Andromeda cost 40 million, TW3 cost 32 million... What went wrong?

The Witcher 3 was far from quality at release, so I guess they are the same after all.  Unless you consider save game corruption to be a positive about a game.  Of course the community will always go back and blame the person that has the problem by saying "you don't have enough saves" when it is CDPR game, but I am pretty sure if it was BioWare "how dare they, they don't know how to program" oh wait they do that.

As far as attitude goes have you been to both locations to see what attitudes they have there, I really wish BioWare would get out of the "trying to make the fans happy" approach and give the finger to the people that do nothing but whine and complain because BioWare didn't write the game they expected them to.

To be Honest Witcher 3 has set the new standards for rpgs. Any 18+ rpgs made in the future will be compared with tht. Clearly Bioware and EA are bitting their nails and are way lower now compared to CDPR, Rockstar and Bethesda

Paying whole other actor for Scott and rendering his model is really expensive. Plus they had a year dedicated to NMS like game but took it out as you said.

Well, the first one wasn't at least. I can tolerate the second one a bit more and the third one, to be fair, has some good stuff in it.

I do think they are all overrated overall though. But you can't deny what they do right either, especially witcher 3 in the seamless open world department.

STOLEN? wtf? do anyone owns a goddamn patent or COPYRIGHT FROM SEX? DETECTIVE VISION? you wot m8?

I just wanted to cheer some people up with this.

What happened? Poor leadership, lots of devs left during the development cycle and a junior crew working on the game.

It's got nothing to do arrogance, it's simple cost of living.
Same way Switzerland is more expensive than France, for example.
It's not saying they are less talented but that the money goes further allowing more hours for the same budget. It's why Apple gets all its phones made by child labour in Asia.

I think you and many other in these Forums are lying.

First of all Mass Effect 2 was not the holy grail most of you here praise it for, it was much worse than Andromeda, the Story full of holes, exploring was not in it the most levels are only Tunnelshooterstyle, Equipment Customisation was not really possible and the Skillsystem was really fucked up. only the Characters are good worked on.

Mass Effect Andromeda is much more an good Game, it is not what the most people wish for and thats why they are all unhappy with it, but the core of the game is really good, the Story has not many flaws and is good written.
Charakters are good explained and every Crewmember has to tell something, not so steril as the old Normandys where every Crewmembers has its corner and not move out of it.
Graphics are not high end but till the End High resolution Textures und really nice-looking worlds to explore.
Skillsystem is something, at the beginning i had to become an feeling for it but yet it is real good and let you combo the shit out of your enemys
The Battlesystem is not like ME1, thats more RPG Style, but its more fluid than the ME2 or ME3 system, Jetpack is awesome.
And finally we get our Groundvehicle back, ok without weapons but i am fine with it, it climbs hills like an Muly and race thru plain lands like an wild steed.

But it has real bad characteristics, most of the People look like dead inside and yeah i know but the animations are not really great more like an Animation designer first year internship try.
And the Music is not that good to remember afterwards.

After all the game is an solid 89/100 and if they have the will and work on the problems this game has the potential to reach an 94/100.

It won't stop until Bioware makes a game that is universally loved again. Can they do that? Who knows. We'll just have to wait for the new IP or the next Dragon Age to find out.

A dummie.