Mass Effect/Bioware Might Be Too Inclusive...but

May 30, 2017 10:17:34 GMT Psychevore said:

Yeah, let's assume you're lying. How would you know these people exist if you never saw the comments? How are we supposed to talk to you about these comments when you didn't actually see them and refuse repeatedly to show them to us?

That would make us morons for believing you at face value, wouldn't it?

But this concept fucking eludes you. We should just believe you for whatever shitty reason, because in a topic about God knows what we should be talking about your Twitter adventures with some degenerates.

And that still leaves the point of all of this to be desired, because I honestly don't know what the standpoints of these degenerates has to do with how Mass Effect turned out. Is it anti white? Is it anti heterosexual? Is it anti male? No, it isn't any of that. It just seems that to you the mere presence of non white, non heterosexual, non male characters in prominent positions is a problem.

But I just answered your question, even if I lied (which I didn't, I just can't be arsed to dig in twatter for a few retarded comments I saw earlier), the existence of other examples of this behavior (like say, Manveer Heir)

more than justifies bringing this retardation to light so everyone not infected with the SJW virus would be able to mock it as it deserves.

As for you being a moron, well, you said it, not me.

And as I said clearly before, I didn't connect any of this to Mass Effect specifically. The discussion merely moved to FC5, and that's what I responded to.

I don't have a problem with the "mere presence" of anyone. I care very little about the skin color of antagonists, as I repeatedly mentioned before. But I suppose misrepresentation isn't a new tactic for you guys.

Are you going to call me "deplorable" next? Or go straight for "Nazi"?

May 30, 2017 11:22:49 GMT Psychevore said:

I'm pretty sure I didn't, I'm also pretty sure you have absolutely no basis to whine about misrepresentation when you are constantly picturing social justice by it's absolute worst and most extreme proponents.

So you just defended yourself with "whataboutism". "It's okay for me to misrepresent you, because in my opinion you also engage in misrepresentation."

To which my reply is: Like it or not, when you allow your worst to set the tone in your movement, that's how people are going to see you.

I mean, not that I would agree with any kind of ideology obsessed with identity politics, but I likely wouldn't feel the same need to mock it if it was just a tad more... reasonable.

As for me, I don't speak for anyone but myself.