You think ME Andromeda will be more "childish" than the trilogy?

I think a lot of us are open to new conventions. If you see a movie and it emotionally resonates regardless of your preconceived notions about the dos and donts of moviemaking, then it's hard to deny that it works.

However, if you look far down enough into literature and see what it comes from and what the qualities are you'll probably see it more my way and agree that there are certain objective qualities and lack of qualities to some attempts at writing. I thoroughly disagree with the statement "People can tell stories how they want" as if to say that I can't call something out on being flawed because I didn't make it.

I pretty much, albeit vaguely, described what I think bad writing is in most cases. It's writers being uneducated in what exactly they're doing when they write or at best try to imitate something they liked without really understanding where that thing they liked came from intellectually. The more merit writing has the better, and by merit I mean all things like historical value, drawing parallels, being critical or analytical of society - past, present, future - not being intrustive in however it presents its messaging. For example Deus Ex Mankind Divided and Heavy Rain have issues in the fact that they're very obviously about something but they fail to let their message be part of the subtext. Instead you'll see everyone going "origami killer this and that" in Heavy Rain and in Mankind Divided everyone you meet is either augmented or normal and their dialogue is laser-focused on addressing that fact to remind you "HEY THIS STORY IS ABOUT THE APARTHEID OF AGUMENTED AND HUMANS!" so there's no subtlety and you spend 20 hours being banged over your head with a theme you already get by the 5-minute mark of the introduction, and rarely if ever does the story subvert this understanding by presenting you with a third kind of person or agumented people that don't give a shit about their augs.

That's perhaps a too specific example that doesn't generalize writing enough but you should get the point. Writing isn't infallible just because it's based on an author's subjective style or viewpoints. In fact viewpoint and subjectivity of author is almost certain to bleed into the craft everywhere. That's why narrative as I see it is a form of argument. It's an author presenting their ideas about their subject of choice (in Dragon Age there's religion for example) and they're saying something about it but in a more pleasant and entertaining way which you can overlook if you don't care about subtext and just want an adventure with dragons. That's why writing is art. It's layered. I've said enough, hopefully you get what I mean in that opinions can't be faulted, cuz writing incorporates opinion at every turn.