If Bioware ever decides to choose a canon ending for Mass Effect 3, which one would you prefer?

Synthesis and Control are practical victories not emotional victories. They each have their own sub category they can be divided into but they both take the practical look while Destroy focuses on pure emotional satisfaction that the Reapers are gone.  Particularly because a popular reason I've seen pop up again and again that people choose Destroy is simply because Shepard can survive that ending so the Disney fairy tale ending is the primary reason for said choice.  Just like Refuse is a moral choice for people who think the choice is wrong and simply choose not to pick because it goes against heir morals. And if Destroy had the same teeth as Refuse has it would have made the ending even better. Because it would require players to think and realize morality and emotional satisfaction are not always the best paths in life and certainly not the best paths in war.  But people don't want thought provoking or even be slightly pushed out of their happy ending zone at all. Hence why at least 8 out of 10 people who when asked how they would redo the ending would eliminate the choice and simply have the Reapers blown up and Shepard go on to live happily ever after with their chosen partner.  Simple cut and dry Saturday morning Disney cartoon for 3 year olds style ending.

All Destroy ending would be is the Andromeda Initiative only more technologically advanced. Control offers the new technology the Reapers and their impact on live development to create a new set up and allow a more logical force to deal with those two mysterious races that exist in Andromeda that are on par with Reaper tech levels. Or the fundamental alteration of all life in the milky way galaxy and the new paths beyond the limits of organic evolution offers. Hell synthesis even ties into the MEA story line. The whole thing with SAM being able to interface on a neural level with the Ryder twins is the basic concept of Synthesis. Combining the best of organic and technology to create something better then the sum of it's parts.

The negative ending with the second most negative parts (refuse is arguably worse) has all the negative parts taken away and never mentioned or hinted at.  And when these realistic parts are brought up on this site and others people who choose destory get a bit...snippy for pointing stuff out like all the ships in space hit with the pulse would slowly die of lack of oxygen.  Lack of Relays and the impact of the war would mean entire colonies and planets would go all Mad Max over the few remaining supplies they have. Murdering and killing each other in a desperate bid to survive. Because without the Relays there wouldn't be any way to distribute supplies to those far reaching colonies in time. Particularly given that nearly every planet has been devastated and wouldn't be able to support their own populations without heavy rationing of food, water and medical supplies.  Hell you literally see an entire content on Palivin burning. You really think it would be able to effectively support the remaining Turian population post war?

Destroy ending and particularly post EC wipes all those consequences clean of the ending. Which means the galaxy is the exact same as before with no major changes or possible changes done.