship higher spirits as gods that they perfectly acknowledge are capable of dying as well, so divinity is a lot more complex than conventionally understood. I personally wish Inquisition had not gone the route it did as far as portraying the Dalish themselves as “wrong” unilaterally about their history and elements of their culture but that is a different convo.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 26, 2023 13:47:03 GMT
I personally wish Inquisition had not gone the route it did as far as portraying the Dalish themselves as “wrong” unilaterally about their history and elements of their culture but that is a different convo. I prefer to say that I wish the writers hadn't put those words in Lavellan's mouth, since there is an awful lot they got right about the ancient times. They remembered the Creators, which is quite possibly how the worshipers of the Evanuris knew them since they were responsible for creating the elven empire, and that there were originally seven, with Ghilan'nain added to their number later and Fen'Harel as someone trusted (by Mythal at least) but never really one of them. They remember them as being at war when they were shut away, which was true. They remembered that Fen'Harel was responsible for the loss of the gods, which was also true. Merrill also recounts the detail of how the leaders of both sides in the war were enticed into his trap, by giving them the location of a weapon which would win the war, which may well turn out to be true. I've always maintained the pro-Evanuris account of the Dalish may have been because they were largely the descendants of the elves captured from Arlathan Forest by Tevinter and we know this area was dedicated to Andruil. Hence the Way of Three Trees being the main influence on their way of conducting themselves. Any memories retained among their descendants would obviously be slanted in favour of the Evanuris and it is possible that they never knew of Mythal's death because it was either hidden from them by the priesthood or occurred so late on in proceedings that they didn't hear of it. There is also the degree of amnesia that seems to have affected all the races, since the dwarves seem to remember nothing of the Titans or their interaction with the elves (although it is possible there is something in the Memories in Kal'Sharok) and the humans very little from the time pre-Veil. The Avvar do seem to have witnessed its creation, as they have a legend about the home of the gods being lifted up into the sky so it could no longer be reached by mortals, but very little before the Veil beyond that or the fact that reality itself was affected by its creation. This has led me to believe the Veil actually had some way of repressing memory in mortals, either deliberately or accidentally. By contrast, I think there are ancient spirits that do remember, just as the spirits did in the Vir'Dirthara, but you have to find them first and then find a way to persuade them to divulge what they know. It is possible that they would be reluctant to do so because of the fear of Fen'Harel in his Fade form or because they support him.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 26, 2023 14:13:37 GMT
Mythal desire demon/ mother of vengance Elgnarn rage demon/toth Falon'din hunger demon/urthemeil Dirthamen fear demon/lusacan Andruil despair demon/ Andoral Ghilan'nain envy demon/ zazikel Sylaise sloth demon/ Razikale June pride demon/ Dumat Solas Valor spirit (not pride a name he took to give pride to the slaves he was trying to free)/ dreadwolf. I'm not sure I entirely agree with these designations, particularly as spirits may have interacted differently with the world pre-Veil. According to the timeline in WoT, the elves existed before the other races and, according to what we find in the Vir'Dirthara they did seem to have a close relationship with spirits, leading some of us to believe they originally were spirits. However, in that case, if there were no sentient mortals on the surface of Thedas, what emotions existed for them to align with? I believe Solas maintained when we were in the Fade with Nightmare that fear was the first emotion to exist, although I find this somewhat hard to believe and if anything, if you go by the Dalish legend, the first emotion was anger, by Elgar'nan. Now I suppose if the Titans responded to the presence of the elves on the surface with fear, that could account for Fear being the first, but it still means that the elves and the ones who became the Evanuris, because they led them in the war against the "Earth", came into being for some other reason than embodying emotions. I am more inclined to believe that originally the Creators were nature spirits. Elgar'nan has been associated with the sun and lightning; Mythal with water and birth; Sylaise with fire; Falon'Din with the Fade/Air; Andruil with forests, creatures and hunting. That would leave Dirthamen possibly the wind, whispering secrets from the Fade (which would connect him with Falon'Din) and June as a spirit of creation, since it is even said by the Dalish that he created himself. As they embodied nature they could be either benign or fierce according to the situation, just as the Lady of the Forest was in DAO, who told us she was not called out of the Fade but the earth itself. Later these spirits became warped by their time as leaders against the Titans, so they became gradually more and more focused on their destructive side and demanding of worship.
|
|
qbob
N1
Posts: 5 Likes: 6
inherit
12439
0
6
qbob
5
Apr 19, 2023 18:15:22 GMT
April 2023
qbob
|
Post by qbob on Apr 26, 2023 22:13:12 GMT
I am more inclined to believe that originally the Creators were nature spirits. Elgar'nan has been associated with the sun and lightning; Mythal with water and birth; Sylaise with fire; Falon'Din with the Fade/Air; Andruil with forests, creatures and hunting. That would leave Dirthamen possibly the wind, whispering secrets from the Fade (which would connect him with Falon'Din) and June as a spirit of creation, since it is even said by the Dalish that he created himself. As they embodied nature they could be either benign or fierce according to the situation, just as the Lady of the Forest was in DAO, who told us she was not called out of the Fade but the earth itself. Later these spirits became warped by their time as leaders against the Titans, so they became gradually more and more focused on their destructive side and demanding of worship.
That's a really good take, I like comparing them to the lady of the forest. I was doing my best to take first hand information such as solas temple of mythal and Tresspasser as truth. Then try to see how it matched up to dalish legends. Solas contradicts alot of the orginal description he describes Andruil as a goddess of sacrifice. There is also a prayer in temple of mythal about her, were they are praying Andruil doesn't sacrifice them. Though even if you look at Ghilan'nain dalish legend is about her escaping a trap. That would seem to be closest to Razikale god of freedom. Also her items she made in Tresspasser were envious to the touch, plus if you imagine that is the story that she put out to her followers doesn't she sound really envious and insecure. I could go into every one from Mythals actions. Or the idea of Andruil being a despair demon, if you look at that particular demon they show up in alienages places of no hope, that makes me think of Andruil being a goddess of sacrifice.
|
|
rekkampum
N2
Gui meɖi naneke o, gake ŋudͻwͻnu le eŋu
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Posts: 230 Likes: 367
inherit
1947
0
Dec 11, 2024 21:08:56 GMT
367
rekkampum
Gui meɖi naneke o, gake ŋudͻwͻnu le eŋu
230
November 2016
rekkampum
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by rekkampum on Apr 27, 2023 0:48:26 GMT
I prefer to say that I wish the writers hadn't put those words in Lavellan's mouth, since there is an awful lot they got right about the ancient times. I was moreso speaking about how Solas et al basically become an unofficial mouthpiece and the game essentially expects you to accept all the information at face value -i.e. “this is the real history”, which undermines Dalish oral cultures and their struggle against preserving the elements of their history that were lost due to oppression - even some they’d built up in the previous games. For me it simultaneously presents some of their most important historical elements as ones that’ve been misguided or outright distorted all for the purpose of narrative plot twists. I don’t take issue with the idea of things being misremembered, but not in the sense where it invalidates the way things have been reclaimed and taken on new meaning. It’s especially weird for me because Solas consistently notes how he can’t really relate to the Dalish, etc. despite him - if the story is to be believed - being the one their ancestors confided and came to trust during the rebellion against the Evanuris. We are told Dalish clans have varying stories regarding their pantheon but are never given an opportunity to experience them in Inquisition so that their history has nuance and challenges Solas’ absolutist retellings.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 27, 2023 8:18:00 GMT
I could go into every one from Mythals actions. Or the idea of Andruil being a despair demon, if you look at that particular demon they show up in alienages places of no hope, that makes me think of Andruil being a goddess of sacrifice. This is why I suggested they changed over time as they became more corrupt. Andruil may have started out as a guardian of the natural world and a patron of the hunt as a part of the cycle of life, having respect for the creatures you hunt, which is basically what is found in the Way of Three Trees. However, somewhere along the line she became obsessed with hunting (which would be in keeping with the nature of a spirit) and probably started hunting ordinary elves as some sort of ritual of worship, hence becoming known as the goddess of sacrifice. May be it even started out as a test of the ability to survive in the wild and avoid the hunters (rather as Strife had to in TN) as a sort of rite of passage that then took on a more sinister turn over time. There is also a reference in the codex in the Temple of Mythal to support this idea of her obsession: "One day Andruil grew tired of hunting mortal men and beasts." I've often wondered about this on the boards. Were mortal men the elves that were not the gods or their chosen or was this referring to humans? Also, it would seem that Ghilan'nain's monsters were likely created to impress Andruil and give her something new to hunt, possibly even done on her orders, which is why it was left to Andruil to sort out the mess that this caused, which she did by doing a deal to elevate Ghilan'nain to godhood. Finally, her obsession with hunting took her into the Void, with adverse consequences on her return each time and increasing spells of madness, leading the other gods to fearful she would end up hunting them, which is when Mythal took it upon herself to intervene, luring Andruil to her with the rumour of a monster she could hunt and defeat. So, it seems to me that Andruil's prime motivation was that of a hunter, although I have no doubt that the despair of her victims would have encouraged such demons to congregate in the area of their death.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
31,186
gervaise21
13,101
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Apr 27, 2023 8:35:54 GMT
We are told Dalish clans have varying stories regarding their pantheon but are never given an opportunity to experience them in Inquisition so that their history has nuance and challenges Solas’ absolutist retellings. This is what particularly annoyed me about Jaws of Hakkon. Everyone criticised the Dalish for their stance towards Drakon and not even Lavellan was given the option to challenge this. We simply had to accept that he must not have been as bad as they maintained because of his friendship with Ameridan and that the latter was critical of the leaders at that time in the Dales. So everything that happened subsequently to the Dalish was just the result of "pride cookies". Even a non Dalish Inquisitor would have access to an alternative version to offer concerning Drakon's actions in the south when establishing his empire that resulted in the wholesale slaughter of human clans who did not wish to bow the knee to him or had a different version of the faith to his own, which would have supported the view of the Dalish that he was "no better than Tevinter". In fact, in WoT2 it states that he was the grandson of a Tevinter Altus but without the magical ability. No wonder the Dalish leaders were suspicious of him. Yet, this was never revealed and Lavellan in particular just had to accept the wholesale criticism of their people without being allowed to offer any sort of defense. Seeing as there was a clan that had always maintained that Ameridan was one of their own, it is clear that Lavellan should have been aware of that history. It is these aspects that made me feel that the narrative had been shifted away from the Dalish as the last of those "who would not submit" (to human rule), trying to maintain their ancient culture against the odds, to the viewpoint of Solas that they were misguided, stubborn fools, ignorant of the past and who would not accept his wisdom when offered. This is why I became fearful that next game they may be the fall guys who end up being slaughtered but perhaps the existence of Strife and Irelin is encouragement this will not be the case, even though I still have my doubts they are genuine Dalish.
|
|
qbob
N1
Posts: 5 Likes: 6
inherit
12439
0
6
qbob
5
Apr 19, 2023 18:15:22 GMT
April 2023
qbob
|
Post by qbob on Apr 27, 2023 12:55:16 GMT
gervaise21 said
This is what particularly annoyed me about Jaws of Hakkon. Everyone criticised the Dalish for their stance towards Drakon and not even Lavellan was given the option to challenge this. We simply had to accept that he must not have been as bad as they maintained because of his friendship with Ameridan and that the latter was critical of the leaders at that time in the Dales.
I do agree with that. I would have liked to have had an option to argue the point. Or even mention that destroying their entire kingdom and banning their gods was extreme.
rekkampum said:We are told Dalish clans have varying stories regarding their pantheon but are never given an opportunity to experience them in Inquisition so that their history has nuance and challenges Solas’ absolutist retellings.
I do agree with it being Solas interpretation. Though what made me more believe him is the fact his version of Andruil correlated to the prayer of Andruil, at mythals temple. I did compare dalish legends to all the stuff in the Temple but the writers have decided to show the dalish are really misinformed. None of their information seems to match up to the prayers in the Temple.
The only way i can try and make sense of it is to look at it as first hand or second hand information. Where they there to witness it, is there collaborating evidence to support its authenticity. It is the connection that I'm looking for Such as Elgnarn and toth both being associated with fire and rage.
|
|